Trains.com

2 picture upload limit? UPDATED

2943 views
26 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
2 picture upload limit? UPDATED
Posted by coborn35 on Wednesday, January 28, 2009 5:07 PM

Update:

Can only upload 2 a day, thats fine.

Am not allowed to appeal.

Am not allowed to register for the forums.

Am not allowed to email the administrators questions. Luckily I knew how to get around this.

Boy did I hit the hate jackpot or what?

 

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Thursday, January 29, 2009 12:57 AM

 It's just you, and anyone else who gets a ton of rejects. Frankly, I'm suprised I'm still at 10.

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:00 PM

 Thats ridiculous! How are we suppsoed to get any better.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:38 PM

coborn35

 Thats ridiculous! How are we suppsoed to get any better.

 

 Somehow photographers got better before railpictures.net existed.   

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,292 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Thursday, January 29, 2009 4:55 PM

coborn35

 Thats ridiculous! How are we suppsoed to get any better.

Screening submissions takes time, no matter if the submission is accepted or rejected and it probably takes more time and effort for them the reject photos than accept them.  Having demonstrated by continual rejects with few if any acceptances they are telling you that their time is important and for you to use more thought, care and self critiquing in the photos you are submitting.  I would suspect, that if your art improves to the point that most every submission is accepted, the limit will be raised.  With all the submissions that have to be reviewed, the screeners time is valuable to both the screener and railpictures.net.

Youth always believe they know everything about a craft long before they really know ANYTHING about the craft.  Been there and done that through many forms of activity.

 

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 29, 2009 9:29 PM

Heck, take picture for fun. Don't live or die based on railpictures.net

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Thursday, January 29, 2009 11:36 PM

 It'll force you to focus on your best, I guess. Then take it from there.

My style of photography isn't always on good terms with them, but hey, I know that I've got some *** good stuff off that site.

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • 913 posts
Posted by mersenne6 on Friday, January 30, 2009 7:25 AM

  On your rejects - did you keep a count of reject reasons?  By this I mean how many times did you get the same reason for a reject?  If you did keep a record of how many times a particular reason was offered do a bean count of the reasons, note the one or two most common, and then revisit those pictures and think about what you could have done differently to eliminate the problem.  Armed with this information - find your favorite rail spot (perhaps even the same spot that earned you a reject) - look it over before the train comes to see if when you take the picture this time at least that problem won't be present.

  For example - I had a string of pictures that were rejected because of high sun angle.  In that case I just had to wait for a different time of the year because there wasn't any rail traffic on that particular stretch of railroad during the summer months when the sun was low enough to give the shadows they were looking for.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Friday, January 30, 2009 8:12 AM

 None for the same reason. The most one ever got rejected was twice. I use the screeners comments as a tool to review my photos and find the flaws.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Along the BNSF "East End"... :-)
  • 915 posts
Posted by TimChgo9 on Sunday, February 1, 2009 8:13 AM

 I lost patience a long time ago with Railpictures.net for various reasons.  I got a photo rejected along with the comments "Standard angle shots of standard power lashups are not accepted"  (the shot rejecte was taken from a bridge, so it really wasn't a "standard angle"...it was 4 locomotives (2 SD40-2, an SD-70 and  GE) pulling a manifest freight...  Anyway, I went through their database, and guess what I found??? Tons of "standard angle shots" with "standard power lashups"  Honestly, what the heck else is there? I feel strongly that they favor certain photographers over others, and newbies are not really welcome.  I have seen photos from other photographers there, that clearly break the submission rules that they have (or, at least had) posted on their site, but the photos wind up accepted anyway, but, when I have tried to post the same type of photo, mine gets rejected.  I don't have time for that. 

I don't mind having my work criticized, because it is that criticism over the years that has helped me get better.  I have 23 photos on their site, which, when I get around to it I plan on taking down.  I haven't attempted to post a photo there in quite some time.  I have had photos win "awards" on other photo sites I belong to, that were rejected by Railpictures.net.....  

FInd another site (check my signature) that allows all types of photography, and where you will be able to post photos, without worrying about it getting rejected.  

"Chairman of the Awkward Squad" "We live in an amazing, amazing world that is just wasted on the biggest generation of spoiled idiots." Flashing red lights are a warning.....heed it. " I don't give a hoot about what people have to say, I'm laughing as I'm analyzed" What if the "hokey pokey" is what it's all about?? View photos at: http://www.eyefetch.com/profile.aspx?user=timChgo9
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hewitt,TX.
  • 1,088 posts
Posted by videomaker on Monday, February 2, 2009 8:19 PM

Coborn35,

I think we all have told you the same thing..FORGET RR.NET and try other sites... www.LocoPhotos.net 

for instance...

 

Danny
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Monday, February 2, 2009 8:22 PM

 You misunderstand my angst. Im not mad because im not getting things in, which I am, its just that I can only upload 2 at a time.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Richmond, VA
  • 200 posts
Posted by penncentral2002 on Monday, February 2, 2009 9:21 PM

Odd, because they allow me to upload up to 10 for them to reject a day.

Probably because I rarely, if ever submit everything there - considering that out of the 20 or so photos I've submitted there, they have taken exactly one  - but then, I only try with stuff which I think might meet their standards which is especially difficult for me because I know almost nothing about photography (I'm a married attorney with a Jack Russell Terrier and a point and shoot camera (and I often am holding the Jack Russell in one arm when I am taking the photo with the other hand), so I hardly have much time to play around taking photos of trains - and I don't think that holding a hyperactive dog is exactly the best way to get a good photo) and have no idea what half the stuff they reject even mean.  Still, the only thing that I've been able to figure out for certain is that if you submit two very similar photos (similar light conditions, similar composition) but one is of an obscure shortline and the other is off a Class 1 or Amtrak, the odds of them taking the obscure short line are much higher).   Plus, they seem to reject any photo you take when you are holding an hyperactive terrier in one hand.

Zack http://penncentral2002.rrpicturearchives.net/
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Monday, February 2, 2009 9:56 PM

coborn35

 You misunderstand my angst. Im not mad because im not getting things in, which I am, its just that I can only upload 2 at a time.

I wonder if there isn't some preset default built into their system?  For example, maybe it's set up, that if you receive a set number of rejections in a set period of time,  it defaults to limit how often you can upload?  It's probably just some arbitrary parameters they set,  in order to keep someone from flooding the system.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hewitt,TX.
  • 1,088 posts
Posted by videomaker on Tuesday, February 3, 2009 10:05 PM

Murphy Siding

coborn35

 You misunderstand my angst. Im not mad because im not getting things in, which I am, its just that I can only upload 2 at a time.

I wonder if there isn't some preset default built into their system?  For example, maybe it's set up, that if you receive a set number of rejections in a set period of time,  it defaults to limit how often you can upload?  It's probably just some arbitrary parameters they set,  in order to keep someone from flooding the system.

Murphy Siding

coborn35

 You misunderstand my angst. Im not mad because im not getting things in, which I am, its just that I can only upload 2 at a time.

I wonder if there isn't some preset default built into their system?  For example, maybe it's set up, that if you receive a set number of rejections in a set period of time,  it defaults to limit how often you can upload?  It's probably just some arbitrary parameters they set,  in order to keep someone from flooding the system.

Verrrrry Interesting ,You may very well have something there,and again maybe not..It is interesting tho that Coborn35 has these problems with them,then telling him he can only post 2 pix at a time... 

Danny
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: Reedsburg WI (near Wisconsin Dells)
  • 3,370 posts
Posted by Noah Hofrichter on Tuesday, February 3, 2009 10:49 PM

My understanding is Murphy Siding has it exactly right; the 2 picture upload limit is based upon your ratio of rejects to accepted pictures. If you start getting a higher rate of accepted pictures, or you get more than 20 or 25 photos into the database (I forget which), then your upload max goes back to 10. The idea is to make people who just upload every picture they take, no matter how bad it is, to stop and think about what they upload and only send in their best stuff.

I do love how quickly people are always so quick to criticize rp.net. And I'll admit, I was one who used to do it as well. But I've come to realize that about 9 times out of 10 they were really right, the photo of mine they rejected could have been improved in some way to make it much better. I truly believe their criticism helped me to develop a better eye for photography. They are out to have some of the best railroad photos on the net, and they certainly have achieved that. Sure, a few mediocre photo slip through the cracks every now and then, but they are screened by humans so of course that is going to happen.

Many people are quick to suggest that people find other places to post photos as well, like rrpicturearchives or locophotos. And if you aren't interested in sharing only your best photos and sometimes just excepting your photo isn't what somebody else wants to put on their website, then that it a good idea. But if you compare sites like rrpicturearchives to rail pictures, I'd much rather flip through the rail pictures database than rrpicturearchives and the like. In my opinion anyway, Rail Pictures has a bunch of high quality photos with just a few lesser photos thrown in. rrpicturearchives is primarily a bunch of lesser quality photos with just a few high quality photos thrown in. There's quite a difference.

Just my 2 cents. 

Noah

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Tn
  • 22 posts
Posted by nsrayman on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 6:44 PM

 

I just checked it out :

 Your current 24 hour upload limit is 10.
You have uploaded photos so far today.
You have 10 upload slots remaining.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Wednesday, February 4, 2009 8:35 PM

Noah Hofrichter

My understanding is Murphy Siding has it exactly right; the 2 picture upload limit is based upon your ratio of rejects to accepted pictures. If you start getting a higher rate of accepted pictures, or you get more than 20 or 25 photos into the database (I forget which), then your upload max goes back to 10. The idea is to make people who just upload every picture they take, no matter how bad it is, to stop and think about what they upload and only send in their best stuff.

 

Oh, so I guess I'm safe, then. I was wondering why I hadn't been cut off last month after all those cloudy/backlit pics I tried to sneak in...

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    August 2008
  • From: Eau Claire, WI
  • 21 posts
Posted by travsirocz on Thursday, February 5, 2009 12:15 PM

Here is the latest RPNet newbie photographer. http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=33955 Doesn't look like he is having a problem with his first shot getting a screeners choice and also has a POTW.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Thursday, February 5, 2009 4:27 PM

 Awesome. Thanks for contributing to this thread.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Monday, February 9, 2009 2:24 PM

 Ha, they took away my ability to appeal now.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:38 PM

 bump.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hewitt,TX.
  • 1,088 posts
Posted by videomaker on Friday, February 20, 2009 9:05 PM

http://www.flickr.com/photos/8880918@N04/

coburn35 check these photos out..Maybe you should post yours here as well... 

Danny
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Friday, February 20, 2009 10:09 PM

 Well im still submitting my best ones of course, but I went ahead and created my own website, which I hope to launch in the next few weeks.

It isnt one of those generic ones, and it really is alot of work! But with all the new stuff ive learned, and the SWEET gallery Ive created that records view counts, top rated, etc, it should be a good dela. I will keep you all posted.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hewitt,TX.
  • 1,088 posts
Posted by videomaker on Saturday, February 21, 2009 8:53 PM

coborn35

 Well im still submitting my best ones of course, but I went ahead and created my own website, which I hope to launch in the next few weeks.

It isnt one of those generic ones, and it really is alot of work! But with all the new stuff ive learned, and the SWEET gallery Ive created that records view counts, top rated, etc, it should be a good dela. I will keep you all posted.

 This is good ! Now you can get on with taking and posting YOUR chice of photos and nobody can tell you No !

Danny
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Southern California
  • 1,074 posts
Posted by Erie Lackawanna on Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:40 PM

Good luck it with it.  I've thought about it myself.  I think the ability to control everything yourself would be nice in a lot of ways.

Charles Freericks
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,026 posts
Posted by tree68 on Sunday, February 22, 2009 7:18 AM

Erie Lackawanna

Good luck it with it.  I've thought about it myself.  I think the ability to control everything yourself would be nice in a lot of ways.

It's really not that hard - some basic knowledge of HTML will do - I learned most of what I know from two book (one cost just $7).  The really neat part is that you only need to create a couple of pages - one as an index, and one for the full sized view of the picture, which you then modify slightly for each picture.  Example.

Probably the best part is that for a few bucks a month you can get webspace for a fairly large site and there's no advertising.   Just your pictures.

Of course you can get as fancy as you like, too.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy