Trains.com

Oil fired locomotives

11271 views
68 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Monday, October 24, 2005 1:49 AM
The blower nozel, located under the stack, was used to increase draft when the locomotive was stationary, moving slowly, or drifting, that is when the engine wasn't working hard enough for the exhaust to create the necessary draft of air..
The less intense the fire, the more the dampers are closed to prevent the shock of cold air contacting the firebox walls or flues.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 23, 2005 10:52 PM
On sanding the flues:
1.) The cinders in coal acts like sand in cleaning the flues, thereby solving that problem.

2.) One little technicality: egmurphy called the scoop "small." It really isn't small, and I've heard of fireman tossing in a heck of a lot of sand to clean really dirty flues.

3.) When sanding the flues, you would usually close the dampers (to make a strong draft through the firebox door to carry the sand, which also makes the smoke turn black.

To elaborate a little on starting a cold boiler:
1.) Everything said so far is hunky-dory.

2.) In the cab of the locomotive is the firing manifold, from which the fireman controls the admission of steam to all of the oil-related steam usages, and the blower. There is usually a way to put steam into the manifold (frequently through the blower pipe).

3.) With a dead-cold boiler with no steam available (rare then, common now), diesel can be used, which doesn't require heating, and compressed air can be used for the atomizer and blower. If you've got nothing, then build a wood fire, but be sure to clean it all out once you have steam going, since cinders could go out the stack (there isn't as much cinder protection on an oil burner). You want to fire the boiler so that the pressure goes up at about 1-2 psi per minute, no more.

I hadn't known about the smoke lights, cool!

I have heard of running with the blower on. It's not the "correct" practice, but because of peculiarities of some locomotives, such as FEF-3's, some fireman would do it.

Sincerely,
Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Sunday, October 23, 2005 6:41 PM
Black smoke means too much fuel is being sprayed in relation to the draft, causing accelerated soot build-up in the flues, a waste of fue and offensive pollution. White smoke means insufficient oil for the amount of draft produced by the cylinder exhaust or blower. This causes cold air being drawn othrough the flues stressing the boiler. A grey haze is desired.
The fireman has to adjust the fuel oil/atomizer ratio for throttle changes made by the engineer. When the engine exhaust interval decreases, the fireman turns off the blower. The fireman has to watch out for the fire being blown out.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Sunday, October 23, 2005 6:24 PM
Oil-fired fireboxes had floors. I'm looking at two drawings of two different fireboxex arrangements. (One has the burner in the front, and the other in the back.) They both show floors that include air intake openings or dampers toward the forward end of the firebox.
Couldn't imagine a floor-less firebox. When I operated an oil-fired Shay as a guest, I noticed a floor in the firebox. The burner on this one was in the rear, pointing forward.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Mexico
  • 2,629 posts
Posted by egmurphy on Sunday, October 23, 2005 5:22 PM
QUOTE: Murphy Siding: reading that the oil had to be heated to 100 degrees in order to get it to flow. This heating was done using steam,presumably from the locomotive. It seems that you would need to have a fire burning, to make steam,to heat the oil,to feed the fire,to keep the fire burning ? How do you start one of these things?
Normal procedure where there was an engine house/round house would be to have a stationary boiler (often an old out of service boiler from a locomotive) fired up. This would usually provide steam for any machinery in the roundhouse as well as providing steam to keep steam locos (and their oil) warmed up while not in operation. Or have a hostler who's job included keeping locos warm with low level fires. Cycling steam locomotives from cold start through operational temperature back to cold start is (as far as I have been told) harder on the equipment than maintaining it warm.

Regards

Ed
The Rail Images Page of Ed Murphy "If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion and avoid the people, you might better stay home." - James Michener
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 23, 2005 4:47 PM
Practicality question: In reading about new fuel ideas including coal/water fuel and coal/oil blended fuel, the main problem is having to agitate the mixes to keep the coal fines from settling to the bottom of the tank. After reading through this thread, I see that there are also things that need to be done to make sure the bunker oil is of the right consistency for firing.

Is it really that much different in terms of added work to agitate coal/water and coal/oil mixtures as opposed to having to pre-heat bunker oil and steam-assist the spray?
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Sunday, October 23, 2005 4:06 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding

Chicken and egg question, of sorts: I'm reading that the oil had to be heated to 100 degrees in order to get it to flow. This heating was done using steam,presumably from the locomotive. It seems that you would need to have a fire burning, to make steam,to heat the oil,to feed the fire,to keep the fire burning ? How do you start one of these things?


Near the back of the September or October Trains in Selected Railroad Reading there should be a story of a Sunday afternoon watchman starting a fire by throwing buckets of diesel fuel into the firebox.
Dale
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, October 23, 2005 3:36 PM
Chicken and egg question, of sorts: I'm reading that the oil had to be heated to 100 degrees in order to get it to flow. This heating was done using steam,presumably from the locomotive. It seems that you would need to have a fire burning, to make steam,to heat the oil,to feed the fire,to keep the fire burning ? How do you start one of these things?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:47 PM
Ed
A question was asked about Mexican 4-8-4s on this topic.
http://www.trains.com/community/forum/topic.asp?page=1&TOPIC_ID=44651
Would you have time to take a look ?
Dale
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Mexico
  • 2,629 posts
Posted by egmurphy on Sunday, October 23, 2005 11:59 AM
Flues develop a build-up of soot on the inside, which decreases heat transfer and decreases gas flow through the flues. To clean the flues, the fireman threw a small scoop of sand into the firebox which would get sucked through the flues along with the hot gases, effectively sand blasting the inside of the flues. This usually resulted in a shower of soot coming out of the stack.

I suspect soot build-up depends in part on the fuel you're burning. The NdeM burned a really heavy oil, and they had a lot of sooting of the flues. Their tenders had a rather large sand box right at the front of the tender, for easy access by the fireman.


Regards

Ed
The Rail Images Page of Ed Murphy "If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion and avoid the people, you might better stay home." - James Michener
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, October 23, 2005 11:22 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by nanaimo73

QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29

5.) Sand the flues regularly.
Sincerely,
Daniel Parks


Daniel,
I thought oil fired steam locomotives needed less sanding than coal fired locomotives ?


Some railroads put lights on the top of their locomotives so the fireman could see the smoke at night and adjust his fire.


? Can someone explain sanding the flues? For better *traction* of the smoke? I'm lost.

Thanks

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Sunday, October 23, 2005 11:01 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29

5.) Sand the flues regularly.
Sincerely,
Daniel Parks


Daniel,
I thought oil fired steam locomotives needed less sanding than coal fired locomotives ?


Some railroads put lights on the top of their locomotives so the fireman could see the smoke at night and adjust his fire.
Dale
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, October 23, 2005 10:49 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by markpierce

Oh Murphy Siding!! Yes, the atomized oil burns in "mid air" and does not puddle in the bottom of the firebox. When I guest-engineered (drove) a small oil-fired Shary in 2002, I observed that the atomizer was in the back of the firebox, blowing forward. However, a current article on oil-fired Southern Pacific locomotives stated that was its practice then, but by 1905 it was changed to the opposite with the burner in the front of the firebox facing the rear.


Cool! It kind of sounds like a tamed dragon.[:)]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:48 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by markpierce

I believe all of the tenders of oi-fired locomotives had steam coils in the tender to warm up the fuel. The burners (fuel sprayers) also included a steam pressure passage to help atomize the fuel.


Firstly, about the pressure gauge, I've never seen one on any locomotive (didn't mean it didn't happen though). The locomotive I volunteer on (Ventura County Railway no. 2) doesn't have one, and neither does AT&SF 2926 to my knowledge. It really wouldn't do you much good except in finding leaks (which is easy enough with the atomizer steam pipe).

Some had heating coils, but the old system of putting steam right into the oil worked pretty well. The oil pipe in the tender tank would rise up about 2", so that the heavier condensed water would fall below it, and only oil would be taken.

Not trying to be condescending, just helpful [:)].

Sincerely,
Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:48 AM
Oh Murphy Siding!! Yes, the atomized oil burns in "mid air" and does not puddle in the bottom of the firebox. When I guest-engineered (drove) a small oil-fired Shary in 2002, I observed that the atomizer was in the back of the firebox, blowing forward. However, a current article on oil-fired Southern Pacific locomotives stated that was its practice then, but by 1905 it was changed to the opposite with the burner in the front of the firebox facing the rear.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:39 AM
Dear Old Timer,
As Elliot pointed out, without a floor there would be an uncontrolled and massive amount of air coming in, and at high speeds the oil would quite easily be blown out.

The locomotive I volunteer on has a flat floor of steel which I assure you is quite thick. Other locomotives sometimes have a V-shaped floor with a flat bottom (SP 1795, for example).

Since it was brought up, here are some fineries of firing oil burners (random points):
1.) The fireman must increase the firing valve as the Amount Of Steam Used is increased (it's not just the throttle--it's the reverser). If the fireman doesn't, the fire could be blown out because of a large draft (gives you a new appreciation of the exhaust nozzle that it could put out a locomotive's fire). But, open it too much and you will be "forcing the fire," which can cause leaky tubes and flues, and waste fuel. The engineer will tell the fireman when he plans to change the amount of steam used (like leaving the station). The firing quadrant (on which the firing lever is mounted) usually has a spot for an adjustable marker/stop for the "drifting fire"--the lowest amount of oil which can maintain full steam pressure when drifting. (The one I work on was converted to oil on the cheap in 1941, and doesn't have a nice quadrant like that.)

2.) To keep the fireman entertained, he also has two other controls which require his constant attention--the atomizer and the damper. The atomizer valve controls how much steam is used at the burner.

Too little atomizer and the oil won't atomize (what a surprise), too much and you're wasting steam, and worse, making the fire burn cooler, and wasting oil. Either way leads to black smoke.

Too little damper and the oil won't burn all the way--black smoke, wasted oil, colder fire. Too much damper and the fire can get too cold--black smoke, wasted oil (burning more to keep the same temperature); worst, too much damper and the flues will contract and leak.

3.) The blower control can be turned on to increase draft. Have fun.

4.) Whenever possible, only use the injector when running. If necessary to use it while stopped, increase the firing valve above the drifting stop to prevent losing steam pressure. Alternate which injector is used to minimize wear on the nozzles.

5.) Sand the flues regularly.

6.) Oil can burn with up to 50% more heat/time than coal.

You might not have to shovel oil, but it does require constant vigilance, and balancing the firing valve, damper, and atomizer is definitely an art.

Sincerely,
Daniel Parks
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:15 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by egmurphy

As Daniel mentioned, they inject the oil using steam to force it through the spray heads. So it's under pressure only at the final point. It flows from the tender by gravity.

QUOTE: Daniel: 1.) The floor of the firebox on an oil burner is solid, there is no gap between the sides and bottom (in practice, small gaps of sunlight can be seen, but it's not a big deal.
Could be, but not necessarily all of them. The one oil burner (actually converted to diesel) I am aquainted with does have a large opening in the bottom of the fire box, or maybe they're just huge dampers.



I would guess that it's the damper, but you've seen it, I haven't. On vertically drafted locomotives, like the one I work on, there is a square hole in the floor, which opens into a "box" of which one side is the damper door.

QUOTE: Originally posted by egmurphy


QUOTE: 4.) It is made more fluid by heating it with steam put into the tender (it condenses, and at the end of the day the tank is drained of water).
Some had steam heating coils passing through the oil bunker in the tender.

I suspect there were several variations.


You're absolutely right, I was keeping things simple. This teaches me to be mindful though that for every "fact" about steam locomotives, there are 17 railroads with different practices.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Sunday, October 23, 2005 12:08 AM
I'm with you Murph, it doesn't seem right to have the burners open to a major draft. Yes, you need combustion air, but you also want to transfer the heat to the water efficiently and not worry about the fire blowing out at running speed.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, October 22, 2005 11:28 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Old Timer

I don't believe the fireboxes of oil burners had floors. They sure didn't need grates, or ashpans.

Old Timer


Wouldn't they have to have *something* to form the bottom of the firebox?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 22, 2005 10:56 PM
I don't believe the fireboxes of oil burners had floors. They sure didn't need grates, or ashpans.

Old Timer
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Mexico
  • 2,629 posts
Posted by egmurphy on Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:40 PM
Fortunately, no. The hurricane just finished blasting the far eastern part of the country, including Cancun and Cozumel. I'm on the Gulf Coast, but in the state of Veracruz, about 300-400 miles south of Brownsville, TX. But thanks for asking.

Regards

Ed
The Rail Images Page of Ed Murphy "If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion and avoid the people, you might better stay home." - James Michener
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:33 PM
ed: I see your location as Mexico. Are you ducking a hurricane?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Mexico
  • 2,629 posts
Posted by egmurphy on Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:29 PM
QUOTE: For example,what happens if the fireman has too much fuel pumping to the firebox for the fire to consume at the moment?

Lots of black smoke, waste of oil, and in extreme cases a danger of explosion. One of the fireman's most important jobs on an oil burner was to carefully control the flow of oil to match the throttle setting. I believe the engineer and fireman kept a dialogue going when making significant changes in the throttle so as to avoid catching the fireman unaware.

Regards

Ed
The Rail Images Page of Ed Murphy "If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion and avoid the people, you might better stay home." - James Michener
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:23 PM
If the fuel oil is being sprayed, or atomized,then is it burning in the air,between the orifice and the floor of the firebox? Or, does it also burn on the floor of the firebox too? For example,what happens if the fireman has too much fuel pumping to the firebox for the fire to consume at the moment?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:12 PM
I believe all of the tenders of oi-fired locomotives had steam coils in the tender to warm up the fuel. The burners (fuel sprayers) also included a steam pressure passage to help atomize the fuel.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Mexico
  • 2,629 posts
Posted by egmurphy on Saturday, October 22, 2005 8:08 PM
As Daniel mentioned, they inject the oil using steam to force it through the spray heads. So it's under pressure only at the final point. It flows from the tender by gravity.

QUOTE: Daniel: 1.) The floor of the firebox on an oil burner is solid, there is no gap between the sides and bottom (in practice, small gaps of sunlight can be seen, but it's not a big deal.
Could be, but not necessarily all of them. The one oil burner (actually converted to diesel) I am aquainted with does have a large opening in the bottom of the fire box, or maybe they're just huge dampers.

QUOTE: 4.) It is made more fluid by heating it with steam put into the tender (it condenses, and at the end of the day the tank is drained of water).
Some had steam heating coils passing through the oil bunker in the tender.

I suspect there were several variations.

Regards

Ed

The Rail Images Page of Ed Murphy "If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion and avoid the people, you might better stay home." - James Michener
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Martinez, CA
  • 5,440 posts
Posted by markpierce on Saturday, October 22, 2005 7:50 PM
I believe the cab-forwards pressurized the fuel tanks to move the fuel to the front of the locomotive (the firebox was at the extreme front end of the train) because it was such a long way. Otherwise, it was gravity fed.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, October 22, 2005 7:36 PM
Is the fuel put under pressure to get it to *spray* out into the firebox?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 22, 2005 4:04 PM
Just doing my job.

I am needed elsewhere now...wherever members of the public call a freight car a "train"...wherever innocent 3985-like locomotives are excursioning (I want to see it too)...wherever steam locomotives cry out for justice and steamization. My Grand Canyon Limited is about to leave off into the sunset.

Okay, never mind that last part because it would be heading east, but oh well....

[:)][:D][8D][:-,][swg][swg]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 22, 2005 3:54 PM
Thanks!

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy