Trains.com

Train designations and radio use

3559 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2001
  • From: El Dorado Springs, MO
  • 1,519 posts
Train designations and radio use
Posted by n2mopac on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:38 AM

I know most modern railroads use long train designations that incude the train type, three letter marker for stations of origin and destination, priority, and date. My question is how do they identify themselves on the radio? Do they use this entire designation or do they use some sort of abbreviation?

Ron

Owner and superintendant of the N scale Texas Colorado & Western Railway, a protolanced representaion of the BNSF from Fort Worth, TX through Wichita Falls TX and into Colorado. 

Check out the TC&WRy on at https://www.facebook.com/TCWRy

Check out my MRR How-To YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/c/RonsTrainsNThings

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,011 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:04 AM

Not all railroads use designators such as you suggest.  NS uses three character train designators, and CSX uses four characters, followed by the two digit date (ie, Q621-13).

I often hear CSX using just the four character designator informally, especially if that's the only train with that designator in the area (a delay might put two of them on the road at the same time - ie, Q620-12 and Q620-13).  Adding the date tends to sound like your mother using your middle name....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:22 AM

On the UP, I only hear actual designations (MPRSS=Manifest PRoviso SouthSaintpaul) or the identifying number (UP6688 North).  Many moons ago (during my day) the C&NW trains had 'unofficial' train numbers that we used (477, 291, etc), but were officially frowned upon for safety reasons.

On the CP and the CN, I hear trains call themselves by their 'unofficial' number ("807's train, 482's train, etc) and/or by their identifying number.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 2,593 posts
Posted by PNWRMNM on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:23 AM

In the Pacific Northwest BNSF and UP dispatchers just use lead unit numbers.  It is so much easier.

Mac

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Calgary AB. Canada
  • 2,298 posts
Posted by AgentKid on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:18 PM

In the Calgary area I've never heard CP use anything but the lead engine number.

AgentKid

So shovel the coal, let this rattler roll.

"A Train is a Place Going Somewhere"  CP Rail Public Timetable

"O. S. Irricana"

. . . __ . ______

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: KS
  • 999 posts
Posted by SFbrkmn on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:42 PM
There was a briefing on this about a month ago on radio id rules. Its not mainly the carriers but more FRA and of course they have to enforce what big brother says. Basically the FRA frowns on train numbers/symbols being used and listen  for the eng number to be broadcast. That is not always easy to do as a society our minds are so cluttered w/ so many numbers nowdays. Heck, half the time I can't even remember my eng number. Also the FRA is no longer allowing names of crew members to be used in switching movements--instead the eng number. They are also getting very, very picky on car counts. The half plus one has been in use a few yrs but now the 25 feet count is being enforced and if its not heard, a opt test failure could be handed out to the entire crew. As well, the going in between via radio now reads that every crew member on the job has to respond when a fellow member is going in between and then is in the clear.
  • Member since
    April 2001
  • From: US
  • 2,849 posts
Posted by wabash1 on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 5:33 PM

It is what ever i feel like some times its train symbol and sometimes its engine number ,

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,011 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 6:08 PM

Interesting on the car counts, etc.  We're using 85' passenger cars, so we usually use 40' or half car, 20' or quarter car. 

We use the NORAC "three step."  Just finished our NORAC class for the year and having the entire crew acknowledge wasn't mentioned.  For that matter, many times only the trainman and the engineer are even near the train during some moves - everyone else is cooling their heels in the station or setting up to flag the crossing we don't blow for.

As for the name thing - we've always used the engine number during moves.  Unless we're calling a specific member of the crew.  If there's more than one trainman, you either have to give them some sort of designator or just call them "trainman Smith."  "Trainman Smith" is a lot easier to remember.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 6:08 PM

On the NS Lake Division, the crews use their symbol only when calling signals or talking to the dispatcher about the line-up.  When switching, or getting three point protection they use train symbol and engine number.  When copying Track Authorities, they use engine number only. 

"big brother" must have been listening a few months ago as they were spelling out the number of the Track Authorities.  It really tied up the radio for both the dispatcher and the permitee to spell out all those numbers.

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 8:17 PM

PNWRMNM

In the Pacific Northwest BNSF and UP dispatchers just use lead unit numbers.  It is so much easier.

And safer!
  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Allentown, PA
  • 9,810 posts
Posted by Paul_D_North_Jr on Thursday, May 14, 2009 9:03 AM

Using the names of the crew members - as in (to the engineer) "OK to go ahead now, Jim" could be problematical when there's more than 1 "Jim" running a locomotive - or any on-track equipment - on any railroad - within radio range.

"This Fascinating Railroad Business" (title of 1943 book by Robert Selph Henry of the AAR)
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: KS
  • 999 posts
Posted by SFbrkmn on Friday, May 15, 2009 2:10 PM

The micro managing rule on repeating numbers on TW's is a joke. I haven't touched a TW in yrs and if I to repeat one back, lord help us.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy