Trains.com

Very interesting picture...

1660 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2001
  • From: SOUTHERN WASH-ATL MAIN
  • 187 posts
Very interesting picture...
Posted by railroad65 on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:31 AM

How/what caused this to happen. Notice even the truck slid along with the box on the frame.

http://www.railpictures.net/viewphoto.php?id=244396

 

Thanks for information,

Railroad65

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Aurora, IL
  • 4,515 posts
Posted by eolafan on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:35 AM
A guess from one who is not a technically sound railfan would be that the car had LOTS of weight in it and was stopped VERY suddenly during a switching move and the contents of the car shifted forward VERY suddenly and VERY hard, breaking the welds or bolts that held the car body to the frame.  Am I close to being correct?
Eolafan (a.k.a. Jim)
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:40 AM
My guess is a cushion underframe desigend to "travel" on start or stop to ease damage to the load.  An over aggresive move exceeded the slack action limits and jerked the whole thing off the car. One of the reasons cabooses were abandoned in addition to the cost of them is that as a train  started by the time the slack action got tothe rear of the train people in the caboose were knocked out of their chairs and even suffered broken bones or worse.
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 9:26 AM

...With today's different motive power and torque application when starting....and T  E ratings.....Can "slack" be designed out of the system to an advantage, or is it still necessary to have it for train operation.....??

Believe "slack" is minimum in Triple Crown type train operations and how about passenger train consists....Min. "slack" if I understand it correctly.....

Quentin

  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:30 AM
Slack is a thing of the past on todays road engines BUT switchers are a different story I would suspect.  In addition the mechanism could have been weakened through corrsion or rusting and I did not notice a date of when the picture was taken so it could be older then today
  • Member since
    September 2002
  • 7,486 posts
Posted by ndbprr on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:34 AM
I checked it again and the picture is dated 1978 so it definitely predates modern engines.  It could have occurred previous to that date also and may have been stored for awhile. 
  • Member since
    January 2002
  • From: Canterlot
  • 9,575 posts
Posted by zugmann on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:44 AM

Only slack on triple crowns is between the engines, and b/t the engines and the first trailer.  The rest is solid.  But they're also very light.  

 Without slack on traditional trains, you'd have to find a new way to couple/uncouple them. And I sure hope it isn't the triple crown style of pins... we'd never get anything moving. 

 Modelcar wrote:

...With today's different motive power and torque application when starting....and T  E ratings.....Can "slack" be designed out of the system to an advantage, or is it still necessary to have it for train operation.....??

Believe "slack" is minimum in Triple Crown type train operations and how about passenger train consists....Min. "slack" if I understand it correctly.....

  

The opinions expressed here represent my own and not those of my employer, any other railroad, company, or person.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Menasha, Wis.
  • 451 posts
Posted by Soo 6604 on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:13 PM

My guess is that it was carrying the very first shipment of Viagra and some of the boxes broke open and leaked out. Big Smile [:D]

Or, new heavy duty cushioning for glass shipments

Paul

  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: WSOR Northern Div.
  • 1,559 posts
Posted by WSOR 3801 on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:13 PM

That car has a cushion underframe.  On these older ones, the center sill slid back and forth, while the trucks and body stay still.  Note the trainline attached to the sill.  Probably had a defect in the sill, at the head of a long, heavy train, and ripped it most of the way out.  Older engines had worse wheelslip control.  They could have slipped, train ran in, then when the engines regained their footing, run-out, and snap!Shock [:O]

Mike WSOR engineer | HO scale since 1988 | Visit our club www.WCGandyDancers.com

  • Member since
    October 2002
  • From: US
  • 2,358 posts
Posted by csxengineer98 on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 1:24 PM

 ndbprr wrote:
Slack is a thing of the past on todays road engines BUT switchers are a different story I would suspect.  In addition the mechanism could have been weakened through corrsion or rusting and I did not notice a date of when the picture was taken so it could be older then today
i beg to differ..slack is far from a thing of the past with any engin!!!!you can rip a train apart just as fast with modern engins as you can with older engins...

csx engineer 

"I AM the higher source" Keep the wheels on steel
  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 2:14 PM

...Yes, I'm sure the uncoupling issue would be hindered with force on couplers and would prevent the "normal" uncoupling without the "slop" between cars...Hadn't thought of that.

Quentin

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • From: Milwaukee WI (Fox Point)
  • 11,439 posts
Posted by dknelson on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 5:09 PM

Gee, who said the Kadee coupler with the extra-long shank wasn't prototypical!

Dave Nelson

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:49 PM

The cushion underframe device has been removed for replacement or repair...there are two huge springs, (each over 6 feet long) one at each end of the center sill/drawbar, with the hydraulics and reservoir in the middle.

When the mechanisms and springs are removed, the sill/drawbar can free wheel so to speak, running from limiting stop to limiting stop.

We had one of the drawbar spring locks fail, the drawbar slid out and the spring came screaming out of the sill, shot several car lengths down the middle of the track...scared the crud out of my helper.

 

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    February 2002
  • From: Muncie, Indiana...Orig. from Pennsylvania
  • 13,456 posts
Posted by Modelcar on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 8:48 PM

.....Boy Ed, that set up on cushion underframes  sounds like it has pent up potential to be a killer in certain kinds of wrecks that might open that sill, allowing those springs to fly out in all directions....Something like a concentric overhead garage door set of springs might be if they could ever get loose.

Quentin

  • Member since
    December 2001
  • From: Sunny (mostly) San Diego
  • 1,919 posts
Posted by ChuckCobleigh on Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:33 PM
 edblysard wrote:

We had one of the drawbar spring locks fail, the drawbar slid out and the spring came screaming out of the sill, shot several car lengths down the middle of the track...scared the crud out of my helper.

Yet another reason to stay out of the gauge?Shock [:O]

  • Member since
    March 2002
  • 9,265 posts
Posted by edblysard on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:32 AM

Q,

Funny thing was the car had just come out of our heavy RIP track, the drawbar had been replaced along with the plate it rides on...seems the car man who repaired it didn't put the keeper key in the right way...the draw bar rides in a pocket with a pivot pin and other stuff, the back of the pocket is the spring retainer, and when the key that holds the draw bar failed, it broke another part, which allowed the steel pocket for the draw bar to slide out also.

We were switching the cut of cars out of the rip track, and when I kicked the car ahead of this one, the draw bar on the box car went right along with it...use your imagination, but the spring made the exact sound you would expect a big spring to make when it shoots out of a steel tube.

My helper was walking down the lead, with his back to the cut, and this thing hit the ground between the tracks right beside him...he moved sideways faster than I can run in a straight line!

 

From what I can tell, the springs are used to return the sill to center, some what of an equalizing system, and to absorb the initial impact of coupling, compress some, and then the hydraulics take over.

 

Chuck, you right, one more reason not to stand in the dead zone...about the only reason I can come up with to be in the middle of the tracks is to adjust a knuckle/draw bar, or replace a knuckle...other than that, there is nothing I need to do that involves being in the dead zone.

23 17 46 11

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Elmwood Park, NJ
  • 2,385 posts
Posted by trainfan1221 on Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:22 PM
It's usually the knuckle that breaks I thought.  Interesting picture indeed.

Join our Community!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

Search the Community

Newsletter Sign-Up

By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine.Please view our privacy policy