Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
photo gear ?
photo gear ?
2997 views
36 replies
Order Ascending
Order Descending
1
2
M636C
Member since
January 2002
4,612 posts
Posted by
M636C
on Wednesday, March 3, 2004 11:41 PM
A note for Jamie:
The 18 -55 lens that is shipped with the Digital Rebel (EOS 300D) has a rear element that prevents it fitting any other Canon camera made so far. All 35mm lenses, and lenses for Canon APS EOS cameras will fit the digital cameras. I find that 28mm gives a wide enough view for normal purposes, but is a bit lacking for cab interiors and really dire situations in locomotive terminals.
Peter
Reply
jchnhtfd
Member since
January 2001
From: US
1,537 posts
Posted by
jchnhtfd
on Thursday, March 4, 2004 12:19 PM
Peter -- yeek! why on earth did Canon do that? I wasn't aware of that. What a nuisance. And one does need a pretty wide angle for cab interiors and those loco terminals where there always seems to be a wall or inspection pit of some durn thing in the way!
Jamie
Reply
RudyRockvilleMD
Member since
September 2001
From: US
1,015 posts
Posted by
RudyRockvilleMD
on Thursday, March 4, 2004 8:59 PM
Evaddek:
To answer your question whether 100 speed film will work on moving trains the answer is it depends. If you are photographing an oncoming train, and if you have enough light (if you are in a desert on a sunny day) then100 speed film will work. After all I have seen photos of moving trains taken with a 64 speed film, and they were clear and sharp. I personally prefer a 200 speed slide film because of its speed and its all-weather capability. I have been using Kodachrome 200 since it first came out in the late 1980's, and I like the color rendition in that it tends to emphasize the red end of the light spectrum. Further, it is not too grainy.
My problem with Kodachrome is processing. Kodak used to have a lab in Rockville, MD which gave me 24 hour turn-around service when they processed Kodachrome film. However, they stopped processing Kodachrome film in Rockville several years ago, sending it to Fairlwn, NJ instead. Kodak closed their Rockville lab nearly 2 years ago, and the turn around time for processing is now 2 weeks regardless whether I send it in themail or drop it off at a nearby camera store.
Reply
M636C
Member since
January 2002
4,612 posts
Posted by
M636C
on Friday, March 5, 2004 4:51 AM
Jamie,
I think Canon had to produce a camera with the small CCD that had the same lens focal length range as a 35mm camera. They had built a 22-55mm for the APS SLR, but that didn't give the wide angle range they needed. The only way of getting this range without going to a much more complex and expensive lens - the so-called "inverted-telephoto" like the Sigma 19-35 mm which can be used with 35mm but relatively costs much more - was to modify the 22-55mm to have a wider angle. To do this the rear element had to be further back, and the modifying the structure of the Digital Rebel was the easiest and cheapest way. This is only a problem if you have an earlier Digital camera that can't take the lens (and want one). By the way, the 22-55mm is out of production. If anyone has one they don't want, I'll buy it as the next best thing!
Peter
Reply
Hugh Jampton
Member since
September 2003
From: Southern Region now, UK
820 posts
Posted by
Hugh Jampton
on Friday, March 5, 2004 6:36 AM
I done some ciphrin:
At 50 miles an hour a train moves 3 and a half inches in 1/250 of a second.
This is a linear relationship, so it's easy to work out how far a train at any speed will move for any shutter speed.
Generally a lurker by nature
Be Alert
The world needs more lerts.
It's the 3rd rail that makes the difference.
Reply
evaddek
Member since
February 2004
7 posts
Posted by
evaddek
on Friday, March 5, 2004 7:34 AM
RudyRockville MD
Thanks for the good info.I have used supra 100 for a while now. Its hard to find good film now that most photoshops are gone..I order from B&H now and will place order for 200 Kodachrome. I use their mailers also and your right about turnaround. I use a 28-70 f2.8 nikon most of the time for that low light problems.
thanks again dave
Reply
evaddek
Member since
February 2004
7 posts
Posted by
evaddek
on Friday, March 5, 2004 7:48 AM
PHD Hugh
That means a flea can go from my dogs tail to his head in-----well it must be fast!
dave
Reply
1
2
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy