Back in the day, when I was a kid at UCSB, sugar beet trains were a staple on the Coast Line. (That and autoracks serving the plant at Fremont.) I don't remember which way they went loaded. But this suggests they were grown somewhere north of Santa Barbara.
John Bishop
J. Bishop Back in the day, when I was a kid at UCSB, sugar beet trains were a staple on the Coast Line. (That and autoracks serving the plant at Fremont.) I don't remember which way they went loaded. But this suggests they were grown somewhere north of Santa Barbara. John Bishop
Sugar beets were (and may still be) a staple on the Santa Maria Valley.
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
As we wander around here can we get back to the specifics of the UP intermodal proposal in Phoenix. My initial analysis, derived from UP's unspecific description of it's operation is unclear. Can anyone with UP connections get them to furnish a map showing how they will move the containers within the City.
diningcar <SNIP> Can anyone with UP connections get them to furnish a map showing how they will move the containers within the City.
<SNIP>
Can anyone with UP connections get them to furnish a map showing how they will move the containers within the City.
diningcar:
May I suggest the reason things are ‘not clear’ is because UP might not want things to be clear! It should be remembered that UP bought, according to a TRAINS newswire some months ago, as I recall a 10% interest in an autonomous firm. Of course UP would be ‘unclear’ about something like that, because if UP got the wrath of labor, labor could destroy UP politically and shareholder-wise. Obviously, this all is only theory, but I think you will agree that there is a very strong possibly that that may be the way things are!
Fred M. Cain made a valid point, that this thread is about the West Pheonix Line. However, if UP had autonomous trucks delivering containers, that could very well put a death stroke to ever reopening the West Phoenix Line.
Fred M. Cain and Super Hope for the West Phoenix Line
Much of Union Pacific’s ex-Southern Pacific West Phoenix Line is mothballed and basically without hope. However, rebuilding that line to a wondrous two-track commuter route is not as crazy as one would think! Two examples are given, both in Southern California.
First, Santa Fe’s old Super Chief Route though Pasadena. That line was rebuilt to a wondrous electrified two-track commuter line, and is being extended to Pomona, and eventually then even further to Montclair. Ridership is great! BUT no one has yet figured out how to solve the thorny problem of when THAT low fare line meets the high fare line at Pomona!
Second, the Perris Valley Line. Basically, there is NO ridership between Riverside and South Perris, even after a Riverside authority spent $250 million rebuilding that ex-Santa Fe line. Now, that entity is spendings millions and millions more to two-track a big part of the line!
So, in Arizona, it is just a matter of promoting the West Phoenix Line to the RIGHT people! Dangling one or two billion dollars in Federal money in front of politicians therein has to get someone’s attention!
Commuter rail to where? Most of the residential development on the West side of PHX is miles away from the SP line. And we have a decent grid street system plus I-10, Loop 303/101 and a future east-west freeway that will run from Loop 202 to Hwy 85(the projected route of I-11)
azrail Commuter rail to where? Most of the residential development on the West side of PHX is miles away from the SP line. And we have a decent grid street system plus I-10, Loop 303/101 and a future east-west freeway that will run from Loop 202 to Hwy 85(the projected route of I-11)
azrail:
‘Commuter rail to where?' you asked. This thread is about the West Phoenix Line and possibly resuming service on it. In my opinion, any reopening of the line would cost more than UP could ever make! But a commuter service from Buckeye to downtown Phoenix MAY be workable. And as the ridership grew, extending the Phoenix Line farther west seems feasible.
Concerning autonomous trucks delivering Intermodal containers to the Phoenix area, I believe UP sees it as a great profit mechanism with great potential. Personally, I’m inclined to believe such will eventually be OUTLAWED! Here in California automatic running red light ticketing got the wrath of the electorate and was outlawed. Autonomous trucks I believe will suffer the same fate, and UP’s investment in such will become a total loss. But that is just an opinion.
To all:
Fred M. Cain is right, that thoughts on the West Phoenix Line should be posted in this thread. Anything else should be posted elsewhere, except for a slight mention.
croteaudd <SNIP> In my opinion, any reopening of the line would cost more than UP could ever make! But a commuter service from Buckeye to downtown Phoenix MAY be workable. And as the ridership grew, extending the Phoenix Line farther west seems feasible. <SNIP>
In my opinion, any reopening of the line would cost more than UP could ever make! But a commuter service from Buckeye to downtown Phoenix MAY be workable. And as the ridership grew, extending the Phoenix Line farther west seems feasible.
The question I have is what is the advantage to the customer for the West Phoenix line? I'm not seeing one.
LA to Phoenix by highway is about 390 miles, a 6-7 hour drive.
LA to Phoenix by rail via W Phoenix is about 425 miles and via Piccacho is about 525 miles.
At 50 mph it's 8.5 hours vs 10.5 hours. At an average of 40 mph its 10.6 hrs vs 13 hours.
If I have a 5pm departure from LA on a 40 mph avg. train it will get to Phoenix at 4 am via W Phoenix vs 6 am via Piccacho. Either way it's avilable for next day delivery.
How many customers in Phoenix will want their boxes at 4 am vs 6 am? Probably not many. Why should the UP spend millions of dollars to upgrade a line so boxes can sit in a parking lot a couple extra hours waiting to be picked up?
Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com
samfp1943 Fred M Cain Group, Check out this line from the TRAINS Magazine new wire: Union Pacific to open new international intermodal terminal in Phoenix - Trains Could the reopening of the West Phoenix Line be for behind? Only thing is, they mentioned "drayage". It's not completely clear to me if containers moving to Phoenix from West Coast ports would actually move by rail or be drayed? Seems like Uncle Pete may be watching and learning from their competitiiion? BNSF aS ALREADYJ Anounced and is starting to build their left coast containjer consolidation operation ( Bakersfield) and UP was feeling they were victimized? .Here is a partial lift from the TRAINS Newswire article linked by Mr.Cain: FTA:"... “We are excited to offer regional shippers and receivers in Arizona a fast, sustainable rail option to move product into and out of Southern California that is cost competitive and removes trucks from our nation’s congested highways, with an ability to expand offerings and grow in the future,” Kenny Rocker, UP’s executive vice president of marketing and sales, said in a statement. The new facility will open with drayage support provided by Duncan & Son Lines, a family-owned logistics firm in Buckeye, Ariz., that primarily focuses on international container drayage from the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. Duncan & Sons will dray all imports to its 25-acre container yard at Laveen Village, Ariz., which is about 15 miles from the terminal. UP says it will begin daily service between Phoenix and the ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, and its Intermodal Container Transfer Facility in Long Beach during the first quarter of 2024.." Phoenix area seems like a bit of a stretch, milage-wise; but I'd bet the brain trust at UPRR, has "veted" this option, as best for 'Uncle Pete'. I live on the BNSF at Mulvane; and have noted the 'traffic' here, both East, and Westboundm, has been steadily picking up, in both directions: (since earLy AM 3 stackers EB and 2 WB; 1 WB -FAK,m and a EB Hopper Train, all rolling at speed. Seems like the doubele tracking between Rose Hill and Augusta, is having the desired results fr BN$F ?
Fred M Cain Group, Check out this line from the TRAINS Magazine new wire: Union Pacific to open new international intermodal terminal in Phoenix - Trains Could the reopening of the West Phoenix Line be for behind? Only thing is, they mentioned "drayage". It's not completely clear to me if containers moving to Phoenix from West Coast ports would actually move by rail or be drayed?
Group,
Check out this line from the TRAINS Magazine new wire:
Union Pacific to open new international intermodal terminal in Phoenix - Trains
Could the reopening of the West Phoenix Line be for behind? Only thing is, they mentioned "drayage". It's not completely clear to me if containers moving to Phoenix from West Coast ports would actually move by rail or be drayed?
Seems like Uncle Pete may be watching and learning from their competitiiion?
BNSF aS ALREADYJ Anounced and is starting to build their left coast containjer consolidation operation ( Bakersfield) and UP was feeling they were victimized?
.Here is a partial lift from the TRAINS Newswire article linked by Mr.Cain:
FTA:"...
“We are excited to offer regional shippers and receivers in Arizona a fast, sustainable rail option to move product into and out of Southern California that is cost competitive and removes trucks from our nation’s congested highways, with an ability to expand offerings and grow in the future,” Kenny Rocker, UP’s executive vice president of marketing and sales, said in a statement.
The new facility will open with drayage support provided by Duncan & Son Lines, a family-owned logistics firm in Buckeye, Ariz., that primarily focuses on international container drayage from the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles. Duncan & Sons will dray all imports to its 25-acre container yard at Laveen Village, Ariz., which is about 15 miles from the terminal.
UP says it will begin daily service between Phoenix and the ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, and its Intermodal Container Transfer Facility in Long Beach during the first quarter of 2024.."
Phoenix area seems like a bit of a stretch, milage-wise; but I'd bet the brain trust at UPRR, has "veted" this option, as best for 'Uncle Pete'.
I live on the BNSF at Mulvane; and have noted the 'traffic' here, both East, and Westboundm, has been steadily picking up, in both directions: (since earLy AM 3 stackers EB and 2 WB; 1 WB -FAK,m and a EB Hopper Train, all rolling at speed. Seems like the doubele tracking between Rose Hill and Augusta, is having the desired results fr BN$F ?
https://www.railwayage.com/freight/class-i/report-bnsf-moves-ahead-on-arizona-intermodal-project/
UP already owns a reload/storage facility in West Phoenix..through its LOUP division. They recently acquired PCI, which operates the facility at the corner of 35 Ave and Buckeye. But it is about a mile off of the UP West Phx Line, on an industrial spur.
Fred M. Cain:
You mentioned someone else having a conversation with signal installers that were working west from Phoenix to near Arlington. May I suggest UP had decided to replace all the old signals because parts were running out on the old ones, and such was a convenient time because the Sunset Route was having two-tracking Estrella to Tucson in full sway. I don’t believe those signalmen knew the whole story. Interestingly, about that time, the far western end of the Phoenix Line had signals upgraded too, but it was often with used equipment.
dehusman:
Your calculations of train vs. auto comparisons on various routes make for some interesting comparisons. My experience, though, tells me those calculations are unrealistic and way, way off. That is said NOT in a mean way, but from what I’ve personally seen. You will agree with me at the end of this write-up!
I’m from the Cajon Pass area in Southern California. I’ve seen railroad timetables for fifty-five years. The Super Chief was Trains Nos. 17 and 18, then with Amtrak the Nos. were 3 and 4. It is not sure what current timetables say, but for years that train was average speed given as just over 40 M.P.H. San Bernardino-Barstow, Calif.
Once, I drove from the Cajon Pass area to Nebraska, spending a night in a motel midway. After being at my destination and trackside the next day for a few hours, UP 2429 (then an SD60M) passed westbound. My wife called on the cell phone. There was a crisis back home, and she requested I return home. I went to my room, slept till about 4 A.M., packed-up and left for California. In southern Utah, I stayed overnight at a motel. Back on the road early morning, I got to Yermo, Calif and saw my friend, UP 2429 that I saw in Nebraska. Back home, I found everything solved and fine!
So, anyway, speeds can be deceptive, and are much, much slower than we think, as seen with the Super Chief. Humans have to eat and sleep, and crews need to be changed, and deal with sidings on single track, and stopping at crossovers because a train is running around another. And average speed goes down and down and down …
There is a possibility that commuter rail could go from Buckeye <> Tucson. If it does then the Phoenix sub from downtown Phoenix to the CP at Gila sub of the Phoenix bypass maybecome congested. Up may feel that the fluidity would be reduced so much that the Wellton branch would need to be restored.
croteauddSo, anyway, speeds can be deceptive, and are much, much slower than we think, as seen with the Super Chief.
I realize that. Average train speed is way below 40. However there were expedited Z trains that had schedules that were around 40 mph.
But on the other hand, if the trains go typical train speed, lets say 20 mph average, that means that the transit from LA to Phoenix is in the 20-26 hour range. Would that be competitive with a truck that can make it 8 hours or less? If that isn't competitive with trucks, then once again, there isn't much reason for the UP to upgrade a line to provide service that won't be competitive and therefore not have enough volume to justify the upgrade.
If you can't compete on transit time, then you have to compete on rate. Will a low enough rate to lure shippers away from trucks generate enough return to pay for the upgrades? Generally the UP doesn't like to underbid rates just to gain volume.
Lets not forget that Drayage from LAX <> PHX is long haul. A driver cannot make a round trip due to HOS. Also many out of CA state drivers cannot operate their rigs in California due to various restrictions. If UP has international containers waiting for as long as a day or more to get out and into Long Beach then using train IMs makes sense.
It would seem that Campo Yard would be the likely candidate to host an intermodal pad. About 15 miles down the 202 to the Duncan and Son Lines container depot at Laveen, AZ.
https://www.duncanandson.com/
Researched this topic more myself. Amtrak started this whole rumor with it's plan to serve Phoenix again. The local papers in Arizona are speculating this means reactivation of this line (East and West). It was stated in one article UP maintains and holds onto the line because it is making bank on the communications lines along the right of way and sees potential to sell additional rights for potentially power transmission. Also stated that UP uses parts of the line still.
There was also speculation it could be used as a commuter rail line but I too scratch my head about that unless they are talking about future urban sprawl not yet here. SP built the line initially for passenger train access to Phoenix not freight train access. So the West Line is engineered for high speed passenger with some restrictive curves (50 mph).
Phoenix to Tucson has been visited by the Amtrak candyman and promised money for study of a future Amtrak corridor so that has stirred some recent dreams as well locally. I think they got $500k like other emerging corridors did to do a study.
Additionally read that UP is laying new track in Mesa to access another part of it's trackage or a new customer........forget which.
About signals on little used lines (like the West Phoenix Line), let me relate a few examples, and share what I know.
Fifty years ago, the Niland, Calif to the Mexican Border line, now UP’s Calexico Sub off the Sunset Route, had Automatic Block Signals (ABS). Apparently, many trains traversed that line with agricultural products from Imperial County and the like. As rail shipments dried up and trucking got cheaper, Southern Pacific applied for permission to de-signalize the line and got it! So, all the signals disappeared. I personally saw those target signal over fifty years ago and then they all disappeared. The line is now “dark” territory.
Second, I make reference to the Santa Fe Super Chief route on the old Second District between Pomona and Irwindale, Calif. That stretch now sees the Gold Line (L line, changed to the A Line) commuter light rail trains, and the new construction of the line to Pomona; but also on a separate track freight service. That now BNSF branch line is signaled also, and sees only a train a day and back, if even that. That line recently had its old signal upgraded to new, modern ones.
Now, back to Arizona and the West Phoenix Line and upgraded signals that see only a local a day! It is understood that to remove those signals government approval is necessary, and the process is expensive and cumbersome. Maintaining those dirt cheap (said figuratively) signals is way cheaper than going through the government regulatory removal process!
Croteaudd,
Ah, yes ~ ! I remember the signals on the line through the Imperial Valley well ~ ! You surely know that that line also once had passenger trains up until around 1950 (I do not have the exact date in front of me). I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) but it was the Imperial Limited. After running from L.A. to Calexico, it crossed the border into Mexico, then headed east over the inter-American line to Algodones after which it crossed back into California and rejoined the mainline at Araz Jct. I'm not sure what the eastern terminus of the Imperial was but having to cross and recross the border like that was a major headache for the Espee.
Anyhow, that was the story behind the searchlights on the Imperial Valley line as told to me long ago by an SP conductor. As you pointed out, they remained in service long after the Imperial was gone.
However, the story behind the signals on the Santa Fe's old Foothills Subdivision is a bit more bizarre. This was actually reported on a couple of years ago in one of the raifan magazines, I can no longer recall which one, but I don't think it was TRAINS.
Bringing us back on topic to the West Phoenix line, you could very well be right about this. But I still think it defies logic. But that's just the way a lotta stuff is nowadays - illogical.
Your thoughts were most fascinating about the passenger trains on that Imperial Valley line, and 1950. Slightly before my time, but interesting to hear about.
The ONLY hope I see for reopening the West Phoenix Line – Yes, I do see a hope! – is ‘differentials’ on the Sunset Route. I am talking about freight, but Amtrak’s Nos. 1 and 2 could play a part. When Estrella (on the Sunset Route) west is finally two-tracked to California, an oddball situation will develop when a differential of speeds arises. Generally, freight trains all move along close to the same speed. Say five westbound trains meet six eastbound trains on two-track territory. An oddball 30 M.P.H. train thrown in the mix can cause great convulsions for the Dispatcher! IF the Phoenix Line was open with good track the 30 M.P.H. oddballer could take it and stay out of the way of Sunset Route ‘same speed’ trains. I’m inclined to think there are more of those than we think. Amtrak’s Nos. 1 and 2 are the opposite, with everything getting in its way! (Such is why UP doesn’t want a daily Sunset Limited.) Amtrak going via the West Phoenix Line everything on the Sunset Route would pretty much remain free flowing! As far as sidings on the two-track Sunset Route, I suggest in the last twenty years that two-tracking sidings that were laid be extended to four miles with intermediate signals midway. Of course, there is now some talk of limiting train lengths by LAW, which would kind of nullify the need for the four-mile sidings concept.
Duplicate post. Kalmbach please remove.
Well, it's now been reported on the TRAINS Magazine website under "News Wire" that the planned intermodal terminal in Phoenix has opened. I find it rather interestig that UP plans to " test markets before building large, permanent facilities."
So, if this things takes off, I still suspect they might seriously look at reopening the Wellton line if they're not doing so already. My theory has been that the UP has wanted to reopen the line for a long time but they pushed off doing so in hopes that they might get some help from either the State, the Feds or Amtrak. But if that just never comes to pass, they might decide to throw in the towel and "go it alone". In that case, good luck for Amtrak getting back onto the Phoenix line.
In another development, there was a long article in the most recent print version of TRAINS Magazine which listed and detailed all the future passenger rail routes, extensions and increased frequencies as developed through the FRA, if I understood that right. A nice, detailed map was included.
Unfortunately, although both the new Tucson-Phoenix corridor was inclued AND the making of the Sunset Limited daily, there was no mention in anyway about reopening the Wellton Line and returning the Sunset Limited to Phoenix.
So, sad to say it doesn't appear to me as though anyone is really pushing for this. If they are pushing for it, then they have evidently kicked the can far down the road to "long term plans" which sometimes means "never".
However, I continue to hold out hope that the UP might do it and go it alone. If I were the manager of that railroad and Amtrak later approached me about moving back onto the line I'd tell 'em "to go fly a kite".
I suspect that UP wishes to capture some of the Los Angeles - Phoenix business now being handled by trucks who will be hampered by the California laws regarding trucks.
I doubt they expect to capture much westbound traffic from BNSF. BNSF has the westward automobile business well in hand with its El Mirage site near Sun City West and they use the same route for intermodal.
This was shared on the passenger forum by CMStPnP
Interesting that there is a block signal west of the end of line marker at 1:19:20
Dining-car: Unless, of course, Amtrak was willing to come up with money for "capacity enhancement."
diningcarI suspect that UP wishes to capture some of the Los Angeles - Phoenix business now being handled by trucks who will be hampered by the California laws regarding trucks.
If UP wanted to capture Intermodal business in Phoenix, they should build an Intermodal terminal in Maricopa, AZ. It is about 45 miles from BNSF's Intermodal terminal in Glendale, AZ. They would not be at a disadvantage on freight to the southern metro area, and time wise, they could get freight to it destination faster by avoiding thr UP Phoenix line.
Maybe UP & Amtrak can come up with a cost sharing agreement. Up pay for new trackage and ROW + signaling? Amtrak pay for necessary siding and associated costs foor installing those CPs for those sidings? Then allow daily Sunset trips. . Maybe just make it daily thru Tucson with upgrading all the way to NOL in the future?
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.