Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
ALASKA RR EXTENTION- 1,187 MILES OF NEW TRACK INTO CANADA
ALASKA RR EXTENTION- 1,187 MILES OF NEW TRACK INTO CANADA
3070 views
35 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
1
2
FJ and G
Member since
August 2003
6,434 posts
Posted by
FJ and G
on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 3:28 PM
1. This development was proposed decades ago. I'm hoping this moves forward quickly. Next, an extension to Vladivostok!
2. Question: do Alaska RR freight cars ever wind up in lower 48 (not as in car delivery but in revenue service)
Dave Vergun
Reply
FJ and G
Member since
August 2003
6,434 posts
Posted by
FJ and G
on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 3:30 PM
Ooops.
Last thought.
3. Wonder if the cruise lines will oppose this move
Reply
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Tuesday, June 8, 2004 3:54 PM
BC Rail has graded most of the ROW and laid track part of the way for their Dease Lake extension. Work on this extension was stopped when there was a change of government in Victoria. I have heard that even if the line is completed the Dease Lake line will NOT be the connection to Alaska. Does anyone ynow why? Mountains? Or what? Even my contact, the former CFO of BC Rail does not know why.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 10, 2004 5:04 PM
If this is built who would have control of it the Alaskan railroad or CN.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Thursday, June 10, 2004 5:27 PM
When it comes to freight, whats up there in Alaska that would offer an expansion of this magnitude?
Is there really that much oil and seafood or are we down here in the lower 48 going back to ice boxes[(-D]
Reply
Edit
passengerfan
Member since
March 2004
From: Central Valley California
2,841 posts
Posted by
passengerfan
on Thursday, June 10, 2004 9:47 PM
In answer to the question about ARR cars showing up in lower 48 it does happen but rarely mostly you find cars from the lower 48 operating to Alaska by barge from Seattle or Vancouver. It is easier to assign a back load to one of these cars than return the car to the lower 48 empty and Cheaper.
Reply
1
2
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy