Trains.com

AC vs. DC traction

12160 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:48 PM
I have seen the BN burn up alot of DC motors on pushers at Crawford Hill.
Allan.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 4:42 PM
Yes they can but when they are mue'd use lose they low speed advantage of the ac units.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: SE Iowa
  • 15 posts
Posted by daveallisonpe on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 3:08 PM
Godd Answers! Question: Can AC & DC be MU'd?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:47 PM
Yea, thank you all, good readings.

So then, if you had a bunch of AC's and bunch of DC's in your fleet, how would you assign jobs to them? I mean it seems to me like AC's would get all the job, cause they are good for both high speed trains and for slow heavy crawls.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 2:21 PM
Good explanations
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,011 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:44 PM
I read an account in TRAINS some time ago that said that an AC was in run 8 at about a half mile per hour, pulling a sizeable train up a grade. Can't do that with DC. (Would have been interesting to see the result when they broke a drawbar, which I believe the story said they did).

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:20 PM
Tony-

Good answer. I'll just add:

AC: better wheelslip = higher adhesion = more tractive effort, which is the stuff you need to haul heavy trains such as unit trains

The reason you don't see 6000 HP DC locomotives is that about the most the frt RRs ever need from a locomotive with 100,000 to 120,000# TE is 4000 - 4500 HP. More than this and you're just wasting fuel. A six axle AC and do 150,000 to 175,000# TE which is a good match for 5000 - 6000 HP.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Cambridge, UK
  • 419 posts
Posted by owlsroost on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 1:05 PM
In general terms:

DC drive
--------

Good : Cheaper (currently), simpler, well understood, generates less interference with signalling etc

Bad : Not as good performance as AC for really heavy-haul freight or for high-speed passenger use. Motors have brushgear which needs maintenance and is a weak point if abused.

AC drive
--------

Good : Better wheelslip control than DC so ideal for really heavy-haul freight (also better dynamic braking), and AC traction motors can withstand abuse that would wreck DC motors. AC motors are lighter and smaller than DC so it's possible to get more power in the same space (which is probably why the GE/EMD 6000hp units are AC drive only) - this is also important for for high-speed passenger trains.

Bad : More expensive than DC (but getting cheaper) due to complex electronics, can create interference problems with signalling etc.


The railway world in general is going AC drive, so as soon as the cost of AC drives matches that of DC the DC drive will become obsolete for new rolling stock (my prediction [:)]). We've pretty much reached that stage in Europe, certainly for electric locomotives/multiple units.


Tony
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
AC vs. DC traction
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 21, 2005 12:14 PM
Can someone explain to me what are the pros and cons of each of the traction systems, and for what kind of jobs would it be preferable to use one over the other?

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy