Trains.com

NS orders 65 more C40-9W's

3010 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: United States of America, Tennessee, Cookeville
  • 408 posts
Posted by Allen Jenkins on Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:59 PM
Yea, macguy, as Rush Limbaugh, says, follow the money.
Wear & tear, whatever, the derating, is always about the money.
The Norfolk Southern, figures, as stated, in their text, the locomotives shall give the work, same as a regular rated engine, and the power reduction, shall ultimately save fuel.
The CSX, studied the same objective, however, they activated a "delayed throttle," application, starting with the Dash 840-C locomotive. Twenty seconds to activation, after the throttle application.
A capital idea.
Enjoy Corporate Resource Conservation, In A Realtime Horsepower War!
ACJ.
Allen/Backyard
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 23, 2004 8:35 PM
Sounds like a fuel conservation thing to me.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Van Halens Van.
  • 215 posts
Posted by Clutch Cargo on Saturday, October 23, 2004 5:13 PM
Ahhh...Grasshopper......
It should be so easy.

Kurt
Next to Duluth....We`re Superior. Will Rogers never met an FBI Agent.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:07 PM
The locomotives have a switch that enables the operation of the last motor to supply the extra horsepower. It is only used when needed, so horsepower is not wasted. When extra horsepower is needed, the engineer flicks a switch and the horsepower is available immediately.
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: State College PA
  • 344 posts
Posted by ajmiller on Saturday, October 23, 2004 2:45 PM
Yay! More lupins!
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 21,669 posts
Posted by Overmod on Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:49 PM
I think, all in all, it's much more likely that the 'derating' is to reduce 'wear and tear' and perhaps allow longer intervals for scheduled maintenance. Who here (Don Oltmann?) knows exactly what modifications were made in the engine-management software to accompli***he change?
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Saturday, October 23, 2004 12:30 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Colin

QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

I don't know why NS won't go for the extra 400 hp and make them C44-9Ws?


I heard from a GE technician that NS's Dash9-40CW's are indeed in reality Dash9-44CW's they are just held back from giving the extra 400 HP by means of the computer software. NS's Road Foremen of Engines carry with them a special key to release the extra HP when they think the situation justifys it.

They either don't trust their engineers with all that HP[:0] !!

Or they just want to simplify the power desk dispatching at 4000 HP like ATSF did for a time at rating the B40-8's at the GP60's HP rating of 3800 HP. But they never artificially held back the extra 200 HP.

From what I hear about NS's attitude towrard their employees it is probably BOTH!!


Huh...............(flaberghasted at NS reasoning)[:0]
Andrew
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: NY
  • 913 posts
Posted by dwil89 on Saturday, October 23, 2004 12:28 PM
I thought it was to save fuel too, as the extra 400 HP used more fuel than the benefit the extra horses provided.....Dave Williams http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nsaltoonajohnstown
David J. Williams http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nsaltoonajohnstown
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 23, 2004 12:22 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Junctionfan

I don't know why NS won't go for the extra 400 hp and make them C44-9Ws?


I heard from a GE technician that NS's Dash9-40CW's are indeed in reality Dash9-44CW's they are just held back from giving the extra 400 HP by means of the computer software. NS's Road Foremen of Engines carry with them a special key to release the extra HP when they think the situation justifys it.

They either don't trust their engineers with all that HP[:0] !!

Or they just want to simplify the power desk dispatching at 4000 HP like ATSF did for a time at rating the B40-8's at the GP60's HP rating of 3800 HP. But they never artificially held back the extra 200 HP.

From what I hear about NS's attitude towrard their employees it is probably BOTH!!
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: St.Catharines, Ontario
  • 3,770 posts
Posted by Junctionfan on Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:49 AM
I don't know why NS won't go for the extra 400 hp and make them C44-9Ws?
Andrew
  • Member since
    July 2001
  • From: Shelbyville, Kentucky
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by SSW9389 on Saturday, October 23, 2004 6:39 AM
Dang, you would think that NS would get tired of a diet of catfish. Variety is the spice of life!
COTTON BELT: Runs like a Blue Streak!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
NS orders 65 more C40-9W's
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, October 23, 2004 5:59 AM
I found out that NS has added 65 (the units will now go to 9976) to its C40-9W order, the units are starting to be released from Erie. *sigh* Now they will have almost 1,100. I'd expect 35 SD70M's, SD70M-2's, or ES40DC's also.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy