Trains.com

Cost per Car load. Dollars.

5327 views
31 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Cost per Car load. Dollars.
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 8:57 AM
Lets say I want to buy a car load of lumber from the UPRR. Just how much would the UPRR charge me for the cost of the shipment? Because one car load is a lot of lumber.
BNSFrailfan.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:03 AM
Go the this spot on the UPs web site http://c02.my.uprr.com/cdm/price_query.jas
Bob
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Austin TX
  • 4,941 posts
Posted by spbed on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:07 AM
1st thing when asking for a rate is from where to where? As a example Tacoma to Chicago. I think if you log on to the UPRR site there is way to get a rate also. [:o)][:D]


Originally posted by BNSF railfan.
[

Living nearby to MP 186 of the UPRR  Austin TX Sub

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: near Chicago
  • 937 posts
Posted by Chris30 on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:19 AM
BNSF fan... why are you interested in an entire carload of lumber??

CC
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:38 AM
You don't "buy a carload of lumber from the UP". The UP doesn't sell lumber. You buy a carload of lumber from Boise Cascade. The UP will charge you (or Boise Cascade) to ship it where ever.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 11:57 AM
The UP price inquiry site is cool. I've been checking out prices of various commodoties and routes. Interesting stuff.

And here's what it would cost to have a load of lumber shipped from Longview,Wa. to Blair,Nb.: $3,696.00-$4,944.00 Per Car
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:04 PM
Here are some avgs for NS

http://www.nscorp.com/nscorphtml/speech05/lip0427/lip0427.pdf

See page 9.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: near Chicago
  • 937 posts
Posted by Chris30 on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:12 PM
QUOTE: You don't "buy a carload of lumber from the UP". The UP doesn't sell lumber.


If you give the right price to the right person you just might be able too... if ya know what I mean[(-D]

CC
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 12:28 PM
Bob Wilcox:

Do ytou have any idea of how much traffic moves under tariff authority vs contract authority for rails these days? I doubt if you would know the exact percentage, but is it a large portion?

Do most of the large shippers (GM, Ford, etc.) move under contract?

thanks


ed
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Crozet, VA
  • 1,049 posts
Posted by bobwilcox on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 1:57 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by MP173

Bob Wilcox:

Do ytou have any idea of how much traffic moves under tariff authority vs contract authority for rails these days? I doubt if you would know the exact percentage, but is it a large portion?

Do most of the large shippers (GM, Ford, etc.) move under contract?

thanks


ed



It depends on the commodity. Things like autos and petrochemicals move on contracts(80%+). Food products and box car traffic such as lumber go mainly by tariff(80%). Western coal is in a transition from 100% contracts to 100%tariffs as contracts expire. A few large intermodal third parties have heritage contracts but the others use tariffs.

More and more tarffic will be moving on tariffs unless capital investments need to be protected.
Bob
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,010 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 2:37 PM
Wish my aunt had web access. She's now retired, but in her working days she would have made regular use of the type of inquiry Chad did - she worked for a wholesale lumber company. They bought and sold lumber by the car load. She'd be amazed (and her job would have been that much different).

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:10 PM
Just for the heck of it I got prices on a couple different routes for several commodities for side by side comparison

Prices between LA & Houston

lumber $4,066.00-$5,423.00 Per Car
scrap metal $4,207.00 Per Car
LPG $3,460.00-$4,151.00 Per Car
plastics $3,460.00-$4,151.00 Per Car
wheat $3,362.00 Per Car
catsup $3,340.00-$4,554.00 Per Car
oil $3,460.00-$4,730.00 Per Car
cement $2,238.00-$4,230.00 Per Car
gravel / balast $2,238.00-$3,475.00 Per Car


LA & Yuma

lumber $1,942.00-$2,428.00 Per Car
scrap metal $2,294.00 Per Car
LPG $1,908.00-$2,290.00 Per Car
plastics $1,908.00-$2,290.00 Per Car
wheat $1,427.00 Per Car
catsup $1,908.00-$3,041.00 Per Car
oil $1,908.00-$2,290.00 Per Car
cement $1,848.00-$2,661.00 Per Car
gravel / balast $1,848.00-$2,661.00 Per Car


I find it interesting how much scrap metal fetches. I also find it interesting how relativly little LPG and oil is. Also the wide differance between gravel & lumber. You could ship 2 loads of gravel for every lumber load.

I also noticed there are differences according to the kind of car used. The differance favoring the boxcar (not illustrated)
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:26 PM
No wounder why the Railroads are so FILTHY rich! wow.
If one car load costs that much,Id just hate to see what one 140 car loaded Coal Train would cost. It would be stagering.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:44 PM
A 100 car train carried 100 tons of coal/car between the PRB and Louisiana is around $180,000
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 7:24 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevarc

A 100 car train carried 100 tons of coal/car between the PRB and Louisiana is around $180,000
WOW!
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:08 PM
BNSF FAN

You are forgetting the capital cost of that train. Make the math easy, 100 cars at $60,000, $6,000,000. Three new units is another $6,000,000. Now add fuel, labor, track investment, and track maintenance and not much of that $180,000 gets into the stockholder's pockets.

Mac
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 9:19 PM
We own our trainsets.
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 10:45 PM
$180,000 x how many trips per year, 25 maybe? That's $4.5 million per year for the railroad gross. If the utility bought or leased their own cars, then all the railroad is paying for is rent for engines, labor, etc. The railroad has gotta be clearing one or two million annually with each captive coal utility, maybe half a million for utilities with some rail head to head competition. Yeah, I'd say those global investment firms are getting a decent share of what the ratepayers are forking over.
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Wednesday, April 27, 2005 10:46 PM
Chad:

Thanks for the freight charges. This is what I find most interesting these days on the rails. The LPG rates may be impacted somewhat by the fact that tank cars are not railroad supplied, but owned/leased by shippers.

I wonder why the high rate for lumber. Perhaps it is due to specialized nature of the cars, but doubt it.

Take a look at most of the rates and you see the value of the commodity drives the freight charges...as it should. Lower valued products tend to stay close to the point of manufacture or distribution. I seriously doubt if many cars of scrap metal move at $4200 per car. Mostly I would think those would move within a few hundred miles.

I took advantage of light work schedule, good weather, and four CN eastbounds stacked up to go train watching. The revenue generated on these trains had to have been staggering.

For instance...CN 396 (Memphis - Toronto) had 152 cars. Many of those cars were tank cars. Most were loads. Highly rated freight moving long distances. CN 398 off of the UP had 89 cars ( powered by a WC SD45 btw) and CN394 from the BNSF only had 86 cars. Throw in 708 with 120 loads of PR Coal from the UP and there was some serious coin in the cash register today.

All in all, a very enjoyable two hours.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:48 AM
We get 3 to 4 trains a week. During turnarounds we do not get coal, so figure about 168 trians a year. And as I have stated before, we are a captive facility.

Studies show that if we had competitive shipping, we could save over $14+million a year.

There is also a price saving for using aluminum cars - about $0.50-0.60/ton

A few hard numbers from other cases that are a matter of public record.

Hugo Power Plant in Olkahoma - their price AFTER doing a buildout went from $1.5/mmbtu to $1/mmbtu

Houston Power & Light had a drop of about the same size when they did a buildout.
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:06 AM
Kevin,
By buildout you mean building a spur from a competing railroad to the plant, Right?
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:21 AM
yes

Studies have shown I we build one, which includes a major bridge over a navigatable river, we could recover the costs in less than 5 years.
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:29 AM
5 years seems like a lot. How many miles do you have to build? And how much is the bridge estimated to cost?
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: Atlanta
  • 11,971 posts
Posted by oltmannd on Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:36 AM
Five years payback IS a long time. The internal rate of return hurdle for Conrail in the mid 1990s was roughly 30% which is roughly a 3 year payback. DIscretionary projects with longer rates of return didn't get done.

-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • 4,115 posts
Posted by tatans on Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:14 AM
Very interesting subject and superb answers, so when you go to pick up your brand new cadillac SUV, check the freight charges now that you know what it costs to ship a freight car, that will surprise your car dealer.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:51 AM
Autorack rates are not available on UPs price site. That is one of the things I was interested in. I guess most auto transportation prices are on a contract basis so there is no need. The same goes for coal rates but kevin has done a good job of informing us on that.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Thursday, April 28, 2005 1:12 PM
The payback period varies on the costs and the savings from the lower cost of transportation. The low end is 3.5 years with a high end of 6 years. I just picked a conservative value.

It would be about a 10 mile line and the cost would be around $46 million
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:23 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by MP173

Chad:

I wonder why the high rate for lumber. Perhaps it is due to specialized nature of the cars, but doubt it.

Take a look at most of the rates and you see the value of the commodity drives the freight charges...as it should. Lower valued products tend to stay close to the point of manufacture or distribution. I seriously doubt if many cars of scrap metal move at $4200 per car. Mostly I would think those would move within a few hundred miles.


I asked a local scrap shipper in Lewiston Idaho where they send their gondolas of scrap metal (about 10 a week). He stated they send all of it to the Deep South. That's a couple a thousand miles. I also have a friend that works in the timber industry. They currently send a good portion of their lumber loads to the Midwest and East Coast. Another couple a thousand miles. It is interesting to note that the local shortline railroad has competitive rate setting from both UP and BNSF. I wonder how much that plays into the longer hauls?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:34 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by kevarc

We get 3 to 4 trains a week. During turnarounds we do not get coal, so figure about 168 trians a year. And as I have stated before, we are a captive facility.

Studies show that if we had competitive shipping, we could save over $14+million a year.

There is also a price saving for using aluminum cars - about $0.50-0.60/ton

A few hard numbers from other cases that are a matter of public record.

Hugo Power Plant in Olkahoma - their price AFTER doing a buildout went from $1.5/mmbtu to $1/mmbtu

Houston Power & Light had a drop of about the same size when they did a buildout.


I was part of a lobbying effort by a local economic development agency here in North Central Idaho trying to get one of the proposed coal fired power plant proponents to locate up here instead of in Southern Idaho. I pointed out that the rail rates to get the coal to a plant located in Southern Idaho (served only by UP) would be close to twice the rate of locating here in North Central Idaho where we are served by shortline proxy by both UP and BNSF. The one drawback of course is the transmission bottleneck between the upper PNW and California (the intended market), whereas there is much more available transmission capacity running from Southern Idaho to California. The one thing I could not answer (and perhaps you could) is, would the savings from having competitive rail rates outweight the cost of upgrading transmission? If we're talking $15 million a year in savings by having competitive rail rates, wouldn't that make up for the enterprise's share of upgrading the BPA lines running south?
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Richland WA
  • 361 posts
Posted by kevarc on Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:09 PM
To be honest, I don't know.

I'll ask around at work and see if I can get an idea.
Kevin Arceneaux Mining Engineer, Penn State 1979

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy