Trains.com

Yikes!

2605 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Yikes!
Posted by ericsp on Saturday, June 25, 2011 8:48 AM

I think this car is missing more than an axle.

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=2255427

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Saturday, June 25, 2011 9:11 AM

I'd say "Yikes!" , too, since the other car's coupler wouldn't be that distorted if the blue tank weren't loaded.  I'm not sure, but I think the bottom shelf of the black tank's coupler (and the truck on the end of that tank) is doing all of the work here.

(Always at war with those who think OTR [off-the-rails] trucking is easy...sorry, EdBenton!)

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, June 25, 2011 9:20 AM

Well! 

Sure says a lot to the effectiveness  of the 'Safety' type locking coupler system(?)

 

 


 

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Sunday, June 26, 2011 3:38 AM

I looked at the album and found a photograph from a different angle.

http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=2255425

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Sunday, June 26, 2011 5:05 AM

In the 2nd photo, you can see the 'missing' truck way off to the right, about midway along the next blue tank car, just to the right of the wood utility pole. 

Note that the caption to the 2nd photo says that "This is the result of a remote control switch throwing itself under the train" ( ! ? ! )  I don't have enough experience with them to know if either that's even possible, the result of operator error (like my typing !),  a protective safety circuit to prevent that - such as by detecting occupancy of the switch - didn't work - perhaps because that car was so long the trucks spanned over the circuit ? - or the switch truly just decided to act on its own, etc.

In the 1st photo, note also that the numbers of the 2 blue tank car are sequential - TILX 301732 and TILX 301733.

The shelf-coupler guys ought to be patting themselves on the back for a graphic demonstration of how good their product is, and now having another inadvertent but nevertheless great photo for the advertising guys to work with ! 

Thanks for sharing. 

- Paul North.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:49 PM

I was going to suggest a failed metal theft incident, given recent news items.  Big Smile

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, June 26, 2011 2:41 PM

I tend to doubt the story there, since the remote-control circuitry is generally designed to be fail-safe, and the circuits are designed to handle the longest possible distance between axles, which is, I think, about 65 feet.  The total length of the blue tank car is 68'10", so I'm guessing that the distance between close axles of the trucks would be 55 feet, at most.

More likely, a wheel on the errant truck picked the point, probably due to a thin flange. 

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Henrico, VA
  • 8,955 posts
Posted by Firelock76 on Sunday, June 26, 2011 2:59 PM

"Geez, now where'd I leave that truck?  It MUST be around here someplace...."

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Sunday, June 26, 2011 4:28 PM

Well, basically, that's why I'm not into model trains.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    September 2010
  • From: Libertyville, IL
  • 372 posts
Posted by Mr. Railman on Sunday, June 26, 2011 7:00 PM

well i'll be...that's one way to transport a  bad order!

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: phillipsburg nj
  • 25 posts
Posted by sd45-2 on Wednesday, July 6, 2011 9:11 PM

first i find my car up on blocks now this......Surprise

  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 1,103 posts
Posted by ValleyX on Friday, July 8, 2011 10:28 PM

Perhaps the switch had been placed on hand-throw operation, of which a key step is lining the switch over and lining it back for movement after taking the switch off power and placing it in hand-throw operation.  Failure to do this can cause the switch to "float", creating a gap in the points and leading to potential derailments.  

I certainly don't know what happened here, points could have been picked, too.  

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy