Trains.com

Erie proposed 4-10-4

2556 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 187 posts
Erie proposed 4-10-4
Posted by IA and eastern on Wednesday, January 5, 2022 4:30 PM

Erie proposed a 4-10-4 locomotive. Is there any drawings or any info on this locomotive? Gary

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Wednesday, January 5, 2022 4:37 PM

You asked this already; as I recall, it was a 2-10-4 and the detail proposal was in 1929.

The former thread on this documented the actual source.

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 187 posts
Posted by IA and eastern on Wednesday, January 5, 2022 8:32 PM

this locomotive was proposed as talks between Erie and Lima around 1942. Gary

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, January 6, 2022 3:56 PM

That would be interesting - that would likely be a 'wartime engine' like the PRR Q2, and I'd expect the WPB to be a big part of the reason they weren't built then.

What might be interesting is whether Erie got its FTs in place of 4-10-4s...

Erie being the high-wide go-to in the WWII Northeast might make large, comparatively fast road power more of a priority.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,024 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, January 6, 2022 4:32 PM

While drawings are a possibility, I would surmise that the discussions involved how to adapt a current design into the desired locomotive.  Santa Fe was using a 2-10-2.  Adding another axle to the pony and trailing trucks would not have been a serious challenge.

 

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2016
  • 2,631 posts
Posted by Backshop on Thursday, January 6, 2022 6:21 PM

IA and eastern

this locomotive was proposed as talks between Erie and Lima around 1942. Gary

 

It sounds like you know more about it than the rest of us.  What other information do you have?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, January 6, 2022 8:11 PM

IA and eastern
this locomotive was proposed as talks between Erie and Lima around 1942. Gary

Any and Everything proposed in 1942 and later would have had to have had War Production Board authority to proceed.  The WPB made their decisions based on available resources and existing designs to minimize everything necessary to get the requested power on the rail and hauling freight.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    June 2002
  • 20,096 posts
Posted by daveklepper on Sunday, January 9, 2022 4:53 AM

The logical starting point for the design of a Lima - Erie 4-10-4 would be the 2-10=4s built for the C&O and PRR.

Would be a terrific dual-service locomotive, if drvers were 69" or 70" or larger, with good counter-balancing.  Probably highest HP for any two-cylinder locomotive.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, January 18, 2022 7:29 PM

I couldn't find any reference to a 4-10-4 in Hirsimaki's book. There was of course a lot of data about the proposed 4-8-6 and the possible conversion of an NYC 4-6-4 to the double Belpaire firebox.

There was a drawing of a 4-10-6 proposed to T&P instead of their final order for 2-10-4s, but this was much earlier than the 4-10-4 mentioned.

Peter

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • 2,678 posts
Posted by kgbw49 on Tuesday, January 18, 2022 8:37 PM

Erie being the high wide railroad could have easily accomodated a variation of the Santa Fe 74-inch-drivered 2-10-4 5001 class first constructed in 1938 in both coal-fired and oil-fired versions.

Equally at home on fast freight and the occasional varnish as needed, they would almost certainly have given a good account of themselves on the Erie during WWII.

https://donsdepot.donrossgroup.net/dr0901/bl426.jpg

https://donsdepot.donrossgroup.net/dr1401/atsf5007a.jpg

https://donsdepot.donrossgroup.net/dr1005/atsf5010.jpg

https://donsdepot.donrossgroup.net/dr1005/atsf5010a.jpg

https://oscalekings.org/gary_shrader/atsf_5001/images/gs08_proto_5008.jpg

https://oscalekings.org/gary_shrader/atsf_5001/images/gs08_proto_5001.jpg

https://oscalekings.org/gary_shrader/atsf_5001/images/gs08_proto_5006.jpg

https://www.railarchive.net/randomsteam/atsf5004.htm

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy