23 17 46 11
Quentin
QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSF railfan. I can't just see Trains going down the Main line with only just the Engineer only. What would happen if the Engineer where to fall asleep at the Throttle?
QUOTE: Originally posted by Limitedclear QUOTE: Originally posted by BNSF railfan. I can't just see Trains going down the Main line with only just the Engineer only. What would happen if the Engineer where to fall asleep at the Throttle? No problem. You just pull off at the rest area and take a nap, right FM?? LC
She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
QUOTE: Originally posted by bobwilcox The Class I railroads have been working up to this for some time. Why didn't they ask for national barganing on this as a part of their Section 6 notices? This was simpler whey the Eastern Railroads cut wages 10% and the trainmen responded by burning down Pittsburgh![:)]
QUOTE: Originally posted by Mookie This is scarey and it isn't even Halloween yet!
QUOTE: Originally posted by samsooter@yahoo.com QUOTE: Originally posted by bobwilcox The Class I railroads have been working up to this for some time. Why didn't they ask for national barganing on this as a part of their Section 6 notices? This was simpler whey the Eastern Railroads cut wages 10% and the trainmen responded by burning down Pittsburgh![:)] it was asked in the section six notices!!!! go to the utu web site and you will see that the railroads propose the ablilty to call conductors when they want too on what train they want too. the crew constist is the only thing protecting the conductors. if the court decides to deslove the crew contist the railroads will not ever have to call another conductor on a road train ever again!!!!
QUOTE: Originally posted by bobwilcox QUOTE: Originally posted by samsooter@yahoo.com QUOTE: Originally posted by bobwilcox The Class I railroads have been working up to this for some time. Why didn't they ask for national barganing on this as a part of their Section 6 notices? This was simpler whey the Eastern Railroads cut wages 10% and the trainmen responded by burning down Pittsburgh![:)] it was asked in the section six notices!!!! go to the utu web site and you will see that the railroads propose the ablilty to call conductors when they want too on what train they want too. the crew constist is the only thing protecting the conductors. if the court decides to deslove the crew contist the railroads will not ever have to call another conductor on a road train ever again!!!! The UTU better get ready for some very tough negotiations. If the carriers provide job protection to current trainmen Congress will not be on the UTUs side.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.