Trains.com

British Railway Operations

122468 views
1906 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, May 7, 2006 3:40 PM
There are still some football specials run. West Coast Railways run a fair few and railway staff know what your on about when you say Footex. (other terms for specials are Crankex and Steamex.) But most football fans use thier own cars or coach tours.

Thanks for the info on passenger service. i get the impression that there is not that much incentive for Amtrack to be entreprenurial and go after buisness that look atractive. Such as developing servive between cities that are 200 to 400 miles apart which in Britain would generaly have a good level of service and can be money making. After all before privatisation the Inter City sector of BR turned a profit and most of the Inter City franchises pay premiums to the government. Virgin West Coast and Cross Country being the exeptions.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Sunday, May 7, 2006 3:48 PM
I have several friends who are Spurs fans and would have been delighted if they'd been blanked out today! As an impartial observer (i.e. Barrow AFC supporter) I was'nt too thrilled myself - I'd far rather Spurs had made Europe.

Back to the topic in hand - one of the things that the old BR football specials became notable for in the '80's was older vacuum braked stock - because it did'nt matter if the "fans" kicked lumps out of it.

That meant that the older - and rarer - vacuum braked locomotives would come out on a Saturday to work them, much to the delight of the enthusiast community.

Surprisingly, in my experience, football boys and railfans tended to cohabit quite peacefully on these trains.

I have mixed emotions recalling 47314 - with no facilities for heating the train whatsoever - out of Manchester Victoria in 1986. We managed to get an SSO at Huddersfield and stepped out into 6 inches of snow, but the train was going to Newcastle - another 2 hours in very sub zero conditions.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, May 7, 2006 4:04 PM
After watching Kettering Town for the best part of 10 yrs I have become disillusioned with the game of association football. I am considering holidaying on Mars this year. :-(
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Sunday, May 7, 2006 4:37 PM
Townsend - this has been dealt with before on the many pro and anti Amtrak posts on this forum.

It's not a question of incentive, it's a question of market. Whilst I dearly love Amtrak, your 200-400 mile bracket (which is undoubtedly rail territory anywhere else in the world) simply does'nt work in the US other than on the NEC, the Pacific Coast and possibly Milwaukee - Chicago.

Indianapolis - Chicago should, on paper, be an ideal test. It's about 100 miles and equates in economic and social terms to Birmingham - London. There's one daily train and it takes 3 hours.

I'm not about to start finding out how many flights there are a day, or how many bus journeys, but I'm fairly confident that there'll be more, with better times.

I began to find European railways boring when the Belgians went DMU in 2000, and work and domesticity means that I have to limit my visits to preservation in the UK but a six month F40 bash in 1999 left me with an enormous love for American railroads.

Sadly American railroads don't love me - or their small but loyal ridership. Don't expect anything other than retraction over the next few years.

I think that this post has become quite exclusive to a handful of visitors since it was started by Murphysiding, so let me speak my mind amongst friends. Amtrak is dead. George War Bush has killed it. It's only hope - and this won't happen - is that it's offered to a European open access operator.

Sorry - partially for the rant but Lynne is out and I've broken into the Chablis - but also for the truth.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Sunday, May 7, 2006 4:56 PM
Unwittingly I've probably thrown lots of verbal abuse at poor old Cogload in the the past!

My parting gesture - we've got the wrong Steve. Should have been Coppell, not McLaren.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Sunday, May 7, 2006 5:09 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by nanaimo73

Thanks for the answers.

I don't see anything wrong with****nal being blanked out.
[(-D]

Oh dear! Is it pronounced the same way it's spelled?[:0]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, May 8, 2006 1:28 AM
Murphy - yes it is.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Monday, May 8, 2006 2:30 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by John Bakeer

David,
With modern stock it is possible to have both loco's powered up and driven in multiple in fact on long heavy trains this is a necessity.
In the case of the Barmouth run using older stock lacking MU connections and a fairly light train, my guess is that only the lead engine would be under power.


I think you were right about the rear loco not running. The reason for top and tailing was not because they could not run round at Barmouth (they can - it still has a passing loop and siding for parking excursion trains out of the way of scheduled trains) but to spread out the weight of the locos. Since Barmouth Bridge was re-opened to loco hauled specials last year all such specials have only been allowed to have one loco on them. This was the first one where two locos were allowed, but topped and tailed. For the record, other passing loops on the Cambrian coast line are Tywyn, Harlech and Porhtmadog. There is still a run round loop for loco hauled trains at the terminus at Pwllheli and also a stabling siding where DMU's can be stabled and re-fuelled.

The subject of push pulling working was touched upon the discussion. One of the 33;s that worked the tour was 33 103. This is one of the batch that were equipped for push pull working and could work in multiple with Southern Region electric units. (When the Bournemouth line was electrified in 1967, in order to continue to provide thru passenger services onward to Weymouth, the push pull 33;s would haul electric units to Weymouth and then pu***hem back - this saved time having to run round. This practice lasted until 1988 when the electrification was extended to Weymouth, It's success resulted in other applications of push pull working in Britain and Ireland).
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 732 posts
Posted by John Bakeer on Monday, May 8, 2006 3:15 AM
Tulyar,
Do's this mean that there was a crew on each of the Barmouth loco's?
Murphy,
There was a famous double act (comedy) on Briti***V (Morecambe & Wise) Eric Morecambe (to get past the censor) always expleted the footy teams name when annoyed.
Simon,
How sad that the efforts of Gunne and others are being blighted by blind political dogma, as happened over here to many industries (coal, steel, textiles, engineering,etc.) during the Thatcher years.
Hopefully we are over most of that, although my confidence in the current regime is not very high
John B.

John Baker

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Monday, May 8, 2006 4:37 AM
I don't share the pessimism about Amtrak. There is every possibility that the terror that Sadui Arabia manufactured and exported throught their Wahabee distortion of traditional Islam will come back to effect them, until they join the modern world in spirit and not just in cash. If they did that they would be able to use all available help to stop terror, but the real anti-terrorists aren't going to help them now, especially since they have masterminded Bush's and Balr's attempted defeat in Iraq, after Bush and Blair defeated Saddam Hussein for ( among others) the Saudis' and the Emirates-Kuwait's benefit. So expect gas prices to rise still further, possibly dramatically.

In that case Amtrak will be seen, as it is already seen in fact by many Senators and Congressmen, as a very vital USA national resource. Also there is the nearby comparison with Canada's VIA, which on a per capita, a per citizen, basis, gets a much larger subsidy than Amtrak does and so presents a far better face to tourists visiting from Europe and Japan.

Indeed at a social occasion I met some old friends who are Americans living abroad like me. They just returned from North America. While living in the USA, like many Easterners, they had never seen the Rocky Mountains up close. Only from above from airplanes. The booked a tour. What Rocky Mountains did they see? Of course, the Canadian Rockies. They visited East Coast relatives, flew to the West Coast, then to Vancouver, and then came back east by VIA on an organized tour with stopovers at Jasper, side trip to Lake Louis and then on to Calgary with a side trip to Edmonton (or is it the other way around), and they enjoyed the train rides very much. "The same sleeping cars I rode in as a youngster with my parents going to and from Florida." So the wife said, and she showed her husband how to lower roomette beds without the help of the attendant!

Some Senators and Congressmen realize that good long distance rail service is just a necesary part of a civilized country. The rising gas prices will do the rest.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, May 8, 2006 12:53 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tulyar15

QUOTE: Originally posted by John Bakeer

David,
With modern stock it is possible to have both loco's powered up and driven in multiple in fact on long heavy trains this is a necessity.
In the case of the Barmouth run using older stock lacking MU connections and a fairly light train, my guess is that only the lead engine would be under power.


I think you were right about the rear loco not running. The reason for top and tailing was not because they could not run round at Barmouth (they can - it still has a passing loop and siding for parking excursion trains out of the way of scheduled trains) but to spread out the weight of the locos. Since Barmouth Bridge was re-opened to loco hauled specials last year all such specials have only been allowed to have one loco on them. This was the first one where two locos were allowed, but topped and tailed. For the record, other passing loops on the Cambrian coast line are Tywyn, Harlech and Porhtmadog. There is still a run round loop for loco hauled trains at the terminus at Pwllheli and also a stabling siding where DMU's can be stabled and re-fuelled.

The subject of push pulling working was touched upon the discussion. One of the 33;s that worked the tour was 33 103. This is one of the batch that were equipped for push pull working and could work in multiple with Southern Region electric units. (When the Bournemouth line was electrified in 1967, in order to continue to provide thru passenger services onward to Weymouth, the push pull 33;s would haul electric units to Weymouth and then pu***hem back - this saved time having to run round. This practice lasted until 1988 when the electrification was extended to Weymouth, It's success resulted in other applications of push pull working in Britain and Ireland).

I take it "top and tailing" means a locomotive on each end of a train? Surely, this train wouldn't require two locomotives to haul it?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Monday, May 8, 2006 1:12 PM
You are correct, the leading loco pulls both the train and the trailling loco until the train goes the other way then the situation is reversed.
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Tuesday, May 9, 2006 5:49 AM
Murphy - you're quite right about top tailing. Also strictly speaking a single class 33 would have been able to manage a train of 8 cars (that was there normal limit on the Southern Region.) However not only does having an extra loco provide insurance against breakdown - very important on the Cambrian line when the nearest other loco could be 200 miles away - but also means the train could go faster. We had quite a spirted run as I said. Although we left Birmingham NEw St over an hour late, the deficit had been cut to 40 minutes by Machynlleth. On the return leg both locos earned their keep on the 13 mile stretch from Machynlleth to Talerdigg summit which is a continous climb of 1 in 49 (or just over 2%).
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Tuesday, May 9, 2006 7:04 AM
Tulyar15: What kind of speeds are we talking about here? Not the 90mph that Cogload mentions, is it?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 9, 2006 8:41 AM
On the Cambrian Coast line you'd probably be travelling at around 50mph tops - certainly that's the line speed limit in the MSTS add-on and that's pretty well researched, so would seem a safe source. There are local limits of 40MPH or lower on occasion as well, though I don't think it's quite as bad as the 25MPH of the southern end of the Heart of Wales line...

I bet there were some impressive sound and smoke effects on the bank too - that's the one part of the line they reckoned the freight MUs might have trouble with on timber trains. First one went straight up fully laden and hauling the '37 that had been brought as backup!
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:55 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Railroading_Brit

On the Cambrian Coast line you'd probably be travelling at around 50mph tops - certainly that's the line speed limit in the MSTS add-on and that's pretty well researched, so would seem a safe source. There are local limits of 40MPH or lower on occasion as well, though I don't think it's quite as bad as the 25MPH of the southern end of the Heart of Wales line...


Really? I'm surprised at that as much of the Cambrian between Shrewsbury & Machynlleth was upgraded for 90 mph running when the class 158 DMU's were introduced on the line in the 1990's. I gather some bits of the coast have (or will) upgraded to this maxima as 158's are now the standard rolling stock used on all scheduled passenger trains on the Cambrian. Their introduction enabled the journey time to be cut by 20 minutes between Shrewsbury & Machynlleth and the same level of service to be operated with one less unit as compared with the 70mph class 153 and 156's that were previously used. I dont know what speed t he 33's got up to. Officially I think they're now limited to 75mph (their max speed in BR days was only ever 85mph) but it certainly felt like we were achieving those sorts of speeds.

A few years ago a Pathfinder Tour which started from Newtown, Powys and was hauled by Deltic #16 "Gordon Highlander" (sporting Porterbrook Purple!) was clocked at 95 between Welshpool and Shrewsbury. I was on that tour too and it was a good day out (to Carlisle via the S&C)

QUOTE: Originally posted by Railroading_Brit
I bet there were some impressive sound and smoke effects on the bank too - that's the one part of the line they reckoned the freight MUs might have trouble with on timber trains. First one went straight up fully laden and hauling the '37 that had been brought as backup!


Yes, it seemed like we reached the top of Talerdigg in no time at all!
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 732 posts
Posted by John Bakeer on Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:47 AM
Tulyar,
It appears that your Barmouth special did have two crews?
Unless there is some wonderous gadget that works via satellite and cardboard wireless?
The MSTS gives no clue about this.
John B.

John Baker

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:41 AM
Satellite?? It's the UK we're talking about,, more likely to be some Heath Robinson affair made of bailer twine, odd bits of wood and some sticky back plastic nicked from Blue Peter (the TV show, not the locomotive)
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Wednesday, May 10, 2006 4:57 PM
Not on the route you took but I seem to remember that the Dovey Junction-Aberystwyth section is pretty fast running and has been so for a while.

To go back to a question raised by Murphy - what can you see at 90? Think about being a passenger on the highway. The foreground detail is a little blurred but that's about the only distortion.

What do you want to see? Anything further than about 20 feet from the train is perfectly clear, it just goes past a bit faster.

One of the disadvantages of the new build high speed rail lines in Europe is that they're often in cuttings or tunnels, or have "sound walls" built around them which does restrict your vision but out of those areas it's perfectly possible to enjoy the scenery even at 186mph.
  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Bath, England, UK
  • 712 posts
Posted by Tulyar15 on Thursday, May 11, 2006 2:06 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by John Bakeer

Tulyar,
It appears that your Barmouth special did have two crews?
Unless there is some wonderous gadget that works via satellite and cardboard wireless?
John B.


I suspect you're right but can't say for sure. Just an aside, I think some of the Mk2 coaches used by Arriva and Wessex trains have been thru wired so that if you couple a "blue star" diesel loco at either end (eg Classes 31, 33 or 37) you can run the locos in multiple. The top and tail 31's used on the Bristol - Weymouth route last year were operated in this fashion I believe. (For the benefit of those not familiar with British locos, they are given a coloured symbol to indicate which other locos they can work in multiple with. Most of the classic diesel electrics are coded "Blue Star" whilst the newer heavy freight diesels - classes 56 and 58 are "Red Diamond". Not sure what code the EMD classes 66 and 67 are but they can multiple with each other).

As to the question of what you can see at 90mph, one of things we enjoyed seeing was our train overtaking cars on the adjacent road. Between Wolverhampton and Shrewsbury we overtook traffic on the M54 motorway and between Welshpool and Caersws (pronounc "Care -sous") we overtook cars on the parallel A road!
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:04 AM
Friend returned to the USA and reported that Ireland and Northern Ireland have both reversed rail curtailments and are now making improvements and even opening up closed lines. He was of course impressed with Dublin's two light rail lines and with the north-south suburban electrication. He noted that most locomotives in Ireland are double-cab EMD's, and the rest British Brush, reengined with EMD diesels. He was impressed with "Enterprise" Doublin-Balfast service and the eight-trains a day each way schedule. Commuter rail is strong in both cities and Belfast is also planning some ligh rail.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 732 posts
Posted by John Bakeer on Thursday, May 11, 2006 4:17 AM
The EMD deisels have 'Big Mac &/or KFC' compatibility symbols?!
John B.

John Baker

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 11, 2006 6:06 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Tulyar15



Really? I'm surprised at that as much of the Cambrian between Shrewsbury & Machynlleth was upgraded for 90 mph running when the class 158 DMU's were introduced on the line in the 1990's. I gather some bits of the coast have (or will) upgraded to this maxima as 158's are now the standard rolling stock used on all scheduled passenger trains on the Cambrian. Their introduction enabled the journey time to be cut by 20 minutes between Shrewsbury & Machynlleth and the same level of service to be operated with one less unit as compared with the 70mph class 153 and 156's that were previously used. I dont know what speed t he 33's got up to. Officially I think they're now limited to 75mph (their max speed in BR days was only ever 85mph) but it certainly felt like we were achieving those sorts of speeds.



Ah - I stand corrected! Guess the MSTS pack must be set during the '70s (it has the old Class 101 DMUs, which were my principle reason for buying it). I can say that you don't want to ride in a 153 at 70 for any length of time - had a run back from Shrewsbury on one that was running late, driver didn't lift off the power once until we got to the junction at Craven Arms. Very loud, very rough!
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: United Kingdom
  • 732 posts
Posted by John Bakeer on Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:48 AM
With SMTS t's possible to run any thing from a Shinkansen to a SD70 MAC on the Cambrian or S&C, but it'll run Wrong line. Though when I do, ERNI gets rhe hiccoughs and goes into a sulk.
John B.

John Baker

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 11, 2006 11:39 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Simon Reed
To go back to a question raised by Murphy - what can you see at 90? Think about being a passenger on the highway.

The only time I was a passenger in a car going 90, was with my wife driving.[:0]. I only recall my life flashing before me-no scenery.[;)]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Sulzerland, UK
  • 337 posts
Posted by Simon Reed on Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:13 PM
Dave - all IR and NIR locomotives are GM - there's been no British built locos in action since the Metropolitan-Vickers "A" class were withdrawn in 1997.

Murphy - travel on the Motorway (Interstate equivalent) in the UK. 90 is illegal but tame. My car is very comfortable at about 85 and that's probably about an average speed for cars.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:22 PM
Slightly off topic here but hey. Yesterday morning the Up "Hind" (0507 Penzance - London Paddington) encountered a shopping trolley/ goggle box set which had been placed on the line at Dolcoath and promptly knocked the air cocks out. That train stood for two hours. Crawled into Cogloads station at around 07:45 (booked to depart at 05:42!). Train terminated. Queue of trains behind to Penzance. Sent train back to Pigsarse (Long Rock). Then the points failed in reverse at the west end. The 06:01 arrival crawled in at around 08:40. The first train East was eventually sent on its way at 09:10.

As you may imagine, there was a hefty queue especially on an AB railway with rather long signal sections. Managed to eventually sit down at 11:30 ish and rant at the world.

Today, sun shining, workwent smoothly and have just been for a 4 mile walk along Penhale beach with the sun setting and a smooth late evening tide with enough to tempt the late evening surfers. Turn 180 and the moon was low in the early evening sky, bright as a button. All what was missing was female company. Moral of the story - your work does not have to follow you home and I am very lucky to live where I do.

Just thought I would share that.
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Thursday, May 11, 2006 3:42 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Simon Reed

Dave - all IR and NIR locomotives are GM - there's been no British built locos in action since the Metropolitan-Vickers "A" class were withdrawn in 1997.

Murphy - travel on the Motorway (Interstate equivalent) in the UK. 90 is illegal but tame. My car is very comfortable at about 85 and that's probably about an average speed for cars.

Ah yes, but you've never ridden with my wife.[:0]

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canada, eh!
  • 737 posts
Posted by Isambard on Thursday, May 11, 2006 6:21 PM
Cogload:
I speak some English and understand some Britspeak (my middle son and his new wife live in Southampton), however wrt "shopping trolley/ goggle box set ", what does "goggle box set" refer to??
[:)]

Isambard

Grizzly Northern history, Tales from the Grizzly and news on line at  isambard5935.blogspot.com 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Thursday, May 11, 2006 9:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Isambard

Cogload:
I speak some English and understand some Britspeak (my middle son and his new wife live in Southampton), however wrt "shopping trolley/ goggle box set ", what does "goggle box set" refer to??
[:)]


A TV
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy