Trains.com Sites
Resources
Shop
E-mail Newsletters
SEARCH THIS SITE
Help
Contact Us »
|
Customer Service
Get our free e-mail newsletters
Model Railroader
(weekly)
Model Railroader VideoPlus
(weekly)
Trains
(weekly)
Classic Toy Trains
(bi-weekly)
Garden Railways
(bi-weekly)
Classic Trains
(bi-weekly)
By signing up I may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers from Trains.com. We do not sell, rent or trade our e-mail lists.
Details about our newsletters »
Read our privacy policy »
Join our Community!
Our community is
FREE
to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.
Search Community
Searching
Please insert search terms into the box above to run a search on the community.
Users Online
There are no community members online
Thread Details
Rate This
78
Replies — 17910 Views
0
Subscribers
Posted
over 19 years ago
Thread Options
Subscribe via RSS
Share this
Tag Cloud
1950s
advice
Amtrak
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Baltimore and Ohio
Boxcars
Bridges
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Caboose
Canada
Canadian National Railway
Canadian Pacific Railway
cargo
Chicago
Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
Colorado and Southern
Coupler
Coupling
CSX
dcc sound
Depots
Diesel Engines
education
Emporia
fec
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 24: January 31, 2005
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 24: January 31, 2005
|
Want to post a reply to this topic?
Login
or
register
for an acount to join our online community today!
1
2
3
4
5
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 24: January 31, 2005
Posted by
Bergie
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 2:13 PM
In our online feature,
Trackside with Erik and Mike
, Trains.com staff members Erik Bergstrom and Mike Yuhas go trackside and share their photo results with you. In each installment, we’ll include let our users vote on who got the best shot.
Read this week’s installment.
Please vote and then share your comments.
Erik Bergstrom
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Replies to this thread are ordered from "oldest to newest". To reverse this order, click
here
.
To learn about more about sorting options, visit our
FAQ page
.
Posted by
mikeyuhas
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 2:27 PM
There! I voted for mine this week!
Thank you for reading
Trains
magazine!
click here
if you dare
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 3:39 PM
I voted for Photo #2 simply because it was at a slightly different angle and showed the Signals at the right side of the picture. I had logged on to "Trackside" earlier today, (1/3l/05) and the last photos were Volume 22. I attempted to e-mail Trains.com to find out why I hadn't seen any recent photos. My e-mail was returned adviving there was no such address. I then sent an e-mail to Kalmbach e-mail address. Guess what? I just happened to log on to Trains.com-Railroading and there was Erik and Mike Volume 24. How's that for speedy service. Thanks to all and keep up the good and enjoyable work. w stolper (Doodlebug)
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Noah Hofrichter
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 4:34 PM
Had to go with number 2, For the above mentioned reason of the signal, and also you can see the slope better in the track.
Noah
Click the image above to visit my website, Badger Rails. My Model Railroad Club's website:
http://sandhousecrew.webng.com
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
DICKK
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 5:36 PM
I voted for number two. The signal plus more of the train decided it for me. Number one seemed a bit clearer though.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
virogue
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:02 PM
Hi!!!
I wanted to vote for that Wisconsin & Southern shot, but heck, the thing would not work [#dots]!!! So well, shot number 1 took my vote. I guess the mile sign and signals already mentionned were more a distraction to my eyes, and I wanted more focus on the train.
Nice to see you shooting together for once! However, I may have a tortuous mind, but I'd rather see two completely different pictures (I don't care if they are "blind" or not, I vote for the photograph, not for the author... nothing personal here!) I was a little jeopardized having to vote for what almost looked like twice the same shot...
But well, maybe we can use the pics for a "Find the 7 differences" game, that could be fun!!!
Keep up the good work, and keep it funny the way you do please, nice to read from you every week! [bow]
Sincerely,
Vianney Roge
France
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
CTGreybeard
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:16 PM
I wanted to vote for the W&S shot, too! [:(]
Photo 2 from this contest had it hands down once I viewed the full sized shots.
The lighting was better (but not great) on the head end to show a little more detail. But what did it for me was both the extent of the train behind with the swale that it is lugging through and the heat ripples above the engine to show that it is working like crazy! Together these bring a dynamic to the static shot that captures me. The non-voting W&S shot is similar because the way the snow is exploding in front of the engine as it plows through the drift is impressive. I wish I had been there! [:D]
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
mandelswamp
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:16 PM
Wow, it was a really tough choice this week. I have been complaining that you guys were doing too many artsy pictures, mainly of locomotives and that I prefer seeing both the locomotives and their consists. Well this week's contest answered my beef and handed me two great pictures. Picture 1 was a little closer shot of the train. Picture 2 showed more of the train plus the signals. After examining and comparing both shots about 3 or 4 times, I decided that Picture 1 seemed a little clearer (better focused) for studying the locomotives and the freight cars and so I voted for Picture 1. Keep up the great work you guys!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:24 PM
I voted for #2. #1 was clearer and expressed the brute strength of the motive power but #2, with the signals and the arc of the train as the track grade changed, did it for me.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
warriorpilot
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:25 PM
I had to go with number 2. While the milepost was a bit of a distraction the signal was nice, and the wider angle showed more of the train, more grade, and MORE HEAT!! Also, the first photo was a bit too dark for my tastes.....or my monitor maybe, and the colors just looked better in number 2.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:30 PM
#2 was a masterpiece of railroading...signal lights, mile marker, etc. This is my first time to respond, but for all the right artistic (and railroad) reasons. Bring on more!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Robertdale
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:37 PM
I voted for photo #2. I liked the signals and also the switch on the opposite side, plus more of the train. But , I agree that photo #1 was a bit clearer.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:46 PM
I voted for number 2, photo showed more as the angle was better, showing the down grade, the signal and the heat vapors raising off of the power, cab was sharper as the sun was not shinning through the back windows.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:51 PM
i chose number two because it has more texture and depth by catching alot more of the train as well as the signal........
ROBBIE!
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
Posted by
Anonymous
on
Mon, Jan 31 2005 6:56 PM
I voted for photo #2. I felt the composition, the signals etc was better. I also think the lighting was slightly better. Keep up the good work and remember, almost anyone can take an excellant picture under ideal conditions, however real photographers get good pictures in poor conditions.
You have posted to a forum that requires a moderator to approve posts before they are publicly available.
1
2
3
4
5
»
Home
»
Discussion Forums
»
General Discussion (Trains.com)
»
Trackside with Erik and Mike, Vol. 24: January 31, 2005