Quentin
QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance Lot's of 53's out there - mostly for domestic use. International is still based on 40' and 20'. dd
Brian (IA) http://blhanel.rrpicturearchives.net.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
QUOTE: Originally posted by oltmannd I think some western states allow 57'ers. The 53' containers have been around for about 10 years. JB Hunt was an "early adopter".
Originally posted by dldance [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply samfp1943 Member sinceJune 2003 From: South Central,Ks 7,170 posts Posted by samfp1943 on Friday, September 16, 2005 10:34 AM Texas, New Mexico and Louisiana allow 57' tlr on higways...and have since about 1988..Several companies pull them, and Arkansas allowed them as permited for delivery only and return outbound empty.. Texas allows 60'ers with a non sleeper cab, the length of the whole rig being 65', I believe I remember that as correct. Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 16, 2005 2:45 PM CN Rail uses alot of 53' Containers and hauls alot of 53' Containers and Trailers into Halifax, Nova Scotia and Moncton, New Brunswick from Toronto, Ontario. How do I know because I go pick them up off the train and deliver them. Just the trailers from the company I work for. There has been a lot of them lately. I do Short Haul, mainly hauling Grocery from the warehouse to the stores in Nova Scotia, but I do occasionally deliver the products that our long haul guys bring home or what comes in by train. Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 16, 2005 5:05 PM Idaho also allows 57' containers and trailers, but since the Left Coast doesn't allow them they are usually only used for local hauls. Ernest Robl has an excellent website (The Intermodal FAQ) you should visit, as it has a good description of the various container variations: http://www.robl.w1.com/Transport/intermod.htm Also, there are some marine applications of 53' containers in the Alaska marine and Puerto Rico corridors: http://www.lynden.com/aml/about-aml/about-us.html http://www.trailerbridge.com/default.asp The 53' marine containers made by Jindo are the multi-stackable versions. Reply Edit greyhounds Member sinceAugust 2003 From: Antioch, IL 4,371 posts Posted by greyhounds on Friday, September 16, 2005 7:18 PM QUOTE: Originally posted by edbenton [b]J B Hunt is getting rid of its containers same with Schneider they discovered that they actually have less avaiblity than a standard trailer. JB hunt is still shipping by rail just using the standard trailer now. You have to remember that with containers you must have a chassis for it when you need it they were having a chassis shortage. [/bor Can anybody else verifty this? I'm just asking for a 2nd source on something that would be HUGE if true. If Hunt and Schneider got beat out of domestic containerization by the chassis management issue, which has been the downfall of domestic containers since there have been domestic containers, we're going to go in a whole differet direction with domestic intermodal. The end of domestic double stack? "By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that. Reply doghouse Member sinceMay 2005 From: Where it's cold. 555 posts Posted by doghouse on Friday, September 16, 2005 11:37 PM On 57 footers, I stand corrected. Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 17, 2005 12:46 PM To Greyhounds, I can't give you a straight answer on JB Hunt and Schneider situation but I can say that from Toronto to Halifax CN deals with alot of Container and Trailer Traffic. It used to be all containers but now is about 1/3 Trailers. I know the company I work for is really busy and doesn't have enough drivers so they get the long haul drivers to go load a trailer bring it to CN in Toronto or Montreal depending where the load is and sent it back home for us local drivers to pick it up from Moncton or Halifax depending on where it is to be delivered. Seems like a waste of a railroad car, just putting one trailer into a well car. But that's the way they do it. Maybe we will see the 89' TTX Flat Car come back!!!! Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:08 PM QUOTE: Originally posted by KevinRC Seems like a waste of a railroad car, just putting one trailer into a well car. But that's the way they do it. Maybe we will see the 89' TTX Flat Car come back!!!! I doubt you'd see a return of the 89' flats due to the dominance of the 53' trailer and the possibility of eventual widespread acceptence of a 57' design. The two 89's connected by drawbar to haul three 53's has a tare weight disadvantage to spine cars, and isn't much better than a 3-pack 53' well car. If there is a reduction of domestic/NA containers in favor of trailers, you'll probably see more 3-pack and 5-pack spine cars with the 53' platforms being built and less of the 53' wells. This bodes well for Trinity and National Steel Car, but not for Greenbrier. If there is a new demand for TOFC cars, I'd prefer an updated version of the TTOX single axle cars since they have the lowest tare weight of all trailer hauling designs. But it won't happen. Reply Edit fuzzybroken Member sinceOctober 2002 From: Milwaukee, WI, US 1,384 posts Posted by fuzzybroken on Saturday, September 17, 2005 1:48 PM Lots of companies have 53'-ers: JB Hunt Schneider (They just got a large batch of new containers, so I doubt they are dead) Hub Group (including red corrugated-side containers) STAX (both dark red corrugated and white aluminum) Pacer Stacktrain (Blue corrugated) I think APL had some too, although I don't know their current status. -Fuzzy Fuzzy World 3 Reply Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 18, 2005 12:08 PM If the truckers had their way, there would be no such thing as domestic containers. Truckers unanimously prefer trailers over containerization. It's just that the railroads prefer containers that can be double stacked, 'cause it's more "efficient" that way. From the supply chain perspective, it may be that TOFC is actually more "efficient" than COFC for North American loads except in the longest haul corridors. Reply Edit Anonymous Member sinceApril 2003 305,205 posts Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 18, 2005 2:17 PM I can say that 45' containers do roam internationally - they're a fairly common sight on trucks and rail cars over here. I've never seen 48' or 53' versions over here though, so I suspect they aren't found outside North America. What's always puzzled me is how do ships cope with the extra 5'? Shipping containers were designed around a 20' grid (20' and 40' lengths) so surely 45' containers throw a major spanner in the works? Reply Edit 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub
QUOTE: Originally posted by edbenton [b]J B Hunt is getting rid of its containers same with Schneider they discovered that they actually have less avaiblity than a standard trailer. JB hunt is still shipping by rail just using the standard trailer now. You have to remember that with containers you must have a chassis for it when you need it they were having a chassis shortage. [/bor
QUOTE: Originally posted by KevinRC Seems like a waste of a railroad car, just putting one trailer into a well car. But that's the way they do it. Maybe we will see the 89' TTX Flat Car come back!!!!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.