Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Why werewhistles replaced by horns
Why werewhistles replaced by horns
1611 views
2 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Why werewhistles replaced by horns
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:16 PM
I am trying to determine why diesel locomotives have always used horns (or seemingly so) while steam always had whistles. No theories, just real answers would be appriciated.
Reply
Edit
Anonymous
Member since
April 2003
305,205 posts
Posted by
Anonymous
on Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:08 PM
Simple Whistles are operated by steam pressure blowing throught the whistle, Diesel electrics have no steam, thus the electric horn replaced the steam whistle
Reply
Edit
john7470
Member since
May 2001
From: US
22 posts
Posted by
john7470
on Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:23 PM
Horns are actually air-operated. Air is piped into the horn, through a sprung diaphragm and out the bell. The vibration results in the noise, the tone being set by diameter and length of bell (and dia of diaphragm?). Loco horns have 2-5 bells, typically.
Air horns were not uncommon on steam locomotives, e.g., SP's, incl. GS-4 4449. Whistles often leaked steam by and were more maintenance intensive. The horn, by comparison, is as loud or louder and aimable (sound is projected in path of travel).
Whistles can operate with compressed air, but need a larger volume of air than a horn. Some US roads did use an "air whistle", made by Hancock (New Haven, for one). At the risk of upsetting someone out there... it sounds pretty pathetic.
Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy