Trains.com

Who is paying for all these autoracks just parked?

3441 views
22 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 51 posts
Who is paying for all these autoracks just parked?
Posted by Grog on Friday, January 30, 2009 6:29 PM

With the auto industries not selling cars I have noticed that lots of autoracks are parked in sidings and some have not moved in months. Who is paying the lease while they just sit there?

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Friday, January 30, 2009 6:34 PM

Grog

With the auto industries not selling cars I have noticed that lots of autoracks are parked in sidings and some have not moved in months. Who is paying the lease while they just sit there?

 

The railroads are paying the bill.  Most autoracks are owned by TTX, a car-leasing company that is owned by the railroads, or by railroads themselves (in some cases the rack is separately owned from the flatcar it's welded to).  The mortgage on the cars has to still be paid each month to the bank that loaned TTX the money to buy the cars from a carbuilder.  If TTX's revenues don't cover the bills, then the railroads are assessed dues.

RWM

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Friday, January 30, 2009 6:36 PM

Car owner (pool) and they pay to store them too if not railroad owned at 2.50(?) a day.

Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, January 30, 2009 6:51 PM

In the midst of all of this gloom and doom (and I, too, have seen strings of racks moving to wherever they can be stored), I should point out that new auto racks are still being built. This past week I saw several Trinity-built racks (both bilevel and trilevel) on older TTX-owned flat cars--racks built in about November, rack numbers with AOK reporting marks, but the racks themselves carrying Ferromex (bilevel) and Canadian Pacific (trilevel) markings.

I suspect that eventually some of the oldest flat cars (and the racks thereon) will be cut up for scrap, and that other flats will be de-racked and used (one sincerely hopes) for moving things necessary for infrastructure revival: power poles, windmill parts, rebar, and, yes, lengths of rail.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 51 posts
Posted by Grog on Friday, January 30, 2009 7:02 PM

So a 50 car train costs someone $125.00 every day they sit idle? Thats $3,750.00 a month. $11,250.00 for 3 months for just that one train? That does not factor in the loss of revenue the cars would have produced.....WOW! Anyone have a ballpark idea of how many cars are sitting parked?

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Friday, January 30, 2009 7:10 PM

Grog

So a 50 car train costs someone $125.00 every day they sit idle? Thats $3,750.00 a month. $11,250.00 for 3 months for just that one train? That does not factor in the loss of revenue the cars would have produced.....WOW! Anyone have a ballpark idea of how many cars are sitting parked?

 

More like $15 a day per car for the lease payment to the bank.  The $2.50 a day is the track space for storage.  Of course if it's a railroad-owned car on its own railroad, it's paying the storage charge to itself.

RWM

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 51 posts
Posted by Grog on Friday, January 30, 2009 7:23 PM

OK. 50 cars at $17.50 per day. $15.00 lease + $2.50 parking. Thats $875 per day. $26,250 per month or $78,750 for 3 months and the loss of revenue. You know the rates are going to go up once shipping starts again.

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Friday, January 30, 2009 7:45 PM

Grog

OK. 50 cars at $17.50 per day. $15.00 lease + $2.50 parking. Thats $875 per day. $26,250 per month or $78,750 for 3 months and the loss of revenue. You know the rates are going to go up once shipping starts again.

 

Rates are "what the traffic will bear."  I think it's going to be a long, long time before auto buyers will bear much of a rate at all.

RWM

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Friday, January 30, 2009 7:55 PM

Grog

OK. 50 cars at $17.50 per day. $15.00 lease + $2.50 parking. Thats $875 per day. $26,250 per month or $78,750 for 3 months and the loss of revenue. You know the rates are going to go up once shipping starts again.

 

Rates are "what the traffic will bear."  I think it's going to be a long, long time before auto buyers will bear much of a rate at all.

RWM

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,009 posts
Posted by tree68 on Friday, January 30, 2009 8:01 PM

I know of a shortline that's storing over 1000 cars for a Class One, at $1 a day, per car.  They weren't using the tracks anyhow, so aside from the cost of spotting the cars, it's all gravy.   It's certainly helping to pay the bills.

I've been told that at least some of the cars being stored are "in the bank" against future car purchases - instead of selling the cars for scrap now and having the steel go directly overseas.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Saturday, January 31, 2009 2:56 PM

tree68

I've been told that at least some of the cars being stored are "in the bank" against future car purchases - instead of selling the cars for scrap now and having the steel go directly overseas.

Mr. Larry, by "in the bank" do you mean they will be traded in on the new cars?

James


  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,009 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, January 31, 2009 3:49 PM

The Butler

tree68

I've been told that at least some of the cars being stored are "in the bank" against future car purchases - instead of selling the cars for scrap now and having the steel go directly overseas.

Mr. Larry, by "in the bank" do you mean they will be traded in on the new cars?

I"m not sure I totally understand the concept - I think the steel is the thing - perhaps they can get a break because they're supplying the raw material for the car as opposed to having to buy it on the open market.  The steel still has to be processed into the actual materials needed to build the new cars, but I think there are mills that do that sort of thing using recycling techniques.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Southeast Missouri
  • 573 posts
Posted by The Butler on Saturday, January 31, 2009 4:21 PM

Bear with me, I can be a little slow at times. Blush Are you implying the railroads store the cars until time for new ones arrives, then scaps the old cars, and then uses the money to pay for the new railcars? Confused

James


  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,276 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Saturday, January 31, 2009 4:55 PM

Cars get stored when there aren't enough loads for a car type to support that type in the fleet as it exists.  If and when loadings for the car type rebound the cars are pulled out of storage and used to support the business again.

If the long term business projections for car use indicate that there is no likelyhood of a business rebound to utilize all of the the car type that is stored, the fleet of that car type will be culled of the oldest, most maintenance intensive members of that car type in the fleet.  Those cars that are scrapped will provide a level of revenue that will be used for anything the carrier may need it for at the time the revenue is recieved - engines, track, new cars of an active car type, fixed facilities.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Saturday, January 31, 2009 4:59 PM

BaltACD is correct, and I am also having trouble wrapping my head around the idea that TTX or a railroad would intentionally lose money.

If you own something called "scrap metal" -- which might be in the shape of a freight car -- there's only two things you can do with it:  sell it for market value today, or store it anticipating the market will rise and sell it when the market rises.  Scrap metal is an analog for money, and just like money, you invest it wisely.  In any case, it's a simple calculation to discount the future value of the scrap metal value (whatever you think it will rise to) using whatever you predict the interest rate will be, between now and the day and you sell it.  In general, you either have to be predicting either a very high future value for scrap, or a very low interest rate, to want to sit on the scrap metal for any appreciable length of time, because it cannot be loaned like money so earns you no interest, but in contrast it costs you money to store it, insure it, and, if you do not own it, to make payments to the bank you borrowed the money from in the first place.

I don't think anyone is predicting a return in the near future to the stratospheric scrap prices of early 2008, so I think the reason the railroads are parking these cars have nothing to do with any plan to scrap them in the near future.  They're parked because there's nothing else to do with them, but someone thinks there might be demand for them to move autos in the future.  If there was an expectation that the demand for new autos in North America will never be enough to put them back to work, then they would go to scrap despite the low scrap value at the present time.

Foreign vs. domestic steel making or ownership of the scrap steel resource is not relevant.

RWM

 

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,009 posts
Posted by tree68 on Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:18 PM

I only know what I was told by an employee of the shortline that's storing them..  I'm also under the understanding that the hoppers in question aren't really serviceable anymore.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: marion
  • 234 posts
Posted by alcodave on Sunday, February 1, 2009 2:10 AM

As the stored auto racks I hear that FEMA is stockpiling them and adding shacklesDead......

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,276 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Sunday, February 1, 2009 5:02 PM

Railway Man

I don't think anyone is predicting a return in the near future to the stratospheric scrap prices of early 2008, so I think the reason the railroads are parking these cars have nothing to do with any plan to scrap them in the near future.  They're parked because there's nothing else to do with them, but someone thinks there might be demand for them to move autos in the future.  If there was an expectation that the demand for new autos in North America will never be enough to put them back to work, then they would go to scrap despite the low scrap value at the present time.

Foreign vs. domestic steel making or ownership of the scrap steel resource is not relevant.

RWM

 

With TTX cars in auto carrier service, TTX owns the car, the carrier who's identity is shown on the rack structure owns the rack.  If the long term projections for auto traffic indicate that there will never be a need for a portion of the rack fleet, the racks will be removed from the cars and scrapped, the cars will return to TTX and in many cases are reequipped as a TTX car type that is in demand.  Most TTX cars have the ability to be adapted to many different uses.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Valparaiso, In
  • 5,921 posts
Posted by MP173 on Monday, February 2, 2009 1:55 PM

Automotive sales are typically 15 million vehicles yearly in U.S.  Sales are off 30% and are in the 10.5 - 11 million range.  When will production pickup?  That is the big question right now. 

United States personal savings rate is now approaching the 8% level, which is very amazing since we have been a net consumer over the past years, rather than saving. The American consumer has seen the writing on the wall and understands (at long last) the need to have an emergency fund set behind.  Using the home as an ATM in the form of HELOC, while it did stimulate (overly so) the economy has proven to be in bad form.

One dollar per day seems pretty cheap for storage.

ed

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Burbank Junction
  • 195 posts
Posted by karldotcom on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 8:13 PM

If you look at January's figures it is a 9 million annualized production rate....although I personally believe we are bottoming out in that regard.

 >>>>Sales are off 30% and are in the 10.5 - 11 million range. 

My train videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/karldotcom

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Terre Haute IN
  • 199 posts
Posted by robscaboose on Saturday, February 7, 2009 9:37 PM

Smile  Many short line RR & museums store RR cars during a major downturn in rail traffic.  The RR's don't want them on the properity as they take up track space in yards.  Remember when traffic flow is good these cars are out on the mainline in a train going someplace.  With no auto's to transport you got to put them someplace, preferably out of the way & not plugging up your yard.

Charging a couple of bucks per day and "a switching in & out fee" is great for the short lines & museums, espically this time of the year as most museums are shut down for the winter & have no $$$$$$ comming in.   It helps pay the bills or the refurbishing of  a piece of equipment.

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Sunday, February 8, 2009 8:43 PM
CShaveRR

In the midst of all of this gloom and doom (and I, too, have seen strings of racks moving to wherever they can be stored), I should point out that new auto racks are still being built. This past week I saw several Trinity-built racks (both bilevel and trilevel) on older TTX-owned flat cars--racks built in about November, rack numbers with AOK reporting marks, but the racks themselves carrying Ferromex (bilevel) and Canadian Pacific (trilevel) markings.

Just a slight correction to my earlier post: the new racks have NKCR, not AOK, rack numbers (the reporting marks, however, are still ETTX or TTGX).

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Georgia USA SW of Atlanta
  • 11,919 posts
Posted by blue streak 1 on Sunday, February 8, 2009 9:45 PM

GA SW RR has miles of baretables of various vintages parked on all of their end of line spurs. Bet they wish that they had kept the Cof GA track north of Columbus instead of pulling it up for additional storage.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy