QUOTE: Murphy Siding: reading that the oil had to be heated to 100 degrees in order to get it to flow. This heating was done using steam,presumably from the locomotive. It seems that you would need to have a fire burning, to make steam,to heat the oil,to feed the fire,to keep the fire burning ? How do you start one of these things?
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding Chicken and egg question, of sorts: I'm reading that the oil had to be heated to 100 degrees in order to get it to flow. This heating was done using steam,presumably from the locomotive. It seems that you would need to have a fire burning, to make steam,to heat the oil,to feed the fire,to keep the fire burning ? How do you start one of these things?
Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.
QUOTE: Originally posted by nanaimo73 QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29 5.) Sand the flues regularly. Sincerely, Daniel Parks Daniel, I thought oil fired steam locomotives needed less sanding than coal fired locomotives ? Some railroads put lights on the top of their locomotives so the fireman could see the smoke at night and adjust his fire.
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29 5.) Sand the flues regularly. Sincerely, Daniel Parks
QUOTE: Originally posted by markpierce Oh Murphy Siding!! Yes, the atomized oil burns in "mid air" and does not puddle in the bottom of the firebox. When I guest-engineered (drove) a small oil-fired Shary in 2002, I observed that the atomizer was in the back of the firebox, blowing forward. However, a current article on oil-fired Southern Pacific locomotives stated that was its practice then, but by 1905 it was changed to the opposite with the burner in the front of the firebox facing the rear.
QUOTE: Originally posted by markpierce I believe all of the tenders of oi-fired locomotives had steam coils in the tender to warm up the fuel. The burners (fuel sprayers) also included a steam pressure passage to help atomize the fuel.
QUOTE: Originally posted by egmurphy As Daniel mentioned, they inject the oil using steam to force it through the spray heads. So it's under pressure only at the final point. It flows from the tender by gravity. QUOTE: Daniel: 1.) The floor of the firebox on an oil burner is solid, there is no gap between the sides and bottom (in practice, small gaps of sunlight can be seen, but it's not a big deal.Could be, but not necessarily all of them. The one oil burner (actually converted to diesel) I am aquainted with does have a large opening in the bottom of the fire box, or maybe they're just huge dampers.
QUOTE: Daniel: 1.) The floor of the firebox on an oil burner is solid, there is no gap between the sides and bottom (in practice, small gaps of sunlight can be seen, but it's not a big deal.
QUOTE: Originally posted by egmurphy QUOTE: 4.) It is made more fluid by heating it with steam put into the tender (it condenses, and at the end of the day the tank is drained of water).Some had steam heating coils passing through the oil bunker in the tender. I suspect there were several variations.
QUOTE: 4.) It is made more fluid by heating it with steam put into the tender (it condenses, and at the end of the day the tank is drained of water).
I'm back!
Follow the progress:
http://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/displayForumTopic/content/12129987972340381/page/1
QUOTE: Originally posted by Old Timer I don't believe the fireboxes of oil burners had floors. They sure didn't need grates, or ashpans. Old Timer
QUOTE: For example,what happens if the fireman has too much fuel pumping to the firebox for the fire to consume at the moment?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.