Trains.com

BNSF Wreck in Wayzata Question

4170 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
BNSF Wreck in Wayzata Question
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:14 PM

It is not earth shaking news on a national scale, but a loaded eastbound BNSF coal train just derailed in Wayzata, MN.  There are lots of buildings right along the track through town.  Apparently the wreck missed the buildings, but not by much.  According to this report, a torn up rail did penetrate one of the office buildings.  The place is a beehive of activity with police blocking several roads and the train strung out through the whole town.

 

One of the news reporters stated something that I am curious about.  The train was 123 cars long with distributed power.  The reporter stated that when the derailment began, the engine on the hind end kept shoving, and that is what jackknifed the derailed cars.  I would not expect a reporter to come up with that analysis on his own, so I assume that he was told that by someone there from BNSF.

 

That kind of effect does seem plausible, considering that the first cars to derail were pulled several hundred feet and remained upright and generally in line with the track.  But wouldn’t the locomotive on the hind end stopped shoving as soon as the brakes went into emergency?

 

I would think that the DP unit did not shove the cars into a jackknife, but rather, they just jackknifed as the momentum of the trailing section of the train dissipated.   

 

http://kstp.com/news/stories/S1631781.shtml?cat=1

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 1, 2010 8:23 AM
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Thursday, July 1, 2010 9:26 AM

Bucyrus

 
One of the news reporters stated something that I am curious about.  The train was 123 cars long with distributed power.  The reporter stated that when the derailment began, the engine on the hind end kept shoving, and that is what jackknifed the derailed cars.  I would not expect a reporter to come up with that analysis on his own, so I assume that he was told that by someone there from BNSF.
 
That kind of effect does seem plausible, considering that the first cars to derail were pulled several hundred feet and remained upright and generally in line with the track.  But wouldn’t the locomotive on the hind end stopped shoving as soon as the brakes went into emergency?
 
I would think that the DP unit did not shove the cars into a jackknife, but rather, they just jackknifed as the momentum of the trailing section of the train dissipated.   
 

http://kstp.com/news/stories/S1631781.shtml?cat=1

 

The DPU locomotive will stop shoving as soon as the emergency brake application reaches it. The signal will pass through the trainline at near the speed of sound. The very brief push from the DPU and the momentum of the trailing cars will start the jackknifing if any cars get far enough out of line. The similarly brief pull of the lead locomotives and momentum of the leading cars will tend to keep cars from jackknifing, but if a coupling breaks they start to pileup.

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Thursday, July 1, 2010 11:08 AM

Wouldn't the Engineer upon realizing he is on the ground put the train into emergency? At that point the signal would reach the DPU units at the speed of radio waves.

There just isn't anything you can do about momentum in any case.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: St. Paul, Minnesota
  • 2,116 posts
Posted by Boyd on Thursday, July 1, 2010 12:17 PM

 I'd sure love to get a section of aluminum plate from one of the totaled hopper cars. I'd use it to build a flatbed on my F250.

Modeling the "Fargo Area Rapid Transit" in O scale 3 rail.

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Thursday, July 1, 2010 12:31 PM

AgentKid

Wouldn't the Engineer upon realizing he is on the ground put the train into emergency? At that point the signal would reach the DPU units at the speed of radio waves.

There just isn't anything you can do about momentum in any case.

Bruce

 

Likely the first indication the Engineer had that his train was on the ground was the emergency brake application reaching the head-end. The derailed cars started about 80 cars deep (based on the car numbers visible in the news reports), so the DPU would have gone into emergency before the lead locomotives.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 1, 2010 12:54 PM

beaulieu

The DPU locomotive will stop shoving as soon as the emergency brake application reaches it. The signal will pass through the trainline at near the speed of sound. The very brief push from the DPU and the momentum of the trailing cars will start the jackknifing if any cars get far enough out of line. The similarly brief pull of the lead locomotives and momentum of the leading cars will tend to keep cars from jackknifing, but if a coupling breaks they start to pileup.

Beaulieu,

 

Your explanation makes sense.  I would tend to conclude that the momentum jackknifed the cars more so than the DPU locomotive shoving.  Although someone else mentioned that the train was only moving 10 mph.  The train pulled a few of the derailed cars some hundreds of feet beyond where the other cars jackknifed.  I believe at least one of them was standing upright completely separated from the pileup and from the cars ahead of the pileup.  A loaded coal car sure does not look like it wants to roll very well on the ballast. 

 

Would the engineer continue pulling with the lead locomotive when the brakes dynamited from the derailment?  I have heard of that being done to help pull derailed cars ahead and possibly reduce the pileup if a derailment happens to be the reason the brakes went into emergency. 

 

At least the last two cars of the leading section of train were on the ground and appear to have been dragged several hundred feet while being on the ground.  Somehow those derailed cars managed to cross Ferndale Road crossing without tearing up the crossing.

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Thursday, July 1, 2010 7:15 PM

Bucyrus


Would the engineer continue pulling with the lead locomotive when the brakes dynamited from the derailment?  I have heard of that being done to help pull derailed cars ahead and possibly reduce the pileup if a derailment happens to be the reason the brakes went into emergency. 

 

 The Engineer can release the locomotives brakes but he cannot reapply power until the PCS switch resets, and that won't happen until the air pressure is restored in the trainline, and the train will be stopped long before that happens. Someone will have to walk the length of the front portion of the train and close the anglecock on the last car still on the rails, before the air pressure can be restored in the trainline.

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Thursday, July 1, 2010 7:45 PM

Apparently, like most of the technologically-challenged media types who 'report' on railway mishaps, this individual either flunked or never took high school physics.  Even at 10MPH, the tonnage involved has a tremendous amount of potential energy - and jackknifing or even smashing a single derailed car doesn't dissipate all that much of it.  The brakes on cars still on the rails were what got things stopped.

I also liked the whoop-de-do about the brick on the desk in the title company.  The outside photo shows that it originated from the window area of the building itself.  I'm not denying the fact that the lady was lucky that she wasn't sitting at her desk when the glass shards came flying in...

The fact that this incident happened in town probably quintupled the amount and intensity of media coverage.  If it had occurred out in the woods, or in the middle of Farmer Jones's pasture, would the local fire and emergency management officials have gotten any TV time?  More likely, a one-paragraph quote in the 'local news' section of the next day's paper.

Chuck

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 1, 2010 8:48 PM

tomikawaTT

I also liked the whoop-de-do about the brick on the desk in the title company.  The outside photo shows that it originated from the window area of the building itself.  I'm not denying the fact that the lady was lucky that she wasn't sitting at her desk when the glass shards came flying in...

The fact that this incident happened in town probably quintupled the amount and intensity of media coverage.

 

Yes, 10 mph can smash things up, but I really don’t know how fast they were going.  They were pulling out of a passing siding and re-entering the mainline.  They probably were stopped in the siding, so they may not have been going very fast.  But most of time they roll through town there at 30-40 mph.  As train wrecks go, this one was rather mild.  I have seen much worse.

 

But I don’t think we have heard the end of the whoop-de-do as you call it.  While the collateral damage only involved a few broken bricks, the potential for major collateral damage to buildings in Wayzata is enormous.  And this wreck will undoubtedly serve as a real eye-opener for the citizens of the town. 

 

There is a long history of the relationship between Wayzata and the railroad going back to the James Hill days.  The town naturally coveted its location on the shore of Lake Minnetonka.  And then James Hill built his railroad right along the lakeshore effectively separating the lake from the town.  This turned into the rather well know war between Hill and the town, which I won’t reiterate here.  But the overall effect has the town crowded up against the lake and the railroad.  

 

If that coal train had derailed right in the middle of town while running 35 mph, it could have taken out a dozen storefront businesses.  There are a lot of patrons and pedestrians surging though the lake area of Wayzata during the day.  Sunsets Café is full of people around lunchtime, and the trains sail by about 30 feet away.

 

I think the point of all of this vulnerability will be driven home in the minds of Wayzata residents as they spend their time touring the wreck scene.  I don’t know what they can do about it, but Wayzata is kind of a special place, and I suspect the residents are going to be convinced that something must be done to protect their town from the trains.  They are no less safe today than they were a week ago, but today they have had their eyes opened for the first time to the train derailment potential.

 

The way I see it, this was a minor derailment and nobody got hurt.  But the real story will be the town’s reaction when their vulnerability sinks in.  Stay tuned.       

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Cordes Jct Ariz.
  • 1,305 posts
Posted by switch7frg on Thursday, July 1, 2010 9:24 PM

Whistling  Confused   This a very interesting Thread. The law of physics is apearent, however . The speed of sound is about 634mph. and the speedof electric signal is186k mph. per second.Did both signals go to the DPU???  Or have the " newsies" been throwing darts at  a board to see which signal to use.  I have a jacknife  in my thoughts  , needs to be set straight.

 Cannonball

Y6bs evergreen in my mind

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Friday, July 2, 2010 8:02 AM

switch7frg

Whistling  Confused   This a very interesting Thread. The law of physics is apearent, however . The speed of sound is about 634mph. and the speedof electric signal is186k mph. per second.Did both signals go to the DPU???  Or have the " newsies" been throwing darts at  a board to see which signal to use.  I have a jacknife  in my thoughts  , needs to be set straight.

 Cannonball

 

Yes, both signals would have been sent, however the DPU would have detected the emergency brake application first and sent the radio signal to the leading locomotives (80 cars from derailed cars to head-end, 43 cars to the DPU). The signal travels in both directions from the point of trainline breakage, so shorter distance to the DPU means that it will detect the application first and then radio the head-end.

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Friday, July 2, 2010 9:02 AM

Thank you very much for your answer.

Bruce

 

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Cordes Jct Ariz.
  • 1,305 posts
Posted by switch7frg on Friday, July 2, 2010 11:17 AM

beaulieu;  thank you for setting things straight.

                                      Cannonball

Y6bs evergreen in my mind

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy