Trains.com

Railroad says bad coupler caused accident

1021 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Railroad says bad coupler caused accident
Posted by dldance on Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:28 PM
Coupler caused accidents seem quite rare.

dd

=======================
Railroad says bad coupler caused accident

NEWS TRIBUNE


A bad coupler is believed to have been the cause of a train derailment that forced an evacuation in Solon Springs [MN] last month, according to Union Pacific Railroad officials.

A coupler malfunctioned, which forced 15 cars from the tracks April 14, said Gene Hinckler, a spokesman for Union Pacific Railroad.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, May 26, 2005 12:32 PM
Why not just say "train malfunctioned". Jeeze, is that all the details they provided. Makes me wonder why they even bothered saying that much.
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,537 posts
Posted by jchnhtfd on Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:28 PM
They are rather rare -- but, depending on just what part of the whole coupler assembly lands where -- can be quite catastrophic.
Jamie
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,276 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, May 26, 2005 8:06 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by dldance

Coupler caused accidents seem quite rare.

dd

=======================
Railroad says bad coupler caused accident

NEWS TRIBUNE


A bad coupler is believed to have been the cause of a train derailment that forced an evacuation in Solon Springs [MN] last month, according to Union Pacific Railroad officials.

A coupler malfunctioned, which forced 15 cars from the tracks April 14, said Gene Hinckler, a spokesman for Union Pacific Railroad.



If the above is the full text of the article, it is so cryptic as to convey virtually no information at all.

Reading between the lines, and paragraphs for that matter, I would expect they are trying to say that the train had a drawbar failure, where the drawbar was pulled out of a car, either because of train handling or because of mechanical failure, and the drawbar dropped to the track structure where it was struck by the wheels or brake rigging of one or more cars initiating the derailment of the 15 cars. While drawbar failure and resulting derailments are not common, they are not a once in a lifetime occurence either. The non-railroading public has no real understanding of the variety of 'coupler failures'....most of which do not cause derailments.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Southern Region now, UK
  • 820 posts
Posted by Hugh Jampton on Thursday, May 26, 2005 8:22 PM
BAD coupler,,, go to the naughty coner.....
Generally a lurker by nature

Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.

It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Upper Left Coast
  • 1,796 posts
Posted by kenneo on Friday, May 27, 2005 1:27 AM
Bad Coupler ... No Donut

I've seen derailments caused by lungers. Strange strange occurrances.
Eric
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Friday, May 27, 2005 8:07 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by jchnhtfd

They are rather rare -- but, depending on just what part of the whole coupler assembly lands where -- can be quite catastrophic.

Yea, if you yank out a drawbar, and it falls between the rails, it can cause all sorts of nasty events to happen.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Friday, May 27, 2005 9:27 AM
Chad: How much of the problem is just plain old the reporter's/media's fault? How much is due to over- simplification because the omitted simplification by the media who wouldn't know what a drawbar or draft gear is if it jumped up and bit them?

Surprised that UP did not have to resort to "train fall down,go boom" to get the point across to the media knucklehead and its sheltered readers who think of railroads as choo-choo's. [V][V][V]
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Friday, May 27, 2005 9:45 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mudchicken

Chad: How much of the problem is just plain old the reporter's/media's fault? How much is due to over- simplification because the omitted simplification by the media who wouldn't know what a drawbar or draft gear is if it jumped up and bit them?

Surprised that UP did not have to resort to "train fall down,go boom" to get the point across to the media knucklehead and its sheltered readers who think of railroads as choo-choo's. [V][V][V]


So true [(-D]
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Near Promentory UT
  • 1,590 posts
Posted by dldance on Friday, May 27, 2005 11:09 AM
guess we will have to wait a year or two for the NTSB report

dd
  • Member since
    April 2002
  • From: Northern Florida
  • 1,429 posts
Posted by SALfan on Friday, May 27, 2005 11:16 AM
"Train fall down, go boom". What a hoot!! Although some of the media types would find even that too complicated.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • 964 posts
Posted by TH&B on Friday, May 27, 2005 11:55 AM
Even the part of the general public that knows NOTHING at all about trains still they seem to know of the term "derailed", and know nothing else. Of coarse many see it only as a catastofic event with loss of life, but that is the one only railroad term some people know.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy