Trains.com

TrainsMag.com Reader Poll – February 9, 2004

24060 views
172 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 27, 2004 4:38 PM
I like Trains the way it is BUT i miss the locomotive list of builders, Railroads Model Numbers Unit Classes Like you did on U.P. SD-90 MAC "s Ilike Fairbanks Morse & Company Locomotives " H 24 66 , H 10 44 , H 12 44 " H 16 66 " C.& n.w. 's Yous
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 27, 2004 9:14 PM
I spent many enjoyable days at Rochelle, it is awesome. Leave the web site the way it is. Norman J. Weimar Jr. Ret. US NAVY. Great Lakes, IL last command.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, April 29, 2004 1:45 AM
The needs of the many outweighs the wants of the few... If you went to higher frequency of pix, increased bandwidth, viewers with slower modems (and there are still many out there) would have difficulty seeing anything. Good work on keeping it available for our fun and relaxation.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, May 6, 2004 12:50 PM
Keep it as is. Yet, every time I've to the site it seems like same person is walking in front or same car is gonig by. Do you tape this and play again??
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: CA
  • 24 posts
Posted by earledward on Friday, May 7, 2004 3:11 AM
I THINK IT IS GREAT TO JUST HAVE THIS WEBCAM..WHY DO WE ALWAYS HAVE TO FIND SOMETHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT...I SAY LET THE GUYS THAT ARE LOOKING AFTER IT...DO IT..I AM SURE THEY ARE PROVIDING US WITH THE BEST THEY KNOW HOW
EARL...SANDY LAKE MANITOBA CANADA
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 8, 2004 5:17 PM
I just voted and my two cents worth went to the option of leaving the webcam just the way it is. Also some of the suggestions to expand deserve to be considered. However the cost to implement them my be prohibitive.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 8, 2004 5:33 PM
I just voted and my two cents worth went to the leave it just the way it is option. However some of the suggestions for expanding the webcam idea merit looking at. Then again they may be to expenseive to implement.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 8, 2004 5:54 PM
SORRY!!!!! I hit the wrong button and thought I erased the first message and I retyped it over again. Some day maybe I'll get the hang of this damn thing. The Storm
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, May 16, 2004 6:00 PM
please keep it just the way it is. I agree with the others about how nice it would be to have other sites. I hope to go there this summer to see it all in person.thanks again for the site you do have
Robertdale
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Grand Rapids, Michigan
  • 124 posts
Posted by JDV5th on Monday, May 17, 2004 6:35 AM
Keep it like it is. Sound would be very cool if even possible. Establishing other web cams would be great too (North Platte, Neb.?) :-)
"One thing about trains...it doesn't matter where they're going. What matters is deciding to get on." from "Polar Express"
  • Member since
    August 2003
  • 8 posts
Posted by ltritt on Monday, May 17, 2004 8:05 PM
First, THANKS for the Rochelle webcam! Keep the 3-second timing so you don't have to limit users as much. In my opinion, the #1 way to improve this webcam would be some way to allow users to know a train is approaching, whether sound [to hear train horns], incorporating signal aspects in some way, or clearing trees. It would also be an improvement if the size of the images could be doubled to improve viewing. But, even as it is, your Rochelle webcam is a delight. LT
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • 2 posts
Posted by theoldhobo on Sunday, May 23, 2004 5:35 PM
Leave the cam the way it is. I am fortunate in being able to visit Rochelle 4 - 6 times a year as I travel from my home in S.W. Indiana to my family in central Wisconsin. Talk about Real Time ! The cam is a welcome break and a reminder. Thanks, Trains.
  • Member since
    June 2002
  • From: Independence, MO
  • 1,570 posts
Posted by UPTRAIN on Sunday, May 23, 2004 7:05 PM
Is that a rare occurence to be "bumped"? It has never happened to me.

Pump

  • Member since
    May 2001
  • From: CA
  • 32 posts
Posted by Trainspotter on Tuesday, June 1, 2004 9:31 PM
Leave it like it is but for heaven's sakes increase the screen size. The image is dwarfed by all the adverts, etc. If you're going to make a webcam available, at least have an image you can see without a microscope.
The trainspotter's credo: 'I was born a spotter. I trainspot, therefore I am.'
  • Member since
    January 2001
  • From: US
  • 8 posts
Posted by cwillis408 on Saturday, June 12, 2004 7:54 PM
Keep it like it is, but adding scanner sound would be a better improvement. Thanks for having it anyways.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 6:00 PM
I would like faster views but would hate to cut someone's viewing time. Any way we could contribute $$ to allow fast speed and no change to viewers?
If push comes to shove, Keep it as is!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:25 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by snielsen

Are there other webcams?
Yes-try Mendota,Illinois on BNSF Mendota Sub Mainline at Mendota'sAmtrak Stationat www.mendotamuseums.org
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Omaha, Nebraska
  • 1,920 posts
Posted by Willy2 on Tuesday, June 29, 2004 12:31 PM
The Rochelle webcam is great! Keep it as it is!

Willy

Willy

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 16, 2004 1:39 PM
please keep it as it is
its perfect now why mess with it?
  • Member since
    September 2001
  • From: US
  • 13 posts
Posted by rhettsease on Saturday, July 17, 2004 7:13 AM
Leave as is, but a larger image and more cameras would be nice.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:27 PM
it is just fine as it is...eliminate some of the new ads you have stuck up there...enlarge the picture size if possible
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, August 2, 2004 10:58 AM
I would like to see it in real-time, but that would take up too muck bandwith, so it is fine how it is.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, August 3, 2004 11:40 AM
Leave the Rochelle camera as is, see if you can get some other interesting sites up with web-cameras!
s10
  • Member since
    December 2001
  • 1 posts
Posted by s10 on Monday, August 9, 2004 11:30 PM
I have enough trouble with AOL bumping me off at the worst possible times, I deffently do not need that from your site. You are providing a very good service just as it is. Please don't change it!
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: US
  • 403 posts
Posted by bcammack on Thursday, August 19, 2004 3:55 PM
Give us a link below the standard image that will open a page with the window resized to twice it's current height and width. Yes, it will be grainy, but I'm half-blind and I can't make things out with the current image size. This would have ZERO impact on bandwidth or anything else. It's just a matter of copying the current page and editing the HTML for it to double the window size. Consider it "accomodating the disabled" or something similar.
Regards, Brett C. Cammack Holly Hill, FL
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, August 20, 2004 10:25 AM
I'm not here to spend other peoples $$ but some of these ideas (bigger picture, sound, faster speed) etc require funds to be spent. I don't want to straddle the fence here but I like the cam the way it is, but also see roads to improvement. If it doesn't break some sort of law, why not do a 'fund-raiser; that would acquire $$ for some of the improvements suggested? The amount of $$ acquired would depend on the number of improvements made. Just a thought.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • 305,205 posts
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 1, 2004 4:02 PM
Everything is just fine the way it is.
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 762 posts
Posted by kolechovski on Tuesday, September 21, 2004 6:00 PM
When the trains come, you usually need those 3 seconds anyway just to look at what you've got. It would be even worse to cut the number of people watching it in 1/2. Leave it as it is. Also...

Dennis Held's comment: "I already made a comment about giving the most people the chance to watch. But, I've always wanted to comment about the view of the webcam. What are the odds of getting some trees cut down on the left side of the view so we can see Global III?? Or knock down some houses on the right side to give a clear view of the BNSF approach?? I'm just kidding here. But...."
-funny, and a very nice thought. At least they could knock down some of those trees on the left
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Wisconsin, USA
  • 175 posts
Posted by Jordan6 on Wednesday, September 22, 2004 8:19 PM
I have always found it to be a really fast webcam. Didn't know you could make it refresh faster. I think it's fine as is.
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: MILE POST k741.11 IN FLORIDA
  • 216 posts
Posted by AC6000CW on Sunday, September 26, 2004 12:23 AM
EVERY THING IS GOOD ON THE WEB CAM BUT THEY CAN BOOST UP THE FRAME RATE.[8D] IT WOULD BE COOL IF THEY COULD ADD NIGHT VISION TO WATCH TRAINS AT NIGHT TIME[?]
http://www.railroadforums.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=5025

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy