Hello!
This week, Mike Yuhas of Trackside with Trains.com is joined by Cody Grivno, associate editor at Model Railroader magazine. Get to know Cody and see how he's more than "just" a modeler.
Read Trackside with Trains.com Volume 88.
Click here to vote then add your comments about this week's photos here.
Erik
Two great shots. I had to go with the action one. As a neophyte,--Just one question, What do you mean by the "Wrong" side of the track? Both shots were of the port side of the train. I thought the only "Wrong" side was on the tracks themselves.
Jersey Bob
Cody, welcome to Trackside. I hope we get to see more of your photos. Although my primary camera is a Canon 30D; I still shoot Fuji Velvia 100F in my Elan 7 on bright sunny days. I like the framing of the motive power between the snow piles. It gives the appearance of a low angle shot. The bright blue sky adds to the overall feel of a cold winter Wisconsin day.
Mike, contrary to popular belief you can take good railroad photos on the "wrong side". You pulled it off magnificently here. In fact I don't think the photo would have the same effect with the exhaust if did shoot it from the other side of the tracks. My favorite photo of the edition of Trackside was your twilight shot of UP Granville job. But I can't vote for it...
I hate to say it but I think the deciding factor for me was the bright blue sky in Cody's photo. I know Mike is leading the polls early, but I'm going to predict a win for Cody. Mike repeat after me, "Red engines in snow, red engines in snow."
Brian
Jersey Bob wrote:I thought the only "Wrong" side was on the tracks themselves.
I thought the only "Wrong" side was on the tracks themselves.
I went with Cody's photo. I just liked it better than the rather run-of-the-mill UP shot. If you'd used that UP night photo, you'd have gotten my vote. Great work to both of you!
Dan
I always have such a hard time picking a photo, I have enjoyed them all and live in an area where I don't get to see any trains and really miss them. As great as your pictures are Mike I'm going with Cody's the snow drifts, blue sky and Red engine has it all and I like the UP but Cody has my vote.
Cody I hope to see more of your pictures and always enjoy your articles keep it up. , Jerry
Carl
Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)
CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)
....Must be honest in opinion.....Neither shot reached out and said "look at this RR action, etc....". Mike, I did like the almost dark shot better of a similar train with the headlight and ditch lights glowing....
But the two submitted photos: Must call it a draw.
Quentin
Had to go with Cody's shot. I liked the framing effect of the snow mounds. Nicely executed. The fact that you're a Pentaxian who graduated in '98 just sealed my vote. Anybody from the class of 1998 and shoots Pentax has got to be a great guy!
P.S. Cody - If you want to make the digital leap, Pentax is a great brand to do it with. ALL of your K-mount glass will be quite usable with a digital body. As an added bonus, all of your old lenses will magically become image stabilized if you pick up a K100D, K10D, K200D or K20D! Drop me a line if you need any info.
-ChrisWest Chicago, ILChristopher May Fine Art Photography"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams
Cody, that is a truly good photo especially with the ME. You have mastered that camera well and it shows. Knowing your equipment and it's limitations along with good photographic skills such as exposeure, framing, composing and etc is all made more difficult in cold winter weather especially with snow and a high sky.
In addition to having a ME I do most of my work with an MX which is mostly manual and have been using that camera since school. It's been in the shop for general cleaning and twice for actual repairs but boy is it tough. I took it to work with me for over 20 years and it bounced around in the back of a pickup or through the airport many times I too will someday not far off be converting to digital and will learn to use a digital to the best of my ability but will always have a soft spot for the film cameras and the great images the camera and I could create.
Tracktalk1
Tough call men, but I lean towards Cody. The Granville shot would have been my favorite. Sorry Mike. As for snow, we enjoyed a fine winter blast here in Ohio these last few days. Trains and snow seem to go together, so keep on shooting.
Thanks,Fred
Before I get to the vote, I should say that I much prefer Mike's daring-the-twilight "steath mission" shot of the UP Granville train (the lights of UP 1063 seem eye-catching to me against the evening background, aside from being a great up-close shot), as well as Cody's shot of the Amtrak Hiawatha 340 (the signal tower and the Milwaukee skyline really add to the shot, I think). I personally thought these would have made better vote choices for this week (although if they were, the decision for me would be super-tough).
Anyway, to the vote: Cody's WSOR shot has a nice side perspective and full lighting, although I must admit that the snow piles in the foreground are a bit too distracting for me; they seem to draw the viewer too much toward them than the train, in my opinion.
Even though Mike's shot is on "the wrong side of the tracks," I think the view of the exhaust billowing out against the tree line really gives it some action. UP 1063 looks really fresh and new in this shot for some reason, like its just out of the paint shop, and that's also appealing.
So in the end, I chose Mike's shot for this week.
- Bryan
A mile from the tracks, but I still hear the whistle! Cleveland, Tennessee
Both were very good shots , but I think that I had seen Mike's photo before !!!! I voted for Cody,
Southern gives the Green Light for Innovations
LU-Trains wrote: How much snow do you people get every year! How do you live in that stuff!?!
Too much.... And we don't live in it, we stay inside whenever possible..... I'm sick of it up here too.
I agree, neither shot is a real grabber. I like the brilliant colors in Cody's pic. I don't have a problem with the snow & the framing with the piles is probably better than an over the top of it shot. A little smoke over the engine would have been nice, but you have to take what you get.
I voted for Mike's shot, it just has a few more goodies. You can see the smoke, & you can see the lights better. The wrong side lighting is what makes it, tho. I recently shot some pics of a standing train during a crew change, & had the opportunity to shoot from both sides. As in Mike's shot, the nose was shadowed from either side. My experience was the sunny side pics seemed washed out, probably because of all the snow. I admit, I shot with the camera only on "auto", perhaps could have done better with some tinkering.
Keep the photos coming, guys (& gals) I enjoy your efforts.
Larry in Wauwatosa
I prefered the UP shot.
While I appreciate the effect I think Cody was trying achieve with the snowbanks, to my eye the prespective just didn't sit quite right. If it had been a natural formation of snow, like a drift, then it might have worked better. Additionally, it seemed a bit overexposed.
The "wrong side" shot of the UP looked nice. Yes, the sky was a washed-out grayish sort of non-descript feature, but the blue exhaust and the trees looked good (too bad about the foreground junk in the lower-right corner).
Actually, if both photographers had submitted their "other" photos (UP Granville job & the Columbus SOO/CP shot) I would have had a more difficut time chosing. I liked both of those better than the submitted images.
While neither picture was overly exciting,both were examples of good solid railroad photography.I voted for Cody's shot,mainly for the way the snowbank in the foreground framed the WS train.
TrackTalk 1 - Kearney, MO.
Just a sidenote - I just noticed your hometown. I was the band director at
Lawson, MO. many years ago! Greetings to a neighbor!
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.