Edit post

Edit your reply below.

Post Body
Enter your post below.
Davide, <br />I thought some more about my response to you earlier this evening and the posts from others. Liability was an issue to the sponsors. If the excursion was sponsored by a group, such as a chapter of the NRHS, they were required to purchase a set amount of liability coverage in addition to the rent of the train. Profit or loss of the trip was then based on ticket sales and the responsibility of the sponsor. Increasing premiums did bring more pressure to bear on these groups, and that had to be reflected in ticket sales and concessions. The popularity of the trips was fading though. <br />As I remember, stopping it was an emotional issue, pros and cons on both sides. But in the final analysis, support eroded beyond tolerance. I can find nothing useful in another post mortem on the steam program...just digging up bones. It's gone and it was time for it to go. For the years it existed, the people of NS who volunteered or were assigned tried very, very hard to make the trips pleasurable and interesting. <br />I hope I've answered you original question. You know, 611 is intact and could be restored to operation again with some expensive repairs and maintenance. Probably not for a long, long while though. Hope you have a safe day and a happy holiday. gdc
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag