Trains.com

BNSF,UPS looking into using roadrailers to further....

2961 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • 344 posts
BNSF,UPS looking into using roadrailers to further....
Posted by chicagorails on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 11:39 AM

Willow Springs,Il. UPS to start trial runs using roadrailers out of Willow Springs,Illinois distribution center terminal later this spring. Officials saying that high fuel costs, with no end in sight prompted the decision.Willow Springs was selected as the first train consist starting point beacause more packages are handled there than any place in US.BNSF will provide services to West Coast using roadrailers provided by NS as there is a 25 % decrease in auto traffic using NS roadrailers to haul auto parts.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Northeast Missouri
  • 869 posts
Posted by SchemerBob on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 11:51 AM

This sounds interesting. Now maybe I'll see RoadRailers more often around where I live. It would also be simpler using RoadRailers for truck trailers, without all those flatcars. The trains might be a little lighter without those flatcars, too. In Hannibal, MO, I saw a GIANT NS RoadRailer train, probably longer than a mile, led by just one locomotive! Maybe the train was empty? (it was heading towards KC)

IIRC, didn't Swift have a RoadRailer train on the BNSF a few years ago? Seems to me I saw a picture of one in a 2002 issue of Trains magazine.

Long live the BNSF .... AND its paint scheme. SchemerBob
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: BNSF MP968.3 in California
  • 247 posts
Posted by BNSF_GP60M on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 12:40 PM
BNSF did run a Swift Roadrailer train a few years ago. They seemed to come by the house on the weekends.
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • 42 posts
Posted by VPayne on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 12:56 PM
April Fools?
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Menasha, Wis.
  • 451 posts
Posted by Soo 6604 on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 1:26 PM

 VPayne wrote:
April Fools?

Gotta be careful what you read today. I'll check on this tomorrow...lol

It would seem logical, Ive been at Tolono on the NS and seen some very long roadrailers consisting of over 135 trailers. I think the longest was around 150. I wonder how long these would be once they get it started? (if not an April fools joke)

Paul

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • 175 posts
Posted by t.winx on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 1:59 PM

Just Curious. How would roadrailers be more fuel efficient than traditional tofc? A lighter train maybe?

 

Tyler
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 5:03 PM

Lighter and lower.

 

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 7:10 PM
Currently 150 is the maximum number of roadrailers per train.  Not sure if this is an FRA mandate or NS policy.  I remember when it was 75 and NS ran two or more per day from FWA to ATL.  Now it's usually just one running anywhere from 90 to 150.  Typical train weight is 1700 tons, so a single unit can handle it.  On the ex-Wabash line out of FWA, you see more Triple Crown trains with a single unit than you do with two.
Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 7:17 PM
 t.winx wrote:

Just Curious. How would roadrailers be more fuel efficient than traditional tofc? A lighter train maybe?

 

At minimum (and maximum) loading, you have only one railroad truck per trailer with a roadrailer.  TFOC needs the body of the flatcar with two trucks for every one trailer at minimum loading.  At maximimum, you get two trailers for every railroad car and two railroad trucks.  The coupler-mate at the front of the train doesn't negate that advantage.  So, yes it is a lighter train, by far.

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: On Track LaGrange IL.
  • 171 posts
Posted by RABEL on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 11:18 PM

UPS Trailers are specialized,I fail to see how Roadrailers could be used.

UPS is also not suffering high fuel prices,the Fuel Surcharge covers that aspect.

  • Member since
    October 2006
  • From: Chicago, Ill.
  • 2,843 posts
Posted by al-in-chgo on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 11:45 PM

I've seen a lot of RoadRailers go through Folkston and they seem to be in great shape and working fine. 

Look forward for them going thru Rochelle??  - a.s.

 

al-in-chgo
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Over yonder by the roundhouse
  • 1,224 posts
Posted by route_rock on Thursday, April 3, 2008 1:08 AM

  Nothing in the genral notices in the Hicago Div about new road railers. Would have o qualify the con and engineer to run said equipment I do believe, and I have seen nothing on this yet.Plus be a pain in the rear trying to get roadrailers togther while still getting out your money trains. Willow isnt that big of a place really and loading it up with a ton of NS 53 footers would be just nuts.

  Also unless the road railers were set on in Cicero Al this would be a strictly Transcon move I would think,But who knows.

Yes we are on time but this is yesterdays train

  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: MP CF161.6 NS's New Castle District in NE Indiana
  • 2,148 posts
Posted by rrnut282 on Thursday, April 3, 2008 9:19 AM

Roadrailers only need a surface flush with the railhead to build a train.  A single track will work in a pinch.  Triple Crown started their hub in Fort Wayne with only a three-track "yard" and about 60' of pavement alongside.

Mike (2-8-2)
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Thursday, April 3, 2008 9:35 AM
Are there any FRA or AAR guidlines regarding maximum length?  I would think that trailers are meant to be pulled not stretched and there has to be a strucural limit to what they can take.  Also, how do the brakes work?  Does the train relay soley on loco braking capability?
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Thursday, April 3, 2008 9:54 AM

....As for size of Triple Crown trains....Thru Muncie here, I've observed many at 140 or so trailers.  Braking appears to be normal like any train.  Brake hoses connect each trailer {boggie}along the train length.

On the trains with that quanity of trailers the power generally is two 6 axle engines.

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Thursday, April 3, 2008 11:53 AM

The trailers are beefed up for RoadRailer service.  I believe the current limit is 150 trailers on a train.

There are two air lines running throughout the train.  The normal air brake line, and a main res line.  Not sure if the bogies have air reservoirs, so some source of air is needed for the brake, and maybe the air ride springs.  The air brakes work good, maybe a little too good, so the usual method of train handling is with dynamics. 

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy