Trains.com

Don Phillips in Sept. Trains

19560 views
121 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Saturday, July 31, 2010 11:17 PM

Convicted One

Run a google on the topic of "privatized profit and socialized losses" and you will better understand

Well, several things came up on the google.  Is this what you mean?

http://www.prophetwithoutprofit.com/tag/tarp/

To me, Phillips can not possibly honestly write on how increased regulation will not harm the railroads because the specific purpose of such regulation will be to divert money from the railroads.  That would be "harming the railroads."

The US railroads are a true industrial success story.  The "Union Guy" who is the current head of the Federal Railroad Administration has called the US rail freight system "The Envy of the World."  The FRA has called the US freight rail system the most efficient and safest in the world.

The railroads are a largely a self supporting and self financing industry that pays its own way, generates wealth for the nation's people, requires no significant subsidies (despite what Zardoz says), pays a union work force well, and pays taxes instead of using taxes.  So, naturally, Phillips wants the government to mess with that and he will make excuses for such government aciton.

Here it is as I see it.  Anything that is produced, mined or manufactured must move through a channel of distribution to the end users.  This channel can consist of the manufacturer, miner, grower, whatever; the "middlemen" who handle the product along the way, and the final retailer who delivers the finished thingy to the ultimate consumer.  Each of these guys gets a cut of what the ultimate consumer pays.  The railroads are often a part of this channel and they get paid for what they do.

Channel members are always, always, always fighting over who gets how much.  When they can't get their way they run to the government and cry "No Fair, the other guy is getting too much and I'm getting too little."  A wise government would say: "Go away boys, you bother me."  A politician seeking votes will promise to divert the money to whomever will give him/her the most votes.  If the politician is successful it will make things worse, except for the fact that he/she may get reelected.

Phillips "believes" in government.  So he'll seek to justify their actions.  But more regulation will hurt the railroads and the nation's economy (that B us).  It can't help but hurt.

  

 

  

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Saturday, July 31, 2010 10:40 PM

Run a google on the topic of "privatized profit and socialized losses" and you will better understand

  • Member since
    December 2009
  • 1,751 posts
Don Phillips in Sept. Trains
Posted by dakotafred on Friday, July 30, 2010 10:00 PM

"I'll save the details for a future column." -- Don Phillips, in Sept. Trains.

Don has been promising periodically for at least five years to tell us why railroads have nothing to fear from relentless Democratic efforts in the Congress to re-regulate.

It's past time for him to deliver, so guys like Jim Young, Matt Rose and all us stockholders can relax.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy