Murray We need back: 1 - The Lehigh Valley 2 - The Erie Lackawanna 3 - The Milwaukee Road (back to the Pacific Northwest)
We need back:
1 - The Lehigh Valley
2 - The Erie Lackawanna
3 - The Milwaukee Road (back to the Pacific Northwest)
I'd love to see The Rock back as well...
Any argument carried far enough will end up in Semantics--Hartz's law of rhetoric Emerald. Leemer and Southern The route of the Sceptre Express Barry
I just started my blog site...more stuff to come...
http://modeltrainswithmusic.blogspot.ca/
Ed: The line currently is caught in a big game of keep-away.The outfit that has it out of service goes around the other two sides of a triangle to get to its connections in PIA. The outfit that wants it has a good sized yard at Champaign and would love to access an automobile plant and interchange at Peoria that it used to have over a tenuous excursion over some branchlines that it dumped thirty years ago. Traffic patterns changed and now PIA would be access to multiple AgEnergy and shortline partners.
Mudchicken:What purpose would the Champaign - Peoria line serve? Is there grain that could move on that line?Ed
MidlandMike mudchicken ... (6) The D&NO/C&S Denver to Pueblo Line + Colorado Springs Branch (or CRIP Falcon-Co Springs) Looking at topo maps, this line seems to have followed a torturous path over 3 highplains divides, the highest elevation equal to the Palmer Lake divide. Would this be preferable to re-installing the second track on the Joint Line north of Colorado Springs?
mudchicken ... (6) The D&NO/C&S Denver to Pueblo Line + Colorado Springs Branch (or CRIP Falcon-Co Springs)
...
(6) The D&NO/C&S Denver to Pueblo Line + Colorado Springs Branch (or CRIP Falcon-Co Springs)
Looking at topo maps, this line seems to have followed a torturous path over 3 highplains divides, the highest elevation equal to the Palmer Lake divide. Would this be preferable to re-installing the second track on the Joint Line north of Colorado Springs?
The D&NO alignment and profile was not as bad as you make it out to be / and it could be improved as well to get away from Sand Creek and the Fountain River south of town. The biggest problem would be a certain dam closer to Denver.
Falcon48 mudchicken (1) The mothballed CRIP/Missouri Central StL-KC Line (2) The Mothballed or partially abandoned Peoria - Champaign Peoria & Eastern Line either side of Mansfield IL (3) The abandoned Dawson RR or ATSF/DC&CV Raton Pass Bypass (Boise City-Felt-Clayton + Dora-Farley-Colmor) (4) The UP/Kansas Pacific/Arkansas Valley RR Kit Carson-Las Animas line (5) The M&O/GM&O Mobile to MS State Line segment (6) The D&NO/C&S Denver to Pueblo Line + Colorado Springs Branch (or CRIP Falcon-Co Springs) I wouldn't include the CRIP StL-KC line. It hasn't been used for a long time. Even SP, after it acquired it, never used it, opting instead for trackage rights over the UP (ex MP) route between the two cities Since it remained in place (unlike some of the other candidates) it could have been restored relatively easily, if there were a reason to do so. There hasn't been, and it's unlikely there ever will be. Last year, Missouri Central abandoned a segment on the western end of the line that severed the route (STB Docket No. AB-1068X), The ROW will probably be made into a trail under the National Trails System Act, so the ROW is technically available for reconstruction of the rail line. But, as a practical matter, the abandonment seals the fate of the line as a through route..
mudchicken (1) The mothballed CRIP/Missouri Central StL-KC Line (2) The Mothballed or partially abandoned Peoria - Champaign Peoria & Eastern Line either side of Mansfield IL (3) The abandoned Dawson RR or ATSF/DC&CV Raton Pass Bypass (Boise City-Felt-Clayton + Dora-Farley-Colmor) (4) The UP/Kansas Pacific/Arkansas Valley RR Kit Carson-Las Animas line (5) The M&O/GM&O Mobile to MS State Line segment (6) The D&NO/C&S Denver to Pueblo Line + Colorado Springs Branch (or CRIP Falcon-Co Springs)
(1) The mothballed CRIP/Missouri Central StL-KC Line
(2) The Mothballed or partially abandoned Peoria - Champaign Peoria & Eastern Line either side of Mansfield IL
(3) The abandoned Dawson RR or ATSF/DC&CV Raton Pass Bypass (Boise City-Felt-Clayton + Dora-Farley-Colmor)
(4) The UP/Kansas Pacific/Arkansas Valley RR Kit Carson-Las Animas line
(5) The M&O/GM&O Mobile to MS State Line segment
Last year, Missouri Central abandoned a segment on the western end of the line that severed the route (STB Docket No. AB-1068X), The ROW will probably be made into a trail under the National Trails System Act, so the ROW is technically available for reconstruction of the rail line. But, as a practical matter, the abandonment seals the fate of the line as a through route..
(1) The abandonment is less than six miles ...and should the line come back to life (BIG IF), there would be two logical moves made that would make the railbanked line a non-issue.
(2) You forget why SSW/SP got the lne in the first place and why the people who have the line now have no desire to rehab it. (neither ever wanted to run it, in the right hands, the line remains a "threat")
(*) Know the line better than most, have walked it all end to end twice since 1998. (and the Osage River Bridge is a thrill along with the tunnels...) The line has several interesting opportunities.
MP173 Fred Frailey's excellent blog on the Frisco line to Avard discusses how BNSF is investing big $$$ to install CTC on a line which at one time was considered for abandonment. It is now a key route in the important Memphis - West Coast intermodal business. The discussion of the Rock Island Memphis - Amarillo line was pointed out as a shorter route (100 miles) yet that line was abandoned in the 1980s as there were no buyers at the "everything must go" sale. What looks promising on a map frequently lacks credibility when all factors are considered. The Memphis-Amarillo ( and on to Tucumcari) line had many shortcomings for Santa Fe. They still had to have the Transcon to Avard and on to KC and Chicago so this would have been a partial duplication. The RI line was in shambles with some incursions by private and public interests (both legal and otherwise) so the cost to rehab and signalize it would be tremendous. The routes through OKC and Little Rock did not lend themselves to expedient operations. The engineering computations which analyze equivalent straight and level miles reduced the 100 miles savings to somewhat less. So at the time Santa Fe was looking at acquiring this line it did not make sense.
Fred Frailey's excellent blog on the Frisco line to Avard discusses how BNSF is investing big $$$ to install CTC on a line which at one time was considered for abandonment. It is now a key route in the important Memphis - West Coast intermodal business.
The discussion of the Rock Island Memphis - Amarillo line was pointed out as a shorter route (100 miles) yet that line was abandoned in the 1980s as there were no buyers at the "everything must go" sale.
What looks promising on a map frequently lacks credibility when all factors are considered. The Memphis-Amarillo ( and on to Tucumcari) line had many shortcomings for Santa Fe. They still had to have the Transcon to Avard and on to KC and Chicago so this would have been a partial duplication. The RI line was in shambles with some incursions by private and public interests (both legal and otherwise) so the cost to rehab and signalize it would be tremendous. The routes through OKC and Little Rock did not lend themselves to expedient operations. The engineering computations which analyze equivalent straight and level miles reduced the 100 miles savings to somewhat less. So at the time Santa Fe was looking at acquiring this line it did not make sense.
Just thought of another one--the old CNW cutoff between Nelson and Nachusa, Illinois, could eliminate or reduce the ruling grade for eastbound coal trains coming out of the Rock River valley.
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
I understand that around or about 1961, CN was toying with the idea of purchasing the Lehigh Valley from the then-controlling PRR.
Kind of a shame that they did not follow through with this.
Definitely, almost the entire E and EL routes were dumped by CR but not abandoned because they knew how often there were much better the grades and clearances, ability to avoid major yard and traffic gridlock situations,. These routes were held, even with feint attempts to run trains, just so competition would not be effected. LV, DL&W, E, CNJ, all had properties which threatened the mojo of PRR and NYC and were therefore dismissed but not dismantled by CR...well, the NJ Cut Off was dismantled, the DL&W from Binghamton to Scranton sold to the D&H, the LV dismantled across NY and stubbed out in northern PA. CR also did it to their own: the NYC from Corning, NY to Newberry yard/Williamsport, for instance. In addition to the lines loss to overhead moves, a lot of local industries were forced out of business and towns decimated by the actions of CR...but CR was a success, so?
RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.
That is true Henry6 but some lines I think were abandonned to avoid competition and customers being leeched. Good example in my opinion is the Canada Southern Line once operated by Wabash. In Ontario, Nanticoke (Esso Oil, Stelco Steel now I think owned by US Steel and a coal using power plant) alone could make a railroad a nice bit of revenue. At one point in St Thomas to Simcoe I believe, all auto parts or auto manufacturing such as Formosa Frames in St Thomas, Ford Assembly in Talbotville (closed down now unfortunately), a few fertilizer and milling operations including ConAgra I believe. Once upon a time, despite using CN trackage rights, NS used to run 4 trains from Buffalo to St Thomas every day and a couple between St Thomas and Detroit. Other major industrial areas once upon a time was Windsor and Niagara Region particularly Port Colborne with multiple milling operations, a bio diesel plant now running, chemical plant making citric acid, steel pipe manufacturing, INCO refinery and several transloading facilities mostly all serviced by a shortline (Triliium Railways). Besides NS or CSX purchasing the CASO to perhaps leech into CN and CP's revenues neer by, it is a very attractive intermodal route between East Coast and Chicago. Currently anything around here in Ontario, needs to go through CN or CP and ship their containers to Toronto/Brampton for terminal loading/unloading. NS has an intermodal yard in Buffalo (William Street) and I believe CSX built an intermodal terminal in their old defuct Seneca Yard I believe. At one point, Dain City (between Welland and Port Colborne Ontario) had an intermodal facility. If the CASO line was still in existence today, I wonder if NS and CSX would be leeching intermodal revenue from CN and CP as well as Dain City still being in service today.
Just because ROW's exist or even exist with rails, does not make a line ripe for renewal or reuse...there has to be a sound marketing and trafficking reason. Also, many I've seen posted, especially here in the East, are not viable because of other uses and blockages by adjacent property owners. What looks good on a map, or in one's mind, may not be good in reality.
MP173 The discussion of the Rock Island Memphis - Amarillo line was pointed out as a shorter route (100 miles) yet that line was abandoned in the 1980s as there were no buyers at the "everything must go" sale.
The line I am thinking is the old L&N line from St. Louis to Evansville. It mostly still there with EVWR using the line from Evansville, Ind. to Okawville, IL. But from there to STL it is partly abandoned and partly used by a light rail transit. If EVWR would have the section going from Okawville to STL I think they could have become a larger part of the interchange business.
There's the former Milwaukee Road line over Snoqualmie Pass between Easton, WA and the Seattle area. BN bought it and could have used it as a low grade/elevation alternative to their ex-NP Stampede Pass which they eventually had to re-open, after ripping up the old Milwaukee line.
BRING BACK THE MODOC !!!
I know, I know. But.....The Modoc could:
1. Do what it was intended to, send Oregon lumber to eastern markets (Mostly southern Oregon).
2. Provide a route for met. coal from Colorado (or Wyoming) to the Pacific (read China) withe very few ascending grades grades (Montello/Peqops, Sand Pass, Viewland grade Sagehen & Ambrose)
3. Provide an alternate route if either the Shasta route or Donner/FRC is closed.
4. Provide an alternate route if the OSL/UP route is closed.
Carl:Has there ever been a really good Chicago - Indianapolis passenger route? Nothing like Chicago - Stl Louis or Detroit, or Milwaukee.
I think the current Monon/Crawfordsville route is decent...if they put big $$$ into it. As it is now, too much jointed rail. But, to get to Chicago and to Indianaplis is an issue...Amtrak has to go Monon/CN/UP/Metra/Amtrak to get from Dyer, In to Union Station. That is brutal.
Ed
My gosh I haven't posted on here for a long time.
There are 3 areas I have actually looked at recently. For CSX or NS-the old CASO line for their intermodal and high priority traffic to by pass all the conjestion in PA and Ohio.
There are a couple of lines that CN might look into. One of them is the BPRR between Buffalo to Pittsburgh to link up to BLE for potential coal and who knows, intermodal development. It would be even better if they could somehow reach Baltimore from Pittsburgh somehow. Also, the Lehigh Valley line that is now largely abandonned between Buffalo and Syracuse NY I believe would be good if other shortlines could be bought out, it would might give CN the option for intermodal revenue between Chicago/Toronto and NY/NJ. On the other hand, it would be such an expensive capital investment and would probably get into political upheaval with the STB, it would likely not be feasible.
Closer to home for us, Ed, I'm betting that the Midwest passenger-rail planners wish they had a decent direct route from Chicago to Indianapolis. I'm not sure what could be cobbled together for them now.
An obvious friend of the forum, not quite ripped out...is Saluda Grade. Lots of speculation on this route. I would make a trip to SC to watch trains on that line.
Another line in "sleep mode" is Tennessee Pass. Yet another route which I would make a trip to watch trains...and possibly fish for trout in adjacent streams.
This is not surprising. Urban planners have for years found when drawing lines for new rapid or public transit projects, those lines often follow the routes of former transit lines. And often, too, railroads have found old unused lines suddenly become valuable assets when new traffic, increased traffic, or changing traffic patterns emerge. Conrail abandoned or otherwise got rid of a lot of the Erie and Erie Lackawanna lines only to find a use for them via short lines. Even NS has leased the former Erie line east of BInghamton, NY but holds its options open as another route into and out of NYCity area...and CSX often uses the route for detours around problems on the RIver Line. Another place CR realized the value of a line was when the abandoned and quickly ripped up the rails on the former DL&W NJ Cut Off knowing the value it would be to anybody else, i.e. real competition. So, I think there are a lot of streaks of rust, and less, lying dormantly awaiting another day..
What other abandoned railroad lines would be utilitized as important routes in today's railroad industry?
This is not necessarily to criticize the railroads for abandoning lines at the time, but simply a "what if" exercize.
I realize this conversation comes up from time to time, but it has been a couple of years.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.