Trains.com

Worst special scheme loco

11337 views
40 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Worst special scheme loco
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:46 PM

I found that KCS too had a bicentennial loco. This has got to be the worst special paint job of all time.  KCS SD40-2 #642 makes BNSF 9647 “vomit bonnet” look like a work of genius.  From looking at the photo, KCS's bicentennial paint job looked very amateurish.  I doubt this is on anyone’s list of best looking locos, and apparantly KCS had 2 of these.  Even KCS’s then-normal white scheme looked better than this.  Other railroads took good care in their bicentennial schemes, but not KCS IMO.   

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Naples, FL
  • 848 posts
Posted by Ted Marshall on Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:05 PM
This is a joke, right?
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Where it's cold.
  • 555 posts
Posted by doghouse on Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:23 PM

 

Where are the reporting marks?  Aren't all road units supposed to carry them?  Maybe on the not seen side? 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:33 PM
In an earlier post, I believe it was stated that grade school kids came-up with this scheme.  I wonder if the KCS management who approved this scheme may have flunked grade school?
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:40 PM

  Yep this was an actual paint scheme.  This engine was painted in the mid 1970s, and I doubt anybody at KCS would get away with this with the current leadership.   According to one link, the paint scheme has something to do with a drawing contest, and one of the contestants drawings was chosen. 

KCS 642 

 

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Naples, FL
  • 848 posts
Posted by Ted Marshall on Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:53 PM
I vote to allow the graffiti vandals to have their way with this one. Anything's better that that. Something tells me, though, that even they wouldn't want anything to do with this ugly beast.
  • Member since
    November 2015
  • 668 posts
Posted by Tjsingle on Sunday, August 31, 2008 10:57 PM
Maybe someone lost a bet?
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • 965 posts
Posted by Lyon_Wonder on Sunday, August 31, 2008 11:01 PM

 WIAR wrote:
In an earlier post, I believe it was stated that grade school kids came-up with this scheme.  I wonder if the KCS management who approved this scheme may have flunked grade school?

At least KCS didn't hold a grade school contest to select the paint scheme for their executive F-units.

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Fountain Valley, CA, USA
  • 607 posts
Posted by garyla on Sunday, August 31, 2008 11:07 PM

Locomotive paint designers, here is your brain on drugs.  See?

If I ever met a train I didn't like, I can't remember when it happened!
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Wisconsin
  • 735 posts
Posted by wgnrr on Monday, September 1, 2008 1:41 AM
 Lyon_Wonder wrote:

I found that KCS too had a bicentennial loco. This has got to be the worst special paint job of all time.  KCS SD40-2 #642 makes BNSF 9647 “vomit bonnet” look like a work of genius.  From looking at the photo, KCS's bicentennial paint job looked very amateurish.  I doubt this is on anyone’s list of best looking locos, and apparantly KCS had 2 of these.  Even KCS’s then-normal white scheme looked better than this.  Other railroads took good care in their bicentennial schemes, but not KCS IMO.   

 

 

 

 

 

Right when I read the thread subject, that is the EXACT loco that I thought of. Gosh it's ugly, but you have to love it!

Phil

My Photo Albums: http://s84.photobucket.com/albums/k32/martin_lumber/ http://tinyurl.com/3yzns6
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
Posted by ericsp on Monday, September 1, 2008 3:54 AM

That KCS locomotive reminds me of those cars that get wrecked and the owner goes to the wrecking yard to get "new" body panels to replace the damaged ones.

Did anyone nickname these locomotives Frankenstein?

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Monday, September 1, 2008 4:31 AM

i like it.. its so differnt it stands out..

csx engineer 

"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Northern New York
  • 25,015 posts
Posted by tree68 on Monday, September 1, 2008 7:02 AM

You gotta admit - there's no mistaking it for anything else.

I wonder if the kid who drew it used all of the crayons in the box.....

LarryWhistling
Resident Microferroequinologist (at least at my house) 
Everyone goes home; Safety begins with you
My Opinion. Standard Disclaimers Apply. No Expiration Date
Come ride the rails with me!
There's one thing about humility - the moment you think you've got it, you've lost it...

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Monday, September 1, 2008 7:14 AM

That is not a special scheme.

That is the shop using up all the left-over cans of paint before they buy new paint.

Laugh [(-D]

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Monday, September 1, 2008 9:47 AM
As noted above, KCS just before the bicentennial in 1976 had a contest open to children of their employees to "design" their bicentennial paint scheme and THIS was the winner!  The kid who won likely is now a reporter for CNN as he/she now believes anything they do is really, really good when in reality, IT IS NOT!
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • 964 posts
Posted by gardendance on Monday, September 1, 2008 10:20 AM

No, this was a test of bar codes for remote equipment technology, 1976 scanner technology was undergoing some serious development.

David Gunn, SEPTA General Manager in the late 1970's early 1980's spoke at one of my railfan clubs. He had told management that he wanted to reduce the number of different paint schemes, so no new schemes without his approval. He said one day he was upset because he saw a Broad St subway car in what he thought was a new scheme with clashing colors. It turns out it had been washed, and the washer had scrubbed off some of the new paint, revealing old colors underneath.

Patrick Boylan

Free yacht rides, 27' sailboat, zip code 19114 Delaware River, get great Delair bridge photos from the river. Send me a private message

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Omaha, NE
  • 10,621 posts
Posted by dehusman on Monday, September 1, 2008 10:28 AM

Actually I think its one of the coolest bicentennial schemes because it was designed by CHILDREN not some big PR firm someplace.  You really have to give the KCS credit for going to the trouble to let kids design a paint scheme.  It shows real creativity.  Its probably more representative of the spirit of America than all the other bicentennial schemes put together.

Dave H.

Dave H. Painted side goes up. My website : wnbranch.com

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Monday, September 1, 2008 10:39 AM

.....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?

Quentin

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Monday, September 1, 2008 2:55 PM
 eolafan wrote:
 coborn35 wrote:
 Modelcar wrote:

.....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?

Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way...

What did he say?????

He said railfans would be very proud to shake the hands of any crew lucky enough to be on this locomotive!

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Monday, September 1, 2008 3:51 PM
Sadly no. I have been verbally abused by railfans before because I was doing something inside the cab of an engine they wanted to get pictures of, and for leaving the cab door open. Iw as refering to the fact that there would be no reason for a crew member to wear a mask, rails dont care about locomotive paint schemes, although I would assume he might get some good natured ribbing... and if any foamers decided to take a shot of this unit, they would probably get mad if the engineer was in the pic, much less wearing a mask, which would add to their anger.

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,900 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Monday, September 1, 2008 4:45 PM

 Ted Marshall wrote:
I vote to allow the graffiti vandals to have their way with this one. Anything's better that that. Something tells me, though, that even they wouldn't want anything to do with this ugly beast.

To me, it looks like the graffiti vandals already had their way with it. 

If this is the winner, I'd like to see what the losing entries looked like.

The RI's Bicentennial scheme was also from a contest, IIRC.  At least the official one on the E-8, not the accidental one on a wreck repair.

Jeff  

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Hewitt,TX.
  • 1,088 posts
Posted by videomaker on Monday, September 1, 2008 5:25 PM
  This looks like something KCS of Mexico came up with ! Ha ,I think it was FNM back then...
Danny
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Monday, September 1, 2008 6:35 PM
 Mookie wrote:
 eolafan wrote:
 coborn35 wrote:
 Modelcar wrote:

.....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?

Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way...

What did he say?????

He said railfans would be very proud to shake the hands of any crew lucky enough to be on this locomotive!

OK, I'll second that sentiment.

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Oregon
  • 563 posts
Posted by KBCpresident on Monday, September 1, 2008 6:47 PM
 jeffhergert wrote:

 Ted Marshall wrote:
I vote to allow the graffiti vandals to have their way with this one. Anything's better that that. Something tells me, though, that even they wouldn't want anything to do with this ugly beast.

To me, it looks like the graffiti vandals already had their way with it. 

If this is the winner, I'd like to see what the losing entries looked like.

The RI's Bicentennial scheme was also from a contest, IIRC.  At least the official one on the E-8, not the accidental one on a wreck repair.

Jeff  

It was probably a random drawing... I hope it was.Wink [;)]

The Beaverton, Fanno Creek & Bull Mountain Railroad

"Ruby Line Service"

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Ely, Nv.
  • 6,312 posts
Posted by chad thomas on Monday, September 1, 2008 7:47 PM
 eolafan wrote:
 coborn35 wrote:
 Modelcar wrote:

.....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?

Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way...

What did he say?????

 

Homer Simpson voice "Dooh" Big Smile [:D] 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Duluth,Minnesota,USA
  • 4,015 posts
Posted by coborn35 on Monday, September 1, 2008 10:05 PM
 chad thomas wrote:
 eolafan wrote:
 coborn35 wrote:
 Modelcar wrote:

.....Wonder if the engineer wore a false face when running that unit...?

Why? Most foamers dont give a **** about the crew anyway. Theyd probably **** thier pants bcause the engineer got in the way...

What did he say?????

 

Homer Simpson voice "Dooh" Big Smile [:D] 

I believe you mean "Doh!"  ;D

Mechanical Department  "No no that's fine shove that 20 pound set all around the yard... those shoes aren't hell and a half to change..."

The Missabe Road: Safety First

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 4:56 PM

If the foamers do not want crew members in the photos then they should photograph model trains.

The photographs are more interesting if there are crew members in the photos and the doors of the locomotives are open occasionally.

Andrew

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 5:24 PM
 Andrew Falconer wrote:

If the foamers do not want crew members in the photos then they should photograph model trains.

The photographs are more interesting if there are crew members in the photos and the doors of the locomotives are open occasionally.

Andrew

last time i checked they wherent all RCO yet.. it still takes a crew...

as far as being verbaly abused.. i was one time by a foamer that wanted to come into the cab and take a look around after he said he worked for GE at one time and i said nope..cant do it..sorry..he got hostel and felt it was "his right" to come in and look at what "his" company had produced... this was after he followed me and my conductor around a grossery store asking questions while we stopped and got some lunch to take on the road....

csx engineer 

"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 6:25 PM
 wgnrr wrote:
 Lyon_Wonder wrote:

I found that KCS too had a bicentennial loco. This has got to be the worst special paint job of all time.  KCS SD40-2 #642 makes BNSF 9647 “vomit bonnet” look like a work of genius.  From looking at the photo, KCS's bicentennial paint job looked very amateurish.  I doubt this is on anyone’s list of best looking locos, and apparantly KCS had 2 of these.  Even KCS’s then-normal white scheme looked better than this.  Other railroads took good care in their bicentennial schemes, but not KCS IMO.   

 

 

 

 

 

Right when I read the thread subject, that is the EXACT loco that I thought of. Gosh it's ugly, but you have to love it!

Phil

Well...no you don't.  But as Spock would say it is...."Fascinating".
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 6:31 PM
Maybe dropping it in a fish tank would help!  (see thread on MR forums).    Aah never mind its been a long day..

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy