Trains.com

Mind if I cut in?

1308 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Mind if I cut in?
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, November 4, 2016 10:51 AM

 

     Question from one of my yard employees- Could a train car of lumber be cut in between the 2nd and 3rd engines of a local train that runs with 10 to 15 cars on a regular basis?

      This would allow the car to be spotted on Tuesday to a facing point switch rather than Wednesday when the train is heading back to the destination yard.  The local  is usually about half and half empties and loaded, mostly tank cars and covered hoppers with the occasional lumber car. Grade is flat as a pancake, out in the country. Power is 3 older Geeps.

      Would this type of arrangement be any harder for the switch crew or the local crew?

 

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    June 2001
  • From: US
  • 13,488 posts
Posted by Mookie on Friday, November 4, 2016 11:31 AM

Gee - I thought for a minute you were going to ask me to dance....Kisses

She who has no signature! cinscocom-tmw

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, November 4, 2016 11:46 AM

Rest assured.  Of all the people on this forum I'd be likely to dance with, you're on the top of the list.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    April 2015
  • 469 posts
Posted by Enzoamps on Friday, November 4, 2016 12:04 PM

I know very little of what you ask, but I would assume the three locomotives were MU'd together, with one engineer.  If you separated them, would they not then require either a second engineer or the addition of distributed power control systems?

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: South Dakota
  • 1,592 posts
Posted by Dakguy201 on Friday, November 4, 2016 12:07 PM

It could be done that way, and the engine could be placed anywhere in the train so long as it was behind the lumber car.  However it would need remote control capability to contribute to the rest of the work to be done that day.  

As a practical matter I doubt that BNSF engines are so plentiful in the Sioux Falls area that one would be used only to accomplish this delivery in this manner.  I'm nearly certain your lumber yard is not willing to pay the premium to speed the delivery by a day.

(edit to add)

I suspect there are major difficulties if the engineer of the whole train is expected to leave his engine to operate the stub engine to do the switching.  I think a second man in the crew has to be qualified as an engineer to get this accomplished.   

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, November 4, 2016 12:09 PM

Truck it. 

  • Member since
    September 2013
  • 2,505 posts
Posted by caldreamer on Friday, November 4, 2016 12:22 PM

ULRICH:

  For that remark, you have just been promoted to PLO (Permenent Latrine Orderly)!!!

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, November 4, 2016 12:54 PM

Dakguy201

It could be done that way, and the engine could be placed anywhere in the train so long as it was behind the lumber car.  However it would need remote control capability to contribute to the rest of the work to be done that day.  

As a practical matter I doubt that BNSF engines are so plentiful in the Sioux Falls area that one would be used only to accomplish this delivery in this manner.  I'm nearly certain your lumber yard is not willing to pay the premium to speed the delivery by a day.

(edit to add)

I suspect there are major difficulties if the engineer of the whole train is expected to leave his engine to operate the stub engine to do the switching.  I think a second man in the crew has to be qualified as an engineer to get this accomplished.   

 

For whatever reason, the local always seems to be quite well powered.  I can't remeber the last time I saw a local that looked like it really needed 3 locomotives, at least not one going south/west to Marion with a fair amount of empties.

     The third engine could be shut down and just along for the ride until needed I suppose. The problem might be as you pointed out, needing 2 qualified engineers on the train.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, November 4, 2016 12:56 PM

Ulrich

Truck it. 

 

Good option and most of our materials are trucked in. But when you're dealing with a bulky, low margin product, the little bit of savings afforded by using trains does make a difference.  Both modes have their positives and negatives.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Friday, November 4, 2016 1:01 PM

Absolutely.. all ribbing aside, I refer some of my business to rail as well. The service is getting better all the time, and the pricing often can't be matched by over the road. 

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Friday, November 4, 2016 1:07 PM

Murphy Siding

 

     Question from one of my yard employees- Could a train car of lumber be cut in between the 2nd and 3rd engines of a local train that runs with 10 to 15 cars on a regular basis?

      This would allow the car to be spotted on Tuesday to a facing point switch rather than Wednesday when the train is heading back to the destination yard.  The local  is usually about half and half empties and loaded, mostly tank cars and covered hoppers with the occasional lumber car. Grade is flat as a pancake, out in the country. Power is 3 older Geeps.

      Would this type of arrangement be any harder for the switch crew or the local crew?

 

 

Yes, 3rd engine would have to not be under power...just along for the ride until needed to spot the car.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, November 4, 2016 2:15 PM

Murphy Siding

Rest assured.  Of all the people on this forum I'd be likely to dance with, you're on the top of the list.

 

Now I'm insulted.

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Friday, November 4, 2016 2:21 PM

Murphy Siding
The third engine could be shut down and just along for the ride until needed I suppose. The problem might be as you pointed out, needing 2 qualified engineers on the train.

Don't need two engineers.  If it is flat, one engine should easily handle 10-15 cars.  Now while it is entirely possible to split the power and put a car in between, I don't know BNSF or GCOR rules.  We normally don't put single cars between engines unless we are push-pull with ALL the cars in between - which still allows you to serve a facing point switch.  I have had to walk back and change ends on a push-pull train a couple times in a night in order to serve an industry out of order because of some operational needs.

Do you have a service window for your industry?  Closed gate or open gate status?  This a special one-time request? 

It's been fun.  But it isn't much fun anymore.   Signing off for now. 


  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.t fun any

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, November 4, 2016 4:13 PM

zugmann
 
Murphy Siding
The third engine could be shut down and just along for the ride until needed I suppose. The problem might be as you pointed out, needing 2 qualified engineers on the train.

 

Don't need two engineers.  If it is flat, one engine should easily handle 10-15 cars.  Now while it is entirely possible to split the power and put a car in between, I don't know BNSF or GCOR rules.  We normally don't put single cars between engines unless we are push-pull with ALL the cars in between - which still allows you to serve a facing point switch.  I have had to walk back and change ends on a push-pull train a couple times in a night in order to serve an industry out of order because of some operational needs.

Do you have a service window for your industry?  Closed gate or open gate status?  This a special one-time request? 

 

Service window?  Tuesdays or Fridays if the railroad desn't run into a problem

Open gate?  No gate.  Alfalfa field with deer and jackelopes.

Special one time requests? Nope.  Basically some wise-asses who like to say things like "What's the big deal? All the railroad has to do is.....".

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: US
  • 25,277 posts
Posted by BaltACD on Friday, November 4, 2016 4:35 PM

Murphy Siding
zugmann
Murphy Siding

Don't need two engineers.  If it is flat, one engine should easily handle 10-15 cars.  Now while it is entirely possible to split the power and put a car in between, I don't know BNSF or GCOR rules.  We normally don't put single cars between engines unless we are push-pull with ALL the cars in between - which still allows you to serve a facing point switch.  I have had to walk back and change ends on a push-pull train a couple times in a night in order to serve an industry out of order because of some operational needs.

Do you have a service window for your industry?  Closed gate or open gate status?  This a special one-time request?

Service window?  Tuesdays or Fridays if the railroad desn't run into a problem

Open gate?  No gate.  Alfalfa field with deer and jackelopes.

Special one time requests? Nope.  Basically some wise-asses who like to say things like "What's the big deal? All the railroad has to do is.....".

When Zug mentions open gate or closed gate it has no relationship to if your plant has a physical fence gate that must be opened to access your plant.

Open gate customers have their newly arriving cars at the serving yard placed in their plant in the next regular servicing of that plant.  For demurrage purposes the demurrage clock begins running from the 1st 7AM after actual placement.  Saturdays & Sundays excluded.

Closed gate customers have their newly arriving cars held at the serving yard and the cars are then placed in the plant upon the customers 'specific ordering of the car(s) by car number(s).  For demurrage purposes the cars are 'Constructively Placed' in the customers account on the 1st 7AM after arrival in the serving yard - Saturdays and Sundays excluded.

My carriers current rules prohibit having engines with cars between them - be that one car or an entire train of cars, except for trains operating with Distributed Power that is under the direct control of the Engineer on the leading engine(s) of the train.

Never too old to have a happy childhood!

              

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: S.E. South Dakota
  • 13,569 posts
Posted by Murphy Siding on Friday, November 4, 2016 4:51 PM

With that explanation, we would be open gate.  Just drop 'er off next time you're in the neighborhood.

Thanks to Chris / CopCarSS for my avatar.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy