Wow! A story that points out that it's not the railroad's fault!
The last two lines of the story:
And ultimately, that's not the fault of the train. It's the fault of the individual who thought he or she could beat it.
And ultimately, that's not the fault of the train.
It's the fault of the individual who thought he or she could beat it.
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
Story with video of a collision with a bicycle rider
https://www.tcpalm.com/story/opinion/editorials/2018/01/29/if-you-dash-front-train-and-get-killed-how-trains-fault-trending/1074296001/
Interesting! Thank you gentlemen!
BaltACD is right. The lightning bolt indecates the high-voltage catenary above the tracks.
On steam locomotives the lightning bolt is a last warning for the personnel not to climb too high on the locomotive in case it is parked beneath a life catenary. The headlight voltage is only 24 V.Regards, Volker
Firelock76Volker, I'm curious. What's the meaning of that lightning bolt symbol on the crossbucks? I've also seen it on photos of German steam locomotives.
Looks like the lightning bolts indicate that there is overhead electrical catenary at the crossing. Not the concern of anyone driving over the crossing - UNLESS they have a very high load, or there is an accident at the crossing and cranes need to be used.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Volker, I'm curious. What's the meaning of that lightning bolt symbol on the crossbucks? I've also seen it on photos of German steam locomotives.
54light15In the U.K. and everywhere on the continent of Europe, crossing gates are on both sides of the road. You can't drive around them.
That is not true at least for Germany. We have almoat everything:http://www.bahnbilder.de/1024/fussgaenger-autofahrer-muessen-warten-bis-567542.jpg
https://bauprojekte.deutschebahn.com/media/projects/4782/gallery/verden-rotenburg-estw-bahnuebergang.jpg
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/v6lfyBbI3SI/maxresdefault.jpg
https://cache.pressmailing.net/thumbnail/story_big/3a4ea012-831c-4a16-85c8-e211cdfeb46e/bpol-ks-gueterzug-erfasst-pkw-rentnerin-leicht-verletzt
For speeds above 100 mph grade crossings are not allowed.Regards, Volker
A strange twist happened in PHX. az this morning usually a train strikes a car. Not this morning, a car struck a train in Gilbert Az. at the crossing. Our talented "Newsies"said the car hit the side of the engine. OKthat was all that was said The car caught fire and driver died. Must have been nobody important. No report on 6PM news. Maybe on the 9PM news along with the 60 mi. car chase in Phx. 2 cars destroyed ,no one killed. Said driver has a loong rap sheet. Such as life in east Phx. At no time were police injured.
Y6bs evergreen in my mind
54light15 In the U.K. and everywhere on the continent of Europe, crossing gates are on both sides of the road. You can't drive around them. Why isn't that done here?
In the U.K. and everywhere on the continent of Europe, crossing gates are on both sides of the road. You can't drive around them. Why isn't that done here?
$$$$$$
Crossings that have proven to be a problem may well have four-quadrant gates. Generally speaking, they are a requirement for the establishment quiet zones.
But there are still crossings across the country that only have flashing lights, not to mention those with only crossbucks.
If a municipality wants to upgrade a crossing, the cost is on them. Many aren't willing to spend the cash.
And, there is the ROI. Spending tens of thousands of dollars to upgrade a crossing that sees only a train or two per day and hasn't had a collision in forever isn't very high on the list.
Johnny
BaltACD Deggesty dubch87 This is the same state that has road signs that say "HILL BLOCKS VIEW". I laughed for five miles after passing those signs. If this refers to insufficient distance to see if it is safe to pass, the solid and dashed center lines in other states have worked rather well in the past; is there something different about Florida hills? I have not driven in Florida in going on four years, and did not notice any such difficulty the last time I did so. The signs appear on US 301 near Hawthorne - a divided highway - where passing is permitted. Suspect they are trying to warn that there MAY be a traffic condition over the crest you can't see.
Deggesty dubch87 This is the same state that has road signs that say "HILL BLOCKS VIEW". I laughed for five miles after passing those signs. If this refers to insufficient distance to see if it is safe to pass, the solid and dashed center lines in other states have worked rather well in the past; is there something different about Florida hills? I have not driven in Florida in going on four years, and did not notice any such difficulty the last time I did so.
dubch87 This is the same state that has road signs that say "HILL BLOCKS VIEW". I laughed for five miles after passing those signs.
This is the same state that has road signs that say "HILL BLOCKS VIEW". I laughed for five miles after passing those signs.
If this refers to insufficient distance to see if it is safe to pass, the solid and dashed center lines in other states have worked rather well in the past; is there something different about Florida hills? I have not driven in Florida in going on four years, and did not notice any such difficulty the last time I did so.
The signs appear on US 301 near Hawthorne - a divided highway - where passing is permitted. Suspect they are trying to warn that there MAY be a traffic condition over the crest you can't see.
The "hills" are actually embankments leading up to bridges over CSX tracks. The signs are on both the north and southbound sides. There aren't traffic signals on either side, or any other reasons for traffic to be stopped as you come over the crest. The sight distances aren't even cut that much.
Overmod BaltACD Ask the Mayor of Darby, PA how that turned out when she tried blocking the Main Street crossing with CSX in her town with a city vehicle. If that's Paula Brown, the "Tasmanian Devil of Delaware County politics", it actually turned out fairly well ... except for CSX. Here is a story with context which I have to post because a Google search on Darby will likely only produce thousands of pages of the SEPTA wreck. Note the general expressed dislike of CSX, even then. As recently as last year, Paula was trying to get back into office (!) running as a write-in Republican.
BaltACD Ask the Mayor of Darby, PA how that turned out when she tried blocking the Main Street crossing with CSX in her town with a city vehicle.
If that's Paula Brown, the "Tasmanian Devil of Delaware County politics", it actually turned out fairly well ... except for CSX.
Here is a story with context
which I have to post because a Google search on Darby will likely only produce thousands of pages of the SEPTA wreck. Note the general expressed dislike of CSX, even then.
As recently as last year, Paula was trying to get back into office (!) running as a write-in Republican.
She is still out of office.
BaltACDAsk the Mayor of Darby, PA how that turned out when she tried blocking the Main Street crossing with CSX in her town with a city vehicle.
Ask the Mayor of Darby, PA how that turned out when she tried blocking the Main Street crossing with CSX in her town with a city vehicle.
benJust remember that this is the state where this had to happen.
Always amusing to see people who don't quite get it.
Larry,
BTDT, mostly on the Gold Wing. Southern Ontario is a great place to visit and Ontarians are most accomodating. It didn't hurt that Vicki and I chose Zeddy Bear as our mascot that rode on the trunk of our bike. Zeddy was, at the time a bit of a national mascot even though he was an advertising medium for Zeller's Department Store.
With a Michigan License plate on the back and Zeddy on the trunk we did get a lot of thumbs up from Ontario motorists. It was in the nineties but those were fun days. Our usual destination was Stratford and the Shakestpear festival.
We met some real good folks on those rides. Canadians are definitly good people.
Norm
I grew up in SE MI, where the Alpine Valley ski area actually added to the top of their ski hill, quite visibly. But there are plenty of hills in SE MI.
Our local trips on the railroad involve a difference of some 200'...
Southwest Ontario, though, is flat as a board. Driving between London and Windsor on the "401," about the highest points are, indeed, the freeway overpasses.
SALfan Obviously you've never been to the Big Bend or the Panhandle. Highest point in FL is around 500 feel above sea level.
Obviously you've never been to the Big Bend or the Panhandle. Highest point in FL is around 500 feel above sea level.
According to wackypedia, the highest point in Florida is 345' msl. In comparison, I'm sitting at about 330' msl and am 6,000' from the Pacific ocean.
SALfan BaltACD blhanel I didn't know there were hills in Florida... The hills of Florida - Interstate overpasses and refuse dumps - refuse dumps are probably the highest 'natural' features on the Florida landscape. Obviously you've never been to the Big Bend or the Panhandle. Highest point in FL is around 500 feel above sea level.
BaltACD blhanel I didn't know there were hills in Florida... The hills of Florida - Interstate overpasses and refuse dumps - refuse dumps are probably the highest 'natural' features on the Florida landscape.
blhanel I didn't know there were hills in Florida...
The hills of Florida - Interstate overpasses and refuse dumps - refuse dumps are probably the highest 'natural' features on the Florida landscape.
The refuse mountains in S. Florida are about 400 feet at present and growing daily.
No I haven't been to the Big Bend area. Just know that the CSX tonnage ratings for the Red Level Jct. coal trains were not indicative of 'mountain railroading'.
blhanelI didn't know there were hills in Florida...
Now, was this a warning for the benefit of people who had moved in from the cold country and had never had the experience of being in a hurricane? I was born in Florida, but grew up in the Up Country of South Carolina (there are hills and curves there).
As to hill warning signs, I have seen many a sign indicating that you shoulld not pass--which, to me, is far more sensible than the signs warning of the effect of hills on the range of vision.
I didn't know there were hills in Florida...
Brian (IA) http://blhanel.rrpicturearchives.net.
DeggestyIf this refers to insufficient distance to see if it is safe to pass, the solid and dashed center lines in other states have worked rather well in the past;
New York adopted a yellow triangular sign that goes on the left side of the road. It, too, indicates that it's unsafe to pass, and is paired with a black and white sign indicating "No Passing Zone."
Given that there are conditions where you simply can't make out the stripes, they really aren't a bad idea.
Just remember that this is the state where this had to happen.
Euclid Euclid samfp1943 Sometime back, around here there was a YouTube video of a Chicago Metra station that had three tracks through the station; the outer tracks were each on platforms and the center track was a 'passing track'. At at least one end of the station there was a pedestrian crosswalk across all three tracks. It of course had the appropriate warning signs about 'watching for the trains'. I think i remember that the scenario was computers racing to cross the tracks to get to the parking lot after deboarding from their commuter train, and failed to see the express, at speed on the center track, and the result was at least one pedestrian was hit by that express train. It seems that distraction may have played a role in that accident. The back story I read said that the woman was walking with her lawyer who was representing her in a divorce. They were walking to meet her husband for a meeting between the three of them. Their view was blocked by other standing trains, so they may have assumed that the crossing signals were activated for those standing trains. When they heard a train horn, the lawyer walked faster to get across ahead of the train, even though the train was not yet within his sight. The woman, seemingly in reaction to her lawyer, also speeded up her walking. So both of them appeard to intend to beat the train. Since the lawyer had sped up his walking first, he pulled ahead of the woman, so when she saw this, she walked even faster to catch up with him and not be left behind by being cut off by the train. The lawyer was taller than the woman and nearer to the approaching train, so it seemed like she may just have deferred to his judgment in beating the train, and did not feel it was necessary for her to look and verify that they could make it. She seemed to be focused only on walking fast to keep up with her lawyer. At the last instant, they passed the standing cars, and the lawyer saw the approaching train coming very fast. He realsized they could not make it, so he abruptly stopped in his tracks. But the woman apparently did not look and verify the danger like the lawyer did. So she kept going and stepped right into the path of the train and was killed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZYDc_yR0qA
Euclid samfp1943 Sometime back, around here there was a YouTube video of a Chicago Metra station that had three tracks through the station; the outer tracks were each on platforms and the center track was a 'passing track'. At at least one end of the station there was a pedestrian crosswalk across all three tracks. It of course had the appropriate warning signs about 'watching for the trains'. I think i remember that the scenario was computers racing to cross the tracks to get to the parking lot after deboarding from their commuter train, and failed to see the express, at speed on the center track, and the result was at least one pedestrian was hit by that express train. It seems that distraction may have played a role in that accident. The back story I read said that the woman was walking with her lawyer who was representing her in a divorce. They were walking to meet her husband for a meeting between the three of them. Their view was blocked by other standing trains, so they may have assumed that the crossing signals were activated for those standing trains. When they heard a train horn, the lawyer walked faster to get across ahead of the train, even though the train was not yet within his sight. The woman, seemingly in reaction to her lawyer, also speeded up her walking. So both of them appeard to intend to beat the train. Since the lawyer had sped up his walking first, he pulled ahead of the woman, so when she saw this, she walked even faster to catch up with him and not be left behind by being cut off by the train. The lawyer was taller than the woman and nearer to the approaching train, so it seemed like she may just have deferred to his judgment in beating the train, and did not feel it was necessary for her to look and verify that they could make it. She seemed to be focused only on walking fast to keep up with her lawyer. At the last instant, they passed the standing cars, and the lawyer saw the approaching train coming very fast. He realsized they could not make it, so he abruptly stopped in his tracks. But the woman apparently did not look and verify the danger like the lawyer did. So she kept going and stepped right into the path of the train and was killed.
samfp1943 Sometime back, around here there was a YouTube video of a Chicago Metra station that had three tracks through the station; the outer tracks were each on platforms and the center track was a 'passing track'. At at least one end of the station there was a pedestrian crosswalk across all three tracks. It of course had the appropriate warning signs about 'watching for the trains'. I think i remember that the scenario was computers racing to cross the tracks to get to the parking lot after deboarding from their commuter train, and failed to see the express, at speed on the center track, and the result was at least one pedestrian was hit by that express train.
It seems that distraction may have played a role in that accident. The back story I read said that the woman was walking with her lawyer who was representing her in a divorce. They were walking to meet her husband for a meeting between the three of them. Their view was blocked by other standing trains, so they may have assumed that the crossing signals were activated for those standing trains.
When they heard a train horn, the lawyer walked faster to get across ahead of the train, even though the train was not yet within his sight. The woman, seemingly in reaction to her lawyer, also speeded up her walking. So both of them appeard to intend to beat the train. Since the lawyer had sped up his walking first, he pulled ahead of the woman, so when she saw this, she walked even faster to catch up with him and not be left behind by being cut off by the train.
The lawyer was taller than the woman and nearer to the approaching train, so it seemed like she may just have deferred to his judgment in beating the train, and did not feel it was necessary for her to look and verify that they could make it. She seemed to be focused only on walking fast to keep up with her lawyer.
At the last instant, they passed the standing cars, and the lawyer saw the approaching train coming very fast. He realsized they could not make it, so he abruptly stopped in his tracks. But the woman apparently did not look and verify the danger like the lawyer did. So she kept going and stepped right into the path of the train and was killed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZYDc_yR0qA
If that's the video I think it is, and since it's a You Tube "sign in" video it probably is, I've seen it once before and really don't want to see it again. The woman takes off like a drop-kicked football when the train hits her. Not pleasant.
It might do some good if the general public could see it, maybe it would wise some people up just a little.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.