Trains.com

FedEx freight

18553 views
45 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Edina, Minnesota
  • 109 posts
FedEx freight
Posted by lattasnip9 on Tuesday, February 1, 2011 6:41 PM

I just read the news wire article about the efforts FedEx is putting towards moving some of its long haul freight on rails.  I hear that UPS actually does quite a bit of this.  This might seem like a stupid question, but what type of car does the freight travel on? Inter modal or box cars?  Would these trains be entirely made up of FedEx freight?  Can someone just explain the whole thing to me?

Robbie
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Tuesday, February 1, 2011 6:55 PM

Robbie:

Almost all of it is intermodal (TOFC, some COFC) using highway trailers mixed-in with other shippers equipment. They also have sattelite firms like Martrac (UPS owned)...Occasionally, UPS ground uses somebody else's equipment in a pinch (Lord knows I saw enough strange stuff go out the UPS gate in LA (Hobart) hastilly re-stenciled UPSZ,  but that gets to be kinda rare right now.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Tuesday, February 1, 2011 9:54 PM

In addition to the regular FedEx Ground  Trailers; there have also been a numbr of these trailers ( with the ground effects air deflectors moving on TOFC cars on trains out here on the El Dorado Sub in both directions.

linked from here : http://www.truckingboards.com/forum/fedex-freight/4580-what-fedex-multimodal.html

 

 


 

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Tuesday, February 1, 2011 9:55 PM

UPS has been a mainstay of rail intermodal service in the US for decades.  They're all intermodal and primarily use trailers as opposed to containers.  They don't want those packages sitting around waiting for a chassis, ever.  I don't think UPS ever used a boxcar.

They were, at one time, the largest intermodal customer for the railroads.  They may still be.  Their use of rail hasn't declined.  But other truckers, such as JB Hunt, have grown their own rail use substantially and may have overtaken UPS as to rail volume.  (Hunt is a container system.)

As was stated, FedEx was one of the last truckers to hold out against intermodal use. 

What this is is basically a reincarnation of the old railway express/less than carload (LCL)/freight forwarder systems.  The railroads operated those services very well until government interferance and/or subsidies to other modes drove the railroads out of the business.

UPS and the railroads figured out a way around the regulations a long time ago.  (Plan I TOFC.)   The other highway carriers got on the trains after deregulation.

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • 602 posts
Posted by Bruce Kelly on Tuesday, February 1, 2011 9:59 PM

The movement of loaded FedEx trailers by rail has been happening in limited areas for at least two years. What's new or different according to the News Wire story?

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Wednesday, February 2, 2011 12:17 AM

Bruce Kelly

The movement of loaded FedEx trailers by rail has been happening in limited areas for at least two years. What's new or different according to the News Wire story?

FedEx has sporadically used intermodal in the past.  Now they're committing to using it on a regular, ongoing basis.  That's the difference.

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, February 2, 2011 5:36 AM

greyhounds

 Bruce Kelly:

The movement of loaded FedEx trailers by rail has been happening in limited areas for at least two years. What's new or different according to the News Wire story?

 

FedEx has sporadically used intermodal in the past.  Now they're committing to using it on a regular, ongoing basis.  That's the difference.

Note that the Package Transportation model is as valid for FedEX  as it is for UPS.   FedEx Global Hub is Memphis Tn. and UPS built their Memphis Hub just across the street.  Admittedly, it is on the same airport, but in many cases the two companies have overlaping service facilities. 

   UPS is by far the older corporation, Their start was East Coast Department store deliveries (NYC/Phila) and then it built out into the rest of the country; it originally pioneered multiple driver truck relays of its freight on trailers..

    FedEx was a product of  a college term/research paper by Fred Smith, utilizing airplanes It was.started in Little Rock in 1971 utilizing smaller business type jets.        Fed Ex was forced out of Arkansas when the Ark. State's Revenue Dept. went after unpaid state taxes  (that Tax case forced Fed Ex to move, and Memphis was the location it moved to.  For a time Fed Ex aircraft had to avoid flying over Arkansas air space, to avoid confiscation of their airplanes for the State Tax bill.  

    It was  the same type of deal we discussed before on this Forum about some State Revenue Depts putting revenue agents on airplanes, or trains, and then ticketing crew personnel for in-flight service of alcoholic beverages in 'Dry air space'; or for serving those same beverages in a Dry county or state.' as the train transited 'Dry' territory.

 

 


 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Wednesday, February 2, 2011 7:52 AM

What has changed for Fed Ex is that they are now much bigger in the LTL freight business. They bought Watkins and Viking, and I believe that they are now the second largest LTL carrier in the US. They will probably be the largest soon. They have set up a two Tier system for LTL, for shippers for whom time is more importand their is Fed Ex Freight Premium which will use team drivers between terminals where necessary, then there is Fed Ex Freight Economy where speed is less important than price, this is where the Intermodal comes in. In lanes where the railroads Intermodal service meets Fed Ex freights needs Fed Ex Freight Economy trailers (initially) will move on Intermodal trains. Likely this will grow as Fed Ex becomes more comfortable with Intermodal. At this time the package part of the business, Fed Ex Ground, is not part of the deal. Fed Ex does receive brand new trailers by rail but of course they are empty.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, February 2, 2011 9:02 AM

FedEx started buying motor carriers in about 2001, after it become FDX Corp in 1998.                     2001when it acquired American Freightways (nee Arkansas Freightways, Harrison,Ar.).

About 1998 it had acquired the assets of Caliber System,Inc;

.2001 it started its rebranding of its surface units (Caliber System's assets were RPS (need Roadway Package System, Viking Freight, Roberts Delivery, Caliber Logistics, Caliber Technology).

As Beaulieu said they have moulded its surface units into various niche service groups. They have become a powerhouse in surface transportation with the stewardship of these surface assets as an adjunct to the air operations.

 

 

 

 


 

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: East Tennessee
  • 162 posts
Posted by Rader Sidetrack on Wednesday, February 2, 2011 9:32 AM

samfp1943 wrote:<quote>

UPS is by far the older corporation, Their start was East Coast Department store deliveries (NYC/Phila) and then it built out into the rest of the country; it originally pioneered multiple driver truck relays of its freight on trailers.. <endquote>

 

As a former Seattle resident, I have to correct this error.  UPS was started by James Casey in Seattle Washington in 1907.  In 1919 the company made its first expansion beyond Seattle to Oakland, California, and adopted its present name, United Parcel Service. 

 

You can see more about early UPS history here:

http://www.ups.com/content/corp/about/history/1929.html

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Wednesday, February 2, 2011 12:21 PM

WELL, Rader Siding, Looks like I owe you, and Seattle an apology!OopsBang Head

  Looks like I was misinformed?  In 1970 I started as a sorter with UPS in Memphis,Tn. We had two Old package cars that were HAHN Motors products. We were told by the managers that they had come from Phila. Pa. and were built around the time of WWII.  They were larger trucks and the unique thing about both of them was they had a machine gun ring mounted opposite of the driver's side of the cab.  Just the ring. (EDITED)

THis was the reason I have always thought that they (UPS) was an East Coast that and that they had a Corporate HQ in Greenwich, CT.  MY MISTAKE!

Link: http://www.coachbuilt.com/bui/h/hahn/hahn.htm

FTA:  "...During World War II, Hahn manufactured mobile machine shops and special recovery trucks for the U.S. Engineer Corps. Hahn's only post-war truck production consisted of a large order of delivery trucks built on Ford chassis for United Parcel Service. Since 1948 the firm has limited manufacture to a line of custom fire apparatus..."

 

 


 

  • Member since
    April 2010
  • 161 posts
Posted by denveroutlaws06 on Saturday, February 5, 2011 5:03 PM

How long is that trailer in the pic?

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Saturday, February 5, 2011 5:37 PM

Standard 53 foot by 102 inches wide.  Nowadays anything smaller is a Special order unless it is a Flatbed and will cost you MOre than the 53 foot Trailer. 

Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Rock Springs Wy.
  • 1,967 posts
Posted by miniwyo on Friday, February 11, 2011 2:51 PM

Its about time FedEx started going intermodal... If anyone has driven across Wyoming in a snow storm, you know that there are usually more FedEx trailers and trucks in the barrow ditch than actually on the road....

RJ

"Something hidden, Go and find it. Go and look behind the ranges, Something lost behind the ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go." The Explorers - Rudyard Kipling

http://sweetwater-photography.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Friday, February 11, 2011 6:28 PM

Yes, UPS, United Parcel Service, did begin in Seattle in the early 20th Century with the concept of being a delivery service for small packages purchased at primarily department stores; it grew to have a presence in virtually every major city and metropolitan area by mid Century.  It wasn't until the later 50's with the advent of piggy back, a successful suit against the United States Post Office, and the total demise of REA or Railway Express,  that it became more involved in intercity and interstate package hauling/delivery.  Piggyback and intermodel expanded the company quickly after that and was followed by air services.  The air service was as much a necessity of the business as it was a defense against the formation of Federal Express at the purchase of Flying Tiger AIrlines.  Fed Ex is seemingly catching up with UPS, on the ground despite there acquisitions of motor freight carriers over the years.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Cordes Jct Ariz.
  • 1,305 posts
Posted by switch7frg on Friday, February 11, 2011 7:31 PM

 Back in the late 50s.or 60s.  Railway express Agency disappeared. Why did it go? Through transition and mergers , what it be called today??  Who would have it today?  ~~ UPS ?  Just curious.  

                             Respectfully, Jim

Y6bs evergreen in my mind

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Saturday, February 12, 2011 6:37 AM

A group of its officers obtained control and changed its name to REA Express about 1970.  The business attempted but did not succeed at turning itself into a multimodal  operation, and it was liquidated in bankruptcy court in 1975.  

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Saturday, February 12, 2011 8:25 AM

In short, Railway Express was the result of the merging of many express companies from the 19th and 20th Centuries and was wholly owned by all participating railroad companies.  The concept was to handle merchadise delivery for individuals and companies which were less than less than carload (LCL) but bigger than the United States Post Office would handle. It was not part of a railroad's freight service.  Upon arrival the receiving agent would notify the recipient or consignee by phone or post card that it was at the Agency office to pick up; larger cities did have truck delivery from agency to consignee.  As UPS and other services grew, with the ruling that these services could also handle correspondence (letters) which was the sole legal domain of the United States Post Office, and the demise of passenger services and open agencies,  REX fell off. Managers bought the service from the railroads, called it REA Express but could not make a go of it in the face of a well run UPS and the emergence of air services which led to Fed Ex.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: South Central,Ks
  • 7,170 posts
Posted by samfp1943 on Saturday, February 12, 2011 8:29 AM

To those interested in the fall of REA Express (nee: Railway Express Agency) the following link may be of interest:  http://vlex.com/vid/airline-handlers-employes-rea-37635829

Linked is the text of arguments in Courts, and before the SCOTUS (Lawyers will enjoy it and others will find it hard to follow) It is a narrative of the arguments between the plaintiffs (various Union entities  and Defendants over labor contract in force at the time [early 1970's +] :

 

Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, Afl-Cio, Appellant, v. Rea Express, Inc., Debtor, Rea Express, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession, Appellee. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Appellant, v. Rea Express, Inc., Debtor, Rea Express, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession, Appellee., 523 F.2d 164 (2nd Cir. 1975)

Federal Circuits



Read more: http://vlex.com/vid/airline-handlers-employes-rea-37635829#ixzz1DkowM2KR

 

 


 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Cordes Jct Ariz.
  • 1,305 posts
Posted by switch7frg on Saturday, February 12, 2011 10:53 AM

Smile  Thank you to all you folks who took time to respond to my questions about Railway Express. I would think that change  said ( it is time to go). 

                                                           Respectfully,  Jim

Y6bs evergreen in my mind

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: At the Crossroads of the West
  • 11,013 posts
Posted by Deggesty on Saturday, February 12, 2011 2:02 PM

For several years, I worked with Viking (unloading and loading their trailers), and I had a good relationship with their drivers and the local customer service people--and this continued after FedEx took over. Most of my shipments were in the West, but from time to time I had one to New England.

Johnny

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • 54 posts
Posted by BNSF@NARS on Sunday, February 13, 2011 1:17 PM

Yes UPS Does Use The Railroad To Provide Connection To Eastern And Western America Which The BNSF Railroad Would Connect With UPS Around Northern Illinois And Move The Train To And From The West Coast Or Provide Movement To The BNSF Western Avenue Yard In Northern Illinois To Connect With The NS Railroad To Connect To Eastern America.

The Train Would Consists Of Intermodal Which A Trailer From UPS Would Be Put On The Train Beside A Container So The Train Would Handle More Than One Truck Trailer.

There Could Be An Entire FedEx Train With FedEx And No Other Business But That Would Be Rare Since BNSF And NS Would Handle An Entire UPS Train Once Or Twice On A Routine Basis.

B-Daddy
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, February 13, 2011 2:14 PM

UPS uses railroads to provide much of their long haul 'Ground' transport between many O-D pairs.

While UPS is a signifigant customer on all the routes they use....they rarely if ever have solid train load moves.  Considering that a 9000 foot double stack train has the ability to handle 280 containers.  280 containers is a WHOLE lot of small parcels and packages in each and every container and I doubt even UPS is moving this amount of traffic at one time between one O-D pair.  50 - 60 - even 80 trailers or containers would not be unheard of.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Sunday, February 13, 2011 3:42 PM

What a difference a few decades make!  UPS used to send 100 or more trailers in each direction between Chicago and NY in each direction every day back in the 70's on EL's 99/100 service...solid trains of UPS trailers often in more than one section, too.  A seperate set went via D&H to and from Binghamton for New England points.  I don't know how many trailers NS carries per because CR took that traffic over the PRR to NY and over the NYC to Boston (Worcester) when they dismantled the Erie and Lackawanna routes through upstate NY.

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Sunday, February 13, 2011 8:27 PM

Henry:

Are you sure about 100 trailers daily? 

 

Ed

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Monday, February 14, 2011 8:35 AM

I counted the cars often.  I was at QD yard office and other EL locations when the trains went through.  What?  Doesn't anybody believe that railroads used to do the job before modern day rules, laws and equipment came onto the scene?  Or do you think I'm just making it up as I go along?

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Monday, February 14, 2011 9:19 AM

A BNSF haulage train came thru Ga yesterday with 2 FED EX pups on it. I find that strange unless the pups were loaded in California and passed thru Memphis without stopping.

Under the subject of pups UPS in this area almost always loads pups for the drivers to double bottom instead of one large trailer. 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • 45 posts
Posted by CHIPSTRAINS on Monday, February 14, 2011 9:28 PM

FED-EX, Hasstarted a lot of TOFC movements , on the "BNSF Transcon" line. I see alot of them both eastbound , and westbound , on "Z" and "Q" trains, and lately on trains to PHoenix, through "WILLIAMS JCT" on the "peavine line.

  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Monday, February 14, 2011 9:43 PM

Every time I see something with a UPS equipment on a train, it has been TOFC.

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 8,156 posts
Posted by henry6 on Tuesday, February 15, 2011 7:04 AM

Truthfully, the UPS and FED EX trains I hate to see are the two car jobbies coming at me on the interstate or twisting along a two lane road evading troopers' scales!

RIDEWITHMEHENRY is the name for our almost monthly day of riding trains and transit in either the NYCity or Philadelphia areas including all commuter lines, Amtrak, subways, light rail and trolleys, bus and ferries when warranted. No fees, just let us know you want to join the ride and pay your fares. Ask to be on our email list or find us on FB as RIDEWITHMEHENRY (all caps) to get descriptions of each outing.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy