Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
1
Reply — 476 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Less of a modeling and more of a software question , but regards design
Less of a modeling and more of a software question , but regards design
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
Less of a modeling and more of a software question , but regards design
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Wed, Mar 30 2005 12:31 PM
Ok, I will be the first to admit that I know a little less than beans about railroading. The sons and I just started getting into the hobby. On the other hand, we have already started outgrowing our 4x8 and are now working on planning the "real" layout.
On the flip-side I do know computers and software. This may actually be a detriment for me, because after experimenting with different for-fee and free track planning applications, I am very frustrated with them. I find myself spending far more time trying to get the darn thing to do what I want than acutally doing anything, or yelling at yet another GPF (not sure why you train guys don't deserve high standard QAed software, but I would be insulted if I were you ;)
So my question to the cross-over geeks like myself. I am about to begin just working in another "real" CAD program so that I can spend my time working and not swearing at the app. I really don't want to reinvent the wheel, however, so I am wodering, is anyone aware of any object library exchanges for CAD apps for model railroad objects or where I can find such a lib? For example, you can find tons and tons and tons of libraries people have developed for things like furnishings, landscaping objects, roofs, beams, etc for use in CAD apps.
Someone has to have developed a model train objects library...right?
Or...and this is my lesser preference at this stage...can you recommed a more robust and stable track planning application? One that is more techincal based, with exposed functionality and less trainsy-cutesy would be far more appealing to me. I want raw CAD functionality with scale objects that has been developed and tested as opposed to having the ability of ride-alongs in a buggy rendering engine.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
ValorStorm
on
Sat, Apr 2 2005 3:32 AM
You might try abracadata.com if you haven't already.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Less of a modeling and more of a software question , but regards design