Trains.com

The Folly of the Different Gauges

5419 views
47 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
The Folly of the Different Gauges
Posted by Kozzie on Wednesday, March 31, 2004 4:00 PM
Here's a story from Downunder for those of you "up Over" folk who liek to read about the RR scene in Oz.

Prior to federation in 1901, the states were previously colonies of great Britain, with their own armed forces, Customs, currency etc etc. So when it came to building railways in the 1800s, with much short-sightedness, each of the colonies decided what gauge they would build their own railway, with no regard to connecting to other colonies on the same continent! What a joke!

So we had:

Standard gauge 4' 8&1/2" in New South Wales (most sensible choice really)

Narrow gauge 3' 6" in Queensland (my state), Western Australia and Tasmania, and

Broad gauge 5' 3" in Victoria and South Australia....(With two other gauges in SA .......Pete - help here please!).

Northern Territory: This is a place where I hope Pete comes in and helps me out.....

I know what you're thinking...what a mess!..as far travelling between the colonies is concerned.

It wasn't till after federation that common sense finally prevailed, and it was decided to connect the states (formerly colonies) with standard gauge track. All state and territory capitals (except in Tasmania - our island state), are now connected by standard gauge.

Initially, between Sydney (New South Wales) and Melbourne (Victoria) about 50 years ago (?), then in stages, till finally,...after many delays...this year, a trans-continental standard gauge track from Adelaide (South Australia) in the south, up through the middle of the continent through mostly desert, to Darwin (Northern territory) way up in the tropics.

Queensland is the last state to have a state-wide railway system owned by a state government. The others have partly or fully privatised and split up their systems. So Brisbane's (capital of Queensland and my home town) suburban network is part of Queensland's state-wide narrow gauge track. Though narrow gauge, it is still regarded as "heavy rail" with the same size rails as the standard and broad gauges down south.

Queensland Rail moves a lot of freight - coal is very big. Also sugar cane, container freight, general freight and we are the last state (in Oz that is) to shift cattle by rail from the cattle yards/collection points to the meat processing centres. So, as I commute into the city to work, we occasionally run neck & neck with, or pass a long freight train.

Five years ago here in Queensland we kicked off a tilt train service from Brisbane in the south east corner, up the east coast through the major regional centres. Regular service top speed is 160 km per hour (100 mph) which I know is no great shakes on the world scene, but we are proud of that sort of speed on narrow gauge. No train in the southern states matches that! ha ha! Ooops! No inter-state rivalry now!

Record for the tilt train is 210 kph (130 mph) but we would need to spend much more money on our tracks to do that in regular service.

However, the main line to the north is being constantly re-aligned and beefed up as money comes available. Comes from having a large country with relatively few people and a therefore a small tax base. But we manage.

I'd better stop yakking. I hope all that has been of interest to the "Up Over" folk and makes sense.

Pete - please add/correct whatever is needed..hopfully this will start an interesting thread. [:D]

Cheers

Kozzie [;)]
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: West Coast
  • 4,122 posts
Posted by espeefoamer on Wednesday, March 31, 2004 4:16 PM
Please see my reply to a quote on your Favorite pre-Amtrak Train thread.
Ride Amtrak. Cats Rule, Dogs Drool.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: indiana
  • 792 posts
Posted by joseph2 on Wednesday, March 31, 2004 6:31 PM
Thanks for the info,I read about the new line from Alice Springs to Darwin,that sounds like an interesting trip.Back a long time ago there may have been some 2' or 2'6'' track also,maybe it was called the Puffin Billy train. Joe G.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Wednesday, March 31, 2004 6:52 PM
Guys,

Why do I get the feeling that I'm being set up here?

The problem started right back in the early 1850s, when the railway in Sydney, NSW changed the suggested gauge from 5'3" to standard gauge. the rivalry between the colonies was such that the line in Melbourne, Victoria was built to 5'3". These lines were built in 1854 to 1855.

South Australia also adopted 5'3'' gauge, from 1856 for lines around Adelaide, and so did Tasmania for lines around Launceston in Northern Tasmania in 1869.

I think Queensland started the narrow gauge of 3'6" in 1865, and this was also adopted later in Western Australia.

Although the original railways in Sydney and Melbourne were private companies, the colonial governments took over operation, and the other colonies started their railways as "state-owned" enterprises.

The problem was that like the roads, the government's responsibility ended at the colonial (or state, after federation in 1901) border.

South Australia suffered from having a lot of marginal agricultural land, and while they needed railways, they opted to extend the system as narrow gauge 3'6" lines, from quite close to Adelaide to the north. They also built (to 3'6") the North Australia Railway south from Darwin in the Northern Territory, which was administered by South Australia until federation in 1901. This line only reached about one third of the way to Alice Springs, near the centre of Australia, which was its intended destination.

The South Australians did extend the 5'3" lines to the Victorian border, where a through connection was made to Melbourne. This was for many years the only through line between states. This was opened in the late 1880s, and the latest American passenger cars, D'Alton Mann's "Boudoir Cars" were purchased for the service.

There were breaks of gauge at Albury, on the Murray river, between NSW and Victoria (standard and 5'3" gauge) and Wallan-Garra, on the NSW -Queensland border (standard and 3'6" gauge).

There was no rail connection to Western Australia until the federal government (called the Commonwealth Government here) built a line from Port Augusta in South Australia to Kalgoorlie in Western Australia. This was built as standard gauge, although it connected to 3'6" lines at each end, creating two more breaks of gauge. This was built from 1915 until 1917, probably assisted by the First World War happening at the time. Up to this time, most travel and freight between states moved by sea, since all state capitals are on the coast. The German submarine campaign in the Atlantic at this time probably helped the buildng of the line.

The situation in South Australia was confused. To travel to Perth WA, you caught a broad gauge train to Terowie (on the 3'6" line to Broken Hill in NSW), then a 3'6" train to Port Augusta, and a standard gauge train to Kalgoorlie WA, and then a 3'6" train to Perth.

The Commonwealth pressed for extension of the standard gauge to Adelaide, but this was opposed by the state government, because they would lose the revenue on the state system from Port Augusta.

This continued until 1936, when the standard gauge was extended to Port Pirie, south of Port Augusta, but a new line owned by the South Australian government was built to connect with it there. Sadly this line was 5'3" gauge, making Port Pirie the first rail centre with three active gauges. The lines to Alice Springs and Broken Hill were 3'6", the line to Adelaide 5'3" and the line to Kalgoorlie standard gauge.

There was some good news. A new standard gauge line was built along the Pacific coast to Brisbane, replacing the break of gauge connection on the inland route. This was opened in 1932, connecting Brisbane and Sydney.

The Great Depression hit Australia hard, and no more standardising occured until 1962, when a standard gauge line was built connecting Melbourne and Albury, providing through traffic to Sydney. The locomotives and crews still changed at the border, but the freight and passengers went through. The broad gauge line remained, and still carried a lot of internal traffic, and most passengers not travelling interstate, so what looked like a double track was two incompatible single lines!

That's enough for now! I'll bring it up to date in a later post. Anyone who isn't bored but can't understand something please ask a question!

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:32 PM
No Pete, I'm honestly not trying to set you up. Thanks for the details.

I realised that you would have more knowledge on the matter, and I thought that it might be an interesting read, as some of the crew "up over" have expressed interest in Oz RR scene. So I thought that I would get it rolling, and see where it goes!
[:)]

Cheers!

Dave
(Kozzie)
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,018 posts
Posted by tree68 on Wednesday, March 31, 2004 9:33 PM
It really wasn't much different in the states in the beginning, although a larger percentage went with standard gauge. There was some narrow in the east, and Erie went with 6 foot. Didn't take too long for them to figure out that 4'8 1/2" was the future.

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:05 PM
OK, time for Episode Three!

We left the Australian Railways in 1962 with a single standard gauge line running into Broad Gauge territory in Victoria. It bypassed the passenger stations and handled through freight and passenger traffic only.

At this stage systems were set up in Melbourne and Albury to change the trucks on freight cars with loading from points on the standard gauge to points on the broad gauge. Cars were marked with an "X" to indicate that they had trucks with fittings suitable for exchange between gauges. This was slow and expensive, but much much faster and cheaper than moving loading between cars.

So freight could now move from anywhere in South Australia or Victoria to anywhere in New South Wales, and to Brisbane in south east Queensland.

In 1965, export of Iron Ore was permitted for the first time, and a number of large standard gauge lines were developed in the Pilbara area in the north west of Western Australia. These were independent, but now have merged into two large systems which are so close that a connection is likely. But this didn't really influence the railways in the rest of Australia.

But Iron Ore was discovered in Koolyanobbing, between Perth and Kalgoorlie, and a standard gauge line was built to connect this mine to the port at Kwinana south of Perth.
Since this was more than three quarters of the way to Kalgoorlie, it was obvious to continue the line to there connecting with the standard gauge Trans Australian line. This was completed in 1968/69.

Freight could now move from Brisbane to Perth with changes of trucks at Melbourne and Port Pirie, standard to broad gauge and back to standard.

I guess I should point out that exchange of trucks between standard and narrow gauge didn't occur, because apart from the gauge, the couplers were incompatible, Western Australia using centre buffers (and vacuum brakes) while Queensland used side buffers and screw couplers (but Westinghouse brakes). Somehow, the broad and standard gauge systems agreed on knuckle type couplers and Westinghouse brakes which allowed interchange once you got the gauge right.

To complete the link from Port Pirie to the East, the South Australian 3'6" gauge line was converted to standard gauge, completed in January 1970. So we could now ship freight right across the country without rebuilding the freight car on the way. I sneaked off from work to watch the first through train, since nobody would notice my absence. This was true, but I was surprised the next day to see myself on the cover photo of "The Australian" newspaper, fortunately facing away from the camera.

By this stage we had another isolated line running from Kalgoorlie to Perth with a parallel narrow gauge line still in service, and the rest of the state network narrow gauge.

South Australia had still managed to avoid getting a standard gauge line to Adelaide, and the freight rate for coast to coast traffic was still calculated as if the traffic flowed over the longer narrow gauge line bypassed in 1936, so that the SA state government didn't lose revenue from allowing the building of the standard gauge.

South Australia now operated trains on all three gauges, and stations at Peterborough and Gladstone had all three gauges. The triple gauge turnouts were a masterpiece of engineering skill, and the six rails on the turntables had to be machined to fit that close together.

Fortunately, the SA railways were now losing money, not just because thay had more rails per track than anyone else, but because road traffic was increasingly taking freight away from rail.

The Federal Government took over the railways in South Australia (and Tasmania) and in the early 1980s built a standard gauge line to Adelaide from Crystal Brook (on the line to Broken Hill), and another standard gauge line to Alice Springs from Tarcoola on the line to Kalgoorlie.

All the state capitals were now connected by standard gauge, although the direct line from Melbourne to Adelaide was still broad gauge.

This was maybe a hundred years after American Railroads had adopted standard gauge, as indicated by Larry in his post above.

I'll take a break at this stage, and continue the story in a later posting.

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Thursday, April 1, 2004 8:01 PM
Right, Episode Four, or "The Failure of Common Sense"

Somewhere back there I made post No 200. And I didn't notice!

Right, we've made it to 1970 and nobody else recognised me on the front page of the newspaper, and fast forwarded to the early 1980s when standard gauge reached Adelaide and the world didn't end, as widely predicted in 1920.

What about Queensland? Nothing changed after 1932. No new standard gauge lines, except for an isolated line hauling bauxite on Cape York (the "pointy bit" up at the top of the map of Australia).

There was a history of lost opportunities in Queensland. The line from Townsville to Mount Isa, right in the middle of Queensland was extensively rebuilt in the very early 1960s, using federal funding intended for rail standardisation. Queensland opposed standard gauge because it would break up the narrow gauge system.

Five years later, a new line was built from Gladstone to Moura for export coal traffic. Although it would have operated independently, the Queensland Government insisted that it be built to narrow gauge rather than standard as the American and Japanese developers building it requested.

Five more years on, another new line from Hay Point, near Mackay was built to narrow gauge. The locomotives on this line were so heavy, they had to run with nearly empty fuel tanks just to meet load limits on the normal main lines. So despite the fact that this was effectively an isolated system, it too was built to narrow gauge.

Development continued, and the lines from Gladstone and Hay point were rebuilt with double track and electrified at 25kV AC. Despite this investment, the opportunity to convert to standard gauge was not taken, although the additional cost would have been quite small.

The main line from Brisbane to Gladstone was rebuilt and electrified. Much of this was on an entirely new alignment, but still narrow gauge. More recently similar rebuilding was extended from Rockhampton to Cairns, including new passenger stations in new locations in Bowen, Mackay and Townsville, and a new station on the original site in Cairns. But no change in gauge.

If these lines had been built or rebuilt to standard gauge, the majority of Queensland would now be standard gauge! The Brisbane suburban lines were completely rebuilt and electrified, again with federal funding, and using a standard design of passenger train, but all to narrow gauge, except for an extension of the standard gauge across the Brisbane River to bring the trains from the rest of Australia into the same station.

This last extension was done using dual gauge concrete ties (called sleepers here). If these had been used on all plain track in the various rebuildings, the gauge could have been changed almost overnight and at low cost, simply by moving the rail across!

Queensland Rail is currently operating standard gauge trains in other states, using existing locomotives (some quite old) and cars converted from narrow gauge, with little problem.

But this wasn't just a Queensland attitude.

In Adelaide, South Australia, the arrival of standard gauge resulted in a new station being built further out of town at Keswick. The suburban trains remained 5'3" gauge, so a lot of track became dual gauge, including the Keswick station. This meant that the switching locomotive moving the cars about was sometimes a different gauge to the cars being hauled! Instructions were that a full size passenger car of the same gauge as the locomotive had to be coupled between the locomotive and the cars of different gauge.

So, since the passenger train to Melbourne from Adelaide ("The Overland") was 5'3" gauge, if an obviously standard gauge car was coupled to it, the switch locomotive was standard gauge. It was hard to tell, because the switchers were all the same type and painted the same colour, so you had to check which rails the wheels were on, or remember the road numbers! The same problem occurred the other way, resulting in "Overland" cars coupled between broad gauge switchers and the "Indian Pacific".

Eventually, it was decided to convert the line from Melbourne to Adelaide to standard gauge. This was done by using "gauge convertible" ties. The six and a half inch gauge difference didn't allow room for fasteners between 60kg/m (120lb/yd) rails, so a special reversible tie plate was used on one side. The spring fasteners, "Pandrol" and "Trak-lok" types were used, so that a gang just knocked the fasteners off, lifted the rail clear, reversed the plates and put them back at the new gauge.

The conversion of the line, more than 1000km (620 miles) was done in a week. But like Victoria, the suburban network in Adelaide remained 5'3", and double track sections of line near Adelaide became two independent lines of different gauge. At least there haven't been many collisions between pasenger trains and freight trains since then!

A new line was built out of Melbourne (in advance of the quick conversion, admittedly) which is parallel to double track broad gauge lines used almost exclusively for passenger traffic.

Sadly, although conversion of many remaining 5'3" freight lines in Victoria to standard gauge is proposed, (some which would have been isolated by the main line conversion were converted at that time), the main passenger lines are being upgraded but remaining broad gauge "because that's the gauge the passenger trains are". Despite this an entirely new fleet of broad gauge passenger trains is being built.
The ties are ordinary concrete ties, setting the broad gauge in concrete (literally) for the foreseeable future. Couldn't we have gauge convertible ties, please?

The line to Darwin from Alice Springs was built, of course to standard gauge, and opened earlier this year. Much more work is needed to get an extension of a single gauge rail system apart from the interstate main lines. If this doesn't happen, the regional systems with their different gauges will just close as road competition renders them uncompetitive, and without feeders, will the main lines be far behind?

I wish I could say that the problem was at least going away!

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Friday, April 2, 2004 5:51 PM
Sorry,

I didn't answer Joseph2's question about 2'6" gauge in Victoria.

Around 1900, the Victorian Government railways decided to build light branch lines in mountainous country to a narrower gauge, and selected 2'6". Four lines were built in widely separated areas of the state.

One of these was in the Dandenong Range to the east of the capital, Melbourne. This lasted in normal service until the 1950s, by which time the area had become part of the residential suburbs. Pert of the line was converted to 5'3" and electrified for commuter trains, but the remainder has been retained and rebuilt as a tourist attraction. This line is known as "Puffing Billy".

There are very extensive 2'0" gauge railways in Queensland hauling sugar cane to the sugar mills, and the nearest one of these to Brisbane, Moreton Central mill at Nambour has recently closed. These lines use B-B diesel hydraulic locomotives of 600HP and haul loads in excess of 1000 tonnes, with Willison automatic couplers and concrete ties under the rails. In a few cases, 3'6" branch lines have been relaid to 2'0" to incorporate them into the mill network. Export sugar and molasses is carried on the 3'6" main lines, particularly around Cairns and Townsville.

Peter
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: St Paul, MN
  • 6,218 posts
Posted by Big_Boy_4005 on Saturday, April 3, 2004 10:31 AM
You Aussies have some very interesting geography, history, and trains. The railroads sound like a bit of a mess however. We Americans still can't figure out how you manage to keep them on the track, when everything is upside down.[D)][(-D][(-D][(-D][swg]
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Saturday, April 3, 2004 7:22 PM
Guys,

The locomotives aren't very smart, even the ones with microprocessors, and as long as we let them think that the side with the ground is "down", they don't notice anything is wrong!

It works really well, and back in 2000, not even the atheletes at the Olympic games realised in time to take advantage in their pole vaulting, for example. As long as you don't worry about it, you won't notice that up and down are reversed.

To stop tourists from thinking about it, we drive our automobiles on the opposite side of the road, and they spend so much time remembering how to make a right turn from (and to) the wrong side of the road.

Despite this, I'm sure that anyone on the forum would enjoy a visit to Australia, and as long as you are careful about the driving on the opposite side, you'll be very welcome and you'll never have to think about up and down,

Peter
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Independence, MO
  • 1,570 posts
Posted by UPTRAIN on Sunday, April 4, 2004 12:54 AM
AND THE AWARD FOR THE WORLD'S LONGEST FORUM POST IS...............DRUMROLL PLEASE....................M636C!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pump

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Sunday, April 4, 2004 5:31 AM
UPTRAIN

I feel I should say a few things in my defence here:

I didn't start a thread that had a subject so complex that it makes Middle East politics look simple by comparison!

Are we talking about individual posts or my three main ones added together?

Is there any documentary proof of this assertion?

However. I'll accept any prize that isn't painful or habit-forming!

Peter
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 4, 2004 8:08 AM
Enjoy it all.....and on the different gauges, the East Broad Top RR in Pennsylvania still operated at times as a tourist operation...and was a coal hauler years ago...is a 3 ft. line and it used to transport coal to be interchanged with the Pennsylvania RR at Hundington...50 miles or less and there was an exchange of trucks on the coal cars [to standard gauge], to get the loads on the main line of the Pennsy, and off to market, etc.............One item from down under that I note with amazement is the fact that people can walk up and over [the top structure], of that large bridge we often see in pictures...I can't believe they allow the public to take that risk in doing that...!

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Sunday, April 4, 2004 7:09 PM
Modelcar,

One line that I didn't mention was an isolated line in North Queensland from Normanton to Croydon. This is run today as a tourist operation, with a small railcar built on an English chassis intended for a double deck bus. Built during the 1930s, this car was kept as an inspection car for the General Manager of the Central lines (from Rockhampton) of Queensland Railways. It has a 102HP Gardner diesel, driving a single rear axle. The front end sits on an arch bar truck. It is too small to carry the traffic, and it hauls much larger aluminium bodied trailers formerly used in Brisbane suburban service.

The track is so light that the lightest modern locomotives were not allowed. The track was built with special deep section steel ties laid directly on (or in) the earth. The theory was that during the frequent floods in that tropical area, the track would survive, and the dead trees and such removed when the water receded, allowing a quick resumption of services. It worked, and the track was retained because it can be brought back more quickly than the road after heavy rain.

It is a tourist attraction, complete with connecting flights at each end to take you the hundreds of miles to the nearest population centres.

The spare locomotive is a six coupled diesel mechanical built to English Drewry Car company design, but fitted with a leading truck to ease the load on the very light track.

The Sydney Harbour Bridge does allow visitors to walk to the top of the arch, but under close supervision, wearing protective clothing, with safety harness, and you are specifically prohibited from taking a camera. This enables the organisers to sell photos taken on the bridge, but does prevent walkers being distracted, and cameras falling on to cars, trains, buses and pedestrians.

My view is, if you can't take photos, why go?

Peter
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 4, 2004 8:01 PM
Thanks for that update Peter....That bridge issue is really surprising. Understand why they don't want items falling down on cars, etc.....Our Matt Lauer from NBC program "the today show" was there several months ago and went to the top of the Sydney bridge and I wondered about that at that time....

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Sunday, April 4, 2004 8:13 PM

Pete (M636C)

Re your comment:
"I didn't start a thread that had a subject so complex that it makes Middle East politics look simple by comparison!"

I started the thread knowing that folk like Modelcar enjoy reading about Downunder RRs, and envisaged a precis type summary. However, your details are appreciated. People can read as much or as little as they like - hence the advantage of a Forum. [:)]

Cheers

Kozzie

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 4, 2004 8:28 PM
....Sure, it's all great.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 4, 2004 8:33 PM
Right now I'm seeing a very pretty full moon out the home office window here and I'm thinking you fellows down under are in full daylight and missing out....but your turn is coming around too....

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Sunday, April 4, 2004 8:39 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

Right now I'm seeing a very pretty full moon out the home office window here and I'm thinking you fellows down under are in full daylight and missing out....but your turn is coming around too....


Hey Modecar [:)] I reckon we had the full moon last night!

What do you reckon Pete?

So...that means we had it first? ?HA HA[:D]

Keep the humour coming, modelcar - very good! [;)]

Kozzie
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 4, 2004 8:46 PM
...Hey, that's cheating, but we'll accept that.

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Sunday, April 4, 2004 8:53 PM
I keep meaning to put on a long telephoto and take the moon as it rises (but I usually see such a moon when driving up to Sydney in the evening, and I'm never in the right place at the right time).

The Sydney Harbour Bridge always had steps, ladders and railings dating back to the construction. There is even a rack railway on the upper chord, with an electrically driven crane which was used for construction. I'm told that it runs very, very slowly! No, I don't know the gauge, but it's probably less than standard. The bridge was built with four standard gauge tracks, two each side of six road lanes, but two were replaced by road lanes after being used for streetcars for about thirty years.

Outside my window right now is a Royal Australian Air Force band practicing for a ceremonial welcome for someone.

Peter
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Sunday, April 4, 2004 9:00 PM
All interesting. At least the planners made the bridge adequate in capacity...Enjoy the music....Bet that sounds great. [8D]

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, April 5, 2004 7:26 PM
Guys,

Hot News:

In the latest (April 2004) edition of the Australian monthly "Railway Digest", on page 4 it is reported that a 130 km line will be built from Wandoan to Theodore in (southern) central Queensland. This will provide a connection that will form a link in a line from Melbourne (Victoria) to Gladstone (Queensland). Sadly there are other gaps yet to be filled, and parts of the current track are both narrow (3"6") and standard gauges.

This line will be built using dual gauge concrete ties, however, allowing quick and cheap conversion to standard gauge.

The line will initially serve narrow gauge coal trains to the export port at Gladstone, using the Moura short line, one of the lines built in the 1960s that was originally intended to be standard gauge.

The line will be built by the "Australian Transport and Energy Corridor (ATEC)" and is intended to form part of a line extending to Tennant Creek on the Alice Springs to Darwin line, the new line to be called the "Australian Inland Rail Expressway".

Now, I'm more than a little sceptical about the chances of all of this happening, the chances of a snowball in Hell come to mind. But at least the option to convert will be there.

Now, if we can convince the Victorian government that passenger trains should be standard gauge...

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Monday, April 5, 2004 7:44 PM
Hey Peter

re: ".... that a 130 km line will be built from Wandoan to Theodore in (southern) central Queensland...." will that mean a connection to the Brisbane to Charleville line via the existing branch to Wandoan, or, does it corss over the Charleville line on another alignment?

Kozzie

Dave
(Kozzie)
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, April 5, 2004 7:57 PM
...It sure is interesting to hear Australia [any nation], is building railroads.

Quentin

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, April 5, 2004 8:09 PM
Kozzie....That big beautiful full moon [minus one day], is just now rising and it will be as pretty as it was last night....So you fellows didn't use it all up yet.

Quentin

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Monday, April 5, 2004 8:24 PM
Dave,

It connects with the branch to Wandoan from Miles on the Charleville line, and with the remains of the Dawson Valley line at Theodore to connect to the Moura line at the North end.

Separately, another line is being built from Rangan on the Central line to Rolleston, but that will be narrow gauge only (they haven't really caught on to the possibilities yet).

Peter
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Australia
  • 786 posts
Posted by Kozzie on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 12:42 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Modelcar

Kozzie....That big beautiful full moon [minus one day], is just now rising and it will be as pretty as it was last night....So you fellows didn't use it all up yet.


Hey Modelcar! [:)] We Aussies aren't greedy are we Peter? [(-D][(-D][(-D]

Enjoy the moon. We've now got cloudy weather down here in Brisbane, so we won't see much tonight. [V]...hmmmm you didn't send the clouds did you modelcar?

...no...I'm casting nasturtiums here.. ha ha [:D]

Cheers

Dave
(Kozzie)
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 4,612 posts
Posted by M636C on Tuesday, April 6, 2004 1:12 AM
It was cloudy here last night, but I did see the moon briefly.

We had nasturtiums in the garden when I was very young, and I remember eating the leaves. They had quite an interesting taste!

Peter

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy