Trains.com

Here comes the latest e-mail blast request!

3350 views
33 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,901 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:19 PM

These issues mostly predate the PSR movement.  If PSR went away, these issues would still remain.

The first is forced reciprocal switching.  Allowing railroad B access to all of railroad A's customers at a point where the two connect, plus a zone extending for a certain length in all directions from where they connect.  And the same access for railroad A to railroad B's customers.  I think the proposal is 30 miles, although some want it everywhere.  Discussed here over the years as Open Access.

I'm not sure about the second item, deregulating certain catagories of freight.  The railroads were partially deregulated with the Staggers Act.  The STB maintains some oversight, one would think total deegulation would be something they want.  I'm missing something, but it's possible that the dereg proposal may transfer some of that oversight from the STB to some other Federal agency.  One that might be less favorable to the railroads.

The third is allowing the STB to set rates.  Reregulation.

Some or all of the provisions are favored by shipper's groups, especially those made up of large shippers/receivers who would have a hard time (expensive) converting to nonrail transportation.  

Jeff 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Thursday, December 5, 2019 11:43 AM

Overmod
Personally I think efforts like this are, if anything, counterproductive.

Oh, I don't know....sometimes I wish that back when I was in highschool someone had taken me aside and opened my eyes to the lucrative world of influence peddling. Of course back then we had no way of foreseeing the internet ....but the whole idea of selling someone a shoulder to cry on just never even occurred to me, little naive me....

  • Member since
    January 2019
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 9,728 posts
Posted by Flintlock76 on Thursday, December 5, 2019 8:25 AM

I have to admit I've never read Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations," but isn't there a passage in the book where Smith says (in so many words) that if you're in business, and you foul-up big-time you deserve all the trouble you get?  

And don't expect others to pull your fat out of the fire like it's a right? 

  • Member since
    May 2019
  • 1,768 posts
Posted by MMLDelete on Thursday, December 5, 2019 8:04 AM

OM, could you explain briefly what what the three STB proposals are?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Here comes the latest e-mail blast request!
Posted by Overmod on Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:30 AM

In my e-mail this evening comes a request from the National Railroad Construction and Maintenance Association, asking me to e-mail my Congresscritters about the STB hearing on the 12th.

Official page is here.  Don't you just love PACs that keep PSR-laden railroads from the consequences of their ongoing 'choices'?

Knock yourself out modifying the ridiculous boilerplate if you like.  Personally I think efforts like this are, if anything, counterproductive.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy