Trains.com

Locating air leaks...

12702 views
51 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Monday, May 9, 2011 9:31 AM

Ed - I believe you're replying to "TrainManTy's" question as below, not mine (I had the same answer, which is how I recognized it).  - Paul North. 

TrainManTy

 edblysard:

*snip*

air hose damaged beyond repair you close the anglecock on the car ahead and set the car out, if there is no where or way to set the car out you button up the train ahead of the problem car and proceeded at restricted speed to the nearest location where the car can be set out.

 

Not that there's any other way to do it out on the road, but doesn't that mean you're dragging a car with it's brakes applied?  

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, May 9, 2011 5:20 PM

Sorry about that, I should read first, then type!

But the answer, even though directed in error, is still the same.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, May 9, 2011 7:09 PM

Runaround hoses are normally in charge of the Car Dept and will be used where a car has at broken trainline that cannot be repaired in the field to permit the bad order to be picked up and brought to a regular car repair facility for actual repair.

zugmann

 edblysard:

Paul,

You would simply bleed off the air from the remaining cars with the bleed rod...no air at all in the cars and they roll free.

 

 

You don't carry runaround hoses?

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, May 9, 2011 7:13 PM
 

 

If you can't repair the airhose with the supplied wrench and replacement hose it may be possible to hang the runaround hose to allow you to continue moving.. with airbrakes.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Monday, May 9, 2011 9:13 PM

My carrier took our runaround hoses and re-railr frogs and chains off the motors about 10 years ago...their concern was we would get something on the ground, then re-rail it and not tell anyone about it...like I am going to let a re-railed LPG or chlorine car head out to interchange with out the car department going over it completly...

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Terre Haute IN
  • 199 posts
Posted by robscaboose on Monday, May 9, 2011 10:02 PM

EmbarrassedHad that happen to me this past weekend on our tourist RR.  I cut the engine in and as I began walking to the rear of the train to begin my terminal brake test, I heard a hissing sound comming from the back of the train (as we have a long backup move crossing several roads, we have a horn & emergency brake valve on the caboose).  The brake valve was cracked open just enough to make a lot of noise, but not enough to build up the air or "dump" the air.  Once I closed the valve, everything was just fine.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Monday, May 9, 2011 10:11 PM

edblysard

My carrier took our runaround hoses and re-railr frogs and chains off the motors about 10 years ago...their concern was we would get something on the ground, then re-rail it and not tell anyone about it...like I am going to let a re-railed LPG or chlorine car head out to interchange with out the car department going over it completly...

 

I can understand the frogs (well, not really) but runaround hoses?  I've never had to personally string one out, but I have had to handle trains where one was already being used due to a broken brake pipe.  They must have confidence in us..?

 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Cardiff, CA
  • 2,930 posts
Posted by erikem on Monday, May 9, 2011 11:32 PM

edblysard

...like I am going to let a re-railed LPG or chlorine car head out to interchange with out the car department going over it completely...

It would be kind of fun if the LPG car and chlorine car were loaded and coupled together...Devil

- Erik

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Tuesday, May 10, 2011 9:59 AM

edblysard
  My carrier took our runaround hoses and re-railr frogs and chains off the motors about 10 years ago...their concern was we would get something on the ground, then re-rail it and not tell anyone about it...like I am going to let a re-railed LPG or chlorine car head out to interchange with out the car department going over it completly... 

  Well, the "railroad mentality"/ culture has changed quite a bit from 'back in the day', though not so much over just the last 10 years.  Recall the likely apocryphal tale about 2 trains which had a head-on collision because one of the crews goofed up on their orders.  No one was injured, but a fair amount of equipment was derailed and down in the ditch.  Both  conductors then walked forward from their respective cabooses to the point of impact.  After looking over the mess, one turned to the other and said: "Don't be in a hurry to call this in - I think we can cover it up !"  Smile, Wink & Grin  Whistling 

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    May 2011
  • 1 posts
Posted by Packy54 on Wednesday, May 11, 2011 8:41 PM

Speaking of run around hoses, is anyone familiar with any safety rules governing the safe and proper use of a run around hose? Would appreciate any help here. Thanks.

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • 86 posts
Posted by MikeInPlano on Wednesday, May 11, 2011 10:40 PM

In the world of computers we call this a binary search.  Repeatedly cutting the part to be searched in half after eliminating one of the existing halves as not having what's being searched for.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, May 12, 2011 7:36 AM

MikeInPlano

In the world of computers we call this a binary search.  Repeatedly cutting the part to be searched in half after eliminating one of the existing halves as not having what's being searched for.

 

With trains, if you're at the head end, there's no need to start halfway back.  Walk back 5-10 cars, close an anglecock, apply brakes.  If no kicker - then walk ahead a few more cars and try again.  Repeat ad nauseum.  It'd be silly to walk to the 50th car of a 100 car train only to find out the kicker was the 4th car.

 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, May 12, 2011 9:45 AM

GFood observation, zug.  Reminds me of Bill Cosby's early comedy bit about him and his younger brother Russell playing the game of "20 Questions": Cos goes at it methodically and logically , uses up all 20 questions, doesn't get it; but Russell guesses randomly and gets it on the 3rd one . . . Whistling

This is an illustration of some deep mathematical principles in the nature of statistics, probability, game theory, "linear programmming", "real math", etc., but I'm too fried right now to remember and assign the correct name.   Suffice it to say that in this exercise (literally !), the "starting position" does matter, and the choices for the next trail or test are not equal, nor is the decision process "free' - it involves time, and the effort of someone walking, and then the time for each 'cycle' of closing the next anglecock, pumping up the air, and applying the brakes, etc. - kind of like friction in physics, in that the intellectual models assume there is no friction, whereas there of course is in the real world.  All of that is to say that given a single car with a certain characteristic somewhere randomly and evenly distributed in a train of x cars, there is likely a rational method to work out the fastest and easiest way to isolate and identify that particular car, which is a hybrid of the above 2 methods.  Someday I might figure out what that is . . . Smile, Wink & Grin 

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Thursday, May 12, 2011 10:50 AM

If you had instant access to each car at random then the "Binary Search" method would be best, but since access to the cars is linear then a linear search is best.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Iowa
  • 3,293 posts
Posted by Semper Vaporo on Thursday, May 12, 2011 10:53 AM

But the more I think about it... it also depends on how long each test takes.  If it takes longer to do the test than to walk half the length of the train then the Binary Search would be faster.  At some point between how long it takes to walk some distance and how long it takes to perform a test one or the other method might be faster.

Semper Vaporo

Pkgs.

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, May 12, 2011 11:27 AM

...or just tell the engineer to not touch the air if he/she can help it. 

 

 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, May 12, 2011 11:44 AM

Yeah - you  (Semper Vaporo) understand the analytical dilemma/ challenge with this:  What are the relative risks/ benefits of adopting a particular method and testing a specific car - in terms of the time already expended to do that, and the most probable amount of time to finish the isolation process ?  SUuperficially, this problem seems similar to finding a specific card in a randomly shuffled deck, and could be solved by writing an equation in the nature of:

Total time = time walking + time testing = (No. of cars walked x average time to walk 1 car-length) +  (No. of cars tested x average time to test 1 car), or = NW*TW + NT*TT. 

Then, substitute the probability equations for the NW and NT terms, and differentiate the resulting equation with respect to the no. of cars walked (NW), and solve for the optimum/ minimum Total Time.

Note that the number of cars walked has no fixed relationship with the number of cars tested (except that they both have to be less than or equal to the total number of cars in the entire train length), and further, the time to walk 1 car-length and the time to test 1 car are also unrelated in any way.  So there might be multiple valid answers, such as if the equation is also solved for minimum Total Time with respect to the number of cars tested (NT).   

Intuitively, I suspect the answer will be related to the inverse of the ratio of the average time to walk 1 car-length to the average time to test 1 car.  So, if it takes 20 seconds to walk 1 car-length (60 ft. at 3 ft./ sec., about 2 miles per hour), but 1* minute to perform the average brake pump-up and release, that would be a ratio of 1/3.  So, the optimum or 'balance point' (in calculus terms, slope of function = 0)  might be around where equal amounts of time are spent on each task - walking and testing - or, 3 times as many cars being walked as are being tested.  So maybe it's better to do the train by 1/3's or 1/4's - but that still doesn't tell us whether it's better to start at the 3rd car of the 1st 4, or at the 75th car of a 100-car train . . . Whistling 

*Made-up number for example purposes only; feel free to substitute real-world values and recalculate. 

Anybody who knows this subject or analysis better, feel free to jump in and contribute what you can !

- Paul North. 

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, May 12, 2011 12:52 PM

Ugh... too much reminder of calculus.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,019 posts
Posted by tree68 on Thursday, May 12, 2011 1:52 PM

Semper Vaporo

If you had instant access to each car at random then the "Binary Search" method would be best, but since access to the cars is linear then a linear search is best.

Indeed - if you're using the binary (or half-split) method on a circuit, you're not usually having to cover 5,000 feet overall in the process...

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, May 13, 2011 4:38 PM

This is elementary line of road railroading generally at 3 AM with the temperature at 10 degrees and a 30 MPH 'breeze'.  Brakemen and Car Knockers are not using calculus to solve the situation....they don't have the education or time for it.

Paul_D_North_Jr

Yeah - you  (Semper Vaporo) understand the analytical dilemma/ challenge with this:  What are the relative risks/ benefits of adopting a particular method and testing a specific car - in terms of the time already expended to do that, and the most probable amount of time to finish the isolation process ?  SUuperficially, this problem seems similar to finding a specific card in a randomly shuffled deck, and could be solved by writing an equation in the nature of:

Total time = time walking + time testing = (No. of cars walked x average time to walk 1 car-length) +  (No. of cars tested x average time to test 1 car), or = NW*TW + NT*TT. 

Then, substitute the probability equations for the NW and NT terms, and differentiate the resulting equation with respect to the no. of cars walked (NW), and solve for the optimum/ minimum Total Time.

Note that the number of cars walked has no fixed relationship with the number of cars tested (except that they both have to be less than or equal to the total number of cars in the entire train length), and further, the time to walk 1 car-length and the time to test 1 car are also unrelated in any way.  So there might be multiple valid answers, such as if the equation is also solved for minimum Total Time with respect to the number of cars tested (NT).   

Intuitively, I suspect the answer will be related to the inverse of the ratio of the average time to walk 1 car-length to the average time to test 1 car.  So, if it takes 20 seconds to walk 1 car-length (60 ft. at 3 ft./ sec., about 2 miles per hour), but 1* minute to perform the average brake pump-up and release, that would be a ratio of 1/3.  So, the optimum or 'balance point' (in calculus terms, slope of function = 0)  might be around where equal amounts of time are spent on each task - walking and testing - or, 3 times as many cars being walked as are being tested.  So maybe it's better to do the train by 1/3's or 1/4's - but that still doesn't tell us whether it's better to start at the 3rd car of the 1st 4, or at the 75th car of a 100-car train . . . Whistling 

*Made-up number for example purposes only; feel free to substitute real-world values and recalculate. 

Anybody who knows this subject or analysis better, feel free to jump in and contribute what you can !

- Paul North. 

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Friday, May 13, 2011 4:56 PM

Another secnerio: If there weren't a kicker, and the train could still move, the headbrakie would get on the ground and let the train roll by then hit the cushions in the caboose if nothing found and ride there to the next destination where he could or would have to return to the locomotive. 

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,900 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Friday, May 13, 2011 10:13 PM

Has anyone ever tried to find a dynamiter/kicker?  I've never heard of it being done.  There's all kinds of variables too.  Some dynamiters go every time you touch the air, some don't.  Some only go during slow speeds, others speed doesn't matter.  You could check every car and find nothing, then the first time you use the air again, it dynamites.

Besides, sometimes the DPU is the one throwing the train into emergency.

Old Wive's Tales (or maybe Old Hoghead's Tales) type remedies.  None guaranteed to work.

Go to the first car behind the engine(s) and cut out the air brakes.  Some say this only works when the car is a long car, like a 89 ft flat or autorack.   

When setting air, first place the brake valve in minimum reduction for a second then back to release.  Repeat once more.  Then make your brake application.  

Again, the experts will say those, and any other methods, won't prevent a dynamiter.  If they seem to work, it's just coincidence.  Well, I've used the second method a time or two.  It doesn't always work, but I've had a few trains where every time I tried it the train didn't dynamite and the times I didn't the train went into emergency.  I actually haven't had a train with a dynamiter in it for a while and have probably jinxed myself now.

Jeff

 

 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy