Trains.com

News Wire: Lac-Mégantic disaster trial enters fourth week

30989 views
690 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2014
  • 8,221 posts
Posted by Euclid on Saturday, January 20, 2018 4:47 PM

Overmod,

The context started when I said this a few posts above:

"Also, it is quite possible that Harding, while being elevated to an Expert's position, simply did not know the securement rules.  Somewhere in this trial coverage, I read that MM&A could not say what the proper number of handbrakes for securement was.  Safety manager, Horan gave the wrong number when testifying in court."   

Essentially, I was responding to Balt who said that Harding had enough experience to know exactly what was required to secure the train per the rules.

I am not at convinced that Harding knew the pertinent rule and instructions.  I would bet that he did not.  And to add some emphasis to my point about Harding not knowing, I pointed out that the MM&A safety manager did not even know the rules. 

I do agree with your points about the minimum likely being far less that what is required by the test.  It is just that I don't view those points as conflicting with the point I was making. 

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy