Trains.com

Where would you want Amtrak to go?

5993 views
70 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Northeast Missouri
  • 869 posts
Where would you want Amtrak to go?
Posted by SchemerBob on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:16 PM
If money was no option, where would you want Amtrak to go, besides the current routes?
Long live the BNSF .... AND its paint scheme. SchemerBob
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Canoga Park (Los Angeles)
  • 494 posts
Posted by TheS.P.caboose on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:20 PM
I'd like to see the Desert Wind again. It ran between Salt Lake City and Los Angeles.
Regards Gary
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:24 PM
Now there's a loaded question! [:-^]
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:25 PM
The Pioneer,from Salt Lake to Seattle via Portland[:)].
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Omaha-ish, Nebraska
  • 703 posts
Posted by DrummingTrainfan on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:28 PM
I'd like to see Omaha-KC-St Louis.
    GIFs from http://www.trainweb.org/mccann/offer.htm -Erik, the displaced CNW, Bears, White Sox, Northern Illnois Huskies, Amtrak and Metra fan.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 3:34 PM
Now there's a loaded question! [:-^]
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • 380 posts
Posted by BNSF4ever on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 5:41 PM
1. If border security issues could be resolved, then the International between Chicago and Toronto.

2. Amtrak California service from Oakland to Los Angeles.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 7:15 PM
Chicago-Memphis (CNIC)-Birmingham-Atlanta (NS) overnight
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: US
  • 383 posts
Posted by CG9602 on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:09 PM
I think I'd like to see at least double the amount of frequencies on the existing routes, plus a Chicago to Florida route.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:33 PM
I wi***hey'd shift the Zephyr to the UP transcon- they'd hit alot bigger population centers here in Iowa, including Cedar Rapids![:D]
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:38 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by blhanel

I wi***hey'd shift the Zephyr to the UP transcon- they'd hit alot bigger population centers here in Iowa, including Cedar Rapids![:D]

And left it in the FRC where it belongs [:p]
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:32 AM
I think there should be Amtrak service between Vancouver and Los Angelas stopping at Seatle, San Fransisco and a few others along the way.

It might be interesting to explore a possible route between Boston, MA and Halifax, N.S-call it the Maritime Limited.
Andrew
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Southwestern Florida
  • 501 posts
Posted by Tharmeni on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:41 AM
Restore the Indy-Louisville route, extend it south through Nashville and on to Florida, making it the first Florida-Chicago route to run in years..
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:12 AM
From anywhere to Calgary. I need to go there and the nearest place I can get by train is Edmonton.
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Still on the other side of the tracks.
  • 397 posts
Posted by cpbloom on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:15 AM
[:p][:p][:p]

Let's make a series of high speed Amtrak trains that run between Cleveland Columbus and Cincinnati.

Let's have a train that runs between New York and Kansas City with stops at Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Columbus, Indianapolis and St Louis.

If NS will let us use the Rathole, I'd have a train running from Detroit to Atlanta, possibly all the way to Miami.

Why not press our luck and ask NS if we could run a train from Detroit to Columbus, south into W Va. and east to Norfolk VA.





  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:40 AM
1. North Station - South Station connector. Then NE Corridor to Halifax, Concord, NH, and then traffic may justify hourly service Boston - Portland

2. Chicago Memphis Birmingham Atlanta Jacksonville Miami

3. Salt Lake City to both LA and Seattle

4. Montrealer and Washingtonian running again, for two routes NY - Montreal (Continue the Adirondak)

5. Pittsburgh (through cars from NY and Washington) - Indanapolis - St. Louis - Kansas City

6. Detroit - Toledo - Cincinnati - Louisville - Nahville - Atlanta - Jacksonville - Miami

7. Restore the Broadway Limited on as close to its old schedule as possible
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: Poconos, PA
  • 3,948 posts
Posted by TomDiehl on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 5:52 AM
I'd like to see a return of the Phoebe Snow. But of course, the Lackawanna Cutoff would have to be restored first across New Jersey and the Portland Bridge.
Smile, it makes people wonder what you're up to. Chief of Sanitation; Clowntown
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 6:40 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by cpbloom

[:p][:p][:p]



If NS will let us use the Rathole, I'd have a train running from Detroit to Atlanta, possibly all the way to Miami.




As far as using the CNO&TP, f you paid NS to double track Atlanta to Chattagnooga, they just might let you!

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 7:05 AM
I'd start here:

http://www.fra.dot.gov/Downloads/RRDev/corridors.pdf

and then play connect the dots

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,537 posts
Posted by jchnhtfd on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:30 AM
dang, Dave K, you beat me to it. Increased frequency (either two Adirondacks or bring back the Montrealer/Washingtonian) from New York to Montreal. Double frequency to Chicago from New York/Boston (and do something so that CSX can run them on time!).

The North Station/South Station connection in Boston would be wonderful, and extend at least some NE Corridor runs to Portland ME and Concord NH. (someone said money no object -- but I just have to add that the North Station/South Station connection was originally part of the 'Big Dig' but got canned by the MassDOT, which is almost as anti-rail as the ConnDOT -- and going on north, New Hampshire, in its infinite wisdom (supported by a hefty payment from a bus company) has decided not to support the Downeaster, never mind any new service).

Albuquerque to Denver would be right handy at times... and it would seem that Chicago to southern Florida might be useful.

But... as someone up there noted, there aren't enough cars to run the trains they have, never mind add new ones...
Jamie
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Ottawa, Canada
  • 234 posts
Posted by jkeaton on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:43 AM
With regard to "It might be interesting to explore a possible route between Boston, MA and Halifax, N.S-call it the Maritime Limited." - there was such a train into the 1960s, called the "Gull" (a better name than Maritime Limited, as 'Maritime' doesn't mean as much to USA folks as it does to Canadians), which was routed CN-CP-MEC-BM. It was one of the few jointly-operated CN-CP trains. I think it would make a great "cruise train" route, at least in the summer - fabulous scenery! (AOE, are you listening?)

Other than Halifax-Boston, I'd vote for Chicago-Florida, Detroit-Atlanta or Detroit-Florida, Minneapolis-Florida and Minneapolis-Winnipeg, Atlanta-Raleigh and Atlanta-Miami. But I suspect that there's a lot more possibilities in fast service between city pairs 200-300 miles apart - Tampa-Miami, routes between Cleveland, Columbus, Cinncinnati and Detroit, etc.

Ottawa-New York would be nice too...

Jim in Ottawa
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 10:12 AM
Bring back the Desert Wind and the Pioneer.[swg]
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Omaha-ish, Nebraska
  • 703 posts
Posted by DrummingTrainfan on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:04 PM
I forgot to mention this in my last post. A Scottsbluff, NE-Omaha, NE stopping in Lincoln and Kearny along with smaller towns. It would be great if it could be a Talgo or "Amtrak Midwest" (same as Amcal just different paint). Just no P42's and Superliners...I can get picst of those on the Cal Zypher.
    GIFs from http://www.trainweb.org/mccann/offer.htm -Erik, the displaced CNW, Bears, White Sox, Northern Illnois Huskies, Amtrak and Metra fan.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:10 PM
What about the Rainbow between Buffalo and Detroit using CN lines through Ontario that would allow them up to 90 mph for most of the trip on the Dundas/ Chatham Subdivisions?
Andrew
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 12:17 PM
Ever since 1971, I've resented the fact that Amtrak took off the last thread of service on the (New York) Washington-Birmingham (New Orleans) route. Denied service to Roanoke, Bristol and Knoxville; also ended any real-life connection to the "Chattanooga Choo-Choo."

That line was Southern Rwy Washington-Lynchburg, VA; N&W Lynchburg to Bristol VA/TN, then Southern again Bristol-Birmingham (and points South). It was fun watching varnish in southwestern Virginia in the Sixties: a mixture of N&W, Southern, and occasional thru rolling stock; also some trains used N&W motive power but at least one (Birmingham Special) was Southern all the way through -- E unit and helper, I believe.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, IN
  • 113 posts
Posted by pat390 on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 1:24 PM
capitol limited used to stop in my town (valparaiso IN) it wouild be pretty cool if they restored that service
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 4:45 PM
For that matter, it would be pretty cool if Amtrak restored the anomalous "Valpo Locals"--a category that technically didn't exist, Amtrak commuter service.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:05 PM
Since I live in central Arkansas I would like to see Amtrak start a route east and west with Little Rock a part of it. This "middle line" would connect the East Coast and West Coast and save passengers time by not having to go either all the way to Chicago or El Paso to catch a connecting train.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:13 PM
chicago-quad cities via the ex-RI
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North Central Illinois
  • 1,458 posts
Posted by CBQ_Guy on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:41 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by farmer03

chicago-quad cities via the ex-RI

I'll second that!

It would only be a couple blocks from my house!!
"Paul [Kossart] - The CB&Q Guy" [In Illinois] ~ Modeling the CB&Q and its fictional 'Illiniwek River-Subdivision-Branch Line' in the 1960's. ~

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy