Trains.com

Cars That Cannot Be Humped

12776 views
45 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Cars That Cannot Be Humped
Posted by caldreamer on Sunday, July 31, 2016 8:37 AM

Other than schnabel cars, cars with very heavy loads on a single car (e.g.: A large transformer in a depressed center or well car), cars marked DO NOT HUMP, and cars that have their load extend over the ends of the car, are there any other cars that that cannot be humped?

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Sunday, July 31, 2016 9:42 AM

caldreamer

Other than schnabel cars, cars with very heavy loads on a single car (e.g.: A large transformer in a depressed center or well car), cars marked DO NOT HUMP, and cars that have their load extend over the ends of the car, are there any other cars that that cannot be humped?

 

Not sure what the current 'rules' are for it; but it used to be a 'common' practice(?) among shipper's with cargos that could be damaged in 'humping' situations to mark cars with placcards on each end, and side that said " DO NOT HUMP".  Some commodities that fit in that catagory were: Food stuffs (Fresh or canned),  Palletized coils of steel, rolls of tinplate ( palletized and on their 'side' ) Glass Containers, or other 'fragile' , any loads that might be damaged in rough handling.         

Also, some boxcars that might, or might not be, of the 'Damage Free' kind,           ( generally internal locking bars, or 'door' systems) They could be used to ship product that was palletized, but could also be double stacked in the car.      

 

 


 

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Louisiana
  • 2,310 posts
Posted by Paul of Covington on Sunday, July 31, 2016 10:59 AM

   I vaguely remember reading some time ago that auto carriers were not allowed to be humped.   The autos were chocked but not otherwise restrained, and they could jump the chocks.   With the unit trains today,  I don't imagine this is likely to be an issue.

_____________ 

  "A stranger's just a friend you ain't met yet." --- Dave Gardner

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Sunday, July 31, 2016 12:01 PM

How about hazmat cars loaded with things such as crude, ethanol, LPG, CNG,etc? One could get a bang out of humping them. Surprise

Norm


  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Mobile Alabama
  • 694 posts
Posted by carknocker1 on Sunday, July 31, 2016 1:39 PM
Intermodal cars and auto racks are the most common cars that can't be humped
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Sunday, July 31, 2016 4:47 PM

carknocker1

 Intermodal cars and auto racks are the most common cars that can't be humped

 

And in addition: BaltACD mentioned tank cars with liquids like grades of crude, compressed gases, and other volital liquids...

Watching passing trains around here, I can say I've not seen "Do Not Hump" warning placcards, eiher on single cars or on cars in unit [train] moves.

  The indication seems to be that certain 'classes'[products/cars] may have specific rules for handling; that everyone who is responsible for their movement understands, and complies with(?)

  My question is: Is there still a requirement for the "Do Not Hump" warning placcard to be affixed to those cars?      Has that requirement for warning placcards, other than the diamond shaped HazMat warning [ They have specific points to be placed on the cars containing HazMat items  been revoked?  

I've never seen a auto rack car placcarded. Blindfold

Thanks,

 

 


 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Defiance Ohio
  • 13,317 posts
Posted by JoeKoh on Sunday, July 31, 2016 5:29 PM

Scale test cars and geometry cars come to mind as well.

stay safe

joe

Deshler Ohio-crossroads of the B&O Matt eats your fries.YUM! Clinton st viaduct undefeated against too tall trucks!!!(voted to be called the "Clinton St. can opener").

 

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 9 posts
Posted by UPRR11 on Sunday, July 31, 2016 10:45 PM
I believe it's loaded autoracks that are prohibited from humping, but empties are fair game. I've certainly seen a few humped at UP's Enlgewood Yard in Houston (And I think I saw a video of some being humped at West Colton).
 

 

As far as haz mat being humped, Englewood wouldn't need to have a hump if haz mat couldn't go over it. Englewood's primary purpose is to serve Houston's petrochemcial complex and they hump all sorts of goodies. Goodies that can make for a big boom if something goes wrong (And I believe SP had a run-in with a boom at Englewood in the 70's).
Also, Strang Yard in La Porte, TX (along the Houston Ship Channel), one of UP's smallest hump yards, serves pretty much only haz mat and plastics. They shove some pretty hazardous stuff over that hump.
  • Member since
    October 2012
  • 225 posts
Posted by DS4-4-1000 on Monday, August 1, 2016 10:41 AM

Before stretch wrapping and banding were as common as they are now boxcars loaded with bricks or ceramics were usually marked "Do Not Hump".  Large steel sheets loaded on flats or gons are also often so marked.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,900 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Monday, August 1, 2016 12:13 PM

UPRR11
I believe it's loaded autoracks that are prohibited from humping, but empties are fair game. I've certainly seen a few humped at UP's Enlgewood Yard in Houston (And I think I saw a video of some being humped at West Colton).
 

 

As far as haz mat being humped, Englewood wouldn't need to have a hump if haz mat couldn't go over it. Englewood's primary purpose is to serve Houston's petrochemcial complex and they hump all sorts of goodies. Goodies that can make for a big boom if something goes wrong (And I believe SP had a run-in with a boom at Englewood in the 70's).
Also, Strang Yard in La Porte, TX (along the Houston Ship Channel), one of UP's smallest hump yards, serves pretty much only haz mat and plastics. They shove some pretty hazardous stuff over that hump.
 

Only the worst of the worst can't be humped and those (the ones I've seen) are marked, "Do not hump."  There are some classes of HM that can be humped, but not "kicked" or otherwise be cut off in motion.  They also can have some special handling instructions, like only allowed over the hump in cuts of no more than two or not being allowed to roll free until preceding cars have cleared the hump lead, etc. 

You need to see a HazMat instruction booklet, specifically the switching chart (not placement in train) for the full scoop.

Kicking cars in general is getting harder to do.  Once a staple of flat switching, it's getting more and more restricted.  They are doing it in the name of eliminating all risk.  I swear that eventually we won't be able to move in the name of zero risk. 

Jeff

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, August 1, 2016 2:09 PM

jeffhergert
Kicking cars in general is getting harder to do.  Once a staple of flat switching, it's getting more and more restricted.  They are doing it in the name of eliminating all risk.  I swear that eventually we won't be able to move in the name of zero risk. 

Jeff

My carrier just put out bulletins prohibiting cutting off cars in motion except at specificaly identified locations and then only for specific tracks.  The original way they worded the bulletin prohibited humping cars at a hump yard, that did get changed in short order.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Southeast Michigan
  • 2,983 posts
Posted by Norm48327 on Monday, August 1, 2016 2:12 PM

BaltACD
My carrier just put out bulletins prohibiting cutting off cars in motion except at specificaly identified locations and then only for specific tracks. The original way they worded the bulletin prohibited humping cars at a hump yard, that did get changed in short order.

And those guys in the suits get paid for thinking this up? Travesty I say, travesty. Hmm

Norm


  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, August 1, 2016 3:27 PM

BaltACD
The original way they worded the bulletin prohibited humping cars at a hump yard, that did get changed in short order.

Ah, yes.  The law of unintended consequences....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, August 1, 2016 3:39 PM

jeffhergert
Kicking cars in general is getting harder to do. Once a staple of flat switching, it's getting more and more restricted. They are doing it in the name of eliminating all risk. I swear that eventually we won't be able to move in the name of zero risk. Jeff

I see here and on the blog section of this site all sorts of people kicking around ideas to increase the number of cars handled or ways to attract more customers.  But with the way management acts, the rules written/modified, and the extreme cost cutting measures (single man crews, fewer locomotives, no OT), even if the business materialized - could the railroads handle it anymore?

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 1, 2016 3:54 PM

Norm48327

How about hazmat cars loaded with things such as crude, ethanol, LPG, CNG,etc? One could get a bang out of humping them. Surprise

I recall sometime in the 60's or 70's on the Alton and Southern a tank car carrying a volitile gas was humped and "bashed" into the string of cars at the bottom going to fast, the result of faulty retarders. The gas was released, and found a spark soon enough. It destroyed about half of the hump yard

Of course, even if the car is marked "Do Not Hump", it is questionable how often the sign was and is obeyed by the hump crews.

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Philly burbs
  • 151 posts
Posted by Eddystone on Monday, August 1, 2016 8:17 PM

I worked for 2 heavy hauling and rigging co's moving, loading and unloading heavy loads handled by railroads, a DO NOT HUMP sign doesn't mean jack to the railroads. We moved 1 transformer 4 times, it had an event recorder on it that registerd over 15,000 "hits". I don't know what constituted a "hit" but the power co. took delivery of it and put it in sevice and it immediately blew and split the case. 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, August 1, 2016 8:40 PM

Eddystone

I worked for 2 heavy hauling and rigging co's moving, loading and unloading heavy loads handled by railroads, a DO NOT HUMP sign doesn't mean jack to the railroads. We moved 1 transformer 4 times, it had an event recorder on it that registerd over 15,000 "hits". I don't know what constituted a "hit" but the power co. took delivery of it and put it in sevice and it immediately blew and split the case.

Don't know what a 'hit' is.  Normal rules state that 4 MPH is the maximum safe coupling speed.  Hump yards and their retarders are engineered to provide safe couplings for the cars that are humped.  While in transit cars are subject to slack action in the trains they are in.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,015 posts
Posted by RudyRockvilleMD on Monday, August 1, 2016 9:11 PM

Cars carrying weapons such as rocket motors or missiles cannot be humped.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • 3,231 posts
Posted by NorthWest on Monday, August 1, 2016 11:46 PM

D. Carleton would know more, but I think unoccupied passenger cars being carried in freight trains are prohibited from being humped.

Historic equipment also often is.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 7:03 AM

NorthWest
but I think unoccupied passenger cars being carried in freight trains are prohibited from being humped.

Previous comments about kicking notwithstanding, I don't think passenger cars are to be kicked, either.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 9:57 AM

Federal law permits humping loaded hazmat cars (except RSSM).  They have to be in cuts of two or less, and they leads have to be clear of car ahead and following cars can't be released until the hazmat cars are clear of the lead and must be in cust of two or less.

RSSM can't be kicked, can't be humped, can't be cut off in motion, must be coupled to at minimum speed, and can't be struck by a car rolling under its own momentum.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Calgary
  • 2,047 posts
Posted by cx500 on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 10:18 AM

Sorry to plead ignorance, Dave, but I can't recall what the acronym RSSM stands for.

John

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,900 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 11:53 AM

dehusman

Federal law permits humping loaded hazmat cars (except RSSM).  They have to be in cuts of two or less, and they leads have to be clear of car ahead and following cars can't be released until the hazmat cars are clear of the lead and must be in cust of two or less.

RSSM can't be kicked, can't be humped, can't be cut off in motion, must be coupled to at minimum speed, and can't be struck by a car rolling under its own momentum.

 

Then UP better change their hazmat switching instructions because it allows TIH/PIH loaded tank cars (RSSM) over the hump with the two car, clear of the lead, etc restrictions.  In a flat yard they can't be kicked, but must be shoved to rest or coupling.

TIH/PIH = toxic inhalation hazard/poison inhalation hazard.    

RSSM = rail security sensitive material. 

Jeff

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 3:52 PM

I have been avoiding this discussion, because I'm too long gone from the scene of the crimes.

Jeff, the special instructions for Proviso used to be different because it wasn't an "automatic" hump like every other one on the railroad.  I know that when I was up there, the instructions were adhered to religiously, but I suspect that the almighty car count persuaded some people to cut corners, and some officers to look the other way.

We did have the advantage of being able to control the retarders to stop cars from rolling beyond them, so coupling a "buffer" car behind them could be done more efficiently.

The "RSSM" classification must have come about after I retired.  I'm sure that it covers some tank cars whose release of commodity would be a total disaster.  I'm sure that chlorine and ethylene are among the RSSM goodies.

I still get a chuckle when I think about the first time a Schnabel car showed up on the hump lead.  It was empty, but it still required special handling, and nobody (else) seemed to know what to do, or why.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 3:59 PM

CShaveRR

I have been avoiding this discussion, because I'm too long gone from the scene of the crimes.

Jeff, the special instructions for Proviso used to be different because it wasn't an "automatic" hump like every other one on the railroad.  I know that when I was up there, the instructions were adhered to religiously, but I suspect that the almighty car count persuaded some people to cut corners, and some officers to look the other way.

We did have the advantage of being able to control the retarders to stop cars from rolling beyond them, so coupling a "buffer" car behind them could be done more efficiently.

The "RSSM" classification must have come about after I retired.  I'm sure that it covers some tank cars whose release of commodity would be a total disaster.  I'm sure that chlorine and ethylene are among the RSSM goodies.

I still get a chuckle when I think about the first time a Schnabel car showed up on the hump lead.  It was empty, but it still required special handling, and nobody (else) seemed to know what to do, or why.

 

You, of course, took care of it without even having to think about it.Smile

Johnny

  • Member since
    September 2014
  • 134 posts
Posted by JC UPTON on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 5:29 PM

Eddystone

I worked for 2 heavy hauling and rigging co's moving, loading and unloading heavy loads handled by railroads, a DO NOT HUMP sign doesn't mean jack to the railroads. We moved 1 transformer 4 times, it had an event recorder on it that registerd over 15,000 "hits". I don't know what constituted a "hit" but the power co. took delivery of it and put it in sevice and it immediately blew and split the case. 

 

 

I worked for a local Power Company, if we had a transformer considered essential  (a generator step up or very large grid unit), we would have a "rider" accomany the car....

 

In some cases, also done for over the highway moves as well

from the Far East of the Sunset Route

(In the shadow of the Huey P Long bridge)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 10:10 PM

Johnny, that's the truth--I dealt with it every day I worked up there.  Eventually folks got used to dealing with me, knew the job would get done safely and properly, and everything was fine.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2010
  • 161 posts
Posted by denveroutlaws06 on Tuesday, August 2, 2016 11:02 PM

certain coal gondolas cant be humped

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, August 3, 2016 4:58 PM

denveroutlaws06
Certain coal gondolas can't be humped

Actually, that's not true.  Those big red signs on the sides of the old steel coal gons say "Do Not Tamp".  I don't think it's a question of structural integrity so much as the possibility of overloading the car if the load of scrap or whatever is compressed.  There are plenty of other cars I'd have been more scared of not surviving a trip over the hump than those.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2010
  • 161 posts
Posted by denveroutlaws06 on Wednesday, August 3, 2016 5:22 PM

i wasnt refering to the steel hopper/gondolas some of the aluminum gondolas have do not hump on them

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=2276746hem

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy