Trains.com

Will Cash for Clunker's Benifit Railroads?

836 views
4 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
  • 1,503 posts
Will Cash for Clunker's Benifit Railroads?
Posted by GP-9_Man11786 on Thursday, August 13, 2009 6:41 PM

 From what I've read about the cash for clunkers prorgram, it seems as though the railroads could see a surge in autorack traffic. Here's links to some stories on MSNBC: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32402024/ns/business-autos/ , http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32394221/ns/business-autos/. Additionally, since old vehicles must be scrapped, the railroads could see increased scap metal traffic too. What are your thoughts?

Modeling the Pennsylvania Railroad in N Scale.

www.prr-nscale.blogspot.com 

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Guelph, Ontario
  • 4,818 posts
Posted by Ulrich on Thursday, August 13, 2009 8:15 PM

Cash for clunkers...hmmm. or maybe the rails can get cash back for every old GP9 or SD40 they turn in on a brand new EMD or GE product...Tongue

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Brecksville Ohio
  • 266 posts
Posted by rluke on Thursday, August 13, 2009 9:31 PM
It's a good boost for now. But these are cars that would have been traded next year or the year after. So things are sure to slow down again.
Rich
  • Member since
    April 2009
  • 12 posts
Posted by ALCO Fan on Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:43 PM

IMHO there will be little impact from the "Clunker" program because the program is aiming at clearing out unsold inventory already delivered. This year's etimated run rate is 10 million vehicles, far below last year's 14 million units so railroads will see little if any new traffic. On the scrap side, most clunker crushing is local and the steel industry and export steel is in recession and not looking for more scrap steel. The railroads will not see significat business growth until the recession ends in late 2010 of early 2011.

Tony -- Up on "The D & H Bridge Line" 

  • Member since
    August 2003
  • From: Antioch, IL
  • 4,371 posts
Posted by greyhounds on Friday, August 14, 2009 1:54 AM

Well, the only increase in production I've heard about from CFC is that the only non-government owned American automaker, Ford, will increase production by 10,000 units split between the Escape and some other model that I don't remember.  If'n every one of 'em was shipped by rail that would be less than 1,000 carloads.  There could also be some loads of parts, but all-in-all, it ain't gonna' move the needle.

There will be a negative effect from this government intervention in the economy.  Someone who was driving around in a paid off 1998 Ford and trades it in on a new Subaru will now have a car loan payment.  That means they will have to cut back on other purchases.  That will mean less freight to haul.  Someone who would have loved to buy that 1998 Ford if it was a regular trade in now can't have it.  So he/she's got to spend money to repair their even older clunker or spend more for a different used car.  So they will have less to spend on other things.  That, too, will mean less freight to haul.

Chick-a-Boom, Chick-a-Boom, don't you just love it.  It's De-Ja-Vu all over again.  It's 1933 and the danged government is trying to impoverish us because they know best.

 

"By many measures, the U.S. freight rail system is the safest, most efficient and cost effective in the world." - Federal Railroad Administration, October, 2009. I'm just your average, everyday, uncivilized howling "anti-government" critic of mass government expenditures for "High Speed Rail" in the US. And I'm gosh darn proud of that.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy