I found that KCS too had a bicentennial loco. This has got to be the worst special paint job of all time. KCS SD40-2 #642 makes BNSF 9647 “vomit bonnet” look like a work of genius. From looking at the photo, KCS's bicentennial paint job looked very amateurish. I doubt this is on anyone’s list of best looking locos, and apparantly KCS had 2 of these. Even KCS’s then-normal white scheme looked better than this. Other railroads took good care in their bicentennial schemes, but not KCS IMO.
Ted M.
got trains?™
See my photos at: http://tedmarshall.rrpicturearchives.net/
Where are the reporting marks? Aren't all road units supposed to carry them? Maybe on the not seen side?
Yep this was an actual paint scheme. This engine was painted in the mid 1970s, and I doubt anybody at KCS would get away with this with the current leadership. According to one link, the paint scheme has something to do with a drawing contest, and one of the contestants drawings was chosen.
KCS 642
WIAR wrote:In an earlier post, I believe it was stated that grade school kids came-up with this scheme. I wonder if the KCS management who approved this scheme may have flunked grade school?
At least KCS didn't hold a grade school contest to select the paint scheme for their executive F-units.
Locomotive paint designers, here is your brain on drugs. See?
Lyon_Wonder wrote:I found that KCS too had a bicentennial loco. This has got to be the worst special paint job of all time. KCS SD40-2 #642 makes BNSF 9647 “vomit bonnet” look like a work of genius. From looking at the photo, KCS's bicentennial paint job looked very amateurish. I doubt this is on anyone’s list of best looking locos, and apparantly KCS had 2 of these. Even KCS’s then-normal white scheme looked better than this. Other railroads took good care in their bicentennial schemes, but not KCS IMO.
Right when I read the thread subject, that is the EXACT loco that I thought of. Gosh it's ugly, but you have to love it!
Phil
That KCS locomotive reminds me of those cars that get wrecked and the owner goes to the wrecking yard to get "new" body panels to replace the damaged ones.
Did anyone nickname these locomotives Frankenstein?
"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)
i like it.. its so differnt it stands out..
csx engineer
You gotta admit - there's no mistaking it for anything else.
I wonder if the kid who drew it used all of the crayons in the box.....
Larry Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date Come ride the rails with me! There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...
That is not a special scheme.
That is the shop using up all the left-over cans of paint before they buy new paint.
Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer
No, this was a test of bar codes for remote equipment technology, 1976 scanner technology was undergoing some serious development.
David Gunn, SEPTA General Manager in the late 1970's early 1980's spoke at one of my railfan clubs. He had told management that he wanted to reduce the number of different paint schemes, so no new schemes without his approval. He said one day he was upset because he saw a Broad St subway car in what he thought was a new scheme with clashing colors. It turns out it had been washed, and the washer had scrubbed off some of the new paint, revealing old colors underneath.
Patrick Boylan
Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message
Actually I think its one of the coolest bicentennial schemes because it was designed by CHILDREN not some big PR firm someplace. You really have to give the KCS credit for going to the trouble to let kids design a paint scheme. It shows real creativity. Its probably more representative of the spirit of America than all the other bicentennial schemes put together.
Dave H.
Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com
.....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?
Quentin
eolafan wrote: coborn35 wrote: Modelcar wrote: .....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way... What did he say?????
coborn35 wrote: Modelcar wrote: .....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way...
Modelcar wrote: .....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?
Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way...
What did he say?????
She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw
Mechanical Department "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."
The Missabe Road: Safety First
Ted Marshall wrote:I vote to allow the graffiti vandals to have their way with this one. Anything's better that that. Something tells me, though, that even they wouldn't want anything to do with this ugly beast.
To me, it looks like the graffiti vandals already had their way with it.
If this is the winner, I'd like to see what the losing entries looked like.
The RI's Bicentennial scheme was also from a contest, IIRC. At least the official one on the E-8, not the accidental one on a wreck repair.
Jeff
Mookie wrote: eolafan wrote: coborn35 wrote: Modelcar wrote: .....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way... What did he say?????He said railfans would be very proud to shake the hands of any crew lucky enough to be on this locomotive!
OK, I'll second that sentiment.
jeffhergert wrote: Ted Marshall wrote:I vote to allow the graffiti vandals to have their way with this one. Anything's better that that. Something tells me, though, that even they wouldn't want anything to do with this ugly beast.To me, it looks like the graffiti vandals already had their way with it. If this is the winner, I'd like to see what the losing entries looked like.The RI's Bicentennial scheme was also from a contest, IIRC. At least the official one on the E-8, not the accidental one on a wreck repair.Jeff
It was probably a random drawing... I hope it was.
The Beaverton, Fanno Creek & Bull Mountain Railroad
"Ruby Line Service"
Homer Simpson voice "Dooh"
chad thomas wrote: eolafan wrote: coborn35 wrote: Modelcar wrote: .....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way... What did he say????? Homer Simpson voice "Dooh"
I believe you mean "Doh!" ;D
If the foamers do not want crew members in the photos then they should photograph model trains.
The photographs are more interesting if there are crew members in the photos and the doors of the locomotives are open occasionally.
Andrew
Andrew Falconer wrote:If the foamers do not want crew members in the photos then they should photograph model trains. The photographs are more interesting if there are crew members in the photos and the doors of the locomotives are open occasionally.Andrew
as far as being verbaly abused.. i was one time by a foamer that wanted to come into the cab and take a look around after he said he worked for GE at one time and i said nope..cant do it..sorry..he got hostel and felt it was "his right" to come in and look at what "his" company had produced... this was after he followed me and my conductor around a grossery store asking questions while we stopped and got some lunch to take on the road....
wgnrr wrote: Lyon_Wonder wrote: I found that KCS too had a bicentennial loco. This has got to be the worst special paint job of all time. KCS SD40-2 #642 makes BNSF 9647 “vomit bonnet” look like a work of genius. From looking at the photo, KCS's bicentennial paint job looked very amateurish. I doubt this is on anyone’s list of best looking locos, and apparantly KCS had 2 of these. Even KCS’s then-normal white scheme looked better than this. Other railroads took good care in their bicentennial schemes, but not KCS IMO. Right when I read the thread subject, that is the EXACT loco that I thought of. Gosh it's ugly, but you have to love it!Phil
Lyon_Wonder wrote: I found that KCS too had a bicentennial loco. This has got to be the worst special paint job of all time. KCS SD40-2 #642 makes BNSF 9647 “vomit bonnet” look like a work of genius. From looking at the photo, KCS's bicentennial paint job looked very amateurish. I doubt this is on anyone’s list of best looking locos, and apparantly KCS had 2 of these. Even KCS’s then-normal white scheme looked better than this. Other railroads took good care in their bicentennial schemes, but not KCS IMO.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.