QUOTE: Originally posted by cbq9911a How about taking it from another angle - considering the components of BN: Burlington - Alive due to Powder River coal. Great Northern - Alive Northern Paciic - Dead Frisco - Don't Kmow SP&S - Dead as a company, but alive as a part of GN.
QUOTE: Originally posted by oltmannd Okay. Let me try: (1) Southern RR - survived. The CNO&TP plus growth in the south should have been enough to keep going (2) N&W RR - survived. COAL! plus Detroit (3) Conrail - A close call, but having North Jersey Intermodal franchise + growth in intermodal might have been just enough (4) L&N - survived, maybe in shrunken state - coal (5) Seaboard RR - with the ACL, probably survived. w/o maybe not. (6) C&O - with the B&O dead, w/o the B&O, maybe there is enough coal to balance out competitive disadvantage with N&W (7) ICG - belly up (8) Wisconsin Central - you mean the original SOO - probably belly up, or at least in a much smaller state (9) UP - they will never die, no matter how badly they screw up - great routes and markets (10) Mopac - live as long as they have the UP on the west end (11) Western Pacific - probably dead - bridge routes do poorly in dereg environment (12) Santa Fe - Intemodal franchise Chic - LA should be enough to keep them going (13) Southern Pacific - alive, but much shrunken. UP and ATSF eat them alive (14) Frisco - same as Mopac (15) BN - alive - can you say powder river (16) Chicago North Western - alive unless UP finds a better way from Omaha to Chic - which they just might (17) CN - alive (18) SOO - the old MILW - dead I didn't give this too much thought. Tell me where I'm all wet. I won't be offended!!!
QUOTE: Originally posted by spbed In the case of the UPRR/CNW you are aware that the UPRR was a large shareholder in the CN & W long before they merged? [:o)][:)][:p] Originally posted by gabe [ Their engines were yellow and green and their wheels went round and round too. In other words, so? [8D][:p][:D][:o)][:o)][:o)] Reply oltmannd Member sinceJanuary 2001 From: Atlanta 11,971 posts Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, May 5, 2005 2:41 PM Okay. Let me try: (1) Southern RR - survived. The CNO&TP plus growth in the south should have been enough to keep going (2) N&W RR - survived. COAL! plus Detroit (3) Conrail - A close call, but having North Jersey Intermodal franchise + growth in intermodal might have been just enough (4) L&N - survived, maybe in shrunken state - coal (5) Seaboard RR - with the ACL, probably survived. w/o maybe not. (6) C&O - with the B&O dead, w/o the B&O, maybe there is enough coal to balance out competitive disadvantage with N&W (7) ICG - belly up (8) Wisconsin Central - you mean the original SOO - probably belly up, or at least in a much smaller state (9) UP - they will never die, no matter how badly they screw up - great routes and markets (10) Mopac - live as long as they have the UP on the west end (11) Western Pacific - probably dead - bridge routes do poorly in dereg environment (12) Santa Fe - Intemodal franchise Chic - LA should be enough to keep them going (13) Southern Pacific - alive, but much shrunken. UP and ATSF eat them alive (14) Frisco - same as Mopac (15) BN - alive - can you say powder river (16) Chicago North Western - alive unless UP finds a better way from Omaha to Chic - which they just might (17) CN - alive (18) SOO - the old MILW - dead I didn't give this too much thought. Tell me where I'm all wet. I won't be offended!!! -Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/) Reply spbed Member sinceDecember 2001 From: Austin TX 4,941 posts Posted by spbed on Thursday, May 5, 2005 2:40 PM In the case of the UPRR/CNW you are aware that the UPRR was a large shareholder in the CN & W long before they merged? [:o)][:)][:p] Originally posted by gabe [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply gabe Member sinceMarch 2004 From: Indianapolis, Indiana 2,434 posts Mergers who would survive; who would not Posted by gabe on Thursday, May 5, 2005 2:14 PM Fairly regularly, people complain about the effects of the last 20 or so years of mergers. I have even been known to do it myself every now and then. My complaint is there are not enough regional railroad spinoffs after mergers and the resulting conglomerate is too large to effectively fight off entrepy and manage itself effectively--I would have no problems with mergers if there were more effective regional spinoffs. But anyway, just to show a balanced approach, I think we should reverse the question: which railroads would have survived had it not been for the mergers: (1) Southern RR (2) N&W RR (3) Conrail (4) L&N (5) Seaboard RR (6) C&O, B&O, and WM (7) ICG (8) Wisconsin Central (9) UP (10) Mopac (11) Western Pacific (12) Santa Fe (13) Southern Pacific (14) Frisco (15) BN (16) Chicago North Western (17) CN (18) SOO Of course, survival is a relative term. I am convinced that at least 4 of these railroads would not have lived to see 2006 under their own flag. But, then again, I don't see a lot of their track being pulled up in a bankruptcy liquidation. Gabe P.S. Because this is a complex question, I am posting another related thread--please read both if you are interested. Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Originally posted by gabe [
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
Originally posted by gabe [ Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub Reply gabe Member sinceMarch 2004 From: Indianapolis, Indiana 2,434 posts Mergers who would survive; who would not Posted by gabe on Thursday, May 5, 2005 2:14 PM Fairly regularly, people complain about the effects of the last 20 or so years of mergers. I have even been known to do it myself every now and then. My complaint is there are not enough regional railroad spinoffs after mergers and the resulting conglomerate is too large to effectively fight off entrepy and manage itself effectively--I would have no problems with mergers if there were more effective regional spinoffs. But anyway, just to show a balanced approach, I think we should reverse the question: which railroads would have survived had it not been for the mergers: (1) Southern RR (2) N&W RR (3) Conrail (4) L&N (5) Seaboard RR (6) C&O, B&O, and WM (7) ICG (8) Wisconsin Central (9) UP (10) Mopac (11) Western Pacific (12) Santa Fe (13) Southern Pacific (14) Frisco (15) BN (16) Chicago North Western (17) CN (18) SOO Of course, survival is a relative term. I am convinced that at least 4 of these railroads would not have lived to see 2006 under their own flag. But, then again, I don't see a lot of their track being pulled up in a bankruptcy liquidation. Gabe P.S. Because this is a complex question, I am posting another related thread--please read both if you are interested. Reply 12 Join our Community! Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account. Login » Register » Search the Community Newsletter Sign-Up By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy More great sites from Kalmbach Media Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy
Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR Austin TX Sub
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.