Trains.com

Trough Train.....

6577 views
47 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Kentucky
  • 356 posts
Posted by myred02 on Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:50 PM
 Phoebe Vet wrote:

Copcarss:

How old must one be to remember Burma-shave signs along the road???????

West Virginia still has a few of them alongside some major highways that I saw on my last trip up to Charleston. As far as I know, these signs were not made by Burma-shave, but they expressed their message in the same manner (one sign after another).

-Brandon

Modeling (and railfanning) the CSX mainlines since... ah fudge I forgot! http://myred02.rrpicturearchives.net/ http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=myred02
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Wyoming
  • 170 posts
Posted by Wyonate on Tuesday, December 18, 2007 10:27 PM
 Railway Man wrote:

 BaltACD wrote:
Good ideas that actually work continue to exist until a better idea that actually works replaces it in the rail industry.  Ideas that don't actually work are not good ideas.

What you said.

RWMThumbs Up [tup]

I think that goes with about any industry

High horsepower moves me!!!
  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Monday, December 17, 2007 4:40 PM

 BaltACD wrote:
Good ideas that actually work continue to exist until a better idea that actually works replaces it in the rail industry.  Ideas that don't actually work are not good ideas.

What you said.

RWMThumbs Up [tup]

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Monday, December 17, 2007 4:26 PM
 raymondtylicki wrote:
  another good idea that died in railroad buracracy....
Good ideas that actually work continue to exist until a better idea that actually works replaces it in the rail industry.  Ideas that don't actually work are not good ideas.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Wyoming
  • 170 posts
Posted by Wyonate on Monday, December 17, 2007 9:32 AM
YES!! Thank you for the drawing!!!! That is what I am looking for!!! Thank you!!!  If there any more drawings out there I would like to look.  Thanks to everyone who has posted!! You guys are awesome!!
High horsepower moves me!!!
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Monday, December 10, 2007 5:36 PM

 CShaveRR wrote:
Dan, the most you'll see in current operation are five-unit articulated cars.  I'm not sure whether the old Santa Fe 10-packs have been scrapped, but I'm pretty sure they're no longer running.  It's also possible, if an intermodal car is bad-ordered, the boxes can be loaded to another one, or simply unloaded and reloaded if that makes it easier to fix.  Try doing either of those with a monster coal car!

Great points Carl.  Thanks!

Dan

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Colorado Springs, CO
  • 3,590 posts
Posted by csmith9474 on Monday, December 10, 2007 3:28 PM
I don't know if this well help or not, but here you go... http://www.nisa.org/Troughca.jpg
Smitty
  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, December 10, 2007 2:50 PM
Dan, the most you'll see in current operation are five-unit articulated cars.  I'm not sure whether the old Santa Fe 10-packs have been scrapped, but I'm pretty sure they're no longer running.  It's also possible, if an intermodal car is bad-ordered, the boxes can be loaded to another one, or simply unloaded and reloaded if that makes it easier to fix.  Try doing either of those with a monster coal car!

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Nanaimo BC Canada
  • 4,117 posts
Posted by nanaimo73 on Monday, December 10, 2007 12:35 PM

 Wyonate wrote:
I lived in Gillette for years and seen it come through all the time until about 1999.  But didn't see it for a few years.  I have recently got into Trainz, (simulator).  I am hoping to get some drawing a possibly rebuilding the Trough Train.  But I need some drawings.

 

Each car had single axels at the ends, and 12 two axel trucks in between.
26 axels total per car.

This photo says deliverly took place during December 1994.
http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/showPicture.aspx?id=977754

Dale
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: MP 175.1 CN Neenah Sub
  • 4,917 posts
Posted by CNW 6000 on Monday, December 10, 2007 11:20 AM
 CShaveRR wrote:
 spokyone wrote:
 CShaveRR wrote:

(Gee, how old does one have to be to remember Mad Magazine?)

Alfred who?

Hey, where'd you get that picture of our governor?

(Oops, politics--wash out my mouth with soap!)

What, Me worry?

On the note of the trough train/larger linked cars, why does this concept still work with the COFC cars?  I see trains made of lots of these cars. 

Dan

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Monday, December 10, 2007 10:12 AM
 spokyone wrote:
 CShaveRR wrote:

(Gee, how old does one have to be to remember Mad Magazine?)

Alfred who?

Hey, where'd you get that picture of our governor?

(Oops, politics--wash out my mouth with soap!)

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Wyoming
  • 170 posts
Posted by Wyonate on Monday, December 10, 2007 8:46 AM
 jeaton wrote:
 Railway Man wrote:
 jeaton wrote:

 raymondtylicki wrote:
  The barge traffic can carry more as 20-40 railroad cars equal one barge and the weight is reduced because there is less ancellory equipment to haul around

A little off on the barge capacity there.  Standard barge carries a thousand tons of coal.  The fleet of rail cars for coal is moving from an old standard of 100 net tons to 115 tons.  Do the math.

Actually 122 tons in a 286K aluminum gon or 118 tons in a 286K rapid-discharge hopper, such as manufactured by FreightCar America or Trinity.

RWM 

Changes come so fast these days...  Next thing you know there will be remote controled locomotives.

My family and I went to northern Montana for Thanksgiving and for the first time, other than a DP unit, I seen, what I figured, a remote controled locomotive.  It was in Anaconda, Montana.  An unmaned GP9M (MRL) shoving on string of about 30 gondolas.  Interesting, but I also thought about another job taken by technology.  (That sucks)

High horsepower moves me!!!
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Wyoming
  • 170 posts
Posted by Wyonate on Monday, December 10, 2007 8:38 AM
I lived in Gillette for years and seen it come through all the time until about 1999.  But didn't see it for a few years.  I have recently got into Trainz, (simulator).  I am hoping to get some drawing a possibly rebuilding the Trough Train.  But I need some drawings.
High horsepower moves me!!!
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Aledo IL
  • 1,728 posts
Posted by spokyone on Monday, December 10, 2007 8:32 AM
 CShaveRR wrote:

(Gee, how old does one have to be to remember Mad Magazine?)

Alfred who?
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Vicksburg, Michigan
  • 2,303 posts
Posted by Andrew Falconer on Sunday, December 9, 2007 11:30 PM

The date of the building of the original BN TroughTrain has to be between 1990-1993 because one of these cars was in Gillette, Wyoming in 1993.

Andrew

Andrew

Watch my videos on-line at https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewNeilFalconer

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Sunday, December 9, 2007 7:47 AM
 Railway Man wrote:
 jeaton wrote:

 raymondtylicki wrote:
  The barge traffic can carry more as 20-40 railroad cars equal one barge and the weight is reduced because there is less ancellory equipment to haul around

A little off on the barge capacity there.  Standard barge carries a thousand tons of coal.  The fleet of rail cars for coal is moving from an old standard of 100 net tons to 115 tons.  Do the math.

Actually 122 tons in a 286K aluminum gon or 118 tons in a 286K rapid-discharge hopper, such as manufactured by FreightCar America or Trinity.

RWM 

Changes come so fast these days...  Next thing you know there will be remote controled locomotives.

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    November 2007
  • 2,989 posts
Posted by Railway Man on Sunday, December 9, 2007 12:55 AM
 jeaton wrote:

 raymondtylicki wrote:
  The barge traffic can carry more as 20-40 railroad cars equal one barge and the weight is reduced because there is less ancellory equipment to haul around

A little off on the barge capacity there.  Standard barge carries a thousand tons of coal.  The fleet of rail cars for coal is moving from an old standard of 100 net tons to 115 tons.  Do the math.

Actually 122 tons in a 286K aluminum gon or 118 tons in a 286K rapid-discharge hopper, such as manufactured by FreightCar America or Trinity.

RWM 

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • From: Rockton, IL
  • 4,821 posts
Posted by jeaton on Sunday, December 9, 2007 12:30 AM

 raymondtylicki wrote:
  The barge traffic can carry more as 20-40 railroad cars equal one barge and the weight is reduced because there is less ancellory equipment to haul around

A little off on the barge capacity there.  Standard barge carries a thousand tons of coal.  The fleet of rail cars for coal is moving from an old standard of 100 net tons to 115 tons.  Do the math.

"We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo Possum "We have met the anemone... and he is Russ." Bucky Katt "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future." Niels Bohr, Nobel laureate in physics

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Wyoming
  • 170 posts
Posted by Wyonate on Saturday, December 8, 2007 10:49 PM

 trainfan1221 wrote:
 eolafan wrote:
Are these the type of cars that sometimes haul garbage out of big cities like New York?
Actually the garbage trains are simply containerized units on a flat car.  And they smell..and have an incredible tendency to stop in front of wherever you happen to be train watching.  Has happened to me several times.

Thats funny!!!! Not insulting you, but that is funny!  Sounds like my luck too.

High horsepower moves me!!!
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Saturday, December 8, 2007 9:23 PM
 eolafan wrote:
Are these the type of cars that sometimes haul garbage out of big cities like New York?
Actually the garbage trains are simply containerized units on a flat car.  And they smell..and have an incredible tendency to stop in front of wherever you happen to be train watching.  Has happened to me several times.
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • 13 posts
Posted by TRAINCATS on Saturday, December 8, 2007 10:34 AM
Were they not hard on the track? Shorter train pluss more weigh = a lot more stress.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Wyoming
  • 170 posts
Posted by Wyonate on Saturday, December 8, 2007 9:56 AM
Yea, but still, does anyone have a scale drawing?  Or know where I could find one?Big Smile [:D] ya know, the Trough Train.
High horsepower moves me!!!
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Mile 7.5 Laggan Sub., Great White North
  • 4,201 posts
Posted by trainboyH16-44 on Friday, December 7, 2007 3:48 PM
 Phoebe Vet wrote:

Copcarss:

How old must one be to remember Burma-shave signs along the road???????

I've read about them in history books Whistling [:-^]

Go here for my rail shots! http://www.railpictures.net/showphotos.php?userid=9296

Building the CPR Kootenay division in N scale, blog here: http://kootenaymodelrailway.wordpress.com/

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: NW Wisconsin
  • 3,857 posts
Posted by beaulieu on Friday, December 7, 2007 10:38 AM
The biggest problem with the trough train beside the fact that only one powerplant had a rotary dumper that could handle them, was fine coal getting between the lap joint at the articulation point in the cars. The abrasion of the coal quickly wore out the sheeting at the joints causing coal to leak out of the cars and fouling the ballast.
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Friday, December 7, 2007 10:22 AM
 CShaveRR wrote:

(Gee, how old does one have to be to remember Mad Magazine?)

I remember the Burma-Shave signs, too.

Back to coal.  We've had at least one power plant in our area make the switch from barge to rail in recent years.  The economics ae shifting.  We still send a few trains to transloading facilities, but that's often ultimately destined to power plants that can't handle trains (such creatures exist!).  More often, these plants are supplied by lake freighters, but one sees barges going up the canal, too.

Moving coal from Scranton / Carbondale/ Lackawanna to the Atlantic Ocean (At Hoboken) at one end, and to the Great Lakes (At Buffalo) at the other end was the primary purpose of the Lackawanna Railroad. I bet even some of those barges were coming from a train.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: Lombard (west of Chicago), Illinois
  • 13,681 posts
Posted by CShaveRR on Friday, December 7, 2007 10:08 AM

(Gee, how old does one have to be to remember Mad Magazine?)

I remember the Burma-Shave signs, too.

Back to coal.  We've had at least one power plant in our area make the switch from barge to rail in recent years.  The economics ae shifting.  We still send a few trains to transloading facilities, but that's often ultimately destined to power plants that can't handle trains (such creatures exist!).  More often, these plants are supplied by lake freighters, but one sees barges going up the canal, too.

Carl

Railroader Emeritus (practiced railroading for 46 years--and in 2010 I finally got it right!)

CAACSCOCOM--I don't want to behave improperly, so I just won't behave at all. (SM)

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Friday, December 7, 2007 9:34 AM
 CopCarSS wrote:

Phoebe Vet,

Actually, Burma Shave signs date to the years B.C. - Before Chris. I'm only 27, but appreciate older classics like steam locomotives, Burma Shave signs, etc. I've got a couple books at home on the Burma Shave signs, including one that is supposed to have each of the slogans ever applied to the signs. I thought the version in my signature line was appropriate for a railroad forum!

 

CopCarSS:

My YOUNGEST child is more than 27, and I do remember Burma-Shave signs.  They were the highlight of any long trip. (& my eldest is named "Chris")

I have cut & pasted yours, and plan to put a set on my layout.    Thanks.

During the cold war, Mad Magazine had a parody set of signs that said:

Fat Nikita's

Getting Stronger

Can't afford to

Wait much longer

Sherman Tanks

 

lol.

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

  • Member since
    August 2002
  • From: Turner Junction
  • 3,076 posts
Posted by CopCarSS on Friday, December 7, 2007 8:29 AM

Phoebe Vet,

Actually, Burma Shave signs date to the years B.C. - Before Chris. I'm only 27, but appreciate older classics like steam locomotives, Burma Shave signs, etc. I've got a couple books at home on the Burma Shave signs, including one that is supposed to have each of the slogans ever applied to the signs. I thought the version in my signature line was appropriate for a railroad forum!

 

-Chris
West Chicago, IL
Christopher May Fine Art Photography

"In wisdom gathered over time I have found that every experience is a form of exploration." ~Ansel Adams

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Charlotte, NC
  • 6,099 posts
Posted by Phoebe Vet on Friday, December 7, 2007 5:43 AM

Copcarss:

How old must one be to remember Burma-shave signs along the road???????

Dave

Lackawanna Route of the Phoebe Snow

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy