Trains.com

Wood ties vs. Concrete ties.

18558 views
61 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Wood ties vs. Concrete ties.
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 7, 2005 7:02 AM
Just last year the Union Pacific had just replaced Thousands of ties on the Blair and Boone subdivisons. After the Wood ties are replaced with Concrete ties,what does the Railroad do with the thousands of older Wood ties right after they have been replaced. Does Concrete last longer than Wood? Why do Railroads use Concrete ties on switch tracks since concrete ties can crack under the extream weight from the constant pounding from a heavy train. I thought that Wood ties would flex much better under the extream weight from the train. I have seen that most track with concrete ties don't flex (bounce) as much as the Wood ties. What gives? Plus with Wood ties,The rails are spiked,on the other hand,Concrete ties are cliped. Thanks,Allan.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 785 posts
Posted by Leon Silverman on Friday, October 7, 2005 7:24 AM
Cannot tell you what is done with old wooden ties. However, pressure treated wood still deteriorates over time if it is buried in the ground. The flexing of wooden ties you mentioned is NOT desireable for trains. If this was so. you would see suspension bridges used on heavy duty railroads. The various designs currently used are intended to provide an unyielding support for the track and trains.
Poured concrete block does, indeed, have very little strength. However, prestressed concrete can support tremendous loads because the concrete always sees only a compressive (where it is extremely strong) load. This is accomplished by stretching the rebar prior to pouring the concrete. Once the poured concrete cures, the rebar is released. In attempting to regain its original length, the rebar now compresses the concrete block. The block will now not crack unless the generated bending moment force exceeds the residual compressive force.
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, October 7, 2005 10:57 AM
If the wooden ties are still in decent shape, they'll be recycled by the railroad--reused in places like yards.

I'm sure Mudchicken will be able to enlighten us on the ways that worn ties are disposed of these days.

There is, or was, a fleet of old coal gondolas running around with reporting marks WWEX--for Wood Waste Energy. That's one possibility, once a number of environmental issues have been cleared.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 7, 2005 11:14 AM
Burn creosote--that's got to be good for the environment [:)].
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Friday, October 7, 2005 11:27 AM
Some of the worst ones often end up in the landscaping market, or at least they used to. I'm not sure if they let the creasote out into the general market place anymore.

Concerte ties have disadvantages too. Put a train on the ground, and all the chipped ones need to be replaced. Wood usually survives derailments
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • 124 posts
Posted by JDV5th on Friday, October 7, 2005 11:40 AM
Old wooden ties- highly valuable for residential retaining walls, right?
"One thing about trains...it doesn't matter where they're going. What matters is deciding to get on." from "Polar Express"
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, October 7, 2005 11:49 AM
Believe me, Big Boy, those ties that make it to the landscape people are far from being "some of the worst ones". At least they still look like ties!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Friday, October 7, 2005 12:39 PM
Carl, next time I go to Menards I'll have to look. I have this image stuck in my mind of large gray "wood like" objects, with all the creasote leached out, and huge checks and splits down the length. Very rustic, but not necessarily the best long term solution for holding back earth. It is possible that that was the reject pile after the customers had cherry picked off the better ones.[swg] The joys of self service lumber.

Another place where old wood ties go to die is railroad museum operations. They like to buy the ones just above landscape grade. Maybe Menards is buying the ones they remove.[:P][;)]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 7, 2005 9:09 PM
Much of the time they sell the whole lot to the highest bidder, who also gets to haul them away. Some are good, some are better, some are not. Most go to the landscape industry.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, October 7, 2005 10:21 PM
I've found that when I'm trying to find or follow an old, long gone ROW through Iowa,Minnesota or South Dakota cornfields,that the fences around the area will feature a lot of old ties as fence posts.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 7, 2005 10:26 PM
Seems to me that concrete ties (or in British, "sleepers") are pretty much the norm on heavily-used European tracks.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Friday, October 7, 2005 10:28 PM
I would've figured that they wouldn't be long enough to make a good fence post- by the time you buried enough of it to make it stable, your fence wouldn't even be three feet high.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Louisville, KY
  • 1,345 posts
Posted by CSXrules4eva on Friday, October 7, 2005 10:43 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Leon Silverman

Cannot tell you what is done with old wooden ties. However, pressure treated wood still deteriorates over time if it is buried in the ground. The flexing of wooden ties you mentioned is NOT desireable for trains. If this was so. you would see suspension bridges used on heavy duty railroads. The various designs currently used are intended to provide an unyielding support for the track and trains.
Poured concrete block does, indeed, have very little strength. However, prestressed concrete can support tremendous loads because the concrete always sees only a compressive (where it is extremely strong) load. This is accomplished by stretching the rebar prior to pouring the concrete. Once the poured concrete cures, the rebar is released. In attempting to regain its original length, the rebar now compresses the concrete block. The block will now not crack unless the generated bending moment force exceeds the residual compressive force.


I do have a question here, if the wooden ties did indeed flex, why wouldn't the other bridges like the truss type bridge, the arc bridge, the cable stay bridge or the beam type bridge work, would the suspension type bridge be the only bridge that would work? I personally would think that the cable-stay type bridge would be better. Just curious.
LORD HELP US ALL TO BE ORIGINAL AND NOT CRISPY!!! please? Sarah J.M. Warner conductor CSX
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 7, 2005 10:54 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29

Burn creosote--that's got to be good for the environment [:)].


Most so-called "contaminated" woods can easily be gasified for energy production. The contaminates are removed during the gasification process.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, October 7, 2005 11:00 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by blhanel

I would've figured that they wouldn't be long enough to make a good fence post- by the time you buried enough of it to make it stable, your fence wouldn't even be three feet high.


If I remember right, they are usually about 8' long. I worked for a lumberyard that sold lots of RR ties. Inevitably, the customer was a grandpa, with his arm in a sling. He had a stock trailer that was full of manure, because he had just taken hogs to the sale barn. "Oh, and you fellers will have to slide them all the way to the front of the trailer, or the pick-up steers funny"[xx(]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Saturday, October 8, 2005 9:55 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by blhanel

I would've figured that they wouldn't be long enough to make a good fence post- by the time you buried enough of it to make it stable, your fence wouldn't even be three feet high.

When I worked for my Granfather in the 1960's, the railroad gave the adjacent landowner first dibs on used ties. Grandad really liked the switch ties as they made great corner posts for his bull pens. At that point a typical used tie had an additional life as a fence post of 10 - 15 years. Pine poles were only good for about 8 to 10 years.

dd

ps- we also experimented with concrete fence posts - good life but they were to heavy to handle and too expensive.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 8, 2005 8:48 PM
Concrete vs. Wood ties are yet another thing the amazing John McPhee discusses in his two-parter on unit coal trains from the PRB (second part, NEW YORKER issue of October 10, 2005). He says the BNSF/UP shared triple track into the PRB region uses concrete and gives a couple of reasons why. I don't think he addressed the role that rebar plays, but otherwise he seems to be pretty much right on the money.
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Saturday, October 8, 2005 9:39 PM
Along with Dave pointing out the fact that the creosote would gasify in the high heat of a power plant, you should note you also get creosote from most low temperature burning woods; it is a natural by product, most common with the sap woods like pine.
Check you house hold chimney, and you will find the creosote that is released when you burn wood slowly at a "low" temperature, like a fire in a fireplace coating the flue and chimney, in fact, creosote build up fires are the most common cause of chimney fires.

Old high school science experiment, place a popsicle stick in a test tube, hold it over a low Bunsen burner, rotate it as the wood stick chars, and note the liquid that collects in the tube...natural creosote.
What is used on railroad tie is petroleum by product, and at high temperatures, it burns as clean as household heating oil...

Ed
QUOTE: Originally posted by trainjunky29

Burn creosote--that's got to be good for the environment [:)].

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 9, 2005 1:54 AM
Tie Tek produces a "recycled" tie that serves as alternative to wood and is cheaper than concrete ties. The company has been around a few years. They make the ties from post consumer recycleables such as milk jugs and tires.

http://www.natk.com/ttprod.html

There main customer is UP, but they recently got an order from BNSF. Looks like this might actually take off! There are some photos under the "investers" link...
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Sunday, October 9, 2005 8:14 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Murphy Siding

I've found that when I'm trying to find or follow an old, long gone ROW through Iowa,Minnesota or South Dakota cornfields,that the fences around the area will feature a lot of old ties as fence posts.

I've seen some of them fence posts that still had tie plates attached.
Jeff
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Brisbane Australia
  • 1,721 posts
Posted by james saunders on Sunday, October 9, 2005 8:23 PM
what bout steel the queensland rail system uses steel exstenvely for ties

James, Brisbane Australia

Modelling AT&SF in the 90s

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Anywhere there are trains
  • 578 posts
Posted by Train Guy 3 on Sunday, October 9, 2005 8:29 PM
Ties get used for landscaping quite a bit around here but they put a ban on burring cresote ties in the ground. Is that an EPA regulation.

TG3 LOOK ! LISTEN ! LIVE ! Remember the 3.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Monday, October 10, 2005 2:36 AM
In Britain in the last 10 years steel ties have become more prevalent. They were tried in the 1930's but the damp British climate meant they rusted too quickly (though this could be reduced by coating them in tar. In the 1980's the preserved Gloucester Warwickshire Railway was given a load of track with steel ties and they coated the good ones with tar and re-used them).

Wooden ties have tended to always be sold off here too. In some cases narrow gauge railways would buy them and saw them in half. Since the 1950's concrete ties have been widely used but London Underground still use wooden because they absorrb more sound.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • 785 posts
Posted by Leon Silverman on Monday, October 10, 2005 8:16 AM
CSXrules:
Suspension Bridges flex a lot more than other types of bridges under the same conditions. This does not mean that railroad bridge do not flex at all. They simply experience minimal girations. I leve in South Jersey but still work and visit in Philafephia. when I stopped for traffic jams on I-95 overpasses or the Walt Whitman bridge, I could feel the roadway vibrating from the flexing of the structure. This movement cannot be tolerated by a train if is traveling at any kind of decent speed.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NE Oklahoma
  • 287 posts
Posted by richardy on Monday, October 10, 2005 8:33 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by james saunders

what bout steel the queensland rail system uses steel exstenvely for ties


Steel ties cannot be used in most of the US where train signal and grade crossing protection systems are present. There is a short line here that uses steel crossties in the approach to and main body of a curve, one is placed about every 40 to 50 feet, the rest are wood. This line does not have train signalling and there are only three protected grade crossings using a very simple insulated island circuit without approach circuits. All of the ties in the island circuits are wood.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 10, 2005 8:49 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Train Guy 3

Ties get used for landscaping quite a bit around here but they put a ban on burring cresote ties in the ground. Is that an EPA regulation.

Yes. A pile of ties on the ground burning, as already mentioned, burns at a relatively low temperature. Some creosote is vaporized without combusting and some is only partially combusted. Sometimes the partial combustion products are worse than the original creosote. Also, as already mentioned, a properly designed and properly operated combustion system burns clean (at least not worse than fuel oil, etc.) because of much higher temperatures. By putting a waste heat boiler on such a system, one can recover the energy and use it for something.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Monday, October 10, 2005 8:58 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by richardy

QUOTE: Originally posted by james saunders

what bout steel the queensland rail system uses steel exstenvely for ties


Steel ties cannot be used in most of the US where train signal and grade crossing protection systems are present.


Why not? They're used in many other countries that have train signal and grade crossing protection systems.
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 10, 2005 10:18 AM
Because steel ties would create a short circuit and all the signals would be red. The signal system requires a short circuit from the wheels of a train in order to detect it, but it wouldn't work with steel ties unless there was insulation between the rail and the tie.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NE Oklahoma
  • 287 posts
Posted by richardy on Monday, October 10, 2005 10:38 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Hugh Jampton

QUOTE: Originally posted by richardy

QUOTE: Originally posted by james saunders

what bout steel the queensland rail system uses steel exstenvely for ties


Steel ties cannot be used in most of the US where train signal and grade crossing protection systems are present.


Why not? They're used in many other countries that have train signal and grade crossing protection systems.


Are they electric lines?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 10, 2005 11:24 AM
The wood ties are used a lot around here in the Des Moines area. You can see them in front of apartment buildings and parking lots. They leave them next to the track bed when they take up tracks that they aren't using anymore. Some people just come up with a pickup truck and take them away. They seem pretty useful.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy