Login
or
Register
Home
»
Trains Magazine
»
Forums
»
General Discussion
»
Acela Article
Edit post
Edit your reply below.
Post Body
Enter your post below.
In order to be run freely on US railroads, any european train design would hace to be extensively redesinged to meet american standards. From the very begining, Amtrak asked for a tilting train, so that's why (despite being slower) the X2000 was considered a candidate, and the ICE builders contacted Fiat for a tilting system. <br /> <br />Although Bombardier/Alstom built the TGV and made sure everyone knew that, they had never built a tilting train, they didn't have a tilting system and they didn't test a train in the US by the time they started building the Acela. But they offered far better financing, and that was very important for a tight-budget agency. <br /> <br />By the way, there is currently a tilting ICE in Germany. It is just 7 mph slower than the Acela, but the point is: the Acela is not a bad concept itself (germans did the same thing because they don't have the money to build lots of new high speed lines) but a bad developement. Now it all depends on the attorneys <br />
Tags (Optional)
Tags are keywords that get attached to your post. They are used to categorize your submission and make it easier to search for. To add tags to your post type a tag into the box below and click the "Add Tag" button.
Add Tag
Update Reply
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Login »
Register »
Search the Community
Newsletter Sign-Up
By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our
privacy policy
More great sites from Kalmbach Media
Terms Of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Copyright Policy