Trains.com

Redeployment or One-Person Crews?

10461 views
134 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, May 20, 2021 2:01 PM

Euclid
No, I think AI is overpromised. 

That's what an AI would say!  We're onto you Euclid2000!  

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Sterling Heights, Michigan
  • 1,691 posts
Posted by SD60MAC9500 on Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:56 PM
 

Euclid

 

So U.P. plans on one ground roving conductor in charge of several autonomous trains with no human engineers.  This will abruptly end the era of monster trains and their broken knuckles, which will be good news to the roving conductors.  This will be the ultimate solution to the war between labor and management over crew size.  It will also be the ultimate solution to the crew fatigue problem by allowing the roving conductors to rove closer to home, so they can sleep at home every night.  It will also usher in the era of short, fast, and frequent trains with their agility and flexibility to live up to the true implication of Precision Scheduled Railroading.  Finally all the pieces fall into place. 

 

 

No it won't. Trains size will not be reduced under automonous operation. Even with a "crewless" train you'll want to keep economies of scale in your favor to remain in competition..

 
Rahhhhhhhhh!!!!
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:50 PM

zugmann
What cracks me up is the whole "this will solve crew fatigue problem!".  Yeah, for the conductor.  What about the guy actually running the train? He's still goign to the flea bag hotel, is on call, etc....

Why does the engineer have to be on the train?  He/she could be remote.  

Just log on from home at say, 7:00 AM.  Do whatever needs to be done until 3:00 PM and then pass off the work to the next shift.  

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Posted by charlie hebdo on Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:22 PM

You all realize this is not just some visionary plan from OM or some other guy who can look to the future.  These notions are plans from our largest railroad.  Good for customers,  good for the railroads; early retirement for operating crews.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:16 PM

zugmann
 
Euclid
Yes, just like the new diesel-electric locomotives.  "They may be okay for yard switching, but not for pulling trains on the mainline."

 

I mean, there's AI bots for posting to forums.  We aren't even needed. 

Although sometimes I wonder if you aren't a AI bot.  The Euclid2000.. increase forum participation with this one trick!

 

No, I think AI is overpromised.  And I don't want to go to Mars. 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:09 PM

Euclid
Yes, just like the new diesel-electric locomotives.  "They may be okay for yard switching, but not for pulling trains on the mainline."

I mean, there's AI bots for posting to forums.  We aren't even needed. 

Although sometimes I wonder if you aren't a AI bot.  The Euclid2000.. increase forum participation with this one trick!

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    April 2020
  • 99 posts
Posted by ttrraaffiicc on Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:09 PM

My opinion is that railroads are facing an existential threat right now from autonmous trucks. They had better start trying new things. Therefore, I welcome experimentation with one man crews.

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:03 PM

zugmann
 
Euclid
It sounds like the bridge has already been bought by U.P.

 

Yeah, and we wer going to have flying cars and nuclear power would give us "energy too cheap to meter". People like believing in stories. 

 

Yes, just like the new diesel-electric locomotives.  "They may be okay for yard switching, but not for pulling trains on the mainline."

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, May 20, 2021 12:24 PM

Euclid
It sounds like the bridge has already been bought by U.P.

Yeah, and we wer going to have flying cars and nuclear power would give us "energy too cheap to meter". People like believing in stories. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, May 20, 2021 11:58 AM

zugmann

I have a bridge to sell you. 

 

It sounds like the bridge has already been bought by U.P.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, May 20, 2021 11:40 AM

I have a bridge to sell you. 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, May 20, 2021 11:34 AM

zugmann

 

What cracks me up is the whole "this will solve crew fatigue problem!".  Yeah, for the conductor.  What about the guy actually running the train? He's still goign to the flea bag hotel, is on call, etc....

 

I am referring to the U.P.  They say they will move to autonomous trains and roving conductors.  So there won’t be any engineers to be away from home and staying in hotels.  No more hotels, and no more fatigue.  Just one conductor on the ground managing several nimble, tiny trains.

 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, May 20, 2021 10:00 AM

You forgot the "/s"

What cracks me up is the whole "this will solve crew fatigue problem!".  Yeah, for the conductor.  What about the guy actually running the train? He's still goign to the flea bag hotel, is on call, etc....

I mean, I hope these roving utilities are figured in future contract so we with more seniority get first crack at them. 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Thursday, May 20, 2021 9:57 AM

 

So U.P. plans on one ground roving conductor in charge of several autonomous trains with no human engineers.  This will abruptly end the era of monster trains and their broken knuckles, which will be good news to the roving conductors.  This will be the ultimate solution to the war between labor and management over crew size.  It will also be the ultimate solution to the crew fatigue problem by allowing the roving conductors to rove closer to home, so they can sleep at home every night.  It will also usher in the era of short, fast, and frequent trains with their agility and flexibility to live up to the true implication of Precision Scheduled Railroading.  Finally all the pieces fall into place. 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, May 20, 2021 9:17 AM

Quote from the article that mirrors many comments from the real railroaders here:

“Carriers’ visions of one-person crews provide no solution to the shortcomings of technologies such as Positive Train Control and Trip Optimizer/Leader or to the business practices the Class I’s have largely chosen to pursue,” Ferguson [of the union] says.

Be interesting to see the practical logistics involved in the 'superconductor' position.  Bet a few of the management types have been eagerly following the Gravity belt developments!  Can it be long before there are handholds atop the cab for arriving conductors, right next to the drone garages?

Well, we've wanted that future since Commander Cody days, so I suppose we shouldn't complain when it's shoved at us...

  • Member since
    September 2017
  • 5,636 posts
Redeployment or One-Person Crews?
Posted by charlie hebdo on Thursday, May 20, 2021 9:07 AM

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy