Trains.com

TSA Airport Security Pat Downs for METRA Passengers

4275 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1,486 posts
TSA Airport Security Pat Downs for METRA Passengers
Posted by Victrola1 on Friday, May 4, 2012 9:23 AM

CHICAGO (CBS) – Some stations on the Metra Electric Line and South Shore Line could be shut down during the upcoming NATO summit, and passengers at other stations could face airport-style security screenings, due to the Secret Service security plan that could be released as soon as Friday afternoon.

http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/05/03/summit-could-mean-airport-style-security-on-metra-electric-south-shore-trains/

If done once for a high security event, will it be done again on a regular basis for whatever reason?

  • Member since
    July 2011
  • From: Reno, NV
  • 26 posts
Posted by Espins1 on Friday, May 4, 2012 9:29 AM

Great, now the TSA is going to make train travel a pain just like they did with air travel.  I hope it's only a one time thing.

Scott Espin
Railfan - Reno NV

  • Member since
    March 2016
  • From: Burbank IL (near Clearing)
  • 13,540 posts
Posted by CSSHEGEWISCH on Friday, May 4, 2012 10:37 AM

Everybody's being quite vague about the security plan for the NATO summit.  While there will be some extra steps taken on the IC/South Shore routes because of their location, I really don't think that they will become a regular practice.

The daily commute is part of everyday life but I get two rides a day out of it. Paul
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Friday, May 4, 2012 12:53 PM

Maybe they were actually refering to the patdowns by the secret service of the strippers in many "gentlemens" clubs in the Chicago metro area ?

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, May 4, 2012 2:37 PM

     Seriously,  it's a meeting of the North Atlantic Treat Organization.  Why have it in Chicago?  How 'bout somewhere practical, that pose less security issues, like Iceland?  What better place than in the middle of the Atlantic?   I bet you wouldn't have to worry about airplanes straying into secure airspace, or passengers getting on the Iceland Comuter(?) railroads. 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: roundhouse
  • 2,747 posts
Posted by Randy Stahl on Friday, May 4, 2012 3:08 PM

I agree, someplace out of the mainstream .. like Bikini Atoll

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Friday, May 4, 2012 3:34 PM

Murphy Siding

     Seriously,  it's a meeting of the North Atlantic Treat Organization.  Why have it in Chicago?  How 'bout somewhere practical, that pose less security issues, like Iceland?  What better place than in the middle of the Atlantic?   I bet you wouldn't have to worry about airplanes straying into secure airspace, or passengers getting on the Iceland Comuter(?) railroads. 

Isn't Chicago home turf for somebody important in D.C. - like POTUS???

Just to show how bughouse paranoid the Secret Service is, when POTUS visited an intercontinental ballistic missile base some years back, the SS insisted on locking all of the shop doors leading onto the corridor the Prez would use with their very own SS padlocks.  Hey, folks.  You couldn't even get into the building without a Secret clearance - and it took Top Secret to be allowed to touch most of the equipment that went into the hole with a Minuteman.

I wonder if they're that squirrely about visits to the Pentagon...

Chuck [MSgt(ret) USAF]

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Friday, May 4, 2012 7:38 PM

Oh joy.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Friday, May 4, 2012 9:04 PM

Randy Stahl

I agree, someplace out of the mainstream .. like Bikini Atoll

Or the moon.  What a joke.

Dan

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Saturday, May 5, 2012 8:17 AM

Better Yet on a Nimtiz Class Carrier for the Summit.  Portable and has its OWN Air Cover 24/7 Plus the Firepower to deal with any Protesters in the Form of the Air wing or teh Surface Escorts and the Submarines that loiter around it.  That and the World Leaders could leave their SO's behind along with the Press and MAYBE GET SOME WORK DONE FOR ONCE. 

Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Saturday, May 5, 2012 8:23 AM

As long as Americans tolerate it, the fist will keep getting tighter.  The only thing that will stop it is if people stop using the facilities in which the Gestapo tactics get installed.  That will not happen.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: near Chicago
  • 937 posts
Posted by Chris30 on Saturday, May 5, 2012 9:29 AM

I want see 'em try to do some "pat downs" at Union Station at, oh... say around 5pm on a weekday. Just try to slow that human cattle train down. Now everybody just line up... (If you've seen the rush at Union Station - or any other large urban commuter station - around 5pm you get the joke.)

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, May 5, 2012 10:01 AM

If the Chicago authorities don't want them there they should just tell them to keep out.  Chicago's transit stations are city, not Federal property, TSA has no business there unless the city asks them to be there.  

Say what you like about the late J. Edgar Hoover, but back when he was Director of the FBI he was VERY careful not to intrude on local authority unless he was asked for assistance by the local law enforcement  people.   Some of the Federal people nowadays could use a bit of Hoovers probity.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Hope, AR
  • 2,061 posts
Posted by narig01 on Saturday, May 5, 2012 1:45 PM

Randy Stahl

I agree, someplace out of the mainstream .. like Bikini Atoll

Better still someplace out the mainstream in the sun in the North Atlantic that has clubs for SS,  The Bahamas.   or  Bermuda.

Rgds IGN

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Saturday, May 5, 2012 2:16 PM

Firelock76

If the Chicago authorities don't want them there they should just tell them to keep out.  Chicago's transit stations are city, not Federal property, TSA has no business there unless the city asks them to be there.  

Sure.....You do realize that both O'Hare and Midway are also owned by the city of Chicago, right?  The TSA DOES have the authority to go onto private and public land.

 

Just to make sure that I mention something with trains in this thread, so the site censors moderators don't delete the post, the TSA was inspecting hazmat cars last night at a large yard in the Chicago area.  They do show up and inspect things quite a bit, and it is all legal.

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Saturday, May 5, 2012 2:51 PM

Firelock76

Say what you like about the late J. Edgar Hoover, but back when he was Director of the FBI he was VERY careful not to intrude on local authority unless he was asked for assistance by the local law enforcement  people.   Some of the Federal people nowadays could use a bit of Hoovers probity.

Back when J. Edgar Hoover was director, that was the law.  Then they passed the USAPatriot Act and created the Department of Homeland Security...

Don't bet that the train stations are too busy.  Have you ever looked at the volume of passengers and crew going through the largest airports?  They wouldn't think twice at the prospect of throwing that big monkey wrench into the works at a busy train station.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, May 5, 2012 3:06 PM

n012944

 TSA was inspecting hazmat cars last night at a large yard in the Chicago area.  They do show up and inspect things quite a bit, and it is all legal.

     What would TSA know about inspecting hazmat cars?

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Moderator
  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: London ON
  • 10,392 posts
Posted by blownout cylinder on Saturday, May 5, 2012 3:21 PM

CNW 6000

 

 Randy Stahl:

 

I agree, someplace out of the mainstream .. like Bikini Atoll

 

Or the moon.  What a joke.

 

mmmmm...I think Resolute might be a better location....or the Falkland Is....Whistling

Any argument carried far enough will end up in Semantics--Hartz's law of rhetoric Emerald. Leemer and Southern The route of the Sceptre Express Barry

I just started my blog site...more stuff to come...

http://modeltrainswithmusic.blogspot.ca/

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: The 17th hole at TPC
  • 2,283 posts
Posted by n012944 on Saturday, May 5, 2012 3:23 PM

Murphy Siding

 

 n012944:

 

 

 TSA was inspecting hazmat cars last night at a large yard in the Chicago area.  They do show up and inspect things quite a bit, and it is all legal.

 

 

     What would TSA know about inspecting hazmat cars?

 

The TSA is quite a bit more than airport security.  They have people working for them, many are former FRA people, doing different checks.  

http://www.tsa.gov/who_we_are/index.shtm

"We look for bombs at checkpoints in airports, we inspect rail cars, we patrol subways with our law enforcement partners, and we work to make all modes of transportation safe."

An "expensive model collector"

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, May 5, 2012 6:35 PM

n012944

 Firelock76:

If the Chicago authorities don't want them there they should just tell them to keep out.  Chicago's transit stations are city, not Federal property, TSA has no business there unless the city asks them to be there.  

 

Sure.....You do realize that both O'Hare and Midway are also owned by the city of Chicago, right?  The TSA DOES have the authority to go onto private and public land.

 

Just to make sure that I mention something with trains in this thread, so the site censors moderators don't delete the post, the TSA was inspecting hazmat cars last night at a large yard in the Chicago area.  They do show up and inspect things quite a bit, and it is all legal.

Not trying to get into a "you-know-what"  contest here, but airports are a different matter.  No-one's going to hijack a train and fly it into a building.  As a matter of fact, no-one's going to hilack an airplane anymore either.  The old days of "sit down, shut up, don't resist, enjoy the flight to Havana" are over.  Every airliner that flies now is full of passengers ready to be the next Todd Beamer, God rest his soul!  And the rest of those heroes and heroines on Flight 93 as well!

At any rate, didn't an Amtrak police official throw the TSA out of his station last year?  As far as I know Amtrak stations are Federal property and still that "top cop" wouldn't put up with any  interferance from anyone outside the "family".  I have no beef with TSA, they've caused me no problems at all in any of the airports I've been to, but like any government agency they're going to try to expand their influence, or at least try to show SOME kind of results or risk getting their budget cut. 

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Saturday, May 5, 2012 6:45 PM

Phoebe Vet

 Firelock76:

Say what you like about the late J. Edgar Hoover, but back when he was Director of the FBI he was VERY careful not to intrude on local authority unless he was asked for assistance by the local law enforcement  people.   Some of the Federal people nowadays could use a bit of Hoovers probity.

 

Back when J. Edgar Hoover was director, that was the law.  Then they passed the USAPatriot Act and created the Department of Homeland Security...

Don't bet that the train stations are too busy.  Have you ever looked at the volume of passengers and crew going through the largest airports?  They wouldn't think twice at the prospect of throwing that big monkey wrench into the works at a busy train station.

It wasn't so much the law back in the J. Edgar days.  When the FBI started coming into it's own many people across the country in positions of authority, and many  congressmen and senators as well were suspicious of the FBI as a possible national police force, which is something that Hoover himself was NOT in favor of.  So, he played it very corrrectly and made sure not to usurp local authority.  Remember the time of the early 30's was also the time of Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, and Stalinist Russia.  No-one wanted anything that smacked of a secret police in this country and Hoover realised that.  Wise man!

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Saturday, May 5, 2012 7:18 PM

n012944

 n012944:

 

 

 

 

The TSA is quite a bit more than airport security.  They have people working for them, many are former FRA people, doing different checks.  

http://www.tsa.gov/who_we_are/index.shtm

"We look for bombs at checkpoints in airports, we inspect rail cars, we patrol subways with our law enforcement partners, and we work to make all modes of transportation safe."

  Thanks.  I had only ever heard about TSA in the context of screening airline passengers.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy