Trains.com

TV alert 6/24: MegaDisasters-Glow Train Disaster

2978 views
34 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
TV alert 6/24: MegaDisasters-Glow Train Disaster
Posted by zardoz on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 6:34 AM

Glow Train Catastrophe
Examining the potential for disaster in Las Vegas, if a railway accident befell nuclear waste being transported for permanent storage below Nevada's Yucca Mountain.

9pm CDT on the History channel; repeats 4 hours later.

=======================================================

Sounds to me like it might be rather sensationalistic, but it might have some interesting bits.

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:06 AM
Just by the name, you can tell what their opinion is going to be.  What are thy trying to imply, if you get close to it, you'll glow in the dark, too?  I'm surprised they didn't call it "Chernobyl Train" or "Last train from Chernobyl".  If I could work China Syndrome into something, I'd have another possible title.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:24 AM

I'll have to admit, I found their special about how Union Pacific is now equiping it's locomotives with shackles to protect their crews from being abducted by space aliens, to be very informative.

The claims about Rail America, however, alledging that they were shanghai'ing hoboes and sport freeloaders and forcing them into servitude in massive team track encampments, seemed a little far fetched. Sleepy [|)]

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:28 AM

...and if a train loaded with fresh fruit were to derail at speed in Las Vegas many, many gamblers just might be drowned in thousands of tons of fruit salad!...the chances of this happening are about the same as the nuclear accident potential so let's move on to a more realistic subject.

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Back home on the Chi to KC racetrack
  • 2,011 posts
Posted by edbenton on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:38 AM
Considering the casks that they use to transport the spent fuel rods can take a hit from a LOCOMOTIVE and not even being breached having one of them derail and come apart is VERY VERY FAR FECTHED.  The locomotive in that test had more damage than the cask.
Always at war with those that think OTR trucking is EASY.
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Hilliard, Ohio
  • 1,139 posts
Posted by chatanuga on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 9:02 AM
 Convicted One wrote:

I'll have to admit, I found their special about how Union Pacific is now equiping it's locomotives with shackles to protect their crews from being abducted by space aliens, to be very informative.

Say what?!?!?!

Kevin

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:08 AM

Did you notice that in one of the "teaser" clips advertising the special, they show a computer-generated sequence of a steam locomotive crossing a bridge, pulling what I guess was the nuclear cargo??

Let's get the public all whipped-up here - they're pulling nuclear cargo with steam engines...

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:15 AM

I would watch the show, but I have an oppurtunity to be hung up in one of the shackle cars for a couple of hours while the show is on.  The shackles are a much more fun form of torture.

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • 371 posts
Posted by ButchKnouse on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:48 AM

Even I know that trains carrying nuclear materials travel at a slow speed and are immediately preceded by a decoy train in case of track sabotage or attack.

Isn't it amazing that the same people who are fanatical about global warming are equally fanatical in their opposition to nuclear power, which DOES NOT emit carbon.

These tree huggers are constantly telling us about how everything is done better in Europe, but Europe, especially France, relies on nuclear power.

I imagine this anti-nuke propaganda on the tube tonight is to whip up the anti-nuke frenzy again.

Reality TV is to reality, what Professional Wrestling is to Professional Brain Surgery.

  • Member since
    April 2007
  • 4,557 posts
Posted by Convicted One on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:49 AM
 chatanuga wrote:
Say what?!?!?!

Kevin

 

Personally, I think that the whole "alien" nonsense is just a clever cover story. I suspect the true motive behind the cab shackles to be more along the lines of UP  now taking a more literal interpretation on the concept of a crew "dying on hours" worked. Evil [}:)]

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 10:54 AM
 ButchKnouse wrote:

Even I know that trains carrying nuclear materials travel at a slow speed and are immediately preceded by a decoy train in case of track sabotage or attack.

Isn't it amazing that the same people who are fanatical about global warming are equally fanatical in their opposition to nuclear power, which DOES NOT emit carbon.

These tree huggers are constantly telling us about how everything is done better in Europe, but Europe, especially France, relies on nuclear power.

I imagine this anti-nuke propaganda on the tube tonight is to whip up the anti-nuke frenzy again.

I believe France gets somewhere near 75% of their power from nuclear reactors:

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf40.html

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:08 AM
 WIAR wrote:

Did you notice that in one of the "teaser" clips advertising the special, they show a computer-generated sequence of a steam locomotive crossing a bridge, pulling what I guess was the nuclear cargo??

Let's get the public all whipped-up here - they're pulling nuclear cargo with steam engines...

 

See, Mr Sol was right.  Only instead of coal, they're using spent rods to heat water to steam.Mischief [:-,]

p.s. Michael, I was not intending to slam you, just the unconvinced.

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:56 PM
Airs on Tuesday June 24 10:00 PM (EDT)

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission plan to transport 77,000 tons of nuclear waste to a permanent storage facility 950 feet below Nevada's Yucca Mountain. If the plan goes through, much of the cargo will travel through Las Vegas, making an accident there a very disturbing possibility. If history has taught us anything, it's that transporting dangerous goods can sometimes have catastrophic results. Take a look at the potential disaster that such a rail accident would have in Las Vegas.

 I guess Salt Lake City is of no never mind. 

I mean what is the worst thing that could happen if the train derailed at 20 MPH right next to the Rio?  Do you think the show's producers came up with this so they could get a free trip to Vegas?

 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Southwest US
  • 12,914 posts
Posted by tomikawaTT on Tuesday, June 24, 2008 4:07 PM
 greyhounds wrote:
Airs on Tuesday June 24 10:00 PM (EDT)

The U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission plan to transport 77,000 tons of nuclear waste to a permanent storage facility 950 feet below Nevada's Yucca Mountain. If the plan goes through, much of the cargo will travel through Las Vegas, making an accident there a very disturbing possibility. If history has taught us anything, it's that transporting dangerous goods can sometimes have catastrophic results. Take a look at the potential disaster that such a rail accident would have in Las Vegas.

 I guess Salt Lake City is of no never mind. 

I mean what is the worst thing that could happen if the train derailed at 20 MPH right next to the Rio?  Do you think the show's producers came up with this so they could get a free trip to Vegas?

Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]

I LIVE in Las Vegas, and I am not the least bit concerned with the Hysterical Channel's dumb donkey pronouncements on this or any other subject.  These are the same people who push, "We have to take drastic action to stop global warming," at every opportunity and were really on top of the Y2K computer disaster that wasn't.

If they were REALLY concerned about public safety, they would have looked at a REAL danger, the hundreds of diamond-placarded trucks that pass through Sin City DAILY on I-15.  Only, who would care about a bunch of 'see em every day' 18-wheelers.

Chicken Little lives, and writes scripts for the History Channel.

Chuck

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 6:53 AM

So after posting this, I completely forgot about it.

Did anyone actually watch this silliness?

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,213 posts
Posted by blhanel on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:58 AM
Yep, and that's pretty much what it was.  Their scenario for disaster would require multiple mistakes/defects and bad luck on location (under a bridge).
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Denver / La Junta
  • 10,820 posts
Posted by mudchicken on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 8:11 AM
Soon to be seen: 'Fearmongering In America", film at 11.....only on the Hysterical Channel.
Mudchicken Nothing is worth taking the risk of losing a life over. Come home tonight in the same condition that you left home this morning in. Safety begins with ME.... cinscocom-west
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 8:25 AM
Unfortunately I fell asleep about two thirds of the way through the show but all I recall seeing was lots about OTHER rail accidents and derailments such as Weyauwega, WI and the Baltimore Tunnel occurrence years ago and VERY LITTLE about potential nuclear waste problems.  Fear mongering at its best/worst and a clear attempt at TV networks looking for ratings points.
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Kenosha, WI
  • 6,567 posts
Posted by zardoz on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:26 AM
 mudchicken wrote:
Soon to be seen: 'Fearmongering In America", film at 11.....only on the Hysterical Channel.
Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:46 AM

 zardoz wrote:
 mudchicken wrote:
Soon to be seen: 'Fearmongering In America", film at 11.....only on the Hysterical Channel.
Laugh [(-D]Laugh [(-D]

+1

Dan

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Waukesha, WI
  • 271 posts
Posted by Kathi Kube on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:12 AM
It really was a joke. There was a touch of valid information, but it was always couched with the fear-mongering, and the DOE wasn't given an opportunity to respond to several outlandish proposals.

For instance, the casks that will be used to transport the spent fuel are currently under design and, of course, will be designed to meet the requirements set forth. The panic people want to see them now and demand proof that they will meet the requirements. Um, duh?

Some of the graphics were absurd, too, including the steam engine leading the train and the semaphore trackside.

The most outlandish part I saw was their final supposition: A unit train of propane will be coming through Las Vegas the same moment a nuclear train does. The propane train's engineer will be running behind schedule and will blow through at 50 mph or more, completely ignoring the speed limit on the line. He'll also take his train through this narrow area underneath a highway bridge despite federal regulations that two haz-mat trains not pass here. The propane train will, of course, derail and the nuclear train will slam into it. As the propane tankcars explode, the highway overpass will fall on a nuclear cask (whose design is yet to be finalized), crushing it, and releasing nuclear waste.

The engineer will speed with a propane unit train because he's running late???? These people obviously know nothing about railroading!

The guy from the department of energy mentioned how the nation has been moving spent nuclear fuel for 30 years without a single release, but no one mentioned HOW it has been moving. They showed UP and SP trains hauling waste — and even showed an engine with a modified FEC logo apparently running through the Nevada desert — but didn't expand at all on current operations.

The whole thing was just silly, I thought. Right now I'm working on a feature for our November issue about the engineering involved with building the railroad through the desert to the Yucca Mountain site. Should be interesting.

Take care!
Kathi
  • Member since
    April 2007
  • From: Naples, FL
  • 848 posts
Posted by Ted Marshall on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 10:31 AM

 mudchicken wrote:
Soon to be seen: 'Fearmongering In America", film at 11.....only on the Hysterical Channel.

I must agree... What I saw last night nothing less that fear-tv at its worst. 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • 624 posts
Posted by fredswain on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:53 AM
 WIAR wrote:

Did you notice that in one of the "teaser" clips advertising the special, they show a computer-generated sequence of a steam locomotive crossing a bridge, pulling what I guess was the nuclear cargo??

Let's get the public all whipped-up here - they're pulling nuclear cargo with steam engines...

It was 3 rail! Lionel is now pulling nuclear cargo.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Menasha, Wis.
  • 451 posts
Posted by Soo 6604 on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 2:00 PM

 Kathi Kube wrote:
It really was a joke. There was a touch of valid information, but it was always couched with the fear-mongering, and the DOE wasn't given an opportunity to respond to several outlandish proposals.

For instance, the casks that will be used to transport the spent fuel are currently under design and, of course, will be designed to meet the requirements set forth. The panic people want to see them now and demand proof that they will meet the requirements. Um, duh?

Some of the graphics were absurd, too, including the steam engine leading the train and the semaphore trackside.

The most outlandish part I saw was their final supposition: A unit train of propane will be coming through Las Vegas the same moment a nuclear train does. The propane train's engineer will be running behind schedule and will blow through at 50 mph or more, completely ignoring the speed limit on the line. He'll also take his train through this narrow area underneath a highway bridge despite federal regulations that two haz-mat trains not pass here. The propane train will, of course, derail and the nuclear train will slam into it. As the propane tankcars explode, the highway overpass will fall on a nuclear cask (whose design is yet to be finalized), crushing it, and releasing nuclear waste.

The engineer will speed with a propane unit train because he's running late???? These people obviously know nothing about railroading!



Take care!
Kathi

HOLY CRAP!!! I'M DOWNWIND FROM THERE!!!!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 3:40 PM
Mega disasters used to be a good show..untill the flood episode...but i knew this was going to be a pile of bull....I mean who would use STEAM IN THIS ERA to transport ANYTHING  espically nuclear waste.
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 6:36 PM
The History Channel has many good shows, the Mega disasters series is interesting but all leads up to the most drmatic what if scenario at the end of the show.  I haven't seen this one but will keep an eye out.
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:01 PM

 eolafan wrote:
Unfortunately I fell asleep about two thirds of the way through the show....

I love history, really, even minored in it with my first (but useless) BA degree.  Unfortunately, the History channel has the same effect on me most of the time.  Even when they are tackling a factual rather than speculative subject, they take ten minutes worth of information and stretch it out into an hour show, making it the ideal vehicle for snoozing through.

I want actual history, I find a book by a reputable author and get my insight from that.  I want to take a nap, I turn on the History Channel. 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Cardiff, CA
  • 2,930 posts
Posted by erikem on Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:23 PM

 Kathi Kube wrote:


The whole thing was just silly, I thought. Right now I'm working on a feature for our November issue about the engineering involved with building the railroad through the desert to the Yucca Mountain site. Should be interesting.

Sounds interesting, looking forward to reading the article.

Thanks for the heads up.

- Erik 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: SW Chicago Suburbs
  • 788 posts
Posted by Mr_Ash on Thursday, June 26, 2008 5:20 AM
Only shows worth watching on History channel are Battle 360 and Cities of the Underworld all the rest is pure garbage, same goes for Discovery only good show on that channel is Myth Busters
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:10 AM
 ChuckCobleigh wrote:

 eolafan wrote:
Unfortunately I fell asleep about two thirds of the way through the show....

I love history, really, even minored in it with my first (but useless) BA degree.  Unfortunately, the History channel has the same effect on me most of the time.  Even when they are tackling a factual rather than speculative subject, they take ten minutes worth of information and stretch it out into an hour show, making it the ideal vehicle for snoozing through.

I want actual history, I find a book by a reputable author and get my insight from that.  I want to take a nap, I turn on the History Channel. 

I recently found the "History International" channel on my cable lineup and found it more interesting than the basic "History Channel".

Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy