Trains.com

ZPDSKP

1959 views
10 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2015
  • 5,134 posts
ZPDSKP
Posted by ericsp on Monday, February 18, 2008 8:55 PM

I saw the UP train symbol ZPDSKP. Presumably this is a train hauling perishables from Portland, OR to Selkirk, NY. I have never heard of it before (including a search of the forum for this symbol). Is there some distribution center (in reverse) in Portland that they truck Willamette Valley produce to and ship it back east?

I did an internet search, but that was not very helpful.
http://www.google.com/search?q=ZPDSKP&client=netscape-pp&rls=com.netscape:en-US

"No soup for you!" - Yev Kassem (from Seinfeld)

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, February 18, 2008 9:03 PM
Eric, I'm wondering whether this is the second weekly trip of the ZWASKP.  I can't find a ZWASKP under any date except the weekly trip we know about, but understand that this is actually the second week for the new run.  I don't know why the Portland origin--I would think that Hinkle would be all right if they wanted something different.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: US
  • 733 posts
Posted by Bob-Fryml on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 7:23 AM

I'm wondering if the ZPDSKP you saw

  1. might not be something like a new "Portland-to-Hinkle" section of the longer established ZWASKP wherein the ZPDSKP traffic is a fill at Hinkle for the ZWASKP or
  2. might it be a new train that is accumulating 70-mph tonnage at Portland and forwarding it directly to the CSXT Selkirk Yard?

Delaying outbound traffic a day or two in Portland in order to have enough cars to justify an Oregon-to-upstate-New York run-through eliminates 

  • 22+ hour car delays at the Hinkle hump, 
  • 24+ hour car delays at North Platte, and
  • another round of 24+ hour car delays at Barr Yard in Chicago.

And cars that don't hump at these three locations lessens congestion and frees up switch engine time to handle other traffic.  Improved transit times and lessening congestion at major classification yards has to be a real win-win situation for both the customers and the two railroads. 

 

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:06 AM
I'll be able to check a little more about this train tomorrow.  Right now, ZPDSKP 16 is just getting into North Platte, with four units and 77 loads (ZWASKP had its normal 55 loads this week).  Couldn't find a projected time into our neck of the woods, but it ought to be early tomorrow, I'd think.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Cedar Rapids, IA
  • 4,212 posts
Posted by blhanel on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:10 AM
That probably puts it through here just a little after dark, yes?
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,846 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:37 PM

 CShaveRR wrote:
I'll be able to check a little more about this train tomorrow.  Right now, ZPDSKP 16 is just getting into North Platte, with four units and 77 loads (ZWASKP had its normal 55 loads this week).  Couldn't find a projected time into our neck of the woods, but it ought to be early tomorrow, I'd think.

Carl, I didn't see a time either, but it auto do OK time wise after a little pause West of Chicago.  Might be a bit shorter though after the pause.  (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) 

Jeff

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 2:45 PM

No, Jeff--we've got good appetites around here, but I don't think we'll significantly shorten the train.

Based on tonnage, it should be a good runner--less than 100 TPOB.

ZWASKP doesn't even pause at Proviso, so there should be no reason for this one to stop, either.  I think our crews take it right to Barr Yard.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Central Iowa
  • 6,846 posts
Posted by jeffhergert on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 7:10 PM

Carl, you AUTO re-read my post.  This one's not all edible.  That's probably why the PD origin.  TPOB probably won't be as good the last few miles to CSX.

Jeff

  

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 7:54 PM

Geez, Jeff, pound it into me, why don't you?  I get it now!  They did that once with ZWASKP.  I wonder if this will be a regular thing.

And you're right--it'll have 25 cars into Proviso, with TPOB well over 100.  Also, it won't get here until after dark, most likely.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: near Chicago
  • 937 posts
Posted by Chris30 on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:46 AM

Quote by Jeff Hergert:

Carl, I didn't see a time either, but it auto do OK time wise after a little pause West of Chicago.  Might be a bit shorter though after the pause.  (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) 

Are you sure that it's a stop at Proviso? Portland, "Auto" plus "West of Chicago" equals West Chicago Toyota facility. Do I win a prize?

CC

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:01 PM

You're correct!

Your prize is a lovely photograph of the shorter train--if you get out trackside quickly enough!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy