Trains.com

How does one become an advocate for railroad grade

2080 views
63 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,319 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Monday, June 9, 2003 7:04 AM
proof?well sir I had 10 little chocolate fingerprints on the wall until I washed it off.
sorry my bad
stAY SAFE

joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    October 2001
  • From: OH
  • 17,574 posts
Posted by BRAKIE on Monday, June 9, 2003 8:22 AM
Better still How does one become a advocate for safe drivers and getting drunks off the highways?? They kill more people in 24 hours then trains does in a years time..

Larry

Conductor.

Summerset Ry.


"Stay Alert, Don't get hurt  Safety First!"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, June 9, 2003 6:24 PM
It seems to me that a lot of people have missed the point on these threads ignoring the profanity that some people have used. In most cases the railroad was built first but the local levels of government have the authority to permit crossings to be built at every landowner's or municipality's whim. If one drives down any 4 lane divided highway one notices that you must go to the next exit to get to where you want to go regardless of whether it is in an urban or rural area. We don't seem to apply the same logic to railroads because the local level of government would have to fund the grade separation. Somehow we can find money to make the traffic flow faster and safer but not to make rail traffic flow faster and safer. One of the main impediments to having high speed rail and reliable schedules is the number of crossings. When we give people access to roads so they can use their automobile we somehow think that we should have a more direct route than even a pedestrian. A double track railroad is like an expressway and there should be no level crossings. If you want to cross the tracks, you pay for the grade separation. I agree with those who have preceeded me and have said stop, look and listen. Here is a perfect example of how government expenditures could be modal neutral benefiting both rail and road traffic.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: US
  • 109 posts
Posted by foamer4000 on Monday, June 9, 2003 8:52 PM
MORON!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy