December 2013 had an excellent article on the westbound Capitol Limited running out of fuel because someone forgot to refuel the two diesels at Ivy City. Don't engineers generally check the fuel level before starting a trip? Are there fuel guages and are they generally reliable?
One way one might check fuel level is by banging (not too hard, don't chip the paint and don't hurt your hand,,) on the side of the fuel tank. The sound when full should be different than when empty.
My companies rules are that Engineers are to report when there is less than 1000 gallons in the tank, a corresponding report is then made through the mainframe computer system which alerts the appropriate people.
In the case reported by the OP - Ivy City is one of Amtrak's main service centers - and I suspect the Capitol's engineer just assumed that proper service had been performed on the engines - as it normally is. He was wrong!
Never too old to have a happy childhood!
Our instructions are to report when fuel is 2000 gallons or less. Those are local instructions, mostly for through trains, and other places may have other parameters.
Most modern engines have two gauges. One is the sight glass on the side of the tank. Modern engines with computer screens also have a digital gauge. One reading is displayed on the engr's screen and digital readouts located on both sides of the engine by the fuel tank.
Some older engines have an analog dial gauge on the tank in addition to the sight glass. (I've even run across a few that have all three types.) The oldest engines just have the sight glass.
It's not unusual to have an engine where the digital gauge isn't working. The sight glass on the tank isn't much help sometimes. On some engines the bottom of the gauge is around 3000 gallons. In that situation, the only way to tell how much fuel is in the tank is to get something to stick down into the tank. Usually if one's available, they have a mechanical dept person do that.
I've had a trailing engine run out of fuel on me. The paperwork showed both engines had been on the train from it's originating point (an empty hopper out of one of the Wisconsin power plants) and were to be fueled enroute. The leader had 2900 gallons when I took charge of it. I assumed since the leader had a sufficient amount and both had been together, that the second engine did too. Somehow when the engines were to be fueled, the second one wasn't. It happens sometimes.
Jeff
Nothing we have is new enough to have anything digital anyhow, so that's out...
Since we run a fairly regular schedule, we kinda know where things are, fuel wise, and have regularly scheduled deliveries. That doesn't preclude issues like missed deliveries or the like, however.
The guages aren't usually a problem, but sight glasses aren't always as easy to read as you might think, between staining, crude, and road grime.
Through most of the season, though, engines are running in ones, and rescue could be a couple of hours away, so we do try to know how we stand.
Sticking a tank isn't always that easy - many have the fill piping arranged in a way that precludes using a straight stick.
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
Some locomotives phone home to Erie with bad GEM data and other times the data is good, just handled improperly.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
oltmanndTank gauges of all types have been notoriously bad since forever. Add to that that nobody shops an engine for a fuel gauge and you have a lousy situation. Calculating fuel burn from generator ho-hum plus idle fuel is far more reliable.
So, start bngng on your tanks. After a while, your ears will be as accurate as a fuel gauge.
Not too different than running passenger, especially commuter, trains. Plan on providing service to the customers and not just running trains. Do things so that running out of fuel doesn't happen. Why are there trainmasters, road foreman of engines, yard masters, master mechanics, supervisors of all kinds, train engineers and conductors if not to assure safety, efficiency, and service?
RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.
HENRY, even with commitment, the best of intentions, etc, people make errors, because we are human and not perfect. At the end of the chain are the on-board railroad people. Engineers should check that everything, or at least everything important, works before advancing the throttle. Food service people should insure that the commisary loaded the right food and drink. Freight conductors that the manifest corresponds to the actual cars on the train. And so it goes. Checking the fuel is just one of a lot of checks that the onboard people should do ---before the throttle is advanced. This in no way implies that the trainmasters, yardmasters, switch crews, and locomotive maintenance people are not doing their jobs. I hope engineers will use my suggestion to make their jobs easier and have better peace-of-mind.
oltmanndTank gauges of all types have been notoriously bad since forever.
daveklepper So, start bngng on your tanks. After a while, your ears will be as accurate as a fuel gauge.
That will last until someone hurts their hand. Then we'll have a rule about banging tanks. I don't think it works that well, either - those tanks have pretty thick walls.
The GPs we use have a combination of sight glasses, analog gauges, and digital gauges. Some have all three. The digital readouts are pretty accurate. Just have to leave a 200 gallon (or so) cushion.
It's been fun. But it isn't much fun anymore. Signing off for now.
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any
If the gauges and/or glass are working OK - no need to bang. If need to bang, why bang so hard as to hurt one's hand? Lots of people knock on doors. But who ever heard of hurting one;s hand doing so? But important to check, not just to assume.
daveklepper If the gauges and/or glass are working OK - no need to bang. If need to bang, why bang so hard as to hurt one's hand? Lots of people knock on doors. But who ever heard of hurting one;s hand doing so? But important to check, not just to assume.
So we assume the gauges are working ok, or are we banging? I'm confused...
daveklepper HENRY, even with commitment, the best of intentions, etc, people make errors, because we are human and not perfect. At the end of the chain are the on-board railroad people. Engineers should check that everything, or at least everything important, works before advancing the throttle. Food service people should insure that the commisary loaded the right food and drink. Freight conductors that the manifest corresponds to the actual cars on the train. And so it goes. Checking the fuel is just one of a lot of checks that the onboard people should do ---before the throttle is advanced. This in no way implies that the trainmasters, yardmasters, switch crews, and locomotive maintenance people are not doing their jobs. I hope engineers will use my suggestion to make their jobs easier and have better peace-of-mind.
Actually Dave, it's not "because we are human an not perfect" but because we are human and not committed. We have jobs, not careers. Management thinks we come a dime a dozen and that there are 10 people in line waiting for our job; so they don't commit to us and we don't commit to them. They say we should be glad we got a job and to shut up and work. So we feel that if we just mosey along doing enough to be good enough, even less since nobody else cares. No one respects rules, management doesn't respect labor and labor doesn't respect management:, there is little respect. Speaking with some modern railroad employees (yeah, employees, not railroaders) and rail fans about how operations with timetables, train orders, and books of rules actually worked and they either think I'm lying, laugh at the thought it could operate today, but few are in awe and respect. Everyone knows that its just a job until something else comes along or that is is enough to pay the bills and then some, so why leave. It ain't like the old days of careers and dedications and respect for rules, superiors and your fellow "railroaders". There maybe some "got your back" activity but too often there is more apathy about the lot and an attitude of having to keep an eye over one's shoulder. Perfection could be attained with respect for rules, for customer needs, for safety for all, for fellow employees, and for management. And vice versa. Too often it is not there. At least not like the way it should or could be; not like railroading was 25 or more years ago.
Henry, I have to agree there are work situations like that and people like that even in some of the best work situations. But my closest experience with railroad operating people was when I was an unpaid employee of the Boston and Maine, 1952-1953 while working on my MIT SB thesis. Those guys were commited, wanted to do the best job possible, and wanted to help me as much as possible. I also used by B&M pass to commute regularly to my job at Mystic Transformers, and I can say I did not meet a single B&M crew member that was not dedicated to doing the best job possible. The worst situation was of course with Penn Central. Many employees stopped caring because they felt that management did not know what they were doing.
But even dedicated people sometimes make a mistake. I know I sometimes do, even when I am dedicated to what I am doing. Not very often, but it does happen. Even in commuting, I thought I boarded a Jerusalem 68 bus when actually it was a 39. Somehow, my eyes played a trick on me.
One of the most innovative and progressive railroads is Norfolk Southern. But I recall a poster corroborating your point by calling the railroad by a term with the same NS initials that the moderator would remove today. So, you are right in many cases, and I am right in others.
You and I Dave come from a time when the world was made up of people relying on each other for social and work situations rather than electronic machines for entertainment, social intercourse, and at work stations. In railroading, there aren't humans strategically located at terminals or trackside, nor aboard the trains for that matter. When an onboard train person talks to his dispatcher most likely neither are next door neighbors nor have ever met...not ten miles apart but maybe thousands. There usually is one other person in the cab and those two may be the only humans they encounter except by radio for hours on end. So much is so different. Especially from the early fifties and so starkly from as late at the 70's. A woman told me her boyfriend saw an ad that NJT was hiring conductors and told her she should go get one of those jobs because they pay so well....she did and told me she kicked her boyfriend out and that she doesn't have much time for a boyfriend anyway because of "the job". Everything is different for everybody...we just notice railroading more than others do.
Knock on the fuel tank will tell you that there is fuel in the tank, bu how can you tell how much is in the tank? you would be guessing, since the tanks are curved on the sides and flat on the top , bottom and ends.
I ra
Banging just DOES NOT WORK! You really can't tell the difference between top and bottom, the bangs all sound the same. That is why they dip. Sight glasses are a waste of time because as mentioned earlier, you can't see through the cruddy glass. That is why they dip.If most RR's are like the NS, they have a centralized computer center that is supposed to keep up with fuelings (along with test dates and the like), but, like everything else some units fall through the cracks. That is why they dip. At least around here they do.
Not to say that it is uncommon to run out of fuel, but, in 40 yrs. I can think of only one time where my units ran out of fuel where it caused the train to come to a complete stop. And, one other time where I was on a set of pusher units. In this case the train was over any hills where they were needed, the lead units could easily handle the train and I was just along for the short ride into the crew change terminal.
While some folks here seem to be making a big deal out of all of this, remember, you don't have locomotives falling out of the sky.
.
Henry, it's getting old when you keep saying all of today's railroaders are F-Up's and don't care about rules etc. Yes there are some who fit your description, but you know what? There are old heads who worked in the "good old days" who also fit your description. Then and now. Most out here do care about rules, customers, and above all the safety of ourselves and fellow employees.
Dave, you see the railroads through their PR departments or railfan media. They show the railroad in the best light possible. People that deal with them everyday have a different perspective. The image the railroads project is not always the reality in the field. The talk doesn't always equal the walk.
A fuel story.
Get on board a one engine hopper train. Fuel gauge on screen shows 800 gals. Call dispatcher who is busy and tell him fuel and engine status. He says to take off, they'll worry about it down the road. We leave. Have only went about 3 miles when the dispatcher calls us back. "How much fuel did you say you have?" I tell him again 800 gals and one engine. He asks if we need a fuel truck sent out to us or if we can make Fremont. Taking in weather conditions, summer with no heavy winds, I tell him we should be OK. He says he will arrange to have the unit fueled at Fremont.
About 15 miles from Fremont, we get a signal indication that we are going into the hole at Kennard. We are down to 300 gals. I dial up the dispatcher (now on a different dispatcher's territory) and the conductor talks to him. Condr asks, "Are you putting us in the siding?" "Why, yes I am." was the smug reply. Condr then asks, "You do know we are short on fuel and down to 300 gals with only one engine?" Dispatcher, "No, I didn't know that. Can you make Fremont? Do you need a fuel truck?" Conductor relays that we should be able to make it in, provided we don't sit for hours. The dispatcher says he's changed his plans and we'll get a signal as soon as it times out.
Jim: Banging may not work for you, because people's ear sensitivities do differ. It might work for one of your coworkers. There are people who can tell a Baldwin (piano) from a Steinway from a Bosendorfer from a Yamaha, even though a good pianist can make them sound identacle to many listeners, even most musicians..
If the dip stick works USE IT. Don't say "making a big deal." One time out of a thousand avoiding tieing up a train or a whole line, worth the thousand checks.
I agree 100% with your last sentance. And can say so 100 times as well!
BigJim Banging just DOES NOT WORK!
Banging just DOES NOT WORK!
As someone else pointed out it does work for some people. Knew a pilot who could take a flashlight and "kick" the tires and tell within 5 # the tire pressure. He drove maintenance crazy doubting him and then finding out he was right. He explained it was like tuning a drum.
Dave & Henry
The differences between employees 50 years ago and today are negligable. The real difference is is the number of employees that are a check/balance on any work activity or result. In years gone by there were multiple checks/balance employees on any specific work action before that action became final. With today's staffing levels, a employee has one chance to do his job correctly and there is no one else that follows up on that employees work until it becomes the final product.
Since I have been playing the 'real' game of railroading for 49 years and am still playing it, I have seen and had to respond to virtually any and every kind of operational F... Up and formulate plans to dig the operation out of the results of the F... Up!
Employees today are no more and no less motivated than employees of days gone by. Employees of yesteryear and employees of today take great delight in malicious compliance with a supervisors instructions. Today''s Supervisors, especially those hired 'off the street' have no idea of the power of words written in instructions - and frequently get results other than what they had anticipated because they worded a instruction poorly. Been watching it happen my entire career.
There were railfoads where everyone did work as a team, and where a worker did feel free to tell a supervisor that his instructions might lead to problems. The Denver and Rio Grande Western was one and the Boston and Maine before McGinnis was another.
There's a lot of truth in what Balt said. I'm friends with a track foreman. A new-read straight out of college- track supervisor was over him. I asked the foreman how the sup was doing and the reply was 'he's learning'. After about a year, the supervisor decided he needed more knowledge of his job and stepped down to work with a track gang for a year before returning to his position. Now he speaks their language and understands their job. Makes his life easier too. Hard, some days, to beat hands on experience.
Norm
daveklepper Jim: Banging may not work for you, because people's ear sensitivities do differ. It might work for one of your coworkers. There are people who can tell a Baldwin (piano) from a Steinway from a Bosendorfer from a Yamaha, even though a good pianist can make them sound identacle to many listeners, even most musicians.. If the dip stick works USE IT. Don't say "making a big deal." One time out of a thousand avoiding tieing up a train or a whole line, worth the thousand checks. I agree 100% with your last sentance. And can say so 100 times as well!
OK Maestro, Let's see you do it!Coal and/or covered hoppers are made of comparatively thin sheet metal. You can very, very easily slap the side of one with your hand and hear if it is empty or not. And, if your arms are long enough, you can even tell very closely how high it is loaded.Fuel tanks are made of much heavier steel. Much heavier! Then due to internal supports, baffles and the like, they do not "Tom-Tom" like a drum. THAT IS WHY THEY DIP THEM!
Now, take into consideration that companies do not have classes teaching the fine art of tuning wine glasses. In other words, they do not line up a bunch of locomotives with varying degrees of fuel loads and rap on each one to illustrate the different tones of each 500 gal. mark.
And while this could be an interesting discussion, some folks are making too big of a deal out of it. No one wants to get out on the road and run out of fuel and consequently heat. especially in as cold of temperatures as we have had lately. If the proper authority is notified of or a question arises about fuel load and is told to "let 'em roll" then that is what they do. Big Brother knows best...or does he?
I admit I've never dipped a fuel tank nor have I relied on banging on the tank, its just not possible to tell how much fuel is in the tank that's way. Sometimes on hot days you can see the tank sweat and that's a giveaway.
I have the luxury of grabbing a shop rag and cleaning the sight glasses. Most locomotives have at least a couple of different fuel gauges, I usually compare them and take an average. If I run across a bad fuel gauge I'll simply change it. If a sight glass is uselessly dirty, I'll clean it.
I've been troubleshooting and working on and around locomotives most of my life, I know what works and what doesn't.
Did anybody read what I said about the number of railroaders and their close and supportive fraternity? Do so and understand what I read before taking me to the woodshed.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.