How much advance notice does the Class 1 need - and what are the 'nuts-and-bolts' mechanics of this ? (presuming the business arrrangements of route and rates, etc. are already in place)
Suppose a good shipping customer of the short line calls and says that 5 carloads will be available for it to pick-up in 2 hours, and then sends the electronic waybills. The short line sends a locomotive with crew and does that, then immediately heads for the interchange point, arriving there about an hour later to wait for the Class 1's train to show up.
But before all this happened, the Class 1's local train departed its originating yard a few hours earlier, with a certain set of locomotives and HP, and the electronic 'switch list' already in the hands (computer) of its conductor.
I suspect the Class 1's train can't just pick up anything the shortline shows up with - without any prior notice, unless the waybills were by then available to the Class 1 and the local's crew. And maybe not even then, if the pickup wasn't on the crew's work list. And how would any such changes be communicated to that crew ?
So does it work like this, or differently ?
How much advance notice does the Class 1 need ?
What else goes into or affects this process ?
On a smaller scale, how does this process work with a shipper that's directly on the Class 1 line, or even a switching line like Ed Blysard's ? Can Ed and his crew pick up a car that's been added aafter they've left their yard with that day's switch list ?
- PDN.
P.S. - This line of inquiry was prompted by the "WSOR 2017 Marketing Award" thread - i.e., coordinating those shipments with NS and BNSF.
Generally the locals or the train that does the interchange runs on a "schedule", it runs so many days a week and more or less the same time. The shortline drops the cars on the interchange and the class 1 picks them up when they get there. The waybills and data are transmitted electronically to the main frame and whatever is on the work order documents when the class 1 local leaves the yard, is what they pull, unless they have some sort of onboard computer or handheld (which many railroads/jobs do not), then its near real time.
Since the class 1 may switch the interchange once a day or every other day or the interchange may roll to the next day because the local is past the interchange.
Also the transit time has to look at the next connection past the yard. there was once customer that insisted that we pick up his cars AS SOON as they were released, even though if they waited to have them pulled by a later train they would actually have a day earlier departure out of the yard. If the class 1 train isn't going to pull the interchange until 8 pm, sending a shortline switcher out to pull them from industry "immediately" when they are released at 10 am isn't going to gain anybody anything really.
Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com
Class 1's and Short Lines normally have a 'operating plan' about their interchange activities. Track(s) are designated at the interchange location for the purpose of interchange. Each carrier accepts (operationally) all cars that are placed on the designated interchange track - the only exception would be for HAZMAT cars that don't have the prescribed paperwork (real or electronic).
Normally each carrier has agreed to time frames they will service the interchange. Daily operational issues may cause changes to the time frame and may even cause the interchange not to be serviced on a particular day (which can create a whole new set of issues). Each carriers serving jobs are placed on duty at their origin with the interchange window being one of the determinates, along with other duties the job must perform as to the actual on duty time for the job. Remember, each carriers crew has 12 hours from their on duty time to complete their work.
Interchange is not based on notice - it is based on actually placing the cars on the interchange track (and the corresponding electronic report of that fact - between the involved carriers and the AAR [the AAR maintains a data base of car movement records for all carriers - that is used by shippers, consignees and 3rd party logistics management firms].
Most, if not all, Class 1's have some form of electronic work order system for dealing with their customers needs in near real time.
The process is simple and complicated all at the same time. Most of the complications are not seen by the T&E crews performing the car movements.
While a Short Line may service a customer more often than daily, interchanges are rarely serviced more than daily. If the interchange volume warrents it may get serviced multiple times per day - this is exceedingly rare.
If a customer is willing to incur Special Train Charges (and they are signifigant) over and above the normal freight charges - special, expedited arrangements can be made to move the shipment - this would require detailed arrangements between the carriers involved and would involve specific supervision by each carriers supervisory personnel - think oversized, overweight loads as being the most common Special Train movements.
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
23 17 46 11
Thanks guys for the quick and thorough answers, for both the Class 1's and the Class 2's & 3's - I thought you'd come through for me !
I believe you've answered all my questions - including some I didn't think to ask. Frankly, I'm a little surprised at the "we'll pick up whatever's there, as long as the paperwork is with it" practice and the 'near real time' capability, but that's why I asked.
Thanks again.
I've watched the interchange operation at Utica for a few years now. The short line (MWHA) leaves their outbound cars on a designated track (on the west end of the yard), with an "air slip" so CSX doesn't have to inspect them. A westbound CSX train (usually Q621) makes the pickup, leaving their train on the main while they dive in and pick up the pickups.
I'm presuming that anything that might be headed east gets picked off at Syracuse (or maybe Buffalo), but I've never investigated that.
CSX makes drops for MWHA on the east end of the yard (CP235). I've never watched that operation, so can't say anything about it.
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
Who is typically $responsible$ for maintenance of the track (sidings) where such interchange is set out to wait?
Couple of interchange examples that will be kept short and not take up two or three pages and not get too boring detailed. Just because rr A brings a interchange cut to rr B does not mean those cars can be pulled. If there are haz mat cars involved, the list has to be in exact correct order and haz mat shipment papers have to match with any such car involved. If not, the cars don't go for a ride. This happens all time w/ SKO to BNSF interchange @ Winfield. You would think after all tyese yrs, the shortline would get it but they don't. Another example is GCW to BNSF interchange. Many times the cars GCW brings over are not even in the BNSF inventory. If haz mats are involved, again the cars don't go for a ride. The KO @ Wichita one night last yr brought the haz mat cut to the BNSF yd. Many of the cars did not have haz mat papers w/them. BNSF by law could not sign off on chain custody.
Convicted One Who is typically $responsible$ for maintenance of the track (sidings) where such interchange is set out to wait?
mudchickenDepends on how the M&O contract/license agreement for the track reads in what basically becomes a joint facility
Thanks!! So is this an area where the class 1 might extract sizeable "switch maintenance" fees from the junior partner?
SFbrkmn Couple of interchange examples that will be kept short and not take up two or three pages and not get too boring detailed. Just because rr A brings a interchange cut to rr B does not mean those cars can be pulled. If there are haz mat cars involved, the list has to be in exact correct order and haz mat shipment papers have to match with any such car involved. If not, the cars don't go for a ride. This happens all time w/ SKO to BNSF interchange @ Winfield. You would think after all tyese yrs, the shortline would get it but they don't. Another example is GCW to BNSF interchange. Many times the cars GCW brings over are not even in the BNSF inventory. If haz mats are involved, again the cars don't go for a ride. The KO @ Wichita one night last yr brought the haz mat cut to the BNSF yd. Many of the cars did not have haz mat papers w/them. BNSF by law could not sign off on chain custody.
Johnny
SFbrkmnCouple of interchange examples that will be kept short and not take up two or three pages and not get too boring detailed. Just because rr A brings a interchange cut to rr B does not mean those cars can be pulled. If there are haz mat cars involved, the list has to be in exact correct order and haz mat shipment papers have to match with any such car involved. If not, the cars don't go for a ride. This happens all time w/ SKO to BNSF interchange @ Winfield. You would think after all tyese yrs, the shortline would get it but they don't. Another example is GCW to BNSF interchange. Many times the cars GCW brings over are not even in the BNSF inventory. If haz mats are involved, again the cars don't go for a ride. The KO @ Wichita one night last yr brought the haz mat cut to the BNSF yd. Many of the cars did not have haz mat papers w/them. BNSF by law could not sign off on chain custody.
BNSF Sales and operating personnel are not doing their job in communicating and ENFORCING the reqirements on the short line. Short line in most instances, can not continue in profitable operation without the cooperation of their Class 1 partner(s) as they don't have sufficient on line Origin-Destination traffic pairs to pay the bills. Most of their income is dependent on interline traffic and interline traffic has rules that apply to all the carriers involved.
Convicted One mudchicken Thanks!! So is this an area where the class 1 might extract sizeable "switch maintenance" fees from the junior partner?
mudchicken
Would it be to the advantage of the class I's to do that? The short lines have to interchange somewhere and excessive costs may send them to other lines if they are available. Captive roads have no choice.
Norm
Convicted One mudchicken Depends on how the M&O contract/license agreement for the track reads in what basically becomes a joint facility Thanks!! So is this an area where the class 1 might extract sizeable "switch maintenance" fees from the junior partner?
mudchicken Depends on how the M&O contract/license agreement for the track reads in what basically becomes a joint facility
Further the above and to tag onto Balt's comments:
Local supervision on the Class 1 and the Class 3 (read the only supervision, applies to some Class 2's as well) can be very poorly versed on the business end of things in the railroad regulatory environment. There's much more to it than just getting trains over the road and personnel matters.
In a M/W supervisor's world, everything in the in-service track structure gets inspected at least monthly, logged and dealt with per FRA and company standards. It's rough when you have only so many people to inspect plus do repair work and other details. On an interchange track, you are making sure that your obligation is covered (maintenance and inspection) plus you at least take a cursory look over the line where your operating people go. If you see something wrong, you tell the other side what's wrong and take your end out of service or otherwise protect the defect until the issue is resolved. (operating people whine constantly about o/s trackage, spiked switches, etc. that are beyond the roadmaster's limits of authority. That issue has not changed in a hundred years along with industry always thinking at maintenance or derailment costs are the railroad's problem and not theirs. Educating the customer and the other railroad (sometimes) is also part of that supervisors PR responsibility. People skills with internal and external customers come with the supervisor's job.)
