henry6 There should be a test period for the law. The State congressman and one or two of his supporters should be required, at a designated multi track station, to cross back and forth over the tracks continuously within an 8 hour period. To make it more challengine, at least one of those participating should be chatting on a cell phone, one listening to an IPod, and another reading a newspaper.Test ends at the end of 8 hours or when one of them gets hit by a train. Snow, rain, or otherwise unfavorable weather would be ideal testing times, too. SIgns should also be posted with the first rule of safety: There could be a train movement on any track, in any direction, at anytime. Similar tests, control tests if you will, should be done crossing major expressways and busy downtown streets to see how effective it is to explain to people about safe crossing of anythng with traffic. If this passes the Illinois legislature, even get to be discussed in the legislature, there has to be something wrong with the people and or the system. Safety has been proven to be a factor that has to be practiced to the fullest, extremist extent in order to be effective. One wiggle, and it is no longer safety.
There should be a test period for the law. The State congressman and one or two of his supporters should be required, at a designated multi track station, to cross back and forth over the tracks continuously within an 8 hour period. To make it more challengine, at least one of those participating should be chatting on a cell phone, one listening to an IPod, and another reading a newspaper.Test ends at the end of 8 hours or when one of them gets hit by a train. Snow, rain, or otherwise unfavorable weather would be ideal testing times, too. SIgns should also be posted with the first rule of safety: There could be a train movement on any track, in any direction, at anytime. Similar tests, control tests if you will, should be done crossing major expressways and busy downtown streets to see how effective it is to explain to people about safe crossing of anythng with traffic.
If this passes the Illinois legislature, even get to be discussed in the legislature, there has to be something wrong with the people and or the system. Safety has been proven to be a factor that has to be practiced to the fullest, extremist extent in order to be effective. One wiggle, and it is no longer safety.
I dissagree... the test should NOT stop when the 1st person is killed... nor end after 8 hours. A single death might have been a fluke. The test must be carried out until all the people are dead, Then there could be some statistical measure of why they each died... old age, or as bug splatter.
Semper Vaporo
Pkgs.
Mm-hmm. Politics as usual. Not just an exclusive Illinois thing.
It's been fun. But it isn't much fun anymore. Signing off for now.
The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any
Nah the Problem is I looked up this State Senator his District was Redrawn and he is NOW having to run in a Heavily Metra Commuter train USED district. I bet he is thinking I pass this law I will have it easy come the Nov Election. However if someone gets KILLED because of it he is going to get hammered by his opponent by it. All he is doing is LOOKING OUT FOR #1 HIMSELF and saying Screw everyone else. Trust me we have the same thing going on by me. A Career Pol that swore he would Never run more than 5 Terms is now in the fight for his life and just went NEgative why he has a Primary Opponent that is Younger and also voted against Raising the Debt limit the last time it came up the other guy voted for it. The other guy also voted for Obamacare and also for the Stimulas package and only Just moved into the District.
This isn't a bad law problem (or rather, just a bad law problem if it goes through), but an access design problem. The law extant is there for everyone's benefit, but stands in the way of access in a local context. People have obviously complained, unknowingly or unthinkingly, that they should be able to use their own discretion when it is perfectly clear that the danger is not present...ie, the train is stopped. If their passage to the other side of the tracks were via another (overhead) safer designated route, this would be a non-issue.
Crandell
Bucyrus I agree. They say that crossing in front of a stopped train is the greatest danger. What is the problem with crossing in front of a stopped train? Wouldn’t the greatest danger be in crossing in front of an approaching train? It sounds like they want to apply bicycle culture, which is where bicyclists don’t have to stop for red lights or stop signs unless there is a car coming. You know, it’s one of those “personal liberty things.”
[emphasis mine - zug]
Problem? Blind spot.
edbenton My point in that rant Zugman was IL were Politicans have no BRAINS and want the Taxpayers to kill themselves off then SUE the RR's for OBEYING a LAW they PASSED. It will happen watch. IL passed a law for Motorcyle riders where they can go thru Red Lights now if the light does not change for them. How soon til someone gets Splattered by a SEMI and his family goes after the Trucking company for hitting him even though the Trtucker by LAW had the RIGHT OF WAY with the light being GREEN. You want to know how screwed up IL is we are the only state that raised Taxes AFTER the collaspe of 2008 and wondered why revenues FELL.
My point in that rant Zugman was IL were Politicans have no BRAINS and want the Taxpayers to kill themselves off then SUE the RR's for OBEYING a LAW they PASSED. It will happen watch. IL passed a law for Motorcyle riders where they can go thru Red Lights now if the light does not change for them. How soon til someone gets Splattered by a SEMI and his family goes after the Trucking company for hitting him even though the Trtucker by LAW had the RIGHT OF WAY with the light being GREEN.
You want to know how screwed up IL is we are the only state that raised Taxes AFTER the collaspe of 2008 and wondered why revenues FELL.
This bill seems to be the work of one person that has a bug up his butt about getting fined for crossing against the lights. And the reason for the motorcycle law is probably because the bikes don't have the mass to trip the circuit. What that has to do with anything is beyond me.
But at least you worked trucking companies in there. I was worried you wouldn't.
In this election year , all sorts of strange things will appear. Would this tend to dirvert things and events of a more serious nature ??? Hmmmm.
Jim
Y6bs evergreen in my mind
jeffhergertThe Palantine officer stresses not crossing in front of a stopped train. Almost to the point one might think it's OK to cross in front of moving trains if one thinks it's a "safe" distance away. The stopped train isn't the one that's going to be running over people. It's going to be the one they don't see or think it far enough away. Jeff
Jeff
I agree. They say that crossing in front of a stopped train is the greatest danger. What is the problem with crossing in front of a stopped train? Wouldn’t the greatest danger be in crossing in front of an approaching train?
It sounds like they want to apply bicycle culture, which is where bicyclists don’t have to stop for red lights or stop signs unless there is a car coming. You know, it’s one of those “personal liberty things.”
If it were the ground level platforms at the Commuter Stations between Boston and Providence, that Acela Headlight a 1/2 mile away will be on you in 10 seconds.
In deference to the MBTA, at the same time the red scrolling signs and loud speakers would be informing "High Speed Train Approaching --- Please Stand Back Of The Yellow Lines".
Maybe that's all that Illinois needs?
Don U. TCA 73-5735
This doesn't need a law since the law would only apply to a very, very limited number of circumstances. A law would be overkill.
There are two ways to approach this. One would be too add some more logic to the crossing such that passengers could get to the center platform when there is no train approaching on the track they have to cross. The other would be to simply put up a sign that would allow passengers access to the center platform when the highway gates are down, provided they "looked and listened".
No mixed-message with either approach since it would only apply to one particular place.
-Don (Random stuff, mostly about trains - what else? http://blerfblog.blogspot.com/)
Dumb .... Would the promoters and sponsors of this bill like to assume all liability for this as well?
(and I'm not sorry at all that the scofflaw that initiated this had his widdle feelings hurt - the citing officer was trying to correct defective behaviour, not harass the lower portion of the gene pool where this clown resides.)
RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.
My thoughts are back to a You tube video of a suburban service train that has stopped to let passengers off, and while it is stopped a man and woman cross on a provided crosswalk across the three tracks in the station. The woman is struck by a through express train. jeffhergert's, analogy is also another situation that could also put people in jeopardy.
Sounds like this proposed law has not been very well thought through...
Is it April 1st already?
The law would allow you to cross tracks, provided that the train is stationary and no others are approaching AND you don't cross the track the waiting train is on. How do you not cross that track?
The article dosen't state if there is a distinction at which end of a stopped train you could cross. The Palantine officer stresses not crossing in front of a stopped train. Almost to the point one might think it's OK to cross in front of moving trains if one thinks it's a "safe" distance away. The stopped train isn't the one that's going to be running over people. It's going to be the one they don't see or think it far enough away.
If that officer likes this law, I wonder if he would support a law that would allow drivers stopped at a red traffic light to proceed when there are no other vehicles or pedestrians present. I doubt it. He would rightly think it would condition drivers to go when it wasn't safe to do so. That's what this law will do for people, condition them to cross when it isn't safe to do so.
The train nearby may be stationary, but one in the distance and out of sight may be approaching at full speed. I agree.
Read this article about a purposed law in Illinois http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120115/news/701159903/ I think this is kind of stupid. What do you all think.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.