The "ENFORCING" issue that BALT is talking about out can be a low key effort that is still direct, specific and non-confrontational/ non-punishing. Putting off or ignoring a problem is not a good thing and will probably come back to bite you...
tree68The short line (MWHA) leaves their outbound cars on a designated track (on the west end of the yard), with an "air slip" so CSX doesn't have to inspect them
Sorry Tree but this one doesn't know what an "air slip" is. Please educate me. Thanks.
Electroliner 1935 tree68 Sorry Tree but this one doesn't know what an "air slip" is. Please educate me. Thanks.
tree68
A 'Air Slip' is a document that says the cars that the slip documents have had a full Class 1 Terminal air test and a crew picking up the cars with a Air Slip need only make a Class 3 air test. (Class 1 air test is inspecteing each side of the track for proper brake shoe application and piston travel on the brake application and then inspecting each side of the track for brake shoe release and for proper piston retraction. Exceptions are to be corrected or set out if not corrected.) A Class 1 air test can be very time consuming.
Electroliner 1935 tree68 The short line (MWHA) leaves their outbound cars on a designated track (on the west end of the yard), with an "air slip" so CSX doesn't have to inspect them Sorry Tree but this one doesn't know what an "air slip" is. Please educate me. Thanks.
tree68 The short line (MWHA) leaves their outbound cars on a designated track (on the west end of the yard), with an "air slip" so CSX doesn't have to inspect them
Thanks to Balt and Ed for covering that for me, in better detail than I could have done so myself.
In this case, cars for interchange are left on yard air, so the four hour rule does not apply. CSX just stops on the main, cuts off the locomotives, ducks in to pick up the cars, brings them back onto the main, recouples to the rest of the train, pumps up, then does a Class 3 with the EOT. It goes fairly quickly.
Many thanks to BALT, Ed, and Larry. Now I know what an AIR SLIP is. Who knew that the air brakes had to be tested so thoroughly and documented with a paper trail. That is a detailed response. And no thanks to all the terrorists for making all those jobs for the TSA and Homeland security that don't create anything but reinforce paranoia. And create more work.
tree68Thanks to Balt and Ed for covering that for me, in better detail than I could have done so myself. In this case, cars for interchange are left on yard air, so the four hour rule does not apply. CSX just stops on the main, cuts off the locomotives, ducks in to pick up the cars, brings them back onto the main, recouples to the rest of the train, pumps up, then does a Class 3 with the EOT. It goes fairly quickly.
Back in the day - when I was a train order operator at Vincennes, IN the 'main line local' from St. Louis would go by the office and stop about 3/8 mile East of the office - set off 10 to 12 cars and pick up the same amount of cars and depart within 20 minutes. Today just setting off the cars and applying hand brakes would take 20 minutes or more; let alone picking up cars, releasing hand brakes and making a Class 1 air test on the cars that were picked up without being on yard air.
Electroliner 1935And no thanks to all the terrorists for making all those jobs for the TSA and Homeland security that don't create anything but reinforce paranoia. And create more work.
I would opine that most of the stuff railroads have to do along this line is self-inflicted, if you will. It's said that the railroad rulebooks are written in blood, and in most cases, that's true.
TSA doesn't really enter into the picture. The FRA certainly does.
BaltACDToday just setting off the cars and applying hand brakes would take 20 minutes or more; let alone picking up cars, releasing hand brakes and making a Class 1 air test on the cars that were picked up without being on yard air.
Heck, just pumping the 100 cars left on the main back up will take probably take all of that...
Which may be a legitimate and significant reason why Class 1 railroads no longer want to serve single carloads or small numbers of cars - having their main lines tied up that long without generating much revenue, and blocking it from far more profitable traffic.
That said, several times I've seen a NS local arrive, do a 3 to 5 car pick-up and drop-off, and then leave in about 20 to 25 minutes. The main is level, but part of the spur where the cars are spotted on a fairly steep grade, so tight handbrakes there are a necessity. But they had a loco on each end of about a 12 - 20 car train, and 3 men to do it, and clearly they all knew what to do. Also, that main line - the Lehigh Line - is double track but not terribly busy - it can be several hours between trains.
Paul,
I will attempt to answer your original question which was basically how does consist and waybill data get exchanged between short lines and the class I carriers.
Your second question was how quickly the short line could get cars to interchange.
I will answer in the context of a Washington State shortline with two interchanges with the BN. In both cases the jobs pulling and spotting customers worked daylight. One side had a "large enough" yard to completely swith out the inbound I/C and make up the daylight jobs. This side also had an intermediate yard where cars for a branch line and main line stations within 30 miles of the I/C point were set out and picked up.
The other side had a two track yard. One of the two day jobs came to work early enough to switch out the inbound train. Then it went one way and the other job went the other.
The first side delivered a train to the BN's hump yard shortly after midnight six days per week and returned with a new train from BN. The other side delivered to a point on the BN's main line about 30 miles east of the hump yard. BN ran a night local to the turnaround point. We delivered to a small BN yard there and we picked up our cars there. I suspect, but do not know that BN's crew was timed to meet our crew and basically swap trains. BN's crew also had a couple of hours worth of local work there so it did not have to be a "headlight meet."
In both cases the shortline ran on BN track at the interchange points. Our crew than ran into the hump yard had to qualify on BN signal rules. The other did not since it never got on BN main track. Ours was the typical style of agreement. BN maintained the track to whatever standard they saw fit. We ran on it at our risk in terms of derailments. There were many other liability provisions that I will not try to recall at this point.
In short and in general, the physical arrangements are whatever works best for the parties. Owner maintains its track. User runs on owner's track largely at its risk.
As to data, we were computerized so we sent an advance consist to the hump yard for each train and interchanged it off to BN when we hit the interchange. Interchange timing is always an issue for car hire. If we had hazmat, the required info was on the consist.
Coming out BN gave us a list, with hazmat dope as necessary. They interchanged the cars to us which gave us the waybill info. Our deal was that we were a switch carrier. In practice this meant that our customers sent their bills of lading to BN and BN created the outbound waybills.
We did not have any hazmat shippers, so that was not an issue. Crews have to know what the material is, and how to deal with it. The what it is may be by switch ticket, bill of lading, waybill, or printout on consist. Most class I carriers print the how to deal with it on the consist. Many short lines give their crewmen the DOT book with instructions to give it to Emergency Responders if they want it.
As to how quickly, we switched the customers when the job got there, and generally did not stick around since there were almost always other customers to switch. Just to head such requests off, we published a special train service tariff item that generated more than enough revenue to pay for a crew, power and fuel for eight hours, plus a profit. We did not have an extra board, so covering a special train usually would fall to operating management. Obviously we were non union. I do not recall that we ever had a special train movement. We were consistent enough the customers were well enough trained, and the traffic was not so time sensative that there was any need for special train service on this property.
Mac
Paul_D_North_JrWhich may be a legitimate and significant reason why Class 1 railroads no longer want to serve single carloads or small numbers of cars - having their main lines tied up that long without generating much revenue, and blocking it from far more profitable traffic.
Ed,
Thanks for the in depth explanation. It helps some of us understand why what seems to be easy and quick takes longer than we think it should.
In my (limited) area of expertise things are not always obvious but are important. Steps along the way must not be skipped. Your post made it obvious that appllies to railroading. Thanks for helping us understand.
I have a 1922 RI Rules and Instructions for the Operation of Air Brakes. It has instructions before leaving a terminal (at least the initial terminal) to make a brake test by walking the train to see that brakes have set and they have the proper brake piston travel. Then walk the release and advise the engineer and conductor on how many brakes are defective. I would guess this would be an industry wide practice, probably required by law since it says, "Proceeding with piston travel of more than 9 inches is a misdemeanor."
It doesn't mention a train needs 100% working brakes or if the car(s) need to be set out if they can't be repaired on the spot. I get the impression they would just cut out the air brakes on the car and let it go.
Jeff
Norm,
With all due respect, Ed's description of the runaway is not exactly right but close enough for talking purposes, except that I do not recall anything about kinked air hoses, which would have been tough to prove with most of the train burned up as it was.
His discussion of Initial Terminal Airbrake tests is so incomplete as to require elaboration. This test has been around a long time, probably to the dawn of air brakes and certainly before 1960. The rest of this is from memory of John Langlot and my book "The Rusty Dusty" which is available on our website 'therustydusty.com'.
As of 1960 this test was required at the initial terminal of any train, and at 500 mile intervals for thru trains. The retest interval was later extended to 1000 miles.
At Wenatchee WA the W-O local ran 20 to 80 cars per day, depending on the season. There was no yard air and no carmen. Procedure was put engine on train and start pumping the air. After the gauge on the caboose was within at least 20 pounds of the feed valve setting of 90 pounds, the rear brakeman would signal the engineer to set the brakes. The brakemen both started walking toward each other inspecting trucks, couplers, safety applieances, the adequacy of brake shoes, and that piston travel was within legal limits. When they met in the middle they signaled the engineer to release the brakes, then both crossed over and walked back on the other side inspecting same mechanical components and that the air brakes had released. While the brakeman walked the set, the engineer made a leakage test. Leakage could not exceed 5#/minute from 70# initial brake pipe pressure at the head end. With a 50-60 car train the whole project typically took 50-60 minutes.
Hillyard had yard air and carmen. Sometimes the carmen could hook up yard air and do entire test without trainmen. Some times the engineer had to pump up the train and make the set while two carmen did the inspection. A hot train often got two pairs of carmen to speed the process along.
Cars picked up enroute required the same treatment for the pick up only.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